Search

Background: Thrombocytopenia is a common disorder after heart or lung transplantation. Platelet transfusion is often required to maintain haemostasis but represents a specific cause of morbidity and mortality in this setting including alloimmunisation and graft rejection., Study Design and Methods: As part of a health-care quality improvement project, in a single-centre before-after pilot study, the relevance of a platelet transfusion saving strategy based on romiplostim administration after transplantation was assessed in patients with platelet count <100 × 10 9 /L. Transfusions on days 28 and 90 were compared using propensity matched score for adjustment of demographic characteristics at baseline. The primary outcome was platelet transfusion until day 28 after transplantation., Results: Ninety-three patients were analysed (73 before vs. 20 after). The median [interquartile range] number of platelet concentrate was 1 [0;4.0] before versus 0.5 [0;2.0] in the after period, mean difference 0.5 confidence interval 95% [-0.7 to 1.7], p  =  0.39. On day 28, median [interquartile range] red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher in the before versus the after period, 7 [2.0;13.5] versus 6 [1.5;8.5], mean difference 3.2 CI 95% [0.4-6.0], p = 0.02. At 6 months, the rate of patients with de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen alloimmunisation was 45% before versus 53% in the after period (p = 0.56). Deep venous thrombosis was detected in nine patients (12%) before versus seven patients (35%) in the after period (p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Romiplostim did not significantly reduce platelet transfusion after heart or lung transplantation. Its relevance and safety in a global transfusion strategy remains to be studied in this setting in a large randomised study.

Purpose: Thrombocytopenia is a frequent and serious adverse event in patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock. Similarly to postcardiac surgery patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) could represent the causative underlying mechanism. However, the epidemiology as well as related mortality regarding HIT and VA-ECMO remains largely unknown. We aimed to define the prevalence and associated 90-day mortality of HIT diagnosed under VA-ECMO., Methods: This retrospective study included patients under VA-ECMO from 20 French centers between 2012 and 2016. Selected patients were hospitalized for more than 3 days with high clinical suspicion of HIT and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients were classified according to results of functional tests as having either Confirmed or Excluded HIT., Results: A total of 5797 patients under VA-ECMO were screened; 39/5797 met the inclusion criteria, with HIT confirmed in 21/5797 patients (0.36% [95% CI] [0.21-0.52]). Fourteen of 39 patients (35.9% [20.8-50.9]) with suspected HIT were ultimately excluded because of negative functional assays. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia tended to be more frequent in Excluded HIT at the time of HIT suspicion (p = 0.073). The platelet course was similar between Confirmed and Excluded HIT (p = 0.65). Mortality rate was 33.3% [13.2-53.5] in Confirmed and 50% [23.8-76.2] in Excluded HIT (p = 0.48)., Conclusions: Prevalence of HIT among patients under VA-ECMO is extremely low at 0.36% with an associated mortality rate of 33.3%, which appears to be in the same range as that observed in patients treated with VA-ECMO without HIT. In addition, HIT was ultimately ruled out in one-third of patients with clinical suspicion of HIT and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies.

Objectives: Although heparin-induced thrombocytopemia (HIT) is uncommon, its thromboembolic complications are potentially life-threatening. The low-molecular weight heparins are less responsible of HIT than unfractionated heparin (UFH) but this latter is still indicated in some circumstances such as cardiac surgery. Argatroban, a selective thrombin inhibitor, recently available, has been indicated in HIT treatment. This review presents the main pharmacological characteristics, its indications and uses in the context of cardiac surgery and in intensive care medicine., Methods: Review of the literature in Medline database over the past 15 years using the following keywords: argatroban, cardiac surgery, circulatory assistance, cardiopulmonary bypass., Results: Despite its short-acting pharmacokinetic, argatroban cannot be recommended during cardiopulmonary bypass. On the contrary, argatroban is indicated in many circumstances in postoperative period of various cardiac surgeries (on-pump, off-pump, circulatory assistance). Nevertheless, after cardiac surgery, doses have to be adapted according to coagulation laboratory testing (ACT), particularly in patients presenting acute organ failure (kidney injury, heart failure, liver failure). This compound has no antagonist and is excluded during severe hepatic failure. The continuous intravenous administration is a drawback., Conclusion: Argatroban is a new direct competitive thrombin inhibitor well evaluated as treatment of HIT after cardiac surgery. In HIT management, argatroban is an interesting alternative to lepirudin that is not anymore available and danaparoid because of supply disturbances., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

In a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia few antithrombotic alternate treatments are proposed for cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: danaparoid, lepirudine or powerful antiplatelet agent. Recently, the platelet GPIIbIIIa antagonist tirofiban (Aggrastat) was tested in humans. We reported two cases of patients operated upon for cardiac surgery with unfractionnated heparin (UFH) and tirofiban. The first patient underwent an off-pump coronary artery bypass graft and the second one a mitral valvular replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. Tirofiban was associated with UFH and aprotinine. Postoperative bleeding was in the normal range for the two types of surgeries and haemodynamic tolerance was good. These two case reports support the possibility of secure cardiac surgery under efficient platelet inhibition with tirofiban. The management of cardiac surgery with tirofiban without monitoring of platelet aggregation appeared to be more simple than with the other alternate antithrombotic agents.

Thrombocytopenia is frequently reported in the presence of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) after cardiac surgery and in cardiology, but heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rarely responsible of it in this circumstance. A case-report if HIT in a patient with IABP is presented. This case emphasised the difficulty in diagnosis of HIT in this situation. An acute decrease in platelet count lasting after removal of IABP could suggest the diagnosis of HIT when other origins for thrombocytopenia are excluded.

Abstract: In a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia few antithrombotic alternate treatments are proposed for cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: danaparoid, lepirudine or powerful antiplatelet agent. Recently, the platelet GPIIbIIIa antagonist tirofiban (Aggrastat®) was tested in humans. We reported two cases of patients operated upon for cardiac surgery with unfractionnated heparin (UFH) and tirofiban. The first patient underwent an off-pump coronary artery bypass graft and the second one a mitral valvular replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. Tirofiban was associated with UFH and aprotinine. Postoperative bleeding was in the normal range for the two types of surgeries and haemodynamic tolerance was good. These two case reports support the possibility of secure cardiac surgery under efficient platelet inhibition with tirofiban. The management of cardiac surgery with tirofiban without monitoring of platelet aggregation appeared to be more simple than with the other alternate antithrombotic agents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Thrombocytopenia is frequently reported in the presence of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) after cardiac surgery and in cardiology, but heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rarely responsible of it in this circumstance. A case-report if HIT in a patient with IABP is presented. This case emphasised the difficulty in diagnosis of HIT in this situation. An acute decrease in platelet count lasting after removal of IABP could suggest the diagnosis of HIT when other origins for thrombocytopenia are excluded. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]