Search

Background: Adhesions are a major cause of long-term postsurgical complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery. Existing adhesion scores primarily measure morphological characteristics of adhesions that do not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical adhesion score (CLAS) measuring overall clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery., Methods: An international Delphi study was performed to identify relevant score items for adhesion-related complications, including small bowel obstruction, female infertility, chronic abdominal or pelvic pain, and difficulties at reoperation. The CLAS includes clinical outcomes, related to morbidity of adhesions, and weight factors, to correct the outcome scores for the likelihood that symptoms are truly caused by adhesions. In a pilot study, two independent researchers retrospectively scored the CLAS in 51 patients to evaluate inter-observer reliability, by calculating the Intraclass correlation coefficient. During a feasibility assessment, we evaluated whether the CLAS completely covered different clinical scenarios of adhesion-related morbidity., Results: Three Delphi rounds were performed. 43 experts agreed to participate, 38(88%) completed the first round, and 32 (74%) the third round. Consensus was reached on 83.4% of items. Inter-observer reliability for the CLAS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97). During feasibility assessment, six items were included. As a result, the CLAS includes 22 outcomes and 23 weight factors., Conclusion: The CLAS represents a promising scoring system to measure and monitor the clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications. Further studies are needed to confirm its utility in clinical practice.

Background: Adhesions are the most common driver of long-term morbidity after abdominal surgery. Although laparoscopy can reduce adhesion formation, the effect of minimally invasive surgery on long-term adhesion-related morbidity remains unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of laparoscopy on adhesion-related readmissions in a population-based cohort., Methods: We did a retrospective cohort study of patients of any age who had abdominal or pelvic surgery done using laparoscopic or open approaches between June 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011, using validated population data from the Scottish National Health Service. All patients who had surgery were followed up until Dec 31, 2017. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of hospital readmissions directly related to adhesions in the laparoscopic and open surgery cohorts at 5 years. Readmissions were categorised as directly related to adhesions, possibly related to adhesions, and readmissions for an operation that was potentially complicated by adhesions. We did subgroup analyses of readmissions by anatomical site of surgery and used Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess differences in survival across subgroups. We used multivariable Cox-regression analysis to determine whether surgical approach was an independent and significant risk factor for adhesion-related readmissions., Findings: Between June 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011, 72 270 patients had an index abdominal or pelvic surgery, of whom 21 519 (29·8%) had laparoscopic index surgery and 50 751 (70·2%) had open surgery. Of the 72 270 patients who had surgery, 2527 patients (3·5%) were readmitted within 5 years of surgery for disorders directly related to adhesions, 12 687 (17·6%) for disorders possibly related to adhesions, and 9436 (13·1%) for operations potentially complicated by adhesions. Of the 21 519 patients who had laparoscopic surgery, 359 (1·7% [95% CI 1·5-1·9]) were readmitted for disorders directly related to adhesions compared with 2168 (4·3% [4·1-4·5]) of 50 751 patients in the open surgery cohort (p<0·0001). 3443 (16·0% [15·6-16·4]) of 21 519 patients in the laparoscopic surgery cohort were readmitted for disorders possibly related to adhesions compared with 9244 (18·2% [17·8-18·6]) of 50 751 patients in the open surgery cohort (p<0·005). In multivariate analyses, laparoscopy reduced the risk of directly related readmissions by 32% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·60-0·77), and of possibly related readmissions by 11% (HR 0·89, 0·85-0·94) compared with open surgery. Procedure type, malignancy, sex, and age were also independently associated with risk of adhesion-related readmissions., Interpretation: Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of adhesion-related readmissions. However, the overall burden of readmissions associated with adhesions remains high. With further increases in the use of laparoscopic surgery expected in the future, the effect at the population level might become larger. Further steps remain necessary to reduce the incidence of adhesion-related postsurgical complications., Funding: Dutch Adhesion Group and Nordic Pharma., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adhesion barriers have proven to reduce adhesion-related complications in colorectal surgery. However, barriers are seldom applied. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of adhesion barriers in colorectal surgery., Methods: A decision-tree model was developed to compare cost-effectiveness of no adhesion barrier with the use of an adhesion barrier in open and laparoscopic surgery. Outcomes were incidence of clinical consequences of adhesions, direct healthcare costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per adhesion prevented. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed., Results: Adhesion barriers reduce adhesion incidence and incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in open and laparoscopic surgery. Adhesion barriers in open surgery reduce costs compared to no adhesion barrier ($4376 versus $4482). Using an adhesion barrier in laparoscopic procedures increases costs by $162 ($4482 versus $4320). The ICER in the laparoscopic cohort was $123. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed 66% and 41% probabilities of an adhesion barrier reducing costs for open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery, respectively., Conclusion: The use of adhesion barriers in open colorectal surgery is cost-effective in preventing adhesion-related problems. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, an adhesion barrier is effective at low costs., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Background and Aims: Adhesions, that form in 60-80% of all abdominal operations, can cause complications such as chronic abdominal pain, small-bowel obstruction, female infertility, and the need for adhesiolysis in future surgeries. Our 2010 Adhesion Awareness survey demonstrated that despite the huge clinical impact of adhesions; adhesion-related complications were seldom mentioned in the informed consent. Six years later, a follow-up survey was conducted to assess the progress on awareness on adhesion-related complications in the Netherlands., Material and Methods: The 2010 Adhesion Awareness survey was repeated after a literature update. The knowledge regarding adhesions; the use of anti-adhesive agents and involvement in the informed consent process were assessed. Surgeons and surgical trainees were contacted by e-mail. The data was analysed using a Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test and corrected for multiple testing., Results: The response rate was 32.6%, similar to the survey in 2010 (34.4%). 88.1% agreed with the clinical relevance of adhesions, comparable to 2010 (89.8%). The score on the knowledge test was 38.8% (2010: 37.2%). Involvement of adhesion-related complications in the informed consent process increased, although 32.5% almost never mentions adhesions. In 2016, 42.4% reported a correct occurrence of bowel lesions during adhesiolysis, higher than in 2010 (P<0.001)., Conclusions: The adhesion awareness did not increase in six years, despite the efforts made. However, an increased awareness regarding adhesiolysis related complications was detected. Improvement of knowledge and behavior is essential to narrowing the gap between the impact of adhesions as a major complication of abdominal surgery and the limited adhesion awareness., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency, causing high morbidity and even some mortality. The adhesions causing such bowel obstructions are typically the footprints of previous abdominal surgical procedures. The present paper presents a revised version of the Bologna guidelines to evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of ASBO. The working group has added paragraphs on prevention of ASBO and special patient groups., Methods: The guideline was written under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery by the ASBO working group. A systematic literature search was performed prior to the update of the guidelines to identify relevant new papers on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ASBO. Literature was critically appraised according to an evidence-based guideline development method. Final recommendations were approved by the workgroup, taking into account the level of evidence of the conclusion., Recommendations: Adhesion formation might be reduced by minimally invasive surgical techniques and the use of adhesion barriers. Non-operative treatment is effective in most patients with ASBO. Contraindications for non-operative treatment include peritonitis, strangulation, and ischemia. When the adhesive etiology of obstruction is unsure, or when contraindications for non-operative management might be present, CT is the diagnostic technique of choice. The principles of non-operative treatment are nil per os, naso-gastric, or long-tube decompression, and intravenous supplementation with fluids and electrolytes. When operative treatment is required, a laparoscopic approach may be beneficial for selected cases of simple ASBO.Younger patients have a higher lifetime risk for recurrent ASBO and might therefore benefit from application of adhesion barriers as both primary and secondary prevention., Discussion: This guideline presents recommendations that can be used by surgeons who treat patients with ASBO. Scientific evidence for some aspects of ASBO management is scarce, in particular aspects relating to special patient groups. Results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for ASBO are awaited., Competing Interests: Not applicableThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare adhesion formation after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer resection., Summary of Background Data: After colorectal surgery, most patients develop adhesions, with a high burden of complications. Laparoscopy seems to reduce adhesion formation, but evidence is poor. Trials comparing open- and laparoscopic colorectal surgery have never assessed adhesion formation., Methods: Data on adhesions were gathered during resection of colorectal liver metastases. Incidence of adhesions adjacent to the original incision was compared between patients with previous laparoscopic- and open colorectal resection. Secondary outcomes were incidence of any adhesions, extent and severity of adhesions, and morbidity related to adhesions or adhesiolysis., Results: Between March 2013 and December 2015, 151 patients were included. Ninety patients (59.6%) underwent open colorectal resection and 61 patients (40.4%) received laparoscopic colorectal resection. Adhesions to the incision were present in 78.9% after open and 37.7% after laparoscopic resection (P < 0.001). The incidence of abdominal wall adhesions and of any adhesion was significantly higher after open resection; the incidence of visceral adhesions did not significantly differ. The extent of abdominal wall and visceral adhesions and the median highest Zühlke score at the incision were significantly higher after open resection. There were no differences in incidence of small bowel obstruction during the interval between the colorectal and liver operations, the incidence of serious adverse events, and length of stay after liver surgery., Conclusion: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is associated with a lower incidence, extent, and severity of adhesions to parietal surfaces. Laparoscopy does not reduce the incidence of visceral adhesions.

