Search

Background: Propensity score-matched analysis of the anterolateral minithoracotomy and the partial upper hemisternotomy vs the median sternotomy approach has not been reported to date for isolated aortic valve replacement., Methods: From 2005 to 2013, isolated aortic valve replacement was performed through a partial upper hemisternotomy in 315 patients (38.9%), through a median sternotomy in 328 patients (40.5%), and through an anterolateral minithoracotomy in 167 patients (20.6%). After propensity score-matched analysis, both minimally invasive techniques were independently compared with median sternotomy in 118 matched pairs., Results: In the anterolateral group, conversion to median sternotomy was significantly higher (17 [14.4%]), a second pump run (6 [5.1%]) and second cross clamp (12 [10.2%]) were significantly more often necessary, the median cross-clamp time (94 minutes; range, 43 to 231 minutes) and median perfusion time (141 minutes; range, 77 to 456 minutes) were significantly longer, and more groin complications occurred (17 [14.4%]), all compared with the median sternotomy group. No difference in perioperative results was identified between the partial upper hemisternotomy and the median sternotomy group. There was no significant difference in 1-year survival among the three groups, although a trend of better survival was observed in the partial upper hemisternotomy group., Conclusions: In minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement, the partial upper hemisternotomy shows similar perioperative outcome as the median sternotomy, whereas, the anterolateral minithoracotomy is associated with more perioperative complications. Therefore, only the partial upper hemisternotomy should be the preferred surgical technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the daily routine for a broad spectrum of surgeons., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In aortic valve replacement, a comparison between the anterolateral minithoracotomy and the partial upper hemisternotomy approach has not been reported to date., Methods: From 2006 to 2012, isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 1,118 consecutive patients. Aortic valve replacement was performed through a anterolateral minithoracotomy in 166 patients (14.9%) and through a partial upper hemisternotomy in 245 patients (21.9%). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in 160 matched pairs., Results: Conversion to median sternotomy was significantly higher in the anterolateral group (n = 22, 13.1%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 7, 4.4%) (p = 0.004). A second cross-clamp was significantly more often necessary in the anterolateral group (n = 14, 8.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n =2, 1.3%) (p = 0.003). The median cross-clamp time was significantly longer in the anterolateral group, 93 minutes (range, 43 to 231 minutes) than in the hemisternotomy group, 75 minutes (range, 46 to 137 minutes) (p < 0.0001). The median perfusion time was significantly longer in the anterolateral group, 137 minutes (range, 81 to 456 minutes) than in the hemisternotomy group, 113 minutes (range, 66 to 257 minutes) (p < 0.0001). Significantly more groin adverse events occurred in the anterolateral group (n = 17, 10.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 0, 0%) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in 90-day mortality was seen in the anterolateral group (n = 6, 3.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 2, 1.3%) (p = 0.16)., Conclusions: The anterolateral minithoracotomy is associated with more perioperative adverse events. The partial upper hemisternotomy is an excellent surgical technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the daily routine for every staff surgeon., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim of the Study: Mitral valve surgery after previous cardiac surgery is technically demanding and risky. In patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve surgery is associated with a high risk of injury to the bypass graft with concomitant myocardial ischemia. An aortic valve prosthesis usually severely impairs access to the mitral valve, so that these patients are often denied surgery. Furthermore, patients with porcelain aorta may be inoperable., Methods: A series of 10 patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair via a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy without aortic cross-clamping on the fibrillating heart was investigated. Four patients had an aortic valve prosthesis in situ, six patients had undergone previous CABG, and two patients presented with porcelain aorta., Results: Reconstruction was possible in nine patients. Cannulation was performed femorally in three patients, and via the axillary artery in seven patients. No fatalities were observed. One patient required rethoracotomy for bleeding and subsequently developed a right-sided pneumonia, and a second patient experienced lower-limb ischemia. The postoperative course of the other eight patients was uneventful. No patient presented with significant residual mitral insufficiency at control echocardiography., Conclusion: Minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction via a right-sided minithoracotomy represents an attractive surgical option in a high-risk reoperative setting.

OBJECTIVES Barlow's disease is a specific sub-form of mitral valve (MV) disease, characterized by diffuse excessive tissue and multi segment prolapse. The anterolateral mini-thoracotomy represents the standard access for MV regurgitation in many centres. It still remains unclear which surgical technique provides the best results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare operative safety and mid-term outcomes after (i) isolated annuloplasty, (ii) use of additional artificial chordae or (iii) leaflet resection in patients suffering from Barlow's disease undergoing minimally invasive MV repair. METHODS A consecutive series of patients suffering from Barlow′s disease undergoing minimally invasive MV surgery between 2001 and 2020 were analysed (n  = 246). Patients were grouped and analysed according to the used surgical technique. The primary outcome was a modified Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium combined end-point of mortality, reoperation due to repair failure or reoccurrence of severe mitral regurgitation within 5 years. The secondary outcome included operative success and safety up to 30 days. RESULTS No significant difference was found between the 3 surgical techniques with regard to operative safety (P  = 0.774). The primary outcome did not differ between groups (P  = 0.244). Operative success was achieved in 93.5% and was lowest in the isolated annuloplasty group (77.1%). Conversion to MV replacement was increased in patients undergoing isolated annuloplasty (P  < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Isolated annuloplasty, use of additional artificial chordae and leaflet resection represent feasible techniques in Barlow patients undergoing minimally invasive MV surgery with comparable 5-year results. In view of the increased conversion rate in the annuloplasty group, the pathology should not be oversimplified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; Mitral valve repair; Transaxillary access EN Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery Mitral valve repair Transaxillary access 1 2 2 08/03/23 20230701 NES 230701 There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive mitral repair gets the place it deserves creating a new mindset in the treatment of structural valve disease [[1]]. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, Mitral valve repair, Transaxillary access Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 7 Lamelas J. Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the "Miami Method". [Extracted from the article]

CONCLUSION Evidence from an unselected patient population on a nationwide basis suggests that minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is at least as safe as a full sternotomy. Keywords: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; Full sternotomy; Netherlands National Heart Registration EN Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery Full sternotomy Netherlands National Heart Registration 1107 1108 2 05/05/22 20220501 NES 220501 New surgical techniques and strategies need scientific analysis and evaluation of sufficiently large patient cohorts with respect to equality, possible superiority or even inferiority compared to established therapies. [Extracted from the article]