Search

Background: The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain., Aims: We aimed to compare the effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with STEMI complicated by LVT., Methods: Adult patients with STEMI and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showing LVT were assigned to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or warfarin (international normalised ratio goal of 2.0-2.5) in an open-label, randomised clinical trial (RCT). A prospective pooled analysis was planned comparing DOAC- versus warfarin-based anticoagulation for the same indication. The main outcome of the RCT was complete LVT resolution at 3 months, determined by a blinded imaging core laboratory. Complete LVT resolution and bleeding were investigated in the pooled analysis., Results: A total of 50 patients (median age: 55 years, 18% females) were enrolled from June 2020 to November 2022. Three-month complete LVT resolution occurred in 19/25 (76.0%) patients assigned to rivaroxaban and 13/24 (54.2%) assigned to warfarin (relative risk [RR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.15; p=0.12) with no thrombotic or major bleeding events. Pooled analysis showed numerically better complete LVT resolution with DOACs (rivaroxaban and apixaban; 93/115 [80.8%] vs 79/112 [70.5%], RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.32; p=0.08) and less major bleeding (2/116 [1.7%] and 9/112 [8.0%], risk difference -0.06, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.00; p=0.05) than with warfarin., Conclusions: Although the findings are limited by a small sample size, the results suggest that DOACs are safe with at least similar outcomes concerning LVT resolution and major bleeding compared with warfarin. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05705089).

Background:  In the INSPIRATION-S trial, atorvastatin versus placebo was associated with a nonsignificant 16% reduction in 30-day composite of venous/arterial thrombosis or death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19. Thrombo-inflammatory response in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may last beyond the first 30 days., Methods:  This article reports the effects of atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on 90-day clinical and functional outcomes from INSPIRATION-S, a double-blind multicenter randomized trial of adult ICU patients with COVID-19. The main outcome for this prespecified study was a composite of adjudicated venous/arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause mortality. Functional status was assessed with the Post-COVID-19 Functional Scale., Results:  In the primary analysis, 587 patients were included (age: 57 [Q1-Q3: 45-68] years; 44% women). By 90-day follow-up, the main outcome occurred in 96 (33.1%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 113 (38.0%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.05, p  = 0.11). Atorvastatin in patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset was associated with reduced 90-day hazard for the main outcome (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, p interaction  = 0.02). Atorvastatin use was associated with improved 90-day functional status, although the upper bound CI crossed 1.0 (OR ordinal : 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01, p  = 0.05)., Conclusion:  Atorvastatin 20 mg compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the 90-day composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous/arterial thrombosis. However, the point estimates do not exclude a potential clinically meaningful treatment effect, especially among patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset (NCT04486508)., Competing Interests: D. V. reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Rovi, and Sanofi. Dr. Gupta received payment from the Arnold & Porter Law Firm for work related to the Sanofi clopidogrel litigation and from the Ben C. Martin Law Firm for work related to the Cook inferior vena cava filter litigation. A. G. holds equity in a health care telecardiology startup, Heartbeat Health, Inc., and received consulting fees from Edwards LifeSciences. M. V. M. has received support from an institutional grant by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Columbia University Irving Medical Center (T32 HL007854). S. S. S. reports honoraria from Janssen and Chiesi and research grant support from the American Heart Association. G. P. has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Bayer, Janssen, Alexion, Amgen, and Boston Scientific Corporation, and consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Boston Scientific Corporation, Janssen, Namsa, Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, Boston Clinical Research Institute, and Amgen. S. A. P. reports being on the Advisory Board for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, CSI, Philips, Janssen; research grants: Abbott, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, TriReme Medical, Shockwave Medical; and receiving consulting fees from Terumo and Abiomed. M. M. received an unrestricted educational grant for research from Sanofi, Leo, and Rovi, and fees for participating in advisory meetings from Sanofi. A. J. K. reports institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, CSI, Philips, ReCor Medical, Neurotronic, Biotronik, Chiesi, Bolt Medical, Magenta Medical, Canon, SoniVie, Shockwave Medical, and Merck. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for consulting and/or speaking engagements in which Dr. Kirtane controlled the content. Personal: consulting from IMDS; Travel Expenses/Meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CSI, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. S. B. reports unrestricted research grants from Bayer, Concept Medical, INARI, Boston Scientific, Bard, and Sanofi; honoraria from Bayer, Concept Medical, INARI, and Boston Scientific. B. W. V. T. has received research support from Novartis, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Olatec Therapeutics, Serpin Pharm, and R-Pharm. He has been a consultant of R-Pharm and Serpin Pharma. G. W. S. has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook, Terumo, and Orchestra Biomed; served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, and Cardiomech; and has received equity or options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. G. Y. H. L. reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. H. M. K. reports personal fees from UnitedHealth, personal fees from IBM Watson Health, personal fees from Element Science, personal fees from Aetna, personal fees from Facebook, personal fees from Siegfried & Jensen Law Firm, personal fees from Arnold & Porter Law Firm, personal fees from Ben C. Martin Law Firm, personal fees from National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ownership