1. Comparison of Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b and TICI 3 reperfusion in endovascular therapy for large ischemic anterior circulation strokes.
- Author
-
Winkelmeier L, Faizy TD, Brekenfeld C, Heitkamp C, Broocks G, Bechstein M, Steffen P, Schell M, Gellissen S, Kniep H, Thomalla G, Fiehler J, and Flottmann F
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Registries, Reperfusion methods, Treatment Outcome, Cerebral Infarction diagnostic imaging, Cerebral Infarction surgery, Cerebral Infarction therapy, Cohort Studies, Thrombectomy methods, Endovascular Procedures methods, Ischemic Stroke surgery, Ischemic Stroke diagnostic imaging, Ischemic Stroke therapy, Thrombolytic Therapy methods
- Abstract
Background: Landmark thrombectomy trials have provided evidence that selected patients with large ischemic stroke benefit from successful endovascular therapy, commonly defined as incomplete (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b) or complete reperfusion (mTICI 3). We aimed to investigate whether mTICI 3 improves functional outcomes compared with mTICI 2b in large ischemic strokes., Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted to compare mTICI 2b versus mTICI 3 in large ischemic strokes in the anterior circulation. Patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry between 2015-2021 were analyzed. Large ischemic stroke was defined as an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 3-5. Patients were matched by final mTICI grade using propensity score matching. Primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score., Results: After matching, 226 patients were included. Baseline and imaging characteristics were balanced between mTICI 2b and mTICI 3 patients. There was no shift on the mRS favoring mTICI 3 compared with mTICI 2b in large ischemic strokes (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.64 to 1.94, P=0.70). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher in mTICI 2b than in mTICI 3 patients (12.6% vs 4.5%, P=0.03). Mortality at 90 days did not differ between mTICI 3 and mTICI 2b (33.6% vs 37.2%; adjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.45, P=0.33)., Conclusions: In endovascular therapy for large ischemic strokes, mTICI 3 was not associated with better 90-day functional outcomes compared with mTICI 2b. This study suggests that mTICI 2b might be warranted as the final angiographic result, questioning the benefit/risk ratio of additional maneuvers to seek for mTICI 3 in large ischemic strokes., Trial Registration Number: NCT03356392., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TDF reported grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; Project Number: 411621970). GB reported receiving personal fees from Eppdata GmbH and compensation as a speaker from Balt outside the submitted work. HK reported an ownership stake in Eppdata GmbH and compensation from Eppdata GmbH for consultant services outside the submitted work. GH reported receiving personal fees from Acandis, Alexion, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, and Stryker outside the submitted work. JF reported compensation from Acandis, Cerenovus, MicroVention, Medtronic, Penumbra, Phenox, Roche, Stryker, Tonbridge and stock holdings in Eppdata GmbH and Tegus Medical outside the submitted work. FF reported receiving personal fees from Eppdata GmbH outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF