Search

Background: The creatinine height index (CHI) is an estimate of lean body mass. We hypothesize that a modified CHI estimate using serum creatinine (sCr) levels in patients with normal renal function when performed soon after injury would reflect preinjury protein nutrition status., Methods: The urine CHI (uCHI) was calculated using the 24-h urine sample. The serum-derived estimated CHI (sCHI) was calculated using the sCr on admission. Correlation between abdominal computed tomography images at specific lumbar vertebral levels and total body fat and muscle content was used for comparison as an independent measurement of nutrition status unlikely to be substantially altered by trauma., Results: A total of 45 patients were enrolled, all with a significant injury burden (median injury severity score [ISS] = 25; interquartile range, 17-35). The calculated sCHI on admission was 71.0% (SD = 26.9%) and likely underestimates the CHI when compared with uCHI (mean = 112.5%, SD = 32.6%). Stratifying by degree of stress demonstrated that in a group of 23 moderately and severely stressed patients, uCHI (mean = 112.7%, SD = 5.7%) and sCHI (mean = 60.8%, SD = 1.9%) were significantly different and without correlation (r = -0.26, P = 0.91). In patients without stress, there was a significant negative correlation between sCHI and psoas muscle area (r = -0.869, P = 0.03), and in patients with severe stress there was a significant positive correlation between uCHI and psoas muscle area (r = 0.733, P = 0.016)., Conclusion: The CHI calculated from the initial sCr is not an appropriate estimate of uCHI in critically ill trauma patients and is not a valid measure of psoas muscle mass in this setting., (© 2023 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and interobserver agreement of individual CT findings as well as the bowel injury prediction score (BIPS) in surgically proven bowel injury after blunt abdominal trauma. This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was IRB approved and consent was waived. All patients 14 years or older who sustained surgically proven bowel injury after blunt abdominal trauma between 1/1/2004 and 6/30/2015 were included. Admission trauma MDCT scans were independently interpreted by two abdominal fellowship-trained radiologists who recorded the following CT findings: intraperitoneal fluid, mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding, bowel wall thickening/hematoma, active intravenous contrast extravasation, free intraperitoneal air, bowel wall discontinuity, and focal bowel hypoenhancement. Subsequently, the electronic medical records of the included patients, admission abdominal physical exam results, admission white blood cell count, and findings at exploratory laparotomy of the included patients were recorded. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence and interobserver agreement of the CT findings were as follows: intraperitoneal fluid 93.9 %, kappa = 0.784 (good); mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding 84.8 %, kappa = 0.718 (good); bowel wall thickening/hematoma 42.4 %, kappa = 0.491 (moderate); active IV contrast extravasation 36.3 %, kappa = 1.00 (perfect); free intraperitoneal air 21.2 %, kappa = 0.904 (very good), bowel wall discontinuity 6.1 %, kappa = 1.00 (perfect); and focal bowel hypoenhancement 6.1 %, kappa = 0.468 (moderate). An absence of the specified CT findings was encountered in 9.1 % with surgically proven bowel injuries (kappa = 1.00, perfect). In our study, 9/16 patients or 56.3 % had a bowel injury prediction score (BIPS) of 2 or more as defined by McNutt et al. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(1):105-111, 2014). The presence of intraperitoneal fluid and mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding are the most common CT findings in bowel injuries proven at laparotomy. A small percentage of patients have no abnormal CT findings. This grading system did not prove to be useful in our study likely due to our inherently small patient population; however, the use of BIPS deserves further investigation as it may help in identifying blunt bowel and mesenteric injury patients with often subtle or nonspecific CT findings.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the integration of pelvic computed tomographic (CT) angiography into the thoracoabdominal CT examination of blunt trauma by using 64-detector row CT to differentiate active arterial from active venous hemorrhage., Materials and Methods: This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. Fifty-three patients (30 male, 23 female; mean age, 42 years) with multiple blunt trauma underwent pelvic CT angiography with 64-detector row CT at admission. Arterial phase and portal venous phase pelvic CT angiograms were evaluated for evidence of vascular injury. In patients with active extravasation, the size of the hemorrhaging area was measured on arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase images. The Fisher exact test was used to correlate presence of vascular injury with subsequent clinical management. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test the association between size of active hemorrhage during the vascular enhancement phases and subsequent clinical outcome. Finally, the Fisher exact test was used to correlate presence of vascular injury with severity of osseous injury., Results: At pelvic CT angiography, 21 of the 53 patients had evidence of vascular injury: 10 isolated active arterial extravasations, three isolated arterial occlusions, three cases of both arterial extravasation and occlusion, two cases of arterial and venous extravasations, and three isolated venous extravasations. Eleven of the 21 patients also underwent conventional angiography, with subsequent embolization performed in seven of these 11 patients. The remaining 10 patients were successfully treated conservatively. When the foci of active arterial extravasation were compared on arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase images, the mean areas of hemorrhage across all three phases were larger in patients who required conventional angiography than in those successfully treated with conservative management., Conclusion: With use of 64-detector row scanning, pelvic CT angiography was successfully integrated into the authors' CT protocols and enabled differentiation between active arterial and active venous hemorrhage, which may influence clinical management., ((c) RSNA, 2008.)