of HugoHealth, ownership of Refactor Health, contracts from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, grants from Medtronic and the Food and Drug Administration, grants from Medtronic and Johnson and Johnson, grants from Shenzhen Center for Health Information, and is a Venture Partner at FPrime. Outside the submitted work. B. B. is supported by a research grant from The Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women's Hospital. B. B. reports that he is a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of IVC filters. All other authors report no relevant disclosures., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Thrombolysis is an alternative to surgery for mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (MPVT). Randomized clinical trials have yet to test the safety and efficacy of a proposed ultraslow thrombolytic infusion regimen., Methods and Results: This single-centre, open-label, pilot randomized clinical trial randomized adult patients with acute obstructive MPVT to an ultraslow thrombolytic regimen [25 mg of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) infused in 25 h] and a fast thrombolytic regimen (50 mg of rtPA infused in 6 h). If thrombolysis failed, a repeated dose of 25 mg of rtPA for 6 h was administered in both groups up to a cumulative dose of 150 mg or the occurrence of a complication. The primary outcome was a complete MPVT resolution (>75% fall in the obstructive gradient by transthoracic echocardiography, <10° limitation in opening and closing valve motion angles by fluoroscopy, and symptom improvement). The key safety outcome was a Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type III or V major bleeding. Overall, 120 patients, including 63 (52.5%) women, at a mean age of 36.3 ± 15.3 years, were randomized. Complete thrombolysis success was achieved in 51 patients (85.0%) in the ultraslow-regimen group and 47 patients (78.3%) in the fast-regimen group [odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-1.63; P = 0.34]. One case of transient ischaemic attack and three cases of intracranial haemorrhage (absolute risk difference -6.6%; 95%CI -12% -0.3%; P = 0.07) were observed only in the fast-regimen group., Conclusion: The ultraslow thrombolytic regimen conferred a high thrombosis resolution rate without major complications. Such findings should be replicated in more adequately powered trials., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Thrombotic complications are considered among the main extrapulmonary manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The optimal type and duration of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in these patients remain unknown., Methods: This article reports the final (90-day) results of the Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) study. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care were randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation for 30 days, irrespective of hospital discharge status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause death. The main safety outcome was major bleeding., Results: Of 600 randomized patients, 562 entered the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median age [Q1, Q3]: 62 [50, 71] years; 237 [42.2%] women), of whom 336 (59.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The primary outcome occurred in 132 (47.8%) of patients assigned to intermediate dose and 130 (45.4%) patients assigned to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.55, p  = 0.11). Findings were similar for other efficacy outcomes, and in the landmark analysis from days 31 to 90 (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.45-5.06). There were 7 (2.5%) major bleeding events in the intermediate-dose group (including 3 fatal events) and 4 (1.4%) major bleeding events in the standard-dose group (none fatal) (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.53-6.24)., Conclusion: Intermediate-dose compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not reduce a composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous or arterial thrombosis at 90-day follow-up., Competing Interests: Dr. Parikh reports being on the Advisory Board for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, CSI, Philips, Janssen; research grants: Abbott, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, TriReme Medical, Shockwave Medical; and receiving consulting fees from Terumo and Abiomed. Dr. Gupta received payment from the Arnold & Porter Law Firm for work related to the Sanofi clopidogrel litigation and from the Ben C. Martin Law Firm for work related to the Cook inferior vena cava filter litigation. Dr. Gupta holds equity in a health care telecardiology startup, Heartbeat Health, Inc. and received consulting fees from Edwards LifeSciences. Dr. Madhavan has received support from an institutional grant by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Columbia University Irving Medical Center (T32 HL007854). Dr. Sethi reports honoraria from Janssen and Chiesi and research grant support from the American Heart Association. Dr. Piazza has received research grant support to Brigham and Women's Hospital from EKOS, a BTG International Group company, Bayer, the Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Portola, and Janssen. He has received consulting fees from Amgen, Pfizer, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Thrombolex. Dr. Kirtane reports institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, and ReCor Medical. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for speaking engagements and/or consulting. Personal: travel expenses/meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. Dr. Van Tassell received research support from Novartis, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Olatec Therapeutics, and Serpin Pharma. He is a consultant of R-Pharm, Serpin Pharma. Dr. Stone has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook, Terumo, and Orchestra Biomed; served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, Cardiomech; and has received equity or options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. Dr. Lip reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. Dr. Krumholz reports personal fees from UnitedHealth, personal fees from IBM Watson Health, personal fees from Element Science, personal fees from Aetna, personal fees from Facebook, personal fees from Siegfried & Jensen Law Firm, personal fees from Arnold & Porter Law Firm, personal fees from Ben C. Martin Law Firm, personal fees from National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ownership of HugoHealth, ownership of Refactor Health, contracts from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, grants from Medtronic and the Food and Drug Administration, grants from Medtronic