1. Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
- Author
-
Loreto Monsalve-Guil, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, Ivan Ortiz-Garcia, Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera, Javier Gil, Fernando Muñoz-Guzón, Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra, and Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Estomatología
- Subjects
Materials science ,Surface Properties ,QH301-705.5 ,Surface finish ,Catalysis ,Osseointegration ,Bone Response ,Article ,Inorganic Chemistry ,Implants, Experimental ,Implant surface ,Animals ,New zealand white ,Femur ,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry ,Biology (General) ,Molecular Biology ,QD1-999 ,Spectroscopy ,Dental alveolus ,Titanium ,implant surface ,Superfície sorrejada i gravada amb àcid ,Organic Chemistry ,FEMORAL CONDYLE ,osseointegration ,General Medicine ,Superfície de l’implant ,Computer Science Applications ,Chemistry ,Superficie del implante ,sandblasted and acid-etched surface ,Osteointegración ,Titanium surface ,Implant ,Rabbits ,Superficie pulida con chorro de arena y grabada con ácido ,Sandblasted and acid-etched surface ,Osteointegració ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we used two different types of sandblasted-etched surface implants, an SLA™ surface and a Nanoblast Plus™ surface. Roughness and chemical composition were evaluated by a white light interferometer microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The SLA™ surface exhibited the higher values (Ra 3.05 μm) of rugosity compared to the Nanoblast Plus™ surface (Ra 1.78 μm). Both types of implants were inserted in the femoral condyles of ten New Zealand white rabbits. After 12 weeks, histological and histomorphometric analysis was performed. All the implants were osseointegrated and no signs of infection were observed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) ratio was similar around the SLA™ implants (63.74 ± 13.61) than around the Nanoblast Plus™ implants (62.83 ± 9.91). Both implant surfaces demonstrated a favorable bone response, confirming the relevance of the sandblasted-etched surface on implant osseointegration. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF