Search

Your search keyword '"recovered species"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Descriptor "recovered species" Topic threatened species
3 results on '"recovered species"'

1. Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species.

Author

Akçakaya, H. Resit, Bennett, Elizabeth L., Brooks, Thomas M., Grace, Molly K., Heath, Anna, Hedges, Simon, Hilton‐Taylor, Craig, Hoffmann, Michael, Keith, David A., Long, Barney, Mallon, David P., Meijaard, Erik, Milner‐Gulland, E. J., Rodrigues, Ana S. L., Rodriguez, Jon Paul, Stephenson, P. J., Stuart, Simon N., and Young, Richard P.

Subjects
*WILDLIFE conservation, *BIODIVERSITY conservation, *ANIMAL diversity conservation, *ECOSYSTEM management, *SPECIES distribution, *ENDANGERED species
Abstract

Abstract: Stopping declines in biodiversity is critically important, but it is only a first step toward achieving more ambitious conservation goals. The absence of an objective and practical definition of species recovery that is applicable across taxonomic groups leads to inconsistent targets in recovery plans and frustrates reporting and maximization of conservation impact. We devised a framework for comprehensively assessing species recovery and conservation success. We propose a definition of a fully recovered species that emphasizes viability, ecological functionality, and representation; and use counterfactual approaches to quantify degree of recovery. This allowed us to calculate a set of 4 conservation metrics that demonstrate impacts of conservation efforts to date (conservation legacy); identify dependence of a species on conservation actions (conservation dependence); quantify expected gains resulting from conservation action in the medium term (conservation gain); and specify requirements to achieve maximum plausible recovery over the long term (recovery potential). These metrics can incentivize the establishment and achievement of ambitious conservation targets. We illustrate their use by applying the framework to a vertebrate, an invertebrate, and a woody and an herbaceous plant. Our approach is a preliminary framework for an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green List of Species, which was mandated by a resolution of IUCN members in 2012. Although there are several challenges in applying our proposed framework to a wide range of species, we believe its further development, implementation, and integration with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species will help catalyze a positive and ambitious vision for conservation that will drive sustained conservation action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species

Author

Erik Meijaard, Jon Paul Rodríguez, David P. Mallon, Michael R. Hoffmann, Thomas M. Brooks, E. J. Milner-Gulland, H. Resit Akçakaya, Richard P. Young, Craig Hilton-Taylor, Simon Hedges, David A. Keith, Barney Long, Molly K. Grace, P. J. Stephenson, Simon N. Stuart, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Elizabeth L. Bennett, Anna Heath, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University [SUNY] (SBU), State University of New York (SUNY)-State University of New York (SUNY), IUCN Species Survival Commission (IUCN SSC), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), World Agroforestry Centre, University of the Philippines, Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania (UTAS), Department of Zoology [Oxford], University of Oxford [Oxford], Synchronicity Earth, Red List Unit, Conservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London - ZSL (UNITED KINGDOM), Centre for Ecosystem Sciences, University of New South Wales [Sydney] (UNSW), NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, Global Wildlife Conservation (GWC), Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology, Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU), Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent [Canterbury], Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas (IVIC), Department of Environmental Systems Science [ETH Zürich] (D-USYS), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Institute of Trinity Jersey, University of the Philippines (UP System), University of Tasmania [Hobart, Australia] (UTAS), University of Oxford, Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), and Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])

Subjects
0106 biological sciences, Counterfactual thinking, Conservation of Natural Resources, threatened species, Range (biology), Computer science, conservation impact, conservation optimism, recovered species, red lists, Saiga tatarica, especies recuperadas, Endangered species, Biodiversity, especies amenazadas, [SDV.BID]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity, 010603 evolutionary biology, 01 natural sciences, Animals, IUCN Red List, impacto de la conservación, 14. Life underwater, Taxonomic rank, listas rojas, optimismo de conservación, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Wildlife conservation, Ecology, business.industry, Data Collection, 010604 marine biology & hydrobiology, Endangered Species, Environmental resource management, 15. Life on land, Vertebrates, Threatened species, business
Abstract

Stopping declines in biodiversity is critically important, but it is only a first step toward achieving more ambitious conservation goals. The absence of an objective and practical definition of species recovery that is applicable across taxonomic groups leads to inconsistent targets in recovery plans and frustrates reporting and maximization of conservation impact. We devised a framework for comprehensively assessing species recovery and conservation success. We propose a definition of a fully recovered species that emphasizes viability, ecological functionality, and representation; and use counterfactual approaches to quantify degree of recovery. This allowed us to calculate a set of 4 conservation metrics that demonstrate impacts of conservation efforts to date (conservation legacy); identify dependence of a species on conservation actions (conservation dependence); quantify expected gains resulting from conservation action in the medium term (conservation gain); and specify requirements to achieve maximum plausible recovery over the long term (recovery potential). These metrics can incentivize the establishment and achievement of ambitious conservation targets. We illustrate their use by applying the framework to a vertebrate, an invertebrate, and a woody and an herbaceous plant. Our approach is a preliminary framework for an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green List of Species, which was mandated by a resolution of IUCN members in 2012. Although there are several challenges in applying our proposed framework to a wide range of species, we believe its further development, implementation, and integration with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species will help catalyze a positive and ambitious vision for conservation that will drive sustained conservation action. ISSN:0888-8892 ISSN:1523-1739

Published
2018

3. Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species

Author

Akcakaya, H. Resit, Bennett, Elizabeth L., Brooks, Thomas M., Grace, Molly K., Heath, Anna, Hedges, Simon, Hilton-Taylor, Craig, Hoffmann, Michael, Keith, David A., Long, Barney, Mallon, David P., Meijaard, Erik, Milner-Gulland, E.J., Rodrigues, Ana S. L., Paul Rodriguez, Jon, Stephenson, P.J., Stuart, Simon N., and Young, Richard P.

Subjects
threatened species, Saiga tatarica, conservation impact, 14. Life underwater, 15. Life on land, red lists, recovered species, conservation optimism
Abstract

Stopping declines in biodiversity is critically important, but it is only a first step toward achieving more ambitious conservation goals. The absence of an objective and practical definition of species recovery that is applicable across taxonomic groups leads to inconsistent targets in recovery plans and frustrates reporting and maximization of conservation impact. We devised a framework for comprehensively assessing species recovery and conservation success. We propose a definition of a fully recovered species that emphasizes viability, ecological functionality, and representation; and use counterfactual approaches to quantify degree of recovery. This allowed us to calculate a set of 4 conservation metrics that demonstrate impacts of conservation efforts to date (conservation legacy); identify dependence of a species on conservation actions (conservation dependence); quantify expected gains resulting from conservation action in the medium term (conservation gain); and specify requirements to achieve maximum plausible recovery over the long term (recovery potential). These metrics can incentivize the establishment and achievement of ambitious conservation targets. We illustrate their use by applying the framework to a vertebrate, an invertebrate, and a woody and an herbaceous plant. Our approach is a preliminary framework for an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green List of Species, which was mandated by a resolution of IUCN members in 2012. Although there are several challenges in applying our proposed framework to a wide range of species, we believe its further development, implementation, and integration with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species will help catalyze a positive and ambitious vision for conservation that will drive sustained conservation action., Conservation Biology, 32 (5), ISSN:0888-8892, ISSN:1523-1739

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results