Search

Background While nutritional interventions with prebiotics and probiotics seem to exert immunological effects, their clinical implications in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected subjects initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) at advanced HIV disease remain unclear. Methods This was a pilot multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in which 78 HIV-infected, ART-naive subjects with <350 CD4 T cells/μL or AIDS were randomized to either daily PMT25341 (a mixture of synbiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids and amino acids) or placebo for 48 weeks, each in combination with first-line ART. Primary endpoints were changes in CD4 T-cell counts and CD4/CD8 ratio from baseline to week 48 and safety. Secondary endpoints were changes in markers of T-cell activation, bacterial translocation, inflammation, and α and β microbiota diversity. Results Fifty-nine participants completed the follow-up with a mean CD4+ T-cell count of 221 ± 108 cells/μL and mean CD4/CD8 ratio of 0.26 ± 0.19. PMT25341 was well tolerated, without grade 3–4 adverse effects attributable to the intervention. While most of the assessed biomarkers improved during the follow-up in both arms, PMT25341-treated subjects did not experience any significant change, compared to placebo-treated subjects, in mean CD4+ T-cell count change (278 vs 250 cells/μL, P =.474) or CD4/CD8 ratio change (0.30 vs 0.32, P =.854). Similarly, we did not detect differences between treatment arms in secondary endpoints. Conclusions In HIV-infected patients initiating ART at advanced disease, the clear immunological benefits of ART were not enhanced by this nutritional intervention targeting the gut-associated lymphoid tissue and microbiota. Clinical Trials Registration NCT00870363. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Several studies have involved antiretroviral therapy in the pathogenesis of low bone mineral density (BMD), while others have not confirmed this association. In this study we analyze the impact of HIV status, traditional risk factors and antiretroviral therapy in BMD in an HIV-infected population living in Madrid. Material and methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 107 individuals infected with HIV and exposed to antiretroviral treatment to estimate the prevalence of decreased BMD. Bone mineral density of lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In a multivariate analysis variables related with HIV status, antiretroviral drugs and