Search

Tobacco smoking contributes to tooth discoloration. Pigmented compounds in the smoke generated by combustion of tobacco can cause discoloration of dental hard tissues. However, aerosols from heated tobacco products cause less discoloration than cigarette smoke (CS) in vitro. The objective of the present study was to optimize a method for extracting the colored chemical compounds deposited on tooth enamel following exposure to total particulate matter (TPM) from CS or a heated tobacco product (Tobacco Heating System [THS] 2.2), analyze the extracts by gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and identify the key chemicals associated with tooth discoloration. Sixty bovine enamel blocks were exposed for 2 weeks to TPM from CS or THS 2.2 aerosol or to artificial saliva as a control. Brushing without toothpaste and color measurements were performed each week. Noticeable discoloration of enamel was observed following exposure to CS TPM. The discoloration following exposure to THS 2.2 aerosol TPM or artificial saliva was not distinguishable to the eye (ΔE < 3.3). Carbon disulfide was used to extract surface-deposited chemicals. Untargeted analyses were followed by partial least squares correlation against discoloration scores (R 2  = 0.96). Eleven compounds had variable importance in projection scores greater than 2. Discriminant autocorrelation matrix calculation of their mass spectral information identified eight of the eleven compounds as terpenoids. None of the compounds were related to nicotine. Several of these compounds were also detected in THS 2.2 aerosol TPM-exposed enamel, but at lower levels, in line with our findings showing less discoloration. Compared with CS TPM exposure, THS 2.2 aerosol TPM exposure resulted in lower deposition of color-related compounds on enamel surface, consistent with minimal discoloration of dental enamel., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Filippo Zanetti, Philippe A. Guy, Adrian Haiduc, Nikolai V. Ivanov, Shoaib Majeed, Julia Hoeng, and Manuel C. Peitsch are employees of Philip Morris International; Walter K. Schlage is a biology consultant paid by Philip Morris International., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the relative effects of cigarette smoke (CS), electronic cigarette (EC), red wine, coffee, and soy sauce on the color of enamel, dentin, and composite resin restorations, as well as the effects of whitening treatments., Methods: Seventy premolars with composite restorations were exposed to CS, EC aerosol (a novel EC device with MESH™ technology [P4M3 version 1.0, Philip Morris International]), red wine, coffee, and soy sauce for 56 min/day for 15 days. Two whitening sessions with 6% and 35% hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) were performed on the exposed samples. Teeth exposed to CS and EC aerosol were also brushed with whitening toothpaste for 3 weeks. Color match of resin restorations was assessed, and color changes were compared after exposure and after whitening treatments., Results: Discolorations in enamel, dentin, and composite resin were observed in the order of red wine > CS > soy sauce > coffee > EC. Color mismatch between enamel and resin restorations occurred only in red wine and CS groups. Brushing with whitening toothpaste removed discoloration caused by EC aerosol; H 2 O 2 treatments were necessary to eliminate discolorations caused by coffee and soy sauce. Discolorations of dentin and resin restorations could not be completely removed by whitening treatments, and color mismatch remained in teeth exposed to red wine and CS., Conclusion: Red wine and CS cause significant tooth discoloration and color mismatch in enamel and resin restorations that are not reversible by whitening treatments. Tooth discoloration associated with EC aerosol was minimal and could be removed by brushing with whitening toothpaste., Clinical Significance: Red wine drinkers and cigarette smokers have increased risks for tooth discoloration and color mismatch between enamel and composite resin restorations. Whitening treatments may not be effective in correcting the color mismatch. Tooth discoloration associated with EC aerosol is minimal., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To test if cigarette smoke (CS) causes discoloration of enamel, dentin, and composite resin restorations and induces color mismatch between dental hard tissues and the restorations, and to compare the findings with the effects of aerosol generated by the tobacco heating system (THS) 2.2., Method and Materials: Twenty-two human premolars were prepared with Class V cavities restored with Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M Espe) composite resin. Teeth were divided into two groups and exposed to either CS from 20 reference cigarettes (3R4F) or aerosol from 20 THS 2.2 tobacco heat sticks 4 days a week for 3 weeks. CIE L*a*b* color was assessed before and after exposure and brushing at 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, and surface texture of the Class V restoration were assessed according to a modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criterion., Results: Marked discoloration of enamel and dentin was observed following 3 weeks of CS exposure (ΔE = 8.8 ± 2.6 and 21.3 ± 4.4, respectively), and color mismatch occurred between the composite resin restorations (ΔE = 25.6 ± 3.8) and dental hard tissues. Discoloration was minimal in the enamel, dentin, and composite resin restorations in the THS 2.2 group, and no color mismatch was observed after 3 weeks of THS 2.2 aerosol exposure., Conclusion: CS causes significant tooth discoloration and induces color mismatch between dental hard tissues and composite resin restorations. Reducing or eliminating the deposits derived from tobacco combustion could minimize the impact of tobacco products on tooth discoloration.

Purpose: To study the effects of cigarette smoke (CS) on the discoloration of dental resin composite compared with the aerosol from a heat-not-burn tobacco product, the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS2.2)., Methods: A total of 60 discs were prepared from three commercial resin composites: Durafill VS (DVS), Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU) and Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill (TEC). Twenty discs of each composite were divided into two groups and exposed to CS from 20 reference cigarettes (3R4F) or aerosol from 20 THS2.2 tobacco sticks per day for 3 weeks. Color, gloss and surface roughness of the composite discs were measured at baseline and after exposure and brushing with toothpaste at 1, 2 and 3 weeks., Results: Color differences from the baseline (ΔE) were on average 27.1 (±3.6) in 3R4F and 3.9 (±1.5) in the THS2.2 group after 3 weeks of exposure (P< 0.0001). TEC (30.4±1.4 and FSU (28.0 ±2.5) exhibited more discoloration than DVS (23.0±1.2) in the 3R4F group (P< 0.0001). FSU (2.6 ±0.5) showed significantly less discoloration than TEC (5.3±1.5) in the THS2.2 group (P< 0.0001). Surface roughness of resin composites was not affected by either CS or THS2.2 aerosol, while surface gloss increased in the composite discs with more severe discoloration., Clinical Significance: Cigarette smoke caused significant discoloration of dental composite resins. Reducing or eliminating the deposits derived from combustion of tobacco has the potential to minimize the impact of smoking on the color of composite resin restorations., Competing Interests: Dr. Zanetti, Shoaib Majeed, Dr Peitsch and Dr. Hoeng are employed by Philip Morris International. Dr. Zhao, Dr. Pan, Dr. Malmstrom and Dr. Ren declared no conflict of interest. Dr. Zhao and Dr. Zanetti contributed equally to the study. The study was partially funded by Philip Morris International.