Search

Introduction: Since its first publication in 1997, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has developed into the predominant minimally invasive surgery of the thyroid. A major advantage over conventional thyroid surgery is the superior cosmetic result. However, there are still few data comparing the long-term cosmetic results of the two methods. This paper compares the long-term cosmetic results of the two methods, based on follow-up assessments., Methods: Between 2004 and 2011, 143 preselected patients underwent a MIVAT in our department. Additionally, 134 patients underwent a conventional thyroidectomy in our hospital in 2011. A total of 117 patients from the MIVAT group and 102 patients from the conventional thyroidectomy group received follow-up assessments after 23.1 and 23.6 months, respectively, using the patient and observer scar assessment scale., Results: The measurable cervical scar length averaged 1.9 cm in the MIVAT group and 3.9 cm in the conventional group (P < 0.001). Some 11.1% of the patients in the MIVAT group and 7.1% of the patients in the conventional group had developed keloid (P = 0.391). The patient scar assessment score was 10.4 for the MIVAT group compared with 9.9 for the conventional thyroidectomy group (P = 0.691) and the observer scare assessment score was 8.6 for MIVAT compared with 9.9 for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.011)., Conclusion: In the patient assessment instrument, conventional thyroidectomy had a small advantage over MIVAT in the cosmetic long-term results. This difference between the two groups was, however, not significant. Our result contradicts short-term cosmetic results of published randomized studies with improvement for MIVAT. The Observer Score demonstrates a significant advantage of the MIVAT.

Introduction: Approximately 90,000 thyroid operations are performed in Germany each year. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) accounts for 5 - 10% of these operations. There are few data that compare long-term cosmetic results after MIVAT to those after conventional surgery. Current systematic reviews show no advantage for MIVAT. The goal of this study was to analyse the long-term postoperative results in both procedures and the evaluation of relevant factors., Patients and Methods: The analysis of the long-term results is based on follow-up examinations using a validated method for scar appraisal (POSAS). Cohort analysis was performed on MIVAT operations in our hospital between 2004 and 2011 and conventional thyroid operations in 2011., Results: Follow-up examination data were analysed from 117 patients from the MIVAT group and 102 patients from the conventional group. The follow-up examination was performed with a mean of 23.1 vs. 23.6 months postoperatively (MIVAT vs. conventional). The Friedman Test showed that scar pigmentation (mean rank 4.79) and scar surface structure (mean rank 3.62) were the deciding factors influencing the long-term cosmetic results., Conclusion: Both MIVAT and conventional surgery gave very good long-term cosmetic results. From the patient's perspective, there is no significant advantage with conventional surgery. The evaluation of the long-term results largely depends on factors such as scar pigmentation and surface structure that can only be influenced to a limited extent by the surgical procedure., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has been performed in the authors' department since 2004. Many authors have described some of its advantages over conventional surgery in terms of cosmetic results. The published literature on this topic variously describes the average central incision as 1 to 3 cm. The end point of the cosmetic results (e.g. the question of keloids) cannot be documented during the inpatient stay. This report describes the long-term cosmetic results for this method and analyzes the subjective and objective outcomes after MIVAT., Methods: From January 2004 until March 2010, 116 patients underwent MIVAT in the authors' department. The authors included 96 patients in their subsequent examination, with a follow-up period of 22.4 months (range, 1-64 months)., Results: The measurable cervical scar length was 1.9 cm (range, 1-3 cm). The measurable wideness of the cervical scar was 0.17 cm (range, 0.05-1.5 cm). Keloids in 10 female patients (10.4%) had diverse proliferation. Of the 116 patients, 93 (96.8%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the cosmetic result. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale score was 9.7, and of the Observer Scar Assessment Scale score was 8.1., Conclusion: In terms of long-term results, MIVAT appears to provide excellent cosmetic outcomes. The problem with the development of keloids in the region of the cervical incision, especially in female patients, remains unresolved. The satisfaction of patients with the long-term outcome of MIVAT is high.

We report on 431 operations in conventional visceral surgery with the general use of the ultracision technique for preparation (thyroid resections n = 356, colonic resections n = 28, local excisions of the gastric wall n = 3, gastrectomy n = 14, anterior resections of the rectum n = 19, abdominoperineal resection of the rectum [Miles' operation] n = 11). Ligatures were only used for truncal blood vessel ligation. A thorough study of the technical possibilities is a prerequisite for the use of the ultracision technique. The general use of the ultracision technique leads to a revolutionary change of the surgical technique and saves a considerable amount of suture material. In combination with the use of bipolar electrocoagulation the ultracision technique makes the operation fast and leads to a major reduction of bleeding. The biggest disadvantage of the ultracision technique in comparison to the conventional surgical technique is the high cost of the device at present. Despite of savings of suture material, swabs and blood transfusions, the costs for the ultracision scissors are still higher due to its single use.