Search

Aims: To ascertain whether BRAF V600 mutational analysis is useful for diagnosis of thyroid cancer in thyroid fine needle aspirate (FNA)., Methods: Over 8 months thyroid FNAs reported as Thy 3F (neoplasm possible/suggestive of follicular neoplasm), Thy4 (suspicious of malignancy) and Thy 5 (malignant) were tested for BRAF V600 mutation and managed as malignant if mutations were present., Results: Of 207 FNAs from 176 patients, 5 were Thy 5, 19 Thy 4, 36 Thy 3f, 13 Thy 3a, 84 Thy 2 and 50 Thy 1. 11 Thy 3f, 15 Thy 4 and 3 Thy 5 FNAs were tested for BRAF V600 mutation. 0 Thy 3F cases, 6 Thy 4 and 1 Thy 5 (24% of the total tested) showed evidence of mutation. Four patients with BRAF V600 mutation underwent surgery to remove all thyroid tissue, two patients received a lobectomy and one patient is awaiting thyroidectomy. All patients with BRAF V600 mutation were found to have malignancy on final histology, with a diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy excluding coincidental microcarcinoma of 43% and specificity of 100%., Conclusions: BRAF V600 mutational analysis can enable single-stage total thyroidectomy for carcinoma if gene mutation is present in preoperative FNA. BRAF V600 co-testing may reduce the need for completion thyroidectomy with implied cost savings and lower patient morbidity associated with completion thyroidectomy when the cytology is inconclusive but where BRAF V600 mutation is identified in preoperative thyroid FNA., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that galectin-3 immunohistochemistry may be useful in the fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma as it has been reported to selectively stain carcinomas and not adenomas or goitres., Methods: Fifty-one patients were included in a prospective study of galectin-3 in thyroid FNA; 88.2% were female and 11.8% male, mean age 53 years, range 25-87 years. Cell blocks were prepared and stained for galectin-3 if any cells were present in needle washings from the respective FNAs., Results: Twelve of 51 (23.5%) of cell blocks contained epithelial cells. One benign and one inadequate FNA were negative for galectin-3 staining. One of five non-diagnostic FNA cases, a papillary carcinoma on final histology showed positive staining. Four follicular neoplasm/suspicious of carcinoma cases showed negative staining. One malignant FNA case, a papillary carcinoma showed positive staining with galectin-3 but three further carcinomas, two papillary and one follicular were galectin-3 negative., Conclusion: Galectin-3 immunohistochemistry does not appear to be a useful adjunct to diagnosis in thyroid FNA as it does not reliably distinguish malignant and benign lesions. Many thyroid aspirates are of low cellularity and are not suitable for cell block immunohistochemistry.

This article reviews recent developments in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). While thyroid nodules are common, carcinoma is comparatively rare. Although histological assessment is used in most studies as the benchmark, the differential diagnosis on cytology or histology is not always reproducible. The literature shows wide variations in criteria for inadequate thyroid FNAC and study inclusion or exclusion criteria. In-clinic assessment of specimen adequacy and in-clinic reporting of thyroid FNAC has become popular although the costs and resource implications of in-clinic thyroid FNAC assessment and reporting are substantial. Many centres continue to use conventional techniques although liquid-based cytology and ultrasound-guided FNAC are gaining in popularity. Standardized categorical systems for FNAC reporting can make results easier to understand for clinicians and give clear indications for therapeutic action. Multidisciplinary case review is also essential, especially when there is diagnostic uncertainty. While currently of limited use, molecular pathology testing holds out some promise for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]