Background: Adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery can cause iatrogenic organ injury, increased operative time and a more complicated convalescence. We assessed the impact of adhesiolysis and adhesiolysis-related complications on quality of life and functional status following elective abdominal surgery., Methods: Prospective cohort study, comparing patients requiring and not requiring adhesiolysis during an elective laparotomy or laparoscopy using the SF-36 and DASI questionnaire scores., Results: 518 patients were included. Pre- and postoperative quality of life did not significantly differ between both groups. Patients with adhesiolysis had a significantly lower pre- and postoperative functional status (p < 0.01). Higher age, concomitant pulmonary disease, postoperative complications, readmissions and chronic abdominal pain 6 months after surgery were all associated with a significant and independent decline in quality of life and functional status six months after surgery., Conclusion: Adhesiolysis in itself does not affect functional status and quality of life six months after surgery. Postoperative complications, readmissions and chronic abdominal pain are associated with a lower health status., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: For any anti-adhesive barrier developed for abdominal surgery, the use under conditions in which anastomotic healing is compromised needs to be investigated. The current study evaluates the effect of a new ultrapure alginate gel on early healing of high-risk anastomoses in the ileum and compares this with the gold standard used in clinical practice., Materials and Methods: In 75 adult male Wistar rats, a 5 mm ileal segment was resected and continuity was restored by construction of an inverted anastomosis. Rats were divided randomly into a control group and groups receiving either alginate gel or a sodium hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) film around the anastomosis (n = 25 each). Carprofen, given in a daily dose of 1.25 mg/kg, was used to compromise anastomotic healing. At day three, animals were killed and scored for signs of anastomotic leakage and the presence of adhesions., Results: The incidence of adhesion formation was 95% in the HA/CMC film group, which was significantly higher than in the controls (64%, p = 0.010) and the alginate gel group (52%, p = 0.004). The adhesion score was nearly 40% lower in the alginate gel group compared with the HA/CMC film group. The incidence of ileal leakage in the HA/CMC film group (92%) was significantly higher than in the controls (68%, p = 0.016). Leakage rate did not differ between the alginate gel and control groups. There was no significant difference between groups in either incision bursting pressure or incision breaking strength., Conclusion: Ultrapure alginate gel does not interfere with repair of ileal anastomoses constructed under conditions in which chances of anastomotic dehiscence are high. The alginate gel performs better than the HA/CMC film.

Background: Chronic pain is a frequent post-operative complication, affecting ~20-40% of patients who have undergone surgery of the female genital or alimentary tract. Chronic pain is an important risk factor for diminished quality of life after surgery. Adhesions are frequently associated with chronic post-operative pain; however, surgical treatment of adhesion-related pain is controversial., Objective and Rationale: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and harms of surgical interventions for chronic post-operative pain attributable to adhesions., Search Methods: A search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL, without restrictions pertaining to date, publication status or language. Randomized trials and cohort studies from all surgical interventions for chronic post-operative pain were considered eligible. Patients with a concomitant diagnosis that could cause chronic pain (e.g. endometriosis or inflammatory conditions) were excluded. Outcome measures were graded according to clinical relevance, with improvement of pain at long-term follow-up regarded as most clinically relevant., Outcomes: A total of 4294 unique citations were identified, of which 13 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Two of the analysed studies were randomized trials, of which one had a low risk of bias. Only one trial, randomizing between laparoscopic adhesiolysis without an adhesion barrier and diagnostic laparoscopy, reported improvement of pain at long-term follow-up. In this trial, pain improved in 55.8% of patients after adhesiolysis and in 41.7% of patients in the control group; however, the difference was not significant (relative risk (RR) 1.34; 95% CI: 0.89-2.02). Most non-randomized studies had mid-length follow-up (6-12 months). In pooled analyses of trials and non-randomized studies, improvement of pain was reported in 72% of patients who underwent adhesiolysis (95% CI: 61-83%) at any follow-up longer than 3 months. The incidence of negative laparoscopies was 20% (95% CI: 10-30%). The overall incidence of complications following laparoscopic adhesiolysis was 4% (95% CI: 1-6%)., Wider Implications: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis reduces pain from adhesions in ~70% of patients in the initial phase after treatment. However, there is little evidence for long-term efficacy of adhesiolysis for chronic pain. Other drawbacks of laparoscopic adhesiolysis are the high rate of negative laparoscopies and the risk of bowel injury. At present, there is little evidence to support routine use of adhesiolysis in treatment for chronic pain. New research is needed to investigate whether the results of adhesiolysis can be improved with new techniques for diagnosis and prevention of adhesion reformation., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Background: Previous research on the costs of treatment for ASBO is outdated and often based on reimbursements, rather than true healthcare provider costs of the admission and related interventions. An accurate estimate of the true costs of treatment is necessary to understand the healthcare burden and to model cost-efficacy of adhesion strategies. The aim of this study was to provide an accurate cost estimate of the in-hospital costs for treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) using micro-costing methods., Methods: Consecutive patients admitted for ASBO to the Radboud University Medical Center from November 2013 to November 2015 were included. An episode of ASBO was defined as an admission for SBO with operative confirmation of adhesions or after radiological exclusion of other causes for SBO. For the purpose of generalization we used the costs of medication and interventions as provided by the Dutch Healthcare Authority and only if these were not available local hospital costs. We evaluated costs separately for operative and non-operative treatment for ASBO., Results: During the study period 39 admissions for ASBO were eligible for analysis. An operative treatment was required in 19 patients (48.7 %). Mean hospital stay for ASBO with operative treatment was 16.0 ± 11 days versus 4.0 ± 2.0 days for non-operative treatment ( P  = 0.003). A total of 12 patients developed complications, 2 in the non-operative group (10 %) and 10 in the operative group (52.6 %; P  = 0.004). Overall costs for an admission for ASBO with operative treatment were €16 305 (SD €2 513), and for non-operative treatment € 2 277 (SD € 265) ( p  = <0.001). The highest expenditure with operative treatment for ASBO was made for ward stay (mean €7 856, SD €6 882), OR time (mean €2 6845, SD €1 434), ICU stay (mean €2 183, SD €4 305) and (parenteral) feeding costs (mean €1797, SD €2070). A table with correction coefficient to correct for differences in price levels for goods and services between different countries has been added., Conclusion: The in-hospital costs of an admission for ASBO are higher than previously thought. These costs can be used to guide hospital reimbursement policy and for the development of a cost-effective model for the use of adhesion barriers.

Background: The incidence of reoperation for adhesive bowel obstruction after general abdominal surgery is 2.5% and carries a considerable risk of mortality and morbidity. Adhesions account for 56% of all cases of bowel obstruction. Most epidemiologic knowledge regarding adhesive bowel obstruction is derived from data of national registries and retrospective cohorts of elective abdominal surgery. Because of the design of these studies, it remains unknown whether specific operative factors impact the occurrence of bowel obstruction. We aimed to comprehensively assess risk factors for the incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction with emphasis on intraoperative surgical factors., Methods: Follow-up study of the prospective LAPAD study (LAParotomy or LAParoscopy and Adhesions study; clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01236625) that included patients undergoing all types of elective open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was (suspected) adhesive bowel obstruction. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess risk factors., Results: A total of 604 (88%) of 715 patients were included; 38 (6%) patients experienced an episode of adhesive bowel obstruction. Surgery on the lower gastrointestinal tract (odds ratio 4.57, P < .01) and the severity of adhesions in the operative area (odds ratio 2.37, P = .04) independently increased the risk for adhesive small bowel obstruction., Conclusion: Patients undergoing surgery on the lower gastrointestinal tract and patients with more severe adhesions present at surgery have an increased risk for adhesive bowel obstruction., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Adhesiolysis is a frequent part of colorectal surgery, potentially impeding the operation and causing inadvertent bowel injury. Such difficulties might compromise convalescence and oncological quality of resection. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the impact of adhesiolysis on clinical outcomes and histopathological results in colorectal surgery., Methods: Colorectal procedures were selected from a prospective cohort study of adhesiolysis-related problems. We compared the incidence of bowel injury, morbidity, costs, and the histopathology between patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with or without adhesiolysis., Results: Two hundred and forty nine colorectal surgeries were analysed. Adhesiolysis was required in 59.0%. The mean adhesiolysis time was 28 min. In the adhesiolysis group, enterotomies occurred in 6.1% and seromuscular injuries in 27.2% compared to 0 and 6.9% respectively in the non-adhesiolysis group (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001). In patients requiring adhesiolysis, 29.9% had major surgery-related complications (MSRC) compared to 15.7% without adhesiolysis (p = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences regarding inpatient costs and resection margin or number of harvested lymph nodes., Conclusions: Adhesiolysis during colorectal surgery is related to an increased incidence of iatrogenic bowel injuries and MSRC. Despite the technical challenges associated with adhesiolysis, good histopathological results were obtained in oncological resections., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of recent epidemiologic data on the burden of adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. Second, we elaborate on economic considerations for the application of antiadhesion barriers., Background: Because the landmark SCAR studies elucidated the impact of adhesions on readmissions for long-term complications of abdominal surgery, adhesions are widely recognized as one of the most common causes for complications after abdominal surgery. Concurrently, interest in adhesion prevention revived and several new antiadhesion barriers were developed. Although these barriers have now been around for more than a decade, adhesion prevention is still seldom applied., Methods: The first part of this article is a narrative review evaluating the results of recent epidemiological studies on adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. In part II, these epidemiological data are translated into a cost model of adhesion-related complications and the potential cost-effectiveness of antiadhesion barriers is explored., Results: New epidemiologic data warrant a shift in our understanding of the socioeconomic burden of adhesion-related complications and the indications for adhesion prevention strategies. Increasing evidence from cohort studies and systematic reviews shows that difficulties during reoperations, rather than small bowel obstructions, account for the majority of adhesion-related morbidity. Laparoscopy and antiadhesion barriers have proven to reduce adhesion formation and related morbidity. The direct health care costs associated with treatment of adhesion-related complications within the first 5 years after surgery are $2350 following open surgery and $970 after laparoscopy. Costs are about 50% higher in fertile-age female patients. Application of an antiadhesion barriers could save between $328 and $680 after open surgery. After laparoscopy, the costs impact ranges from $82 in expenses to $63 of savings., Conclusions: Adhesions are an important cause for long-term complications in both open and laparoscopic surgery. Adhesiolysis during reoperations seems to impact adhesion-related morbidity most. Routine application of antiadhesion barriers in open surgery is safe and cost-effective. Application of antiadhesion barriers can be cost-effective in selected cases of laparoscopy. More research is needed to develop barriers suitable for laparoscopic use.

Background: Intra-abdominal infection may lead to adhesion and abscess formation. An adhesion barrier can reduce these complications but also aggravate intra-peritoneal infection, causing the opposite effects. The fear of infection propagation has limited clinical adhesion barrier use in a contaminated or infected abdomen. This study evaluated both adhesion and abscess reduction and infection propagation of a new ultrapure alginate-based anti-adhesive barrier gel in a rat peritonitis model., Methods: In 64 male Wistar rats, bacterial peritonitis was induced via intra-abdominal injection of a mixture of sterile feces, 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU) of Escherichia coli, and 10(4) CFU of Bacteroides fragilis. Surgical debridement and peritoneal lavage were performed 1 h after inoculation. Animals were randomly allocated in equal numbers to a control group or an alginate gel group. Animals were sacrificed on day five post-operatively. Death and the presence and size of intra-abdominal abscesses were noted, and adhesions were scored. All outcomes were compared in the two groups., Results: Seventeen rats (27%) died prematurely without any difference between the groups. Of the surviving rats in the alginate gel group, 88% developed abscesses vs. 100% of the control group. There was no significant difference in the abscess scores or incidence rates of adhesion formation between the groups. The adhesion scores were lower for the alginate gel group compared with control animals (p=0.04)., Conclusion: Ultrapure alginate gel reduces adhesion severity but not abscesses. The gel seemed to be safe, not aggravating intra-peritoneal infection in this abdominal infection model.

