Search

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent vascular thrombosis and miscarriages in the absence of known causes. Antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins (aPL) are pathogenic players in both clotting and pregnancy APS manifestations. There is sound evidence that antibodies specific for beta2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) trigger thrombotic and pregnancy complications by interacting with the molecule on the membranes of different cell types of the coagulation cascade, and in placenta tissues. In addition to the humoral response against β2GPI, both peripheral and tissue CD4 + β2GPI-specific T cells have been reported in primary APS as well as in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated APS. While adaptive immunity plays a clear role in APS, it is still debated whether innate immunity is involved as well. Acute systemic inflammation does not seem to be present in the syndrome, however, there is sound evidence that complement activation is crucial in animal models and can be found also in patients. Furthermore, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been documented in arterial and venous thrombi with different etiology, including clots in APS models. Keeping in mind that β2GPI is a pleiotropic glycoprotein, acting as scavenger molecule for infectious agents and apoptotic/damaged body constituents and that self-molecules externalized through NETs formation may become immunogenic autoantigens, we demonstrated β2GPI on NETs, and its ability to stimulate CD4 + β2GPI-specific T cells. The aim of this review is to elucidate the role of β2GPI in the cross-talk between the innate and adaptive immunity in APS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Grossi, Capitani, Benagiano, Baldari, Della Bella, Macor, Tedesco, Borghi, Maugeri, D’Elios and Meroni.)

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) cause vascular thrombosis (VT) and/or pregnancy morbidity (PM). Differential mechanisms however, underlying the pathogenesis of these different manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are not fully understood. Therefore, we compared the effects of aPL from patients with thrombotic or obstetric APS on monocytes to identify different molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of APS subtypes. VT or PM IgG induced similar numbers of differentially expressed (DE) genes in monocytes. However, gene ontology (GO) analysis of DE genes revealed disease-specific genome signatures. Compared to PM, VT-IgG showed specific up regulation of genes associated with cell response to stress, regulation of MAPK signalling pathway and cell communication. In contrast, PM-IgG regulated genes involved in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix and embryonic and skeletal development. A novel gene expression analysis based on differential variability (DV) was also applied. This analysis identified similar GO categories compared to DE analysis but also uncovered novel pathways modulated solely by PM or VT-IgG. Gene expression analysis distinguished a differential effect of VT or PM-IgG upon monocytes supporting the hypothesis that they trigger distinctive physiological mechanisms. This finding contributes to our understanding of the pathology of APS and may lead to the development of different targeted therapies for VT or PM APS., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Recurrent thrombosis and miscarriages are the main clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Although most patients display both clinical signs, some patients can have isolated vascular or obstetric variants. Emerging data raise the question of whether obstetric and vascular APS are the same or different diseases. An important difference between the two conditions is that a thrombophilic state is a common feature in vascular APS, whereas clot occlusions of the decidual spiral arteries are seldom observed in obstetric APS, and infarctions are found in only one-third of APS placentae. Conversely, inflammation, which is undetectable in vascular APS, is frequently observed in the placentae of patients with obstetric APS and has been documented in the placentae of pregnant mice with fetal loss mediated by antiphospholipid antibodies. Attempts to identify different antibodies or epitopes responsible for the two clinical manifestations of APS have so far been unsuccessful. Possible mechanisms exist that might explain the development of the two clinical presentations, including the tissue distribution and expression level of the main target antigen of antiphospholipid antibodies, β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI). The identification of the factors that promote the onset of either obstetric or vascular APS has important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Objective: It has been suggested that only antibodies against domain 1 (D1) of β2 -glycoprotein I (β2 GPI) are pathogenic and diagnostic. The role of antibodies against other β2 GPI domains is still debated. This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical relevance of domain specificity profiling of anti-β2 GPI IgG antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and in control groups of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases and in asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers., Methods: We evaluated 159 subjects with persistently positive, medium or high-titer anti-β2 GPI IgG, including 56 patients with thrombotic (obstetric or nonobstetric) primary APS, 31 women with obstetric primary APS, 42 aPL-positive patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and 30 asymptomatic aPL carriers. One hundred healthy donors were included. Anti-β2 GPI D1 and D4/5 IgG were tested on research enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays containing recombinant β2 GPI domains., Results: As compared to other groups, aPL carriers displayed higher frequency/titer of anti-D4/5 IgG. Unlike anti-D4/5, anti-D1 IgG antibodies were more frequent and at higher titer in triple than in single or double aPL-positive subjects. An anti-D1 to anti-D4/5 ratio of ≥1.5 was predictive of systemic autoimmunity (odds ratio 3.25 [95% confidence interval 1.45-7.49], P = 0.005). Neither anti-D1 nor anti-D4/5 antibodies were associated with APS clinical criteria., Conclusion: Anti-D1 IgG is the preferential specificity not only in vascular and obstetric primary APS, but also in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease with no clinical features of APS. Conversely, aPL carriers do not have a polarized profile toward D1. Combined testing for anti-β2 GPI IgG with different domain specificity allows a more accurate aPL profiling, with polarization toward anti-D1 IgG as a possible fingerprint of systemic autoimmunity., (© 2015, American College of Rheumatology.)