and Johnson and Johnson, grants from Shenzhen Center for Health Information, and is a Venture Partner at FPrime, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bikdeli reports that he is a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of IVC filters. All other authors report no relevant Enoxaparin was provided through Alborz Darou, Pooyesh Darou, and Caspian Pharmaceuticals companies, and atorvastatin and matching placebo were provided by Sobhan Darou. None of these companies were study sponsors and they had no other role and will not have a role in the design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation of the ongoing results or the decision to submit the resultant manuscript(s)., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis., Objective: To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (first hypothesis) and statin therapy vs matching placebo (second hypothesis; not reported in this article) among adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Patients were recruited between July 29, 2020, and November 19, 2020. The final follow-up date for the 30-day primary outcome was December 19, 2020., Interventions: Intermediate-dose (enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg daily) (n = 276) vs standard prophylactic anticoagulation (enoxaparin, 40 mg daily) (n = 286), with modification according to body weight and creatinine clearance. The assigned treatments were planned to be continued until completion of 30-day follow-up., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days, assessed in randomized patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least 1 dose of the assigned treatment. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (type 3 or 5 definition), powered for noninferiority (a noninferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio), and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 ×103/µL). All outcomes were blindly adjudicated., Results: Among 600 randomized patients, 562 (93.7%) were included in the primary analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [50-71] years; 237 [42.2%] women). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 126 patients (45.7%) in the intermediate-dose group and 126 patients (44.1%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -6.6% to 9.8%]; odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.76-1.48]; P = .70). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (2.5%) in the intermediate-dose group and 4 patients (1.4%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (risk difference, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.4%]; odds ratio, 1.83 [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-5.93]), not meeting the noninferiority criteria (P for noninferiority >.99). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred only in patients assigned to the intermediate-dose group (6 vs 0 patients; risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%]; P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, did not result in a significant difference in the primary outcome of a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days. These results do not support the routine empirical use of intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in unselected patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486508.

Background: Microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events are among the hallmarks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Furthermore, the exuberant immune response is considered an important driver of pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. The optimal management strategy to prevent thrombosis in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 remains unknown., Methods: The Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) and INSPIRATION-statin (INSPIRATION-S) studies test two independent hypotheses within a randomized controlled trial with 2 × 2 factorial design. Hospitalized critically-ill patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 will be randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation. The 600 patients undergoing this randomization will be screened and if meeting the eligibility criteria, will undergo an additional double-blind stratified randomization to atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus matching placebo. The primary endpoint, for both hypotheses will be tested for superiority and includes a composite of adjudicated acute arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism (VTE), use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all-cause death within 30 days from enrollment. Key secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, adjudicated VTE, and ventilator-free days. Key safety endpoints include major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20,000/fL) for the anticoagulation hypothesis. In a prespecified secondary analysis for non-inferiority, the study will test for the non-inferiority of intermediate intensity versus standard dose anticoagulation for major bleeding, considering a non-inferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio. Key safety endpoints for the statin hypothesis include rise in liver enzymes >3 times upper normal limit and clinically-diagnosed myopathy. The primary analyses will be performed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Results will be tested in exploratory analyses across key subgroups and in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts., Conclusions: INSPIRATION and INSPIRATON-S studies will help address clinically-relevant questions for antithrombotic therapy and thromboinflammatory therapy in critically-ill patients with COVID-19., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Filamentous fibrin strands (FSs) attached to valve prostheses have been well described in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, but the frequency and clinical significance of these strands remain poorly defined. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of prosthetic valve strands and to assess their significance in relation to clinical cerebral ischemic events (CIEs) and anticoagulant status., Methods: Three hundred consecutive patients with 421 prosthetic heart valves were evaluated for the presence of FSs (highly mobile, filamentous masses<1 mm thick)., Results: FSs were found in 139 patients (49%) and 147 prostheses (38%) in patients with left-sided prostheses, with a significant association between FSs, CIEs, and anticoagulant status (P<.001). A lower international normalized ratio (<2.5) had a positive association with the occurrence of CIEs., Conclusions: There is a significant association between FSs, CIEs, and patient's anticoagulant status; therefore, aggressive anticoagulation and close follow-up are recommended for these patients.