Search

A major potential side effect of heparin is immunogenicity, eliciting antibody development to a protein complex comprised of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Nevertheless, the clinical implications of heparin antibody positive patients remain broad, ranging from no apparent clinical consequences to life-threatening arterial and venous thromboemboli. The "Iceberg Model" has been proposed to depict this spectrum, with a relatively large population of antibody-positive patients forming the base of the iceberg, a smaller population of thrombocytopenic patients in the middle and a limited number of patients with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis comprising the apex. An underlying assumption of this model is that thrombosis occurs only in settings of relative or absolute thrombocytopenia. However, several recent studies suggest that antibody formation to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, may be associated with thrombotic events. In this review, we summarize these data, consider potential mechanisms for thrombosis, and suggest recommendations for testing and management of antibody-positive patients.

We present three clinical cases that illustrate some of the key features of the diagnosis and management of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The importance of having a high clinical suspicion for HIT in the appropriate clinical setting is emphasized. Early therapeutic decisions should be based on a clinical diagnosis, with laboratory tests serving as confirmation. Low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparins are to be strictly avoided in patients with HIT. Identification bracelets or necklaces may be useful to reduce inappropriate administration of these agents to patients with HIT presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

Heparin was first discovered in 1916 and at present is used in more than 12 million patients a year. In the 1950s, several physicians noticed an uncommon paradoxical phenomenon in which heparin appeared to function as a procoagulant instead of an anticoagulant. This phenomenon is now known as the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Our understanding of this syndrome has evolved over the last 2 to 3 decades, and therapeutic options are arising. This article will focus on the most extensively studied therapy for HIT, which is the class of drugs known as the direct thrombin inhibitors. Specifically, we will focus on the mechanisms by which direct thrombin inhibitors may be useful in this syndrome, the evidence for their use, and the unique characteristics of the two FDA-approved agents in this class, lepirudin and argatroban.

Background: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with abciximab (ReoPro) improves the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. This registry was conducted to characterize the effects of repeated administration of abciximab during intervention., Methods and Results: We recruited 500 consecutive patients at 22 centers in the United States who were receiving abciximab for at least a second time during percutaneous coronary intervention. Safety was measured as the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Efficacy was assessed as event-free clinical success. Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) responses were also characterized. There were no cases of hypersensitivity (95% upper confidence bound, 0.3%), major bleeding, or death. Clinical success was 94.4%. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 patients (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.8% to 6.4%), including 12 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 3.7%) who developed profound thrombocytopenia (<20x10(9) cells/L). In 2 patients (0.4%), profound thrombocytopenia did not develop until after hospital discharge; in 4 (0.8%), profound thrombocytopenia recurred despite platelet transfusion. Before a first readministration, a positive HACA titer was present in 22 of 454 patients (4.8%); after a first readministration, an additional 82 of 432 (19.0%) became HACA-positive. HACA did not neutralize the in vitro inhibition of platelet aggregation by abciximab or correlate with clinical events., Conclusions: The results, including overall rates of thrombocytopenia, were consistent with randomized clinical trials of first abciximab treatment. However, there was a shift from mild to profound thrombocytopenia, and cases of delayed presentation and of recurrent thrombocytopenia were seen. These findings suggest that indications and guidelines for first-time use apply to retreatment, particularly the systematic monitoring for thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-documented complication of heparin anticoagulation therapy. Heparin's frequent use in the cardiovascular population poses a significant challenge for managing patients with HIT in need of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We describe four patients with HIT who successfully underwent PCI without thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications while on lepirudin.