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate delayed-phase computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of active splenic hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment from contained vascular injuries (pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas) that can be treated electively or managed conservatively., Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study; the informed consent requirement was waived. Forty-seven patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed at CT after blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated. Abdominal and pelvic dual-phase CT was performed; images were obtained 60-70 seconds and 5 minutes after contrast material injection. Scans were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale. Patients with intrasplenic hyperattenuating foci on portal venous phase images were classified as having active splenic hemorrhage (group 1) or a contained vascular injury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings. Findings suggestive of active hemorrhage included areas that remained hyperattenuating or increased in size on delayed-phase images. The clinical outcome of these patients was determined by reviewing their medical records. Relationships between several factors were tested with the Fisher exact test, including (a) the presence or absence of hyperattenuating foci and management and (b) the presence of contained vascular injury or active extravasation and management., Results: Portal venous phase CT revealed a focal high-attenuation parenchymal contrast material collection in 19 patients: nine patients were classified as group 1 and 10 were classified as group 2. All patients in group 1 underwent emergent splenectomy, and all patients in group 2 were initially treated without surgery. Significant differences in management were noted on the basis of whether hyperattenuating foci were seen on portal venous phase images (P < .001) and whether hyperattenuating foci seen at portal venous phase imaging were further characterized as active splenic hemorrhage or a contained vascular injury at delayed-phase CT (P < .001)., Conclusion: In blunt splenic injury, delayed-phase CT helps differentiate patients with active splenic hemorrhage from those with contained vascular injuries.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) without oral contrast material for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries that require surgical repair in patients with blunt abdominal trauma., Materials and Methods: The investigational review board approved the study. Informed consent was waived. CT reports for October 2001 to September 2003 were reviewed and 1082 patients were identified who had undergone abdominopelvic CT with a multi-detector row scanner and without oral contrast material. Findings were divided into four categories: negative, solid organ injury with or without hemoperitoneum, free fluid only, and suspected bowel or mesenteric injury. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated by comparing CT findings with laparotomy reports and hospital course., Results: CT findings were no intraabdominal injury (n = 932), solid organ injury only (n = 102), free fluid only (n = 34), and suspected bowel or mesenteric injury (n = 14). CT findings in patients suspected of having bowel or mesenteric injury were pneumoperitoneum with other secondary findings (n = 4), mesenteric hematoma and bowel wall abnormality (n = 2), mesenteric hematoma only (n = 4), and bowel wall thickening only (n = 4). In 11 patients, bowel or mesenteric injury was proved surgically. Thus, the study included 1066 true-negative, nine true-positive, two false-negative, and five false-positive results. Based on these data, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52%, 95%), specificity was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%), positive predictive value was 64% (95% CI: 39%, 83%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%) for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries., Conclusion: Multi-detector row CT without oral contrast material is adequate for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries that require surgical repair. Results are comparable with previously reported data for single-detector row helical CT with oral contrast material., ((c) RSNA, 2004.)

Purpose: To prospectively compare the accuracy of imaging with technetium-99m-labeled Fab' fragment of the anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody (CEA) IMMU-4 with that of computed tomography (CT) for the detection of pelvic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma., Materials and Methods: In 61 patients, blinded interpretations of both modalities were correlated with surgical-pathologic (n = 23) or clinical and CT follow-up findings (n = 38)., Results: Sensitivity and specificity with antibody scanning alone and combined with CT (79% and 84% vs 83% and 81%, respectively) were not significantly different from those values for CT alone (66% and 97%, respectively). Sensitivity of antibody scanning was greater for recurrences larger than 2 cm (94% vs 55% [P = .02]), serum CEA more than 2.5 ng/mL (91% vs 40% [P = .03]), and combined planar and single photon emission CT antibody scanning compared with planar alone (79% vs 48% [P = .03]), without a significant decrease in specificity., Conclusion: Antibody scanning does not improve on findings at CT alone for recurrent colorectal carcinoma but can help differentiate recurrent tumor from fibrosis.