Background: Adhesiolysis during repeat surgery is associated with a high incidence of iatrogenic enterotomies and an increase in postoperative complications. Identification of risk factors would improve preoperative counseling and operating room strategy., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for prolonged and difficult adhesiolysis in a repeat median laparotomy., Design: This is a prospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the risk factors for prolonged and difficult adhesiolysis., Settings: This study was conducted at Radboud University Medical Center., Patients: Patients participating in the LAPAD study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01236625) undergoing an elective repeat median laparotomy were selected., Main Outcome Measures: Detailed data regarding adhesiolysis to gain entry to the abdomen and adhesions underneath the previous incision were gathered by direct observation., Results: A total of 259 patients underwent a repeat median laparotomy. Adhesiolysis was required for 230 patients (89%); the remaining 29 patients (11%) did not have adhesions underneath the incision. Median adhesiolysis time underneath the midline incision was 10 minutes (interquartile range, 5-25). Seventy-six patients (29%) had grade 1 or grade 2 adhesions; 108 (42%) had grade 3; and 46 (18%) had grade 4. The number of previous laparotomies was the only independent risk factor for prolonged (p ≤ 0.01; 95% CI, 2.5-14.10) and difficult adhesiolysis (p ≤ 0.01; OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.74-10.17). History of peritonitis, anatomical location of previous surgery, and the time interval between consecutive median laparotomies did not prolong adhesiolysis., Limitations: This study involved retrospective data collection of patients' medical histories. No data were collected on the severity of previous peritonitis., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that 4 or more previous laparotomies and the presence or history of an intraperitoneal synthetic mesh are independently associated with a longer duration of adhesiolysis needed to gain access to the abdomen. A short time interval between median laparotomies or a history of peritonitis did not prolong the duration of adhesiolysis.

The peritoneum is one of the commonest sites for pathological processes in pediatric surgery. Its response to pathological processes is characterized by an inflammatory reaction with specific pathways depending on the type of injury or peritoneal process involved. This review discusses the current understanding of peritoneal inflammation, adhesion formation, intra-abdominal sepsis, peritoneal metastasis, and ascites and briefly reviews new therapeutic strategies to treat or prevent these pathological entities. Recent studies have improved the understanding of peritoneal responses, resulting in possible new targets for prevention and therapy., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Ultrapure alginate gel is promising in terms of adhesion prevention. Because anti-adhesive barriers have been shown to disturb healing of bowel anastomoses, the effect of ultrapure alginate gel on the repair of colon anastomoses was studied., Materials and Methods: In 102 male Wistar rats, a 0.5-cm segment was resected from the descending colon and continuity was restored by an inverted single-layer end-to-end anastomosis. Animals were randomized into a control, an alginate gel, and a sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose film group, each n = 34. Half of each group was sacrificed at day 3 and 7 postoperatively. Anastomotic strength was assessed by measuring both bursting pressure and breaking strength. Hydroxyproline content was measured and histologic analysis was performed. The incidence of adhesion and abscess formation was scored at sacrifice., Results: No difference in either anastomotic-bursting pressure or breaking strength was found between experimental groups and the controls at any time point. Both the incidence of adhesion formation (35% versus 71%, P = 0.007) and the adhesion score (0.38 versus 0.79, P = 0.009) were significantly lower in the alginate gel group than in the controls. The abscess rate was higher (46% versus 18%, P = 0.030) in the hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose group than in the controls and unchanged in the alginate gel group., Conclusions: While reducing adhesion formation, ultrapure alginate gel does not interfere with the development of colonic anastomotic strength during the crucial early healing period., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Adhesiolysis at repeat surgery induces adhesion reformation which seems more virulent than development of de novo adhesions. We studied the effect of a new ultrapure alginate gel on adhesion reformation., Methods: In 46 male Wistar rats, adhesion formation was induced using the cecal abrasion and peritoneal sidewall excision procedure. Two weeks later, a second laparotomy was performed, adhesions were graded, and surgical adhesiolysis was performed. The animals were then allocated to one of two equal groups, a control group without further intervention and a group receiving 1-ml ultrapure alginate gel to the two opposing and damaged surfaces. Two weeks after the second surgery, rats were sacrificed. Primary endpoint was the incidence of adhesion reformation at areas of injury. Secondary endpoints were adhesion scores, extent of adhesions, and tissue histology., Results: Ultrapure alginate gel significantly (p = 0.046) reduced the incidence of adhesion reformation from 100 % in controls to 78 % in experimental rats. Both the adhesion score (p = 0.009) and the extent of adhesions (p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the alginate group. Tissue healing histology was similar in both groups., Conclusion: Ultrapure alginate gel reduces adhesion reformation following adhesiolysis.

Background: Inadvertent bowel injury during adhesiolysis is a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality following abdominal surgery. Identification of risk factors predicting this complication would guide preoperative counselling and surgical decision-making. The aim of this study was to identify predictive preoperative factors for inadvertent bowel injury occurring during adhesiolysis., Methods: All patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery between June 2008 and June 2010 were evaluated prospectively as part of the LAPAD study. Data on adhesiolysis and inadvertent organ injury were gathered by direct observation during operation. Univariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors that increased the risk of inadvertent bowel injury. Independent predictors of bowel injury were identified using multivariable logistic regression and used to create a clinical nomogram., Results: Of 715 patients eligible for analysis, 48 (6.7 per cent) had inadvertent bowel injuries. In 42 patients the defect was detected during operation and in nine at a later time (3 patients had both). Bowel resection was required for almost two-thirds of the enterotomies. The number of previous laparotomies, anatomical site of the operation, presence of bowel fistula and laparotomy via a pre-existing median scar were independent predictors of bowel injury. A clinical scoring system was constructed using a nomogram incorporating these risk factors; this had a predictive discrimination, measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of 0.85., Conclusion: A nomogram based on four independent factors predicted the risk of inadvertent bowel injury., Registration Number: NCT01236625 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)., (© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Formation of adhesions after peritoneal surgery results in high morbidity. Barriers to prevent adhesion are seldom applied, despite their ability to reduce the severity of adhesion formation. We evaluated the benefits and harms of four adhesion barriers that have been approved for clinical use., Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase for randomised clinical trials assessing use of oxidised regenerated cellulose, hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose, icodextrin, or polyethylene glycol in abdominal surgery. Two researchers independently identified reports and extracted data. We compared use of a barrier with no barrier for nine predefined outcomes, graded for clinical relevance. The primary outcome was reoperation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. We assessed systematic error, random error, and design error with the error matrix approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42012003321., Findings: Our search returned 1840 results, from which 28 trials (5191 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. The risks of systematic and random errors were low. No trials reported data for the effect of oxidised regenerated cellulose or polyethylene glycol on reoperations for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Oxidised regenerated cellulose reduced the incidence of adhesions (relative risk [RR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·31-0·86). Some evidence suggests that hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose reduces the incidence of reoperations for adhesive small bowel obstruction (RR 0·49, 95% CI 0·28-0·88). For icodextrin, reoperation for adhesive small bowel obstruction did not differ significantly between groups (RR 0·33, 95% CI 0·03-3·11). No barriers were associated with an increase in serious adverse events., Interpretation: Oxidised regenerated cellulose and hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose can safely reduce clinically relevant consequences of adhesions., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain., Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses., Data Sources: Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language., Study Selection: All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered., Data Extraction and Analysis: The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies., Results: We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%)., Conclusions: This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients' health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity., Registration: The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180).

