Search

Introduction: The treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after intervention has not been successful thus far. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthrolysis and reconstruction in the treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention. Materials and methods: Twelve patients (12 elbows) with the diagnosis of terrible triad injury were respectively reviewed. All the 12 patients had elbow dysfunction after conservative and surgical treatment of the terrible triad injury. Preoperatively, the flexion arc and forearm rotation were 36.7° ± 28.5° and 51.3° ± 43.4°, respectively, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 56.3 points. The mean interval between the primary injury and our surgical treatment was 6.6 months. Our surgical intervention included elbow arthrolysis, ulnar nerve transposition, radial head replacement, coronoid process and ligament repair, and hinged external fixation. Patients were encouraged to participate in rehabilitation training 24 h after surgery. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 20.1 months; the flexion arc and forearm rotation were 122° ± 18° and 140° ± 20°, respectively, and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 94.6 points (9 excellent, 3 good). Concentric stability was restored in all elbows. Complications included superficial pin tract infection (1), heterotopic ossification (3), and ulnar nerve palsy (1); the ulnar nerve symptoms had improved at the last follow-up. Conclusions: The combination of open arthrolysis and reconstruction performed at a mean interval of 6-month posttrauma can restore functional mobility in cases of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention. Thus, it may be an effective alternative for the treatment of the poor outcome terrible triad injury. We recommend early functional rehabilitation with adherence to the guidelines for hinged external fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An ankylosed elbow is defined as an elbow having a range of motion of 0°. Movement is extremely limited. This study retrospectively analyzes the results of arthrolysis and hinged external fixation performed on 15 patients suffering from ankylosed elbows. Methods: Fifteen completely ankylosed elbows were treated by arthrolysis and hinged external fixation. Patients comprised nine men and six women, with a mean age of 37.93 years (37.93 ± 9.68) when arthrolysis was performed. Before surgery, the elbows were ankylosed at various angles ranging from 30° to 85°. Eleven patients underwent arthrolysis by medial and lateral approaches, three patients by the posterior approach, and one patient by posterior and lateral approaches. Hinged external fixators were applied to all patients. Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was performed in all patients. Result: All patients received satisfactory follow-up. The range of motion of the elbow improved from 0° preoperatively to a postoperative mean of 115.67° (115.67 ± 23.29). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from a mean of 67.67 ± 11.00 to 86.67 ± 8.38 points, with excellent results in nine patients, good in five, and fair in one. This difference is statistically significant ( t = −6.862; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Open arthrolysis and monolateral hinged external fixation are effective in treating posttraumatic ankylosed elbow. Arthrolysis should be performed by a combination of lateral and medial approaches. In addition, routine hinged external fixation and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve may improve the postoperative recovery of elbow stiffness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited forearm rotation is a frequent combined disorder in elbow stiffness. If the radial head cannot be saved during open arthrolysis, prosthetic replacement might be considered because it enhances stability and allows early motion. Methods: In this study we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 8 patients (7 men, 1 woman) who underwent open arthrolysis and simultaneous prosthetic replacement after resection of the radial head to restore elbow range of motion and forearm rotation. Patients were a mean age of 31.7 years (range, 22-40 years). Results: Postoperatively, the mean (range) active range of motion improved from 29.4° (0°-70°) to 113.1° (80°-135°), mean (range) supination increased from 38.8° (0°-80°) to 77.5° (50°-90°), and mean (range) pronation improved from 18.8° (0°-80°) to 68.8° (50°-80°). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from a mean (range) of 57.5 (50-70) to 92.5 (85-100) points. No elbow valgus instability was detected over a mean duration of 26 months of follow-up. The implant was considered stable in all patients. Conclusions: Open arthrolysis and prosthetic replacement of the radial head are effective in treating elbow stiffness with associated rotation limitation after resection of the radial head. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]