Search

Background: Suboptimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) position of both femoral and tibial components is thought to be linked with poor clinical outcomes, polyethylene wear and the "unexplained" painful knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to better understand the effect of implant orientation on knee implant performance.Methods: We analyzed 30 retrieved contemporary TKA implants. Implant positioning measurements in the coronal plane were made prior to revision using a diagnostic algorithm, based on 3D computed tomography (CT) images. Each retrieved polyethylene component was imaged using a micro-CT scanner and a high resolution computational 3D model of each component was digitally reconstructed. The difference in thickness between medial and lateral components was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate the association between component positioning and damage patterns.Results: We found a significant correlation between both the tibiofemoral and femoral angles and difference in thickness between polyethylene compartments: varus angulations were strongly associated with thinner medial compartments, whilst valgus angulations were associated with thinner lateral compartments. Moreover, suboptimal tibiofemoral orientations and tibial component angulations were associated to greater differences in thickness between polyethylene compartments.Conclusion: Our study is the first to compare accurate 3D CT measurements of prerevision TKA positioning in the coronal plane with postrevision retrieval analysis from innovative, accurate and highly reliable micro-CT-based method. Our results demonstrate the impact of component positioning on polyethylene damage and helps understanding of the in vivo performance of these implants.Level Of Evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background With the Persona® knee system a novel anatomic total knee design was developed, which has no pre-coating, whereas the predecessor knee system is pre-coated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Joint registry data have shown no decrease in risk of aseptic revision of PMMA pre-coated tibial components compared with non-pre-coated implants. The aim of this retrieval study was to compare the amount of cement adhesions, geometry and surface features between the two knee designs and to correlate them with the underlying reason for revision surgery. Methods Retrieval analysis was performed of 15 NexGen® and 8 Persona® fixed-bearing knee implants from the same manufacturer retrieved from two knee revision centres. A photogrammetric method was used to grade the amount of cement attached to the tibial tray backside. The geometry and dimensions of the tibial trays, tray projections and peripheral lips were measured using digital callipers and compared between the two different designs. To measure the surface roughness on the backside of the tibial tray, a contact profilometer was used. To investigate differences between the two designs statistical analyses (t-test) were performed. Results All Persona® trays showed evidence of cement adhesion with a % area of 75.4%; half of the NexGen® trays had cement adhesions, with a mean value of 20%. There was a significant difference in the percentage of area covered by cement between the two designs (p

Abstract Background With the Persona® knee system a new polyethylene formulation incorporating vitamin-E which aims to reduce oxidation and maintain wear resistance was introduced. Although in-vitro studies have demonstrated positive effects of the vitamin-E antioxidants on UHMWPE, no retrieval study has looked at polyethylene damage of this system yet. It was the aim to investigate the in-vivo performance of this new design, by comparing it with its predecessor in retrieval analysis. Methods 15 NexGen® and 8 Persona® fixed-bearing implants from the same manufacturer (Zimmer Biomet) were retrieved from two knee revision centres. For retrieval analysis, a macroscopic analysis of polyethylene using a peer-reviewed damage grading method was used (Hood-score). The roughness of all articulating metal components was measured using a contact profilometer. The reason(s) for TKA revision were recorded. Statistical analyses (t-test) were performed to investigate differences between the two designs. Results The mean Hood score for Persona® inserts was 109.3 and for NexGen® 115.1 without significant differences between the two designs. Results from the profilometer revealed that Persona® and NexGen® femoral implants showed an identical mean surface roughness of 0.14 μm. The Persona® tibial tray showed a significantly smoother surface (0.06 μm) compared to the NexGen® (0.2 μm; p