Objective: To determine the incidence of bowel injury in operations requiring adhesiolysis and to assess the impact of adhesiolysis on the incidence of surgical complications, postoperative morbidity, and costs., Background: Morbidity of adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery seems an important health care problem, but the direct impact of adhesiolysis on inadvertent organ damage, morbidity, and costs is unknown., Methods: In a prospective cohort study, detailed data on adhesiolysis were gathered by direct observation during elective abdominal surgery. Comparison was made between surgical procedures with and without adhesiolysis on the incidence of inadvertent bowel defects. Secondary outcomes were the effect of adhesiolysis and bowel injury on surgical complications, other morbidity, and costs., Results: A total of 755 (out of 844) surgeries in 715 patients were included. Adhesiolysis was required in 475 (62.9%) of operations. Median adhesiolysis time was 20 minutes (range: 1-177). Fifty patients (10.5%) undergoing adhesiolysis inadvertently incurred bowel defect, compared with 0 (0%) without adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, adhesiolysis was associated with an increase of sepsis incidence [odds ratio (OR): 5.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-24.71], intra-abdominal complications (OR: 3.46; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05) and wound infection (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.01-5.94), longer hospital stay (2.06 ± 1.06 days), and higher hospital costs [$18,579 (15,204-21,954) vs $14,063 (12,471-15,655)]. Mortality after adhesiolysis complicated by a bowel defect was 4 out of 50 (8%), compared with 7 out of 425 (1.6%) after uncomplicated adhesiolysis (OR: 5.19; 95% CI: 1.47-18.41)., Conclusions: Adhesiolysis and inadvertent bowel injury have a large negative effect on the convalescence after abdominal surgery. The awareness of adhesion-related morbidity during reoperation and the prevention of postsurgical adhesion deserve priority in research and clinical practice.

Objective: Adhesions and related complications lead to substantially increased morbidity and mortality which increase medical costs. We investigated the awareness of adhesions among Dutch gynaecologists and gynaecology residents., Study Design: A survey, assessing knowledge and opinion about adhesions, was sent to a randomly selected group of 381 gynaecologists and 256 residents. In addition, the informed consent process and application of anti-adhesive agents were questioned., Results: The response rate was 56.9%. Complications due to adhesions were highly underestimated, leading to low knowledge scores (mean score 35.1%). Of all respondents 73.8% agreed that adhesions exert a clinically relevant and negative effect, but only 51.2% expressed a positive opinion on adhesion prevention. This correlated with a stronger belief in the clinically relevant and negative effects of adhesions and the opinion that adhesion prevention belongs to standard care (ρ=0.212, p<0.001; ρ=0.495, p<0.001). Of all respondents 31.4% expressed a positive attitude towards anti-adhesive agents and 19.8% expressed a negative one. A negative attitude correlated with a negative view in terms of cost-benefits (ρ=0.245, p<0.001). Although 43.5% had used anti-adhesive agents in the past year, 20.9% had used them before but stopped using agents in the past year. Only 5.2% routinely included adhesions or related morbidity in the informed consent., Conclusions: Awareness of adhesions is limited and informed consent is provided inadequately. Implementing adhesion prevention is related with awareness of adhesions. These findings underline the need to embed adhesions, related morbidity and prevention in educational programmes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative adhesion formation is a common consequence of abdominal surgery, and constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated an ultrapure alginate-based antiadhesive barrier gel., Methods: Experiments were performed in a rat model with caecal abrasion and peritoneal side wall excision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adhesions at 14 days after surgery. In experiment 1 (24 rats), animals treated with alginate gel were compared with controls that had no antiadhesive barrier. In experiment 2 (42 rats), alginate gel was compared with sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) membrane and with no antiadhesive barrier. To check for any remote action of the gel, in experiment 3 (45 rats) application of alginate gel to the ipsilateral versus contralateral side of injury was compared with no antiadhesive barrier., Results: In experiment 1, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions from eight of 12 in control animals to one in 12 (P = 0·009). Tissue healing assessed by histology was similar in both groups. In experiment 2, ultrapure alginate gel and HA/CMC membrane showed similar antiadhesive effectiveness, reducing the incidence of adhesions from ten of 14 rats in the control group to three of 14 (P = 0·021) and two of 14 (P = 0·006) respectively. In experiment 3, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions at the site of direct application (1 of 15) compared with controls (13 of 15; P = 0·001), but not if applied remotely (9 of 15; P = 0·214)., Conclusion: Ultrapure alginate gel decreased the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation in this rat model., (© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

INTRODUCTION Adhesion formation is the most common complication following peritoneal surgery and the leading cause of small bowel obstruction, acquired infertility and inadvertent organ injury at reoperation. Using a 'good surgical technique' is advocated as a first step in preventing adhesions. However, the evidence for different surgical techniques to reduce adhesion formation needs confirmation. METHODS Pubmed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of various aspects of surgical technique on adhesion-related outcomes. Clinical outcomes and incidence of adhesions were the primary endpoints. Identification of papers and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. RESULTS There were 28 papers with 27 studies included for a systematic review. Of these, 17 studies were eligible for meta-analysis and 11 for qualitative assessment only. None of the techniques that were compared significantly reduced the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction. In a small low-quality trial, the pregnancy rate increased after subserous fixation of suture knots. However, the incidence of adhesions was lower after laparoscopic compared with open surgery [relative risk (RR) 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.61] and when the peritoneum was not closed (RR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21-0.63). CONCLUSIONS None of the specific techniques that were compared reduced the two main adhesion-related clinical outcomes, small bowel obstruction and infertility. The meta-analysis provides little evidence for the surgical principle that using less invasive techniques, introducing less foreign bodies or causing less ischaemia reduces the extent and severity of adhesions.

Objectives: To establish the incidence and predictive factors of enterotomy made during adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair and to assess the impact of enterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis on postoperative morbidity such as sepsis, wound infection, abdominal complications and pneumonia, and socioeconomic costs., Background: Adhesions frequently complicate surgical repair of abdominal wall hernia. Enterotomies made during adhesiolysis specifically have a large impact on morbidity of patients, especially surgical site infections. Little is known on the incidence and burden of enterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair., Methods: Between June 2008 and June 2010 demographics, disease characteristics and perioperative data of all patients undergoing elective abdominal wall repair were included in a prospective cohort study that was focused on adhesiolysis-related problems. A trained researcher observed all surgeries and collected data on adhesion location, tenacity, adhesiolysis time, and inadvertent organ damage such as enterotomies. Primary outcome was the incidence of enterotomy, and predictive factors for enterotomy were assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, we evaluated the impact of adhesiolysis and enterotomy on morbidity., Results: A cohort of 133 abdominal wall repairs was analyzed. Adhesiolysis was required in 124 (93.2%), with a mean adhesiolysis time of 35.7 ± 29.8 minutes. Thirty-three enterotomies were made in 17 patients (12.8%). Two patients had a delayed diagnosed bowel perforation. Adhesiolysis time, hernia size greater than 10 cm, and fistula were significant predictive factors in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only adhesiolysis time was a significant and independent predictive factor for enterotomy (P = 0.004). Trends toward an increased risk were seen for patients with mesh in situ and hernia size greater than 10 cm. Patients with enterotomy had significantly more urgent reoperations (P = 0.029), and they more often required parenteral feeding (P = 0.037). Moreover, patients with extensive adhesiolysis (adhesiolysis time, >30 minutes) more often suffered from wound infection (9/63 vs 2/70; P = 0.025), abdominal complications (5/63 vs 0/70; P = 0.022), and sepsis (4/63 vs 0/70; P = 0.048)., Conclusions: One in 8 patients undergoing abdominal wall repair suffer inadvertent enterotomy following adhesiolysis. Adhesiolysis time predicts enterotomy. Morbidity in patients with extensive adhesiolysis and adhesiolysis complicated by enterotomy is high, inducing longer hospital stay and increased health care utilization.

