Search

Background: Payer coverage policies have recently begun requiring physical therapy (PT) prior to total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains controversial if such a mandate is appropriate for patients with end-stage, symptomatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to assess if such patients are amenable to delaying surgery for a trial of PT.Methods: All patients scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty and TKA in a 3-month period by 1 of 7 surgeons at a single institution were contacted and asked to participate in a survey. Participation in PT within the prior 6 months was noted. Patients were asked if they would be willing to delay surgery for a PT trial as a nonsurgical option to improve their symptoms. The primary reason for their answer was also recorded.Results: In total, 200 patients were successfully contacted and agreed to participate. The mean age was 66 years, 47% were male, the mean body mass index was 31 kg/m2, and 66% were scheduled for TKA. In total, 157 patients (79%) stated they had not done PT in the preceding 6 months, and 185 patients (93%) stated they would not want to delay surgery for mandatory PT. The most common reasons for refusing PT were "surgery is inevitable" (44%) and "unlikely to improve pain" (29%).Conclusion: Patients with end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis who are otherwise candidates for surgery appear overwhelmingly opposed to mandatory preoperative PT, mostly due to a lack of perceived efficacy in providing long-term symptom relief compared to total joint arhtroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Under current Medicare bundled payment programs, when a patient undergoes a subsequent elective procedure within the 90-day episode-of-care, the first procedure is excluded from the bundle and a new episode-of-care initiated. The purpose of this study was to determine if staging bilateral total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures within 90 days have an effect on bundled episode-of-care costs.Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of Medicare patients undergoing staged primary THA and TKA from 2015-2019. Patients who underwent a prior procedure within 90 days were compared to those who had undergone a procedure 90-120 days prior. We then performed a multivariate analysis to identify the independent effect of staging timeframe on costs and outcomes.Results: Of the 136 patients undergoing a staged bilateral THA or TKA, 48 patients underwent staged procedures within 90 days (35%) and 88 patients between 91-120 days (65%). There were no significant differences observed for demographics, comorbidities, complications, readmissions, or discharge disposition (all P > .05). Patients undergoing a staged procedure within 90 days had increased episode-of-care costs by $2021 (95% CI $11-$4032, P = .049), increased postacute care costs by $2019 (95% CI $66-$3971, P < .001), and reduced per-patient margin by $2868 (95% CI-$866-$4869, P = .005).Discussion: Patients undergoing staged bilateral THA or TKA within 90 days have increased episode-of-care costs compared to those undergoing a staged procedure from 91-120 days. Since patients may still not be fully recovered from the first procedure, CMS should address the inappropriate allocation of costs to ensure institutions are not penalized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative improved quality and reduced costs following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). In October 2018, the BPCI-Advanced program was implemented. The purpose of this study is to compare the quality metrics and performance between our institution's participation in the BPCI program with the BPCI-Advanced initiative.Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of Medicare primary THA and TKA patients. Demographics, medical comorbidities, discharge disposition, readmission, and complication rates were compared between BPCI and BPCI-Advanced groups. Medicare claims data were used to compare episode-of-care costs, target price, and margin per patient between the cohorts.Results: Compared to BPCI patients (n = 9222), BPCI-Advanced patients (n = 2430) had lower rates of readmission (5.8% vs 3.8%, P = .001) and higher rate of discharge to home (72% vs 78%, P < .001) with similar rates of complications (4% vs 4%, P = .216). Medical comorbidities were similar between groups. BPCI-Advanced patients had higher episode-of-care costs ($22,044 vs $18,440, P < .001) and a higher mean target price ($21,154 vs $20,277, P < .001). BPCI-Advanced patients had a reduced per-patient margin compared to BPCI ($890 loss vs $1459 gain, P < .001), resulting in a $2,138,670 loss in the first three-quarters of program participation.Conclusion: Despite marked improvements in quality metrics, our institution suffered a substantial loss through BPCI-Advanced secondary to methodological changes within the program, such as the exclusion of outpatient TKAs, facility-specific target pricing, and the elimination of different risk tracks for institutions. Medicare should consider adjustments to this program to keep surgeons participating in alternative payment models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unexpected cancelation of scheduled total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures creates patient