Search

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare 90-day costs and outcomes for primary total hip arthroplasty patients between a nonobese (body mass index, 18.5-24.9) vs overweight (25-29.9), obese (30-34.9), severely obese (35-39.9), morbidly obese (40-44.9), and super obese (45+) cohorts.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of an institutional database of primary total hip arthroplasty patients from 2006 to 2013. Thirty-three super-obese patients were identified, and the other 5 cohorts were randomly selected in a 2:1 ratio (n = 363). Demographics, 90-day outcomes (costs, reoperations, and readmissions), and outcomes after 3 years (revisions and change scores for Short-Form Health Survey, Harris Hip Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) were collected. Costs were determined using unit costs from our institutional administrative data for all in-hospital resource utilization. Comparisons between the nonobese and other groups were made with Kruskal-Wallis tests for non-normal data and chi-square and Fisher exact test for categorical data.Results: The 90-day costs in the morbidly obese ($13,134 ± $7250 mean ± standard deviation, P < .01) and super-obese ($15,604 ± 6783, P < .01) cohorts were significantly greater than the nonobese cohorts ($10,315 ± 1848). Only the super-obese cohort had greater 90-day reoperation and readmission rates than the nonobese cohort (18.2% vs 0%, P < .01 and 21.2% vs 4.5%, P = .02, respectively). Reoperations and septic revisions after 3 years were greater in the super-obese cohort compared to the nonobese cohort 21.2% versus 3.0% (P = .01) and 18.2% versus 1.5% (P = .01), respectively. Improvements in Short-Form Health Survey, Harris Hip Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index were comparable in all cohorts.Conclusion: Super-obese patients have greater risks and costs compared to nonobese patients, but also have comparable quality of life improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) vs nonoperative management (NM) among 6 body mass index (BMI) cohorts.Methods: We constructed a state-transition Markov model to compare the cost utility of THA and NM in the 6 BMI groups over a 15-year period. Model parameters for transition probability (risk of revision, re-revision, and death), utility, and costs (inflation adjusted to 2017 US dollars) were estimated from the literature. Direct medical costs of managing hip arthritis were accounted in the model. Indirect societal costs were not included. A 3% annual discount rate was used for costs and utilities. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of THA vs NM. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses of the model parameters were performed to determine the robustness of the model.Results: Over the 15-year time period, the ICERs for THA vs NM were the following: normal weight ($6043/QALYs [quality-adjusted life years]), overweight ($5770/QALYs), obese ($5425/QALYs), severely obese ($7382/QALYs), morbidly obese ($8338/QALYs), and super obese ($16,651/QALYs). The 2 highest BMI groups had higher incremental QALYs and incremental costs. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests that THA would be cost-effective in 100% of the normal, overweight, obese, severely obese, and morbidly obese simulations, and 99.95% of super obese simulations at an ICER threshold of $50,000/QALYs.Conclusion: Even at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALYs, which is considered low for the United States, our model showed that THA would be cost-effective for all obesity levels. BMI cut-offs for THA may lead to unnecessary loss of healthcare access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The potential cost savings of single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear, and the risks associated with it are not well defined. We sought to compare the costs and perioperative complications of single-stage bilateral THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA) to a two-stage bilateral protocol.~Purpose~Objective~We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a single- stage bilateral DAA THA and compared them to a two-stage THA group. We conducted a cost analysis from both the hospital perspective and the Ministry of Health (MOH) perspective.~Methods~Methods~24 patients were included in this study. The 2 groups were similar in age (58.9 vs 63.9 yrs), height (169.2 vs 170.9 cm), weight (80.2 vs 78.6 kg), BMI (27.9 vs 26.3 kg/m2), ASA score (2.2 vs 2.2), and CCI score (2.3 vs 2.9). The mean cost per patient from the hospital perspective for the single-stage group was $10,728.13 (SD = 621.46) compared to $12,670.63 (SD = 519.72) for the two-stage group (Mean Difference = $1,942.50, 95% CI = $1,457.49 to $2,427.51, p<0.001). Similarly, from the MOH perspective, the cost for the single-stage group was $12,552.34 (SD = 644.93) compared to $14,740.58 (SD = 598.07) for the two-stage group (Mean Difference = $2,188.24, 95% CI = $1,661.67 to $2,714.81, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in complication rate between groups. The largest percent of total cost savings from a hospital perspective was attributed to cost of operating room staff and OR set-up (55%).~Results~Results~Our results suggest that single-stage bilateral DAA THA results in significant cost savings compared to two-stage DAA THA.~Conclusions~Conclusions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine agreement between responses on electronic and paper versions of the WOMAC and SF-12(v2) questionnaires following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients completed both electronic and paper questionnaires with a one week interval in-between. The order in which they completed the two versions was randomly assigned. A total of 53 patients completed the study, with a mean age of 69years (range 50–90years). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were high, indicating excellent agreement (WOMAC ICC=0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.98), SF-12 (PCS) ICC=0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.97; SF-12 (MCS) ICC=0.92, 95%CI 0.86–0.95). Online data collection may be substituted for the traditional paper method with no significant effect on the criterion validity of the questionnaires. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The purpose of our study is to assess which patient-related and caregiver-related factors are predictive of caregiver strain and assistance when caring for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) patients within 2 weeks after surgery.Methods: We conducted a prospective study of caregivers of participants enrolled in 2 randomized trials. Caregivers provided demographics and completed the Caregiver Strain Index and Caregiver Assistance Scale pre-surgery and post-surgery. We performed backwards stepwise regression with mixed-effects negative binomial models to investigate predictors of caregiver strain and assistance for THA and TKA caregivers.Results: Three hundred six caregiver/patient pairs were included. Our models of caregiver strain found Caregiver Assistance Scale scores and patient age to be predictive for all caregivers. We also found caregiver gender and smoking status to be predictive for THA caregivers and caregiver age to be predictive for TKA caregivers. Our models of assistance provided by caregivers found time (post-surgery vs pre-surgery) was predictive for all caregivers. We also found patient body mass index, and patient and caregiver gender to be predictive for THA caregivers, and patient and caregiver employment status and caregiver education level to be predictive for TKA caregivers.Conclusion: Our study identifies patient-related and caregiver-related factors which are associated with caregiver strain and assistance when caring for arthroplasty patients. As this is the first study to assess assistance provided by caregivers, it is important for future research to validate our results and to further explore whether patient-reported outcomes may also be related to assistance and strain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]