Background: Postoperative adhesions are the most frequent complication of abdominal surgery, leading to high morbidity, mortality, and costs. However, the problem seems to be neglected by surgeons for largely unknown reasons., Methods: A survey assessing knowledge and personal opinion about the extent and impact of adhesions was sent to all Dutch surgeons and surgical trainees. The informed-consent process and application of antiadhesive agents were questioned in addition., Results: The response rate was 34.4%. Two thirds of all respondents (67.7%) agreed that adhesions exert a clinically relevant, negative effect. A negative perception of adhesions correlated with a positive attitude regarding adhesion prevention (ρ = 0.182, p < 0.001). However, underestimation of the extent and impact of adhesions resulted in low knowledge scores (mean test score 37.6%). Lower scores correlated with more uncertainty about indications for antiadhesive agents which, in turn, correlated with never having used any of these agents (ρ = 0.140, p = 0.002; ρ = 0.095, p = 0.035; respectively). Four in 10 respondents (40.9%) indicated that they never inform patients on adhesions and only 9.8% informed patients routinely. A majority of surgeons (55.9%) used antiadhesive agents in the past, but only a minority (13.4%) did in the previous year. Of trainees, 82.1% foresaw an increase in the use of antiadhesive agents compared to 64.5% of surgeons (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The magnitude of the problem of postoperative adhesions is underestimated and informed consent is provided inadequately by Dutch surgeons. Exerting adhesion prevention is related to the perception of and knowledge about adhesions.

Adhesions can be found after virtually every abdominopelvic operation performed through standard laparotomy as well as by laparoscopic approaches. Adhesions can be completely asymptomatic or can cause significant morbidity and mortality including strangulation, obstruction, and necrosis of bowel loops and/or infertility and organ injury during repeat abdominal surgery. Perhaps because of the multifactorial nature of adhesion development, prevention has been very limited. Three anti-adhesion products are commercially available, none of which has been universally accepted as a panacea. Part of the obstacles with adhesion management is the lack of an objective clinically relevant classification to allow their study. Because a single band can cause a life-threatening bowel obstruction, whereas extensive dense intra-abdominal adhesions may be asymptomatic, neither the mere presence or absence of adhesions nor their extent if present is totally adequate endpoints. Adhesions are a major health care burden, and their reduction is a significant unmet need in surgical therapeutics facing all surgeons. Of all the parameters assessing adhesions currently available, the authors believe that adhesion incidence (presence or absence) is the most relevant endpoint with a direct clinical implication. The authors endorse the development of a validated, clinically relevant scale to assess intra-abdominal adhesions. Given the present limitation of objective assessment of adhesions and prediction of their clinical effect, the authors also advocate, when appropriate, the use of one of the Food and Drug Administration-approved adhesion barriers. Further research is required to develop safe and effective anti-adhesion methods as well as better assessment tools for their efficacy.

Background: Abdominal adhesions and abscesses are a major source of morbidity and mortality after abdominal surgery and peritonitis. Adhesions are hard to detect with standard imaging techniques. Liposomes, coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), represent an agent developed for infection imaging. This study investigated the capacity of 99mTc-PEG-liposomes to localize early adhesion formation after peritonitis. Additionally, the value of 99mTc-PEG-liposomes for therapy evaluation of hyaluronan solution, which reduces adhesion and abscess formation in experimental peritonitis, was assessed., Methods: In 24 rats, a bacterial peritonitis was induced by performing a cecal ligation and puncture procedure. The animals were treated with sodium chloride solution or 0.4% hyaluronan solution intra-abdominally. One week later, scintigraphy was performed using 99mTc-PEG-liposomes, and abnormal focal uptake in the abdomen was scored. Thereafter, autopsy was performed and adhesions and abscesses were scored., Results: A significant correlation was found between the total adhesion score and the scintigraphic score (P < 0.01, r = 0.65). Treatment with hyaluronan significantly reduced the total adhesion score (P = 0.01). The size of abscesses significantly correlated with the scintigraphic score (P < 0.01, r = 0.65). Treatment with hyaluronan reduced the size of abscesses (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: 99mTc-PEG-liposomes are able to detect early adhesions and abscesses and may be used for therapy evaluation of agents that reduce adhesions and abscesses.

Consequences and complications of postsurgical intra-abdominal adhesion formation not including small bowel obstruction and secondary infertility are substantial but are under-exposed in the literature. Inadvertent enterotomy during reopening of the abdomen or subsequent adhesion dissection is a feared complication of surgery after previous laparotomy. The incidence can be as high as 20% in open surgery and between 1% and 100% in laparoscopy depending on the underlying disease. Delayed postoperative detection of enterotomy is a particular feature of laparoscopy associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adhesions to the ventral abdominal wall are responsible for the majority of trocar injuries. Both trocar injuries and inadvertent enterotomies result in conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in almost 100% of cases. There is a paucity of data on other organ injury, such as liver laceration or bladder perforation. Dissecting adhesions before executing the planned operation takes on average 20 min, being one-fifth of the total operating time in patients having had previous open colorectal surgery. There is some evidence that postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients who need adhesiolysis is higher than that of patients with a virgin abdomen. The necessity to dissect adhesions is associated with increased hospital stay. Postsurgical adhesions are considered a main reason for conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in many types of procedures including laparoscopic colonic resection. Adhesion formation is part of the innate peritoneal defence mechanism in peritonitis. Abscess formation and bleeding, organ injury and fistula formation at 'on demand' relaparotomies are well-known complications after surgery for intra-abdominal sepsis associated with fibrinous adhesions. The clinical magnitude hereof is poorly researched. Postsurgical adhesions may cause pain as evidenced by pain mapping clinical experiments. Filmy adhesions between movable organs and the peritoneum appear to be worse in terms of generating pain. The high caseload of gynaecological and some colorectal practices suggest an enormous impact of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain on patient's wellbeing and socio-economic costs. The significant risk of inadvertent enterotomy, conversion to laparotomy and trocar injury, and the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality and increased length of hospital stay warrant routine informed consent of adhesiolysis related complications in patients scheduled for abdominal or pelvic reoperation.