Objectives: This study determined the incidence of pseudothrombocytopenia during abciximab therapy administered for percutaneous coronary interventions and compared the clinical course of patients with pseudothrombocytopenia with the clinical courses of patients with thrombocytopenia and patients with normal platelet counts., Background: Although pseudothrombocytopenia has been previously reported during therapy with abciximab, the incidence and significance of this occurrence are unknown. The failure to differentiate pseudothrombocytopenia from thrombocytopenia could lead to unnecessary interruption of abciximab infusions or to platelet transfusions., Methods: The incidences of pseudothrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were determined in four large placebo-controlled abciximab trials: c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE), Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC), Evaluation of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty to Improve Long-term Outcome of c7E3 GpIIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade (EPILOG) and Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT). The clinical features, bleeding complications and major clinical outcomes of patients with pseudothrombocytopenia and those with thrombocytopenia were compared with each other and with those of patients with normal platelet count., Results: Pseudothrombocytopenia occurred in 2.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.7%, 2.5%) of abciximab-treated patients and in 0.6% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 3.7% (95% CI: 3.2%, 4.2%) of abciximab-treated patients and in 1.8% (95% CI: 1.3%, 2.3%) of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Patients with thrombocytopenia had significantly higher rates of major bleeding, major decreases in hemoglobin and increased transfusion requirements of both blood and platelets compared with those without thrombocytopenia. By contrast, pseudothrombocytopenic patients did not differ from patients with normal platelet counts in any of the measures of blood loss or transfusion requirements. Thrombocytopenic patients, but not those with pseudothrombocytopenia, had increased rates of revascularization at 30 days and six months. As previously reported, there was also a higher rate of death and myocardial infarction in the thrombocytopenic patients., Conclusions: Pseudothrombocytopenia is the cause of more than one third (36.3%) of low platelet counts in patients undergoing coronary interventions who are treated with abciximab. This study demonstrates that pseudothrombocytopenia is a benign laboratory condition that does not increase bleeding, stroke, transfusion requirements or the need for repeat revascularization. It is important to recognize pseudothrombocytopenia so that the beneficial effects of abciximab are not lost by premature termination of therapy.

Objectives: This study sought to determine the frequency of thrombocytopenia and its relation with clinical outcomes in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization who received either the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab (ReoPro, c7E3 Fab) or conventional therapy., Background: The development of thrombocytopenia on exposure to GPIIb/IIIa antagonists threatens the utility and economic viability of this drug class for patients with vascular disease., Methods: We analyzed data from the Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications trial (EPIC), a 2,099-patient, randomized trial of placebo, abciximab bolus or abciximab bolus plus a 12-h infusion during high-risk coronary revascularization., Results: Thrombocytopenia (nadir platelet count <100 x 10(9)/ liter) developed in 81 patients (3.9%) during their hospital stay, with 19 (0.9%) developing severe (<50 x 10(9)/liter) thrombocytopenia. Both thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia were more frequent in the bolus-plus-infusion arm (5.2% and 1.6%, respectively) than in the bolus-only and placebo arms combined (p = 0.020 and p = 0.025, respectively). Acute profound thrombocytopenia developed in two patients in the bolus-plus-infusion arm. Patients with thrombocytopenia experienced more unfavorable clinical outcomes than those who did not develop thrombocytopenia, regardless of treatment assignment, but those with thrombocytopenia who received abciximab had fewer worse outcomes at 30 days. Multivariable logistic modeling revealed a lower baseline platelet count, older age and lighter weight to be important predictors of thrombocytopenia. In a logistic regression model, bolus-plus-infusion treatment was a significant predictor of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.016) and remained so after adjustment for procedures and baseline risk factors (p = 0.0077)., Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia was associated with adverse clinical outcomes and excessive bleeding, but patients receiving abciximab fared better than those receiving placebo.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and clinical implications of thrombocytopenia that occurs in hospital after administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction., Background: The use of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction has improved mortaltiy rates, but hemorrhage remains a major complication. Because thrombocytopenia may be associated with hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy, we examined the incidence and clinical implications of thrombocytopenia after administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction., Methods: The patient population comprised 1,001 patients enrolled in Phases 2, 3 and 5 of the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trial and the urokinase trial. Patients received recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, urokinase or combination therapy in various dosing schemes. All patients received heparin, aspirin and a calcium-channel blocking agent. Thrombocytopenia occurring anytime after thrombolytic therapy was defined as a nadir platelet count either < 100,000/microliters or < 1/2 baseline. Blood loss was quantified by a bleeding index. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent contribution of thrombocytopenia in a model predicting in-hospital mortality., Results: Thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.4% of patients, with no difference among the thrombolytic regimens. Patients with thrombocytopenia had a lower median acute ejection fraction and a higher likelihood of three-vessel coronary artery disease than patients without thrombocytopenia. Patients with thrombocytopenia had more hemorrhage, a higher in-hospital mortality rate and a more complicated hospital course than patients without thrombocytopenia, even after consideration of other important variables, including age, acute ejection fraction, number of diseased vessels, bypass surgery and use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation., Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia after thrombolytic therapy is a common event and is associated with excess hemorrhage and mortality. Platelet counts should be monitored daily after administration of thrombolytic therapy because the appearance of thrombocytopenia identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for hemorrhage and death.