1. Acceptability of 4-poster deer treatment devices for community-wide tick control among residents of high Lyme disease incidence counties in Connecticut and New York, USA.
- Author
-
Nawrocki CC, Piedmonte N, Niesobecki SA, Rowe A, Hansen AP, Kaufman A, Foster E, Meek JI, Niccolai L, White J, Backenson B, Eisen L, Hook SA, Connally NP, Hornbostel VL, and Hinckley AF
- Subjects
- Animals, Male, Humans, Female, Connecticut epidemiology, New York epidemiology, Tick Control, Incidence, Deer, Tick Infestations epidemiology, Tick Infestations prevention & control, Tick Infestations veterinary, Lyme Disease epidemiology, Lyme Disease prevention & control, Ixodes physiology
- Abstract
The 4-Poster Tick Control Deer Feeder (4-poster) device applies acaricide to white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and can reduce populations of the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), which transmits the agents of Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and Powassan virus disease in the Northeastern United States. While 4-poster devices have the potential to provide community-wide management of blacklegged ticks in Lyme disease endemic areas, no recent study has assessed their acceptability among residents. We conducted a survey of residents from 16 counties with high annual average Lyme disease incidence (≥ 10 cases per 100,000 persons between 2013 and 2017) in Connecticut and New York to understand perceptions and experiences related to tickborne diseases, support or concerns for placement of 4-poster devices in their community, and opinions on which entities should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Overall, 37% of 1652 respondents (5.5% response rate) would support placement of a 4-poster device on their own property, 71% would support placement on other private land in their community, and 90% would support placement on public land. Respondents who were male, rented their property, resided on larger properties, or were very or extremely concerned about encountering ticks on their property were each more likely to support placement of 4-poster devices on their own property. The primary reason for not supporting placement of a 4-poster device on one's own property was the need for weekly service visits from pest control professionals, whereas the top reason for not supporting placement on other land (private or public) was safety concerns. Most respondents (61%) felt property owners should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Communities considering 4-poster devices as part of a tick management strategy should consider targeting owners of larger properties and placing devices on public lands., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF