Search

Objective: The aim is to present current clinical practice of thoracic aorta screening in a tertiary referral center. We identified how often imaging techniques were used for screening and established the value of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison with computed tomography (CT) to detect aortic dilation. We also investigated which additional abnormalities of the heart, aorta or smaller arteries were discovered., Design: All patients ≥15 years who visited our tertiary center in 2012-2016 for first thoracic aortic screening were retrospectively included. Diameters of the sinus of Valsalva (SoV) and maximum ascending aorta (AA) were compared between TTE and CT. The sensitivity and specificity of TTE to detect aortic dilation (≥40 mm) was assessed with CT as reference standard. Intracardiac abnormalities found with TTE and arterial abnormalities found with CT were identified., Results: In total 349 patients (155 men, age 41 ± 15 years, 10% genetic mutation) were included. Screening was performed with TTE only in 35% and with TTE and CT in 65%. Patients who underwent TTE only were younger, had less often hypertension and less often a family history of aortic pathology. Although there was a good correlation between TTE and CT, the diameters measured with TTE were typically lower (SoV -1.0, 95%CI -6.6 to 4.7 and AA -0.4, 95%CI -6.5 to 5.8). Sensitivity of TTE for detecting aortic dilation was 61% (SoV) and 57% (AA) and specificity was 96% (SoV) and 100% (AA). Valve abnormalities, ventricular dilation or reduced ventricular function was found with TTE in 26 patients (7%). In 47 patients (13%) ascending aortic dilation was diagnosed and in 10 patients (4%) relevant peripheral arterial abnormalities were identified using CT., Conclusions: Most often patients received both TTE and CT (65%). Since TTE showed a low sensitivity to detect aortic dilation, CT imaging is advised at least once in patients referred for thoracic aortic screening., (© 2018 The Authors. Congenital Heart Disease Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: Hybrid single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has only been evaluated for its diagnostic accuracy as a single test in patients suspected of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Added value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA beyond usual clinical work-up, or use of each of these tests separately, remains unclear. We evaluated the added value of hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT (SPECT) and CCTA, beyond pre-test likelihood and exercise stress ECG (X-ECG), in the diagnosis of CAD., Methods and Results: Two hundred and five patients with stable angina pectoris and intermediate-to-high pre-test likelihood were prospectively included. All patients underwent clinical history and examination, X-ECG, stress and rest SPECT, coronary calcium scoring (CCS) and CCTA. Fractional flow reserve measurement <0.80 or a lesion >50% on coronary angiography (CA) served as reference standard for significant CAD. Multiple imputation was used to correct for missing test results (17-20%). Added value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA to the basic model of pre-test likelihood plus X-ECG was quantified using logistic regression analysis. Model differences were then assessed using differences in C-index and in net reclassification improvement (NRI). The basic model had a C-index of 0.73 (95%CI 0.66-0.80). This significantly increased to 0.85 (95%CI 0.80-0.91) by addition of only SPECT, to 0.90 (95%CI 0.85-0.94) when adding only CCTA, and to 0.96 (95%CI 0.92-0.99) when adding hybrid SPECT/CCTA. The accompanying NRIs were 0.82 (95%CI 0.62-1.02), 0.86 (95%CI 0.66-1.06) and 1.57 (95%CI 1.11-1.59) respectively., Conclusion: Current analysis resembles clinical routine of layered testing and shows that hybrid SPECT/CCTA imaging has a substantially higher yield than standalone SPECT or CCTA in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of significant CAD., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and CT coronary angiography (CCTA) has the potential to play a major role in patients with non-conclusive SPECT or CCTA results. We evaluated the performance of hybrid SPECT/CCTA vs. standalone SPECT and CCTA for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of CAD., Methods and Results: In total, 98 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.1 years, 68.4% male) with stable anginal complaints and a median pre-test likelihood of 87% (range 22-95%) were prospectively included in this study. Hybrid SPECT/CCTA was performed prior to conventional coronary angiography (CA) including fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. Hybrid analysis was performed by combined interpretation of SPECT and CCTA images. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated for standalone SPECT, CCTA, and hybrid SPECT/CCTA on per patient level, using an FFR <0.80 as a reference for significant CAD. Significant CAD was demonstrated in 56 patients (57.9%). Non-conclusive SPECT or CCTA results were found in 32 (32.7%) patients. SPECT had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity 79%, PPV 85%, and NPV 89%. CCTA had a sensitivity of 98%, specificity 62%, PPV 77%, and NPV 96%. Hybrid analysis of SPECT and CCTA improved the overall performance: sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the presence of significant CAD to 96, 95, 96, and 95%, respectively., Conclusions: In > 40% of the patients with a high pre-test likelihood no significant CAD was demonstrated, emphasizing the value of accurate pre-treatment cardiovascular imaging. Hybrid SPECT/CCTA was able to accurately diagnose and exclude significant CAD surpassing standalone myocardial SPECT and CCTA, vs. a reference standard of FFR measurements.