Mounting evidence highlights that adhesions are now the most frequent complication of abdominopelvic surgery, yet many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem and its serious consequences. While many patients go through life without apparent problems, adhesions are the major cause of small bowel obstruction and a leading cause of infertility and chronic pelvic pain in women. Moreover, adhesions complicate future abdominal surgery with important associated morbidity and expense and a considerable risk of mortality. Studies have shown that despite advances in surgical techniques in recent years, the burden of adhesion-related complications has not changed. Adhesiolysis remains the main treatment even though adhesions reform in most patients. Recent developments in adhesion-reduction strategies and new anti-adhesion agents do, however, offer a realistic possibility of reducing the risk of adhesions forming and potentially improving the clinical outcomes for patients and reducing the associated onward burden to healthcare systems. This paper provides a synopsis of the impact and extent of the problem of adhesions with reference to the wider literature and also consideration of the key note papers presented in this special supplement to Colorectal Disease. It considers the evidence of the risk of adhesions in colorectal surgery and the opportunities and strategies for improvement. The paper acts as a 'call for action' to colorectal surgeons to make prevention of adhesions more of a priority and importantly to inform patients of the risks associated with adhesion-related complications during the consent process.

Background: The use of intra-peritoneal polypropylene mesh (PPM) to repair incisional hernia carries the risk of adhesions and damage to the intra-abdominal viscera. Polyglactin 910 mesh (PGM) is advocated to avoid contact between PPM and the intra-abdominal viscera. An experimental study in rats was performed to determine if interposition of a resorbable prosthesis between the PPM and viscera alters biocompatibility, adhesion formation, and herniation., Materials and Methods: A 2- x 3-cm abdominal wall defect was created in 80 rats. Rats were randomly assigned for repair with 2.5- x 3.5-cm PPM (n = 40) or 2.5- x 3.5-cm PPM plus polyglactin 910 mesh (PPM-PGM) (n = 40). The rats were sacrificed at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months (n = 10), and an autopsy was performed to determine herniation and adhesion rates. Mesh-fascia interface was taken for histology., Results: In the PPM group, 1 rat died before the end of the experiment, and at 6 months one of the 10 rats had a herniation. In the PPM-PGM group, two rats died before the end of the experiment, and two rats had a herniation after 1 month and three rats after 6 months. At 1, 2, and 3 months the adhesion score in the PPM group (median, 3; range, 2-3) did not differ from the score in the PPM-PGM group (median, 3; range, 2-3). Also, at 6 months the adhesion score in the PPM group (median, 2; range, 2-3) did not differ from the score in the PPM-PGM group (median, 3; range, 2-3). At microscopy a capsule was formed around the PP fibers, which matured over months in the PPM group. In the first month after implantation an inflammatory response was seen. Histology was similar in both groups, although in the early PPM-PGM group the inflammatory response was more evident., Conclusion: Interposition of PGM between PPM and viscera does not alter adhesion formation nor influences herniation rate.

Background: Prevention of adhesion and abscess formation would decrease mortality and morbidity after peritonitis. In this study the effect of a new anti-adhesive, auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid polysaccharide (ACP) gel, on adhesion and abscess formation was studied in a rat peritonitis model., Materials and Methods: In experiment 1, bacterial peritonitis was induced in 24 Wistar rats, using a cecal ligation and puncture model. Animals were randomized to receive 4 mL ACP gel (4%) or 4 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After 2 weeks animals were killed and adhesions and abscesses were scored. In experiment 2, 72 rats underwent the same procedure but were randomized to receive 2 mL ACP gel, 4 mL ACP gel, or 4 mL PBS. After 1 and 3 weeks, respectively, half of the animals in each group were killed and adhesions and abscesses were scored., Results: The median total adhesion score was 12 (range, 3-20) in the ACP group and was 9 (range, 6-12) in the PBS group (not significant) in experiment 1. 91% of rats in the ACP group developed abscesses, versus 90% in the control group. There were no significant differences in abscess size or number of abscesses. In experiment 2, total adhesion scores in the 2 mL ACP group, 4 mL ACP group, and PBS group were 4 (range, 2-20), 6 (range, 1-11), and 6 (range, 1-18), respectively, (not significant) after 1 week and 3.5 (range, 1-8), 5 (range, 2-15), and 4 (range, 0-9), respectively, (not significant) after 3 weeks. All rats in the 2 mL ACP group and the PBS group and 83% of the 4 mL ACP group had developed abscesses after 1 week. After 3 weeks these percentages were 80, 75, and 73, respectively. There were no significant differences in size or number of abscesses between groups both after 1 and 3 weeks., Conclusion: ACP does not reduce adhesion and abscess formation in a rat peritonitis model.

Incisional hernia is a common surgical problem, frequently requiring prosthetic mesh repair. The demands of the ideal mesh seem conflicting; ingrowth at the mesh-fascia interface, without development of adhesions at the visceral mesh surface. Various antiadhesives combined with macroporous mesh and composite meshes were studied for prevention of adhesions to mesh and ingrowth into the fascia. In 60 rats an abdominal wall defect was created and repaired with underlay mesh. Rats were divided into six groups and treated with polypropylene mesh (PPM, control), PPM with auto-cross-linked polymers (ACP) gel, PPM with fibrinogen glue (FG), polypropylene/expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh, polypropylene/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) mesh, and polypropylene-collagen/polyethylene-glycol/glycerol (CPGG) mesh. Mesh infection was assessed in the postoperative period, adhesions and reherniations were scored at sacrifice 2 months after operation, and tensile strength of the mesh-tissue interface was measured. Six rats developed mesh infection, half of them were treated with PPM/ePTFE. The PPM/HA/CMC group showed a significant reduction in the amount and severity of adhesions. In animals treated with PPM/ACP and PPM/FG, severity of adhesions was reduced as well. Reherniation rate in the PPM/ACP group was 50% and significantly higher than that in other groups. Rats in the PPM/HA/CMC had the highest tensile strength. PPM/HA/CMC approaches the demands of the ideal mesh best, having superior antiadhesive properties, no reherniation and no infection in this rat model of incisional hernia.

Background: A relationship between post-surgical adhesion formation and peritoneal tumour implantation has been proposed. Hyaluronan (HA)-based agents reduce adhesion formation, but the effect on peritoneal tumour is not established. This study investigated the influence of a HA-containing agent on intraperitoneal tumour in an experimental model., Methods: 66 Balb/c mice underwent laparotomy and damage was inflicted to the parietal peritoneum. The animals were randomized into five groups. Groups 1 and 2 received HA-carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane and no treatment, respectively. Mice in groups 3-5 were injected intraperitoneally with 10(5) colon 26-B cells after the laparotomy. Treatment consisted of HA membrane, no HA agent and placement of HA membrane on the non-traumatized peritoneal wall, respectively. Animals were killed after 14 days; adhesions were scored in groups 1 and 2, and the tumour mass in groups 3-5. 45 Wag/Rij rats underwent the same procedures and treatment as mice in groups 3-5. In rats, 10(6) CC-531 cells were injected. Rats were killed after 3 weeks and the tumour mass was scored., Results: HA membrane resulted in a significant reduction of adhesions, but had no major effect on the intraperitoneal tumour mass in mice and rats., Conclusion: HA-carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane has no major effect on intraperitoneal tumour implantation and growth in an experimental model., (Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Introduction: Seprafilm adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) has been proven to prevent adhesion formation after abdominal and pelvic surgery. This article reports safety results, including the postoperative incidence of abdominal and pelvic abscess and pulmonary embolism, from a large, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Seprafilm for reduction of adhesion-related postoperative bowel obstruction after abdominopelvic surgery., Methods: A total of 1791 patients participated in this prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, single-blind, controlled study in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery, the majority of whom had inflammatory bowel disease. Just before closure of the abdomen, patients were randomized to a Seprafilm or no-treatment control group. Patients received an average of 4.4 and as many as 10 Seprafilm adhesion barriers applied to organs and tissue surfaces that sustained direct surgical trauma and to suspected adhesiogenic surfaces. Complications that occurred within the first month after surgery were evaluated., Results: During the safety evaluation period, the difference between the Seprafilm and control groups for the incidence of abscess (4 vs. 3 percent, respectively) or pulmonary embolism (<1 percent in both groups) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Foreign body reaction was not reported in either group. Fistula (2 vs. <1 percent) and peritonitis (2 vs. <1 percent) occurred more frequently (P

