Search

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors have nothing to disclose.

Background: The first-generation ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Boston Scientific) was associated with a non-negligible occurrence of moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. To overcome this issue, the ACURATE neo2 iteration, which incorporates a taller outer skirt aimed at reducing the occurrence of paravalvular AR, has recently been developed., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the ACURATE neo2 (Boston Scientific) THV in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis., Methods: ITAL-neo was an observational, retrospective, multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, treated with first- and second-generation ACURATE neo THVs, via transfemoral and trans-subclavian access, in 13 Italian centers. One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to account for baseline characteristics unbalance. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of moderate or greater paravalvular AR on predischarge echocardiographic assessment. Secondary endpoints included postprocedural technical success and 90-day device success and safety., Results: Among 900 patients included in the registry, 220 received the ACURATE neo2 THV, whereas 680 were treated with the first-generation device. A total of 410 patients were compared after 1:1 propensity score matching. The ACURATE neo2 THV was associated with a 3-fold lower frequency of postprocedural moderate or greater paravalvular AR (11.2% vs 3.5%; P < 0.001). No other hemodynamic differences were observed. Postprocedural technical success was similar between the 2 cohorts. Fewer adverse events were observed in patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 at 90 days., Conclusions: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the ACURATE neo2 was associated with a significant lower frequency of moderate or greater paravalvular AR compared with the earlier generation ACURATE neo device, with encouraging short-term safety and efficacy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging due to the high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI dramatically reduces the clinical benefit of TAVR and is one of the strongest predictors of 30-day mortality as well as long-term adverse outcomes after TAVR. The aim of this study was to evaluate a protocol specifically designed to reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in advanced CKD patients screened for and undergoing TAVR., Methods: Twelve consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis suffering from at least stage 4 CKD underwent both screening with pre-procedural computed tomography scan (CT scan) and bioprosthetic valve implantation without contrast medium. All the TAVR procedures were performed using the CoreValve Evolut R/PRO transcatheter aortic valve (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The annulus and the optimal implantation projection were identified on the non-contrast medium CT scans with the aid of calcifications as a reference. The implant projection was confirmed immediately before the valve implantation by placing two pigtail catheters alternately inside each sinus of Valsalva (SOV)., Results: We enrolled 12 patients: mean age 83.42 4.50 years, number of male 5 (41.7%), mean STS 10.33±6.16, mean EuroScore II 13.75±9.07, mean serum creatinine 2.01±0.63 mg/dL, mean eGFR 23.00±5.69 mL/min/1.7m2. All TAVR procedures were successful, leading to a drop in transaortic mean gradient (mean gradient 33.5±14.09 mmHg; postoperative mean gradient 6.08±mmHg). No patient had more than a mild paravalvular leak. Only two patients underwent permanent pacemaker implantation due to advanced atrioventricular block (AV block). Mean change in eGFR 48 hours after the procedure was 1.3 mL/min. None of the patients developed AKI, according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definition., Conclusions: In patients with advanced CKD, a strategy of "zero contrast" TAVR, preceded by accurate CT scan analysis and procedural planning, appears to be safe and feasible permitting to preserve renal function. The avoidance of contrast medium during preprocedural analysis and TAVR implantation could reduce the incidence of AKI and consequently could improve outcomes in this complex patient cohort.