Search

Recently, researchers in the biomedical community have introduced deep learning-based epileptic seizure prediction models using electroencephalograms (EEGs) that can anticipate an epileptic seizure by differentiating between the pre-ictal and interictal stages of the subject’s brain. Despite having the appearance of a typical anomaly detection task, this problem is complicated by subject-specific characteristics in EEG data. Therefore, studies that investigate seizure prediction widely employ subject-specific models. However, this approach is not suitable in situations where a target subject has limited (or no) data for training. Subject-independent models can address this issue by learning to predict seizures from multiple subjects, and therefore are of greater value in practice. In this study, we propose a subject-independent seizure predictor using Geometric Deep Learning (GDL). In the first stage of our GDL-based method we use graphs derived from physical connections in the EEG grid. We subsequently seek to synthesize subject-specific graphs using deep learning. The models proposed in both stages achieve state-of-the-art performance using a one-hour early seizure prediction window on two benchmark datasets (CHB-MIT-EEG: 95.38% with 23 subjects and Siena-EEG: 96.05% with 15 subjects). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that proposes synthesizing subject-specific graphs for seizure prediction. Furthermore, through model interpretation we outline how this method can potentially contribute towards Scalp EEG-based seizure localization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: When training machine learning models, we often assume that the training data and evaluation data are sampled from the same distribution. However, this assumption is violated when the model is evaluated on another unseen but similar database, even if that database contains the same classes. This problem is caused by domain-shift and can be solved using two approaches: domain adaptation and domain generalization. Simply, domain adaptation methods can access data from unseen domains during training; whereas in domain generalization, the unseen data is not available during training. Hence, domain generalization concerns models that perform well on inaccessible, domain-shifted data. Method: Our proposed domain generalization method represents an unseen domain using a set of known basis domains, afterwhich we classify the unseen domain using classifier fusion. To demonstrate our system, we employ a collection of heart sound databases that contain normal and abnormal sounds (classes). Results: Our proposed classifier fusion method achieves accuracy gains of up to 16% for four completely unseen domains. Conclusion: Recognizing the complexity induced by the inherent temporal nature of biosignal data, the two-stage method proposed in this study is able to effectively simplify the whole process of domain generalization while demonstrating good results on unseen domains and the adopted basis domains. Significance: To our best knowledge, this is the first study that investigates domain generalization for biosignal data. Our proposed learning strategy can be used to effectively learn domain-relevant features while being aware of the class differences in the data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]