The thrombogenic effect of β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI)-dependent anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) in animal models was found to be LPS dependent. Since β2GPI behaves as LPS scavenger, LPS/β2GPI complex was suggested to account for in vitro cell activation through LPS/TLR4 involvement being LPS the actual bridge ligand between β2GPI and TLR4 at least in monocytes/macrophages. However, no definite information is available on the interaction among β2GPI, LPS and endothelial TLR4 in spite of the main role of endothelial cells (EC) in clotting. To analyse at the endothelial level the need of LPS, we investigated the in vitro interaction of β2GPI with endothelial TLR4 and we assessed the role of LPS in such an interaction. To do this, we evaluated the direct binding and internalization of β2GPI by confocal microscopy in living TLR4-MD2 transfected CHO cells (CHO/TLR4-MD2) and β2GPI binding to CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells and human umbilical cord vein EC (HUVEC) by flow cytometry and cell-ELISA using anti-β2GPI monoclonal antibodies in the absence or presence of various concentrations of exogenous LPS. To further investigate the role of TLR4, we performed anti-β2GPI antibody binding and adhesion molecule up-regulation in TLR4-silenced HUVEC. Confocal microscopy studies show that β2GPI does interact with TLR4 at the cell membrane and is internalized in cytoplasmic granules in CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells. β2GPI binding to CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells and HUVEC is also confirmed by flow cytometry and cell-ELISA, respectively. The interaction between β2GPI and TLR4 is confirmed by the reduction of anti-β2GPI antibody binding and by the up-regulation of E-selectin or ICAM-1 by TLR4 silencing in HUVEC. β2GPI binding is not affected by LPS at concentrations comparable to those found in both β2GPI and antibody preparations. Only higher amount of LPS that can activate EC and up-regulate TLR4 expression are found to increase the binding. Our findings demonstrate that β2GPI interacts directly with TLR4 expressed on EC, and that such interaction may contribute to β2GPI-dependent aPL-mediated EC activation. At variance of monocytic cells, we also showed a threshold effect for the action of LPS, that is able to enhance anti-β2GPI antibody EC binding only at cell activating concentrations, shown to increase TLR4 expression. This in vitro model may explain why LPS behaves as a second hit increasing the expression of β2GPI in vascular tissues and triggering aPL-mediated thrombosis in experimental animals., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Beta2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI)-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are the main pathogenic autoantibody population and at the same time the laboratory diagnostic tool for the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These antibodies are responsible for both the vascular and the obstetric manifestations of the syndrome but the pathogenic mechanisms behind these manifestations are not the same. For example, thrombotic events do not appear to play a major role in APS miscarriages and a direct reactivity of β2GPI-dependent aPLs on decidual and trophoblast cells was reported. A local expression of β2GPI on these tissues was reported both in physiological conditions and in APS women, thus explaining the local tropism of the autoantibodies. The two hit hypothesis was suggested to explain why the vascular manifestations of APS may occur only occasionally in spite of the persistent presence of aPLs. This is not apparently the case for the obstetric variant of the syndrome, making the difference even more striking. A different pathogenesis may also provide the rationale for the well-known fact that the vascular and the obstetric manifestations may occur independently although in a minority of cases.

The anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by an adaptive immune response against self phospholipid (PL)--binding proteins. Although APS is considered as an autoantibody-mediated disease, there is now evidence that anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) are necessary but not sufficient to trigger some of the clinical manifestations of the syndrome. For example, mediators of the innate immunity are recognized to be additional second hits able to induce the thrombotic events in the presence of aPL. Finally, environmental agents - in particular infectious ones - were reported to act as triggers for the production of autoantibodies cross-reacting with PL-binding proteins as well as inflammatory stimuli that potentiate the aPL thrombogenic effect. Altogether, these findings suggest a role for the innate immunity in APS pathogenesis. Toll-like receptors (TLR) are receptors that induce prompt inflammatory responses and mediate functional activation in immune effector cells. There is evidence that aPL, and in particular anti-β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies, may activate endothelial cells and monocytes through TLR-4-dependent signalling. Whether or not TLR may behave as surface receptors for β2GPI is still matter of research. Drugs or molecules able to interfere with TLR involvement may represent new therapeutic approaches for APS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic events and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). aPL targeting β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI Abs) provide the main pathogenic autoantibody subset. In monocytes, platelets and endothelial cells (ECs), the interaction of circulating aPL with membrane-bound β2GPI results in cell activation, and EC perturbation provides an important player in clotting. Several receptors have been suggested to mediate β2GPI/EC binding. AnnexinA2 provides a high-affinity binding site for β2GPI but, since it does not span the cell membrane, an adaptor protein is required to trigger signal. Consistent evidence supports the role of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 as co-receptor for β2GPI on ECs. β2GPI was recently reported to behave as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) scavenger. In monocytes, TLR4 activation was shown to be apparent, due to LPS/β2GPI complexes. Conversely, our findings in ECs demonstrate that β2GPI interacts directly with TLR4, and that such interaction may contribute to β2GPI-dependent aPL-mediated EC activation. LPS enhanced anti-β2GPI Ab binding to EC only at cell-activating concentrations, able to up-regulate TLR4. This in vitro model may explain why LPS behaves as a second hit increasing the expression of β2GPI in vascular tissues and triggering aPL-mediated thrombosis in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]