Background: Intra-abdominal adhesions and abscesses cause significant morbidity and mortality. The formation of fibrin in the abdominal cavity is a common pathophysiological pathway for both. The aim of this review was to investigate the pathophysiology of intra-abdominal adhesions and abscesses, and to explore the possible sites of action of hyaluronan., Methods: Data were reviewed from the literature using the Medline database., Results: Both surgery and peritonitis disturb the equilibrium between coagulation and fibrinolysis in the abdominal cavity in favour of the coagulation system. Hyaluronan-based agents reduce adhesion formation after surgery. Moreover, hyaluronan solution reduces abscess formation in experimental peritonitis. Possible mechanisms of action include mechanical separation of wound surfaces, improvement of peritoneal healing, modulation of the inflammatory response and enhanced fibrinolysis., Conclusion: Diminished fibrin degradation is a common pathway for the formation of adhesions and abscesses. The potential of hyaluronan-based agents to reduce intra-abdominal adhesions and abscesses in abdominal surgery and sepsis is a promising new concept. Elucidating the mechanisms involved and the clinical application of hyaluronan in peritonitis are challenges for future research., (Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Intra-abdominal infection is complicated by adhesion and abscess formation. We have assessed the adhesion- and abscess-reducing capacity of various solution volumes and concentrations of two polyanionic polysaccharides, hyaluronan (HA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), in a rat peritonitis model., Study Design: In 192 male Wistar rats a bacterial peritonitis was induced using cecal ligation and puncture. After 24 h the abdomen was reopened and the ligated cecum resected. Animals were randomized into three control groups, nine groups treated with various solution volumes (1 to 8 ml) containing different HA concentrations, and four groups treated with 1.7% CMC solution. Rats were killed at day 7, postoperatively, and adhesions were scored at five abdominal sites on a scale from 0 to 4. The presence and size of intra-abdominal abscesses were noted., Results: Fifty-four rats (28%) prematurely died. There was no significant difference in mortality between treatment groups and controls. Treatment with CMC (P < 0.001) and low (0.2 and 0.4%) concentrations of HA (P < 0.005) significantly reduced intra-abdominal adhesion formation. High volumes of 0.2 and 0.4% HA were most effective (P = 0.01). The effect of CMC was volume independent. The incidence of abdominal abscesses was also significantly reduced by treatment with either CMC (P < 0.001) or low concentrations of HA (P < 0.001). With regard to abscess formation the effect was independent of the volume administered for HA, while low volumes of CMC were most effective (P < 0.005)., Conclusion: Intraperitoneal treatment with either CMC or low-viscosity HA solution reduced intra-abdominal adhesion and abscess formation in a rat peritonitis model. The volume-induced reduction in adhesion formation suggests a hydroflotation effect of HA solution.

Background: Inadvertent enterotomy is a feared complication of adhesiotomy during abdominal reoperation. The nature and extent of this adhesion-associated problem are unknown., Methods: The records of all patients who underwent reoperation between July 1995 and September 1997 were reviewed retrospectively for inadvertent enterotomy, risk factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate parameters, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were assessed., Results: Inadvertent enterotomy occurred in 52 (19 per cent) of 270 reoperations. Dividing adhesions in the lower abdomen and pelvis, in particular, caused bowel injury. In univariate analysis body mass index was significantly higher in patients with inadvertent enterotomy (mean(s.d.) 25.5(4.6) kg/m2 ) than in those without enterotomy (21.9(4.3) kg/m2 ) (P < 0.03). Patient age and three or more previous laparotomies appeared to be independent parameters predicting inadvertent enterotomy (odds ratio (95 per cent confidence interval) 1.9 (1.3-2.7) and 10.4 (5.0-21.6) respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with inadvertent enterotomy had significantly more postoperative complications (P < 0.01) and urgent relaparotomies (P < 0.001), a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (P < 0.001) and parenteral nutrition usage (P < 0.001), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The incidence of inadvertent enterotomy during reoperation is high. This adhesion-related complication has an impact on postoperative morbidity

Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the cumulative incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) after total or subtotal colectomy and to investigate the site of the obstructive adhesions in the abdominal cavity., Methods: The records of 234 patients who underwent colectomy from 1985 to 1994 were reviewed for SBO, potential risk factors for SBO, and the site of adhesions causing obstruction. Mean follow-up, which was complete in 215 patients, was 63 months., Results: SBO occurred in 56 patients (24 per cent) of whom 42 (18 per cent) had adhesive obstruction. The risk of SBO due to adhesions within 1 year was 11 per cent, increasing to 30 per cent 10 years after colectomy. With univariate analysis no risk factor for adhesive SBO, including previous laparotomies, septic complications and omental resection, was identified. The most common site of obstructing adhesions was the pelvis (ten of 28 patients)., Conclusion: The incidence of SBO after colectomy is high. Colectomy may be a suitable model for studies of adhesion prevention.

Background: A relationship between post-surgical adhesion formation and peritoneal tumour implantation has been proposed. Hyaluronan (HA)-based agents reduce adhesion formation, but the effect on peritoneal tumour is not established. This study investigated the influence of a HA-containing agent on intraperitoneal tumour in an experimental model. Methods: 66 Balb/c mice underwent laparotomy and damage was inflicted to the parietal peritoneum. The animals were randomized into five groups. Groups 1 and 2 received HA-carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane and no treatment, respectively. Mice in groups 3–5 were injected intraperitoneally with 10[sup 5] colon 26-B cells after the laparotomy. Treatment consisted of HA membrane, no HA agent and placement of HA membrane on the non-traumatized peritoneal wall, respectively. Animals were killed after 14 days; adhesions were scored in groups 1 and 2, and the tumour mass in groups 3–5. 45 Wag/Rij rats underwent the same procedures and treatment as mice in groups 3–5. In rats, 10[sup 6] CC-531 cells were injected. Rats were killed after 3 weeks and the tumour mass was scored. Results: HA membrane resulted in a significant reduction of adhesions, but had no major effect on the intraperitoneal tumour mass in mice and rats. Conclusion: HA-carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane has no major effect on intraperitoneal tumour implantation and growth in an experimental model. Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]