distress and disruption for the clinical team. The purpose of this study is to identify the etiology and fate of cancelations for scheduled TJAs.Methods: A consecutive series of 11,670 patients at a single institution from 2013 to 2017 was reviewed in March 2020. All patients who were scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty and subsequently canceled were identified. The etiology of cancelation and time to rescheduling were recorded.Results: Of the 505 (4.3%) canceled patients, 209 (42%) were due to medical reasons. Three hundred ninety-one patients (77%) eventually underwent their procedure at a mean delay of 165 days (19-1908). Only 53 (25%) patients canceled for a medical reason underwent further diagnostic or therapeutic intervention for their medical condition. When compared to patient-driven cancelations, those canceled for medical reasons had a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.82 vs 0.39, P < .001), were canceled closer to the scheduled surgery date (8.55 vs 18.1 days, P < .001), and were more likely to eventually undergo surgery (86% vs 73%, P = .004).Conclusion: Canceled elective TJA surgeries are most often due to a medical concern, however only a minority of these patients undergo intervention for that medical condition. To minimize the risk of cancelation, healthcare providers may consider early referral of medically complex patients to the patient's primary care physician. After cancelation, patients should have a clearly defined path to return to the operative schedule to prevent further delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative has been successful at reducing Medicare costs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Target pricing is based on each institution's historical performance and is periodically reset. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of our BPCI program accounting for patient complexity, quality, and resource utilization.Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 9195 Medicare patients undergoing primary TJA from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and readmissions by year were compared. We then examined 90-day episode-of-care costs, changes in target price, and financial margins during the duration of the BPCI program using Medicare claims data.Results: Patients undergoing TJA in 2018 had a higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiac disease (all P < .001) as compared with those in 2015. From 2015 to 2018, there was a decrease in the rate of discharge to rehabilitation facilities (23% vs 14%, P < .001) and length of stay (2.1 vs 1.7 days, P < .001) with no difference in readmissions (6% vs 6%, P = .945). There was a reduction in postacute care costs ($6076 vs $4,890, P < .001) and 90-day episode-of-care costs ($19,954 vs $18,449, P < .001). However, the target price also decreased ($22,280 vs $18,971, P < .001), and the per-patient margin diminished ($2683 vs $522, P < .001).Conclusion: Surgeons have maintained quality of care at a reduced cost despite increasing patient complexity. The target price adjustments resulted in declining margins during the course of our BPCI experience. Policy makers should consider changes to target price methodology to encourage participation in these successful cost-saving programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent evidence has demonstrated that formal physical therapy (PT) may not be required for most patients undergoing total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. This study compared the differences in costs and functional outcomes in patients receiving formal PT and those who did not follow primary THA and TKA.Methods: We queried claims data from a single private insurer identifying patients who underwent primary THA or TKA from 2015 to 2017 in our practice. Demographics, comorbidities, number, and cost of PT visits in a 90-day episode of care were recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients using self-directed home exercises, home PT, outpatient PT, or both home and outpatient PT. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of outcomes.Results: Of the 2971 patients included in analysis, patients using both services had higher 90-day PT costs (mean $2091, P < .001) than those using home PT alone ($1146), outpatient PT alone ($1356), or no formal PT ($0). Home PT had the greatest cost per visit for both private insurance patients ($177/visit) and Medicare Advantage patients ($157/visit), but patients using both home PT and outpatient PT services had the greatest overall PT cost, $2091 for private insurance and $1891 for Medicare Advantage. Patients who used home PT were at significantly higher risk of both complications (odds ratio = 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-4.9; P < .001) and readmissions (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.5; P < .001).Conclusion: Participation in formal PT accounts for up to 8% of the episode of care following THA and TKA. The role of formal PT for most patients should take into account the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has recently designated the codes for total hip and knee arthroplasty as misvalued and has asked the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) to review the work required to perform these procedures. Although other studies have reported time spent on perioperative and postoperative care, time spent on coordinating and performing preoperative care is not included in current RUC methodology and has yet to be addressed in literature.Methods: We prospectively tracked a consecutive series of 438 primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients by one of the 5 surgeons over a 3-month period. Each clinical staff member tracked the amount of time to perform each preoperative care task from the last clinic visit until day of surgery. Data were analyzed separately between providers and ancillary medical staff.Results: Although the current RUC review includes 40 minutes of preservice time on the day of surgery, surgeons spent an average of an additional 43.2 minutes while physician assistants and nurse practitioners spent an additional 97.9 minutes per patient on preoperative care prior to that time. Ancillary medical staff spent a mean of 110.2 minutes per patient. The most common tasks include preoperative phone calls, templating and surgical planning, and preoperative patient education classes.Conclusion: Surgeons and advanced practice providers spend nearly 2 hours per arthroplasty patient on preoperative care not accounted for in current RUC methodology. As readmissions, hospital stay, and complication rates continue to decline, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should consider the substantial work required during the preoperative phase to allow for these improved outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if we could identify patient factors that were predictive of Medicare and privately insured patients being "high-cost."Methods: Ninety-day episode-of-care insurance company payments along with collected demographics, comorbidities, and readmissions were reviewed for a consecutive series of primary total joint arthroplasty patients from 2015 to 2016 at our institution. High-cost patients were identified by determining those patients above the cutoff, where the cost data became demonstrably nonparametric and both univariate analysis and logistical regressions were performed to identify risk factors that lead to increased costs. Receiver operator curves were created to determine the predictive nature of these risk factors.Results: Univariate analysis showed that high-cost privately insured patients were significantly older, more likely to be readmitted and less likely to be discharged to home (P < .001) whereas high-cost Medicare total knee/total hip arthroplasty patients were more likely to have many of the comorbidities analyzed. Logistical regression did not find any predictive factors for privately insured patients and found that diabetes (OR 1.47 and 1.75, respectively), congestive heart failure (OR 1.94 and 3.46, respectively), cerebrovascular event (OR 2.20 and 2.20, respectively) and rheumatic disease (OR 1.78 and 1.78, respectively) were all predictive of being a high-cost Medicare patient.Conclusion: Traditional risk factors for postoperative complications are not reliably associated with increased patient costs after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, the risk factors associated with increased costs vary greatly between privately insured and Medicare-insured patients. Further investigation is necessary to identify cost drivers in this patient subset to preventive higher costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2010, the Affordable Care Act introduced new restrictions on the expansion of physician-owned hospitals (POHs) due to concerns over financial incentives and increased costs. The purpose of this study is to determine whether joint ventures between tertiary care and specialty hospitals (SHs) allowing physician ownership (POHs) have improved outcomes and lower cost following THA and TKA.Methods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015 to 2016 across a single institution comprised of 14 full-service hospitals and 2 SHs owned as a joint venture between physicians and their health system partners. Ninety-day episode-of-care claims cost data from Medicare and a single private insurer were reviewed with the collection of the same demographic data, medical comorbidities, and readmission rates for both the SHs and non-SHs. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of the SHs on episode-of-care costs.Results: Of the 6537 patients in the study, 1936 patients underwent a total joint arthroplasty at an SH (29.6%). Patients undergoing a procedure at an SH had shorter lengths of stay (1.29 days vs 2.23 days for Medicare, 1.15 vs 1.86 for private payer, both P < .001), were less likely to be readmitted (4% vs 7% for Medicare, P = .001), and had lower mean 90-day episode-of-care costs ($16,661 vs $20,579 for Medicare, $26,166 vs $35,222 for private payers, both P < .001). When controlling for the medical comorbidities and demographic variables, undergoing THA or TKA at an SH was associated with a decrease in overall episode costs ($3266 for Medicare, $13,132 for private payer, both P < .001).Conclusion: Even after adjusting for a healthier patient population, the joint venture partnership with health systems and physician-owned SHs demonstrated lower 90-day episode-of-care costs than non-SHs following THA and TKA. Policymakers and practices should consider these data when considering the current care pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alternative payment models for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have incentivized providers to deliver higher quality care at a lower cost, prompting some institutions to develop formal nurse navigation programs (NNPs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a NNP for primary THA and TKA resulted in decreased episode-of-care (EOC) costs.Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015-2016 using claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Medicare Advantage patients from a private insurer. Three nurse navigators were hired to guide discharge disposition and home needs. Ninety-day EOC costs were collected before and after implementation of the NNP. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of the NNP on EOC costs.Results: During the study period, 5275 patients underwent primary TKA or THA. When compared with patients in the prenavigator group, the NNP group had reduced 90-day EOC costs ($19,116 vs $20,418 for Medicare and $35,378 vs $36,961 for private payer, P < .001 and P < .012, respectively). Controlling for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis, the NNP resulted in a $1575 per Medicare patient (P < .001) and a $1819 per private payer patient cost reduction (P = .005). This translates to a cost savings of at least $5,556,600 per year.Conclusion: The implementation of a NNP resulted in a marked reduction in EOC costs following primary THA and TKA. The cost savings significantly outweighs the added expense of the program. Providers participating in alternative payment models should consider using a NNP to provide quality arthroplasty care at a reduced cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the tremendous and long-standing success of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty as treatments for end-stage arthritis, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a rare but feared complication of these procedures.Methods: This review highlights some of the difficulties inherent to studying PJI. These include the difficulty in powering studies to capture this relatively uncommon complication, as well as the heterogeneity in clinical presentation and manifestations associated with the diagnosis and treatment of PJI.Conclusion: We suggest an algorithm for moving forward with new research in an attempt to answer the challenging questions facing the arthroplasty community regarding PJI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our aim was to examine how academic adult reconstructive surgeons have interpreted evidence on femoral head material in total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods: A 16-question survey to evaluate attitudes toward ceramic and cobalt-chrome head use was emailed to 274 faculty at 42 US adult reconstruction fellowship programs.Results: With 116 respondents, the response rate was 42.2%. Faculty use ceramic heads 72.9% of the time. The most common reason why respondents do not use ceramic heads is cost (44.8%). Ninety-four percent of faculty have observed head-neck taper corrosion in cobalt-chrome on polyethylene THA, while 9.5% of faculty have observed head-neck taper corrosion in ceramic on polyethylene THA. Only 6.0% of surgeons have seen Biolox Delta ceramic fracture.Conclusion: Adult reconstruction thought leaders are guided by evidence suggesting that with ceramic heads, taper corrosion and fracture are rare. Cost and personal experience also strongly influence their implant selection. Efforts to equalize cost of ceramic and cobalt-chrome heads may free surgeons to practice in a purely evidence-based fashion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Regional nerve blocks may be used as a component of a multimodal analgesic protocol to manage postoperative pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional nerve blocks after THA in support of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published prior to March 24, 2020 on fascia iliaca, lumbar plexus, and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary THA. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing followed by a systematic review and direct comparison meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the regional nerve blocks.Results: An initial critical appraisal of 3,382 publications yielded 11 publications representing the best available evidence for an analysis. Fascia iliaca, lumbar plexus, and quadratus lumborum blocks demonstrate the ability to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Among the available comparisons, no difference was noted between a regional nerve block or local periarticular anesthetic infiltration regarding postoperative pain and opioid consumption.Conclusion: Local periarticular anesthetic infiltration should be considered prior to a regional nerve block due to concerns over the safety and cost of regional nerve blocks. If a regional nerve block is used in primary THA, a fascia iliaca block is preferred over other blocks due to the differences in technical demands and risks associated with the alternative regional nerve blocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While metal-on-metal (MoM) surface bearings have regained popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA), recent publicity regarding adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) and systemic ion production