Search

Context: Thermal ablative techniques of the thyroid have recently gained clinical traction as a therapeutic alternative that provides symptomatic relief and confers potential advantages over surgery. A truly multidisciplinary technique, thyroid ablation is currently performed by endocrinologists, interventional radiologists, otolaryngologists, and endocrine surgeons. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), specifically, has seen widespread adoption, particularly in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. This review summarizes current evidence on the application of RFA in benign thyroid nodules, and provides a start to finish overview of procedural preparation, performance, and outcomes., Evidence Acquisition: A narrative review of literature focusing on RFA in the treatment of benign nodular disease was performed. Emphasis was placed on consensus statements, best practice guidelines, multi-institutional studies, and systematic reviews to summarize key concepts in candidacy, techniques, expectations, and outcomes., Findings: RFA is increasingly recognized as a first-line treatment strategy in the management of symptomatic nonfunctional benign thyroid nodules. It can also be considered in functional thyroid nodules with small volumes or in patients ineligible for surgery. A targeted and efficacious technique, RFA results in gradual volume reduction that preserves the function of the surrounding thyroid parenchyma. Proper procedural technique, proficiency in ultrasound, and experience in ultrasound-guided procedures are instrumental to maintaining low complication rates and achieving successful ablation outcomes., Conclusions: In pursuit of a personalized approach, physicians across disciplines are increasingly incorporating RFA into their treatment algorithms, most commonly for benign nodules. As with any intervention, thoughtful selection and implementation ensure a safe procedure with optimal patient benefit., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The primary goal of this interdisciplinary consensus statement is to provide a framework for the safe adoption and implementation of ablation technologies for benign thyroid nodules. Summary: This consensus statement is organized around three key themes: (1) safety of ablation techniques and their implementation, (2) optimal skillset criteria for proceduralists performing ablative procedures, and (3) defining expectations of success for this treatment option given its unique risks and benefits. Ablation safety considerations in pre-procedural, peri-procedural, and post-procedural settings are discussed, including clinical factors related to patient selection and counseling, anesthetic and technical considerations to optimize patient safety, peri-procedural risk mitigation strategies, post-procedural complication management, and safe follow-up practices. Prior training, knowledge, and steps that should be considered by any physician who desires to incorporate thyroid nodule ablation into their practice are defined and discussed. Examples of successful clinical practice implementation models of this emerging technology are provided. Conclusions: Thyroid ablative procedures provide valid alternative treatment strategies to conventional surgical management for a subset of patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Careful patient and nodule selection are critical to the success of these procedures as is extensive pre-procedural patient counseling. Although these emerging technologies hold great promise, they are not without risk and require the development of a unique skillset and environment for optimal, safe performance and consistent outcomes.

Purpose of Review: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid nodules confers tangible advantages over surgery, which include promising outcomes in the context of a minimally invasive procedure and the functional benefits of organ preservation. However, the ubiquity of benign nodules worldwide may spur the risk of misuse in cases where there is negligible gain over conventional surveillance. This review summarizes new developments in RFA and examines its judicious utilization in benign nodules., Recent Findings: RFA appears to be safe and effective for addressing compressive or cosmetic issues caused by benign functional and nonfunctional thyroid nodules. Volume regression occurs over 12 months, with some cases requiring multiple staged RFA procedures to achieve adequate shrinkage or to address regrowth. Complication rates including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury are reportedly low and are mitigated by strategic technical maneuvers, training, and experience. Consensus guidelines across international societies have emerged to better define appropriate patient candidates. Although association of overuse in analogous disciplines has been well established, no evidence of misuse in thyroid RFA has been described thus far., Summary: Compelling multi-institutional data support RFA as first-line treatment for select benign thyroid nodules. Defining the nuances of patient selection and long-term surveillance are necessary to substantiate current observed results. Given the high incidence of thyroid nodules worldwide, it is important to emphasize that the majority of benign nodules will not require any intervention. Thorough consideration and careful implementation of recommended guidelines will hopefully lead to measurable benefit and avoid financial misuse., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Thyroidectomy remains the gold standard treatment for benign, symptomatic, or enlarging thyroid nodules, malignant nodules, and metastatic lymph node disease. However, in the past 2 decades, image-guided interventional techniques have emerged as promising alternative treatments for these conditions. Percutaneous ethanol ablation is now an accepted first-line treatment for recurring cystic thyroid nodules. Thermal ablation techniques such as high-intensity focused ultrasound, laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation have shown efficacy in producing a nodular volume reduction of greater than 50% that is maintained for several years with resolution of local compressive symptoms. There is also increasing evidence that these techniques can effectively treat papillary thyroid microcarcinomas and recurrent metastatic lymph node disease. Because these interventional ablation techniques are performed safely in an outpatient setting, are well tolerated, and the risk for needing thyroid hormone supplementation is negligible, they are becoming a popular alternative treatment to surgical resection. In this comprehensive review, we discuss each of these percutaneous interventions: the devices and techniques, the advantages and disadvantages of each energy, and summarize the outcomes published in the literature., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The recurrent laryngeal nerves(RLN) run immediately posterior to the thyroid capsule and could be injured during thyroid radiofrequency ablation(RFA). This study assesses whether RLN functional integrity is altered during RFA using continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring(CIONM)., Methods: Prospective case series of twenty nodules treated with RFA under general anesthesia utilizing the laryngeal adductor reflex(LAR) for CIONM., Results: Thirteen nodules abutted the posterior thyroid capsule and 'danger triangle' for RLN injury. The ablative field did not breach the posterior capsule; 40 W was the maximal power used adjacent to the capsule. No patient experienced significant LAR amplitude alterations. Pre and postoperative laryngoscopy and voice assessments were comparable. At 12 months' median follow-up, no patient displayed posterior nodule regrowth., Conclusions: This prospective case series supports the premise that benign nodule RFA is safe with regards to RLN functional integrity provided the posterior capsule is not breached by the ablation zone and posterior power is ≤ 40 W., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)