Search

We present a comprehensive study of transport coefficients including DC electrical conductivity and related optical properties, electrical contribution to the thermal conductivity, and the shear viscosity via ab initio molecular dynamics and density functional theory calculations on the "priority 1" cases from the "Second Charged-Particle Transport Coefficient Workshop" [Stanek et al., Phys. Plasmas (to be published 2024)]. The purpose of this work is to carefully document the entire workflow used to generate our reported transport coefficients, up to and including our definitions of finite size and statistical convergence, extrapolation techniques, and choice of thermodynamic ensembles. In pursuit of accurate optical properties, we also present a novel, simple, and highly accurate algorithm for evaluating the Kramers–Kronig relations. These heuristics are often not discussed in the literature, and it is hoped that this work will facilitate the reproducibility of our data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the results of the second charged-particle transport coefficient code comparison workshop, which was held in Livermore, California on 24–27 July 2023. This workshop gathered theoretical, computational, and experimental scientists to assess the state of computational and experimental techniques for understanding charged-particle transport coefficients relevant to high-energy-density plasma science. Data for electronic and ionic transport coefficients, namely, the direct current electrical conductivity, electron thermal conductivity, ion shear viscosity, and ion thermal conductivity were computed and compared for multiple plasma conditions. Additional comparisons were carried out for electron–ion properties such as the electron–ion equilibration time and alpha particle stopping power. Overall, 39 participants submitted calculated results from 18 independent approaches, spanning methods from parameterized semi-empirical models to time-dependent density functional theory. In the cases studied here, we find significant differences—several orders of magnitude—between approaches, particularly at lower temperatures, and smaller differences—roughly a factor of five—among first-principles models. We investigate the origins of these differences through comparisons of underlying predictions of ionic and electronic structure. The results of this workshop help to identify plasma conditions where computationally inexpensive approaches are accurate, where computationally expensive models are required, and where experimental measurements will have high impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]