has led to increased focus surrounding the failures of this bearing surface. The purpose of this review is to highlight the literature regarding clinical presentation of failed MoM THA, and the difficulty in differentiating these cases from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A PubMed literature search using MeSH terms “metal on metal” AND “hip” AND (“replacement” OR “arthroplasty”) AND (“reaction” OR “infection”) yielded 19 relevant articles from 2008–2012 regarding ALTR in THA. Included in these were 7 studies discussing MoM reactions and PJI. The most common symptoms in patients with adverse response to MoM bearings were groin pain aggravated by weight bearing; fever and elevated inflammatory markers were not uncommon in this population. Presence of “creamy milk-stained fluid” under high pressure was frequently encountered intraoperatively. Three studies found perivascular lymphocyte infiltration (PVLI) as suggestive of metal hypersensitivity reaction; however, two studies reported PVLI to be nonspecific for MoM prostheses failures. Serum metal ion levels were not adequate indicators of ALTR. Eight cases of PJI presenting concomitantly with ALTR were reported and suggested metal reaction may predispose to bacterial infection. Studies concurred that negative bacterial cultures were the only reliable characteristic distinguishing MoM reaction from PJI. Overall, the literature showed few conclusive diagnostic differences between the two conditions. Further studies will be required to definitively diagnose ALTR in MoM bearings preoperatively. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Irrigation and debridement (I and D) is a procedure commonly used for the treatment of acute periprosthetic infection. This study retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients with periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee who underwent I and D with retention of their prostheses between 1997 and 2005 at a single institution. One hundred four patients (44 males and 60 females) were identified. Mean age at time of initial debridement was 65 years. Average follow-up was 5.7 years. Treatment failure was defined as the need for resection arthroplasty or recurrent microbiologically proven infection. According to these criteria, I and D was successful in 46 patients (44%). Patients with staphylococcal infection, elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and purulence around the prosthesis were more likely to fail. The high failure rate of this procedure implies that it should be preferably limited to select healthy patients with low virulence organisms and equivocal intraoperative findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The anterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty offers superb exposure that can be easily extended for complicated primary and revision surgery. In addition, it can be adapted for small incision surgery. The advantages of this approach include a significantly lower dislocation rate compared with other approaches while allowing for excellent acetabular visualization. The purported disadvantages include heterotopic ossification and limp. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several recent studies have demonstrated that overlapping surgeries in total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty do not increase the rates of complications, but whether this practice is cost-effective has yet to be addressed in the literature. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of overlapping surgery on procedural costs and surgical productivity during THA and TKA.Methods: We identified all patients undergoing primary THA or TKA from 2015 to 2018 by 18 surgeons at a single orthopedic specialty hospital. Procedural and personnel costs were calculated for each case using a time-driven activity-based costing algorithm. Overlap of surgical time by at least 30 minutes was used to define an overlapping procedure. We compared costs and outcomes between overlapping and nonoverlapping procedures, standardizing all costs to 8-hour time blocks. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine independent effect of overlapping procedures on costs and outcomes.Results: Of the 4786 consecutive procedures, 968 (20.2%) overlapped by at least 30 minutes. Although overlapping rooms increased mean operative time by 8.3 minutes (P < .0001) and operating room personnel costs by $80 per case (<.0001), overlapping surgeons could perform significantly more procedures per 8 hours (7.6 vs 6.4; P < .0001), increasing total 8-hour profit margin by $1215 per procedure. There was no difference in 90-day readmission rate, length of stay, or rates of discharge home between the groups.Conclusion: Overlapping noncritical portions of procedures in primary THA and TKA appear to be both a safe practice and an effective strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total hip arthroplasty was originally indicated for older, sedentary patients. This was due to concern that catastrophic wear and failure would occur in younger and more active patients. Total hip arthroplasty has since become a viable option for these patients with advances in implant design, tribology, and surgical technique. However, further study is needed to delineate the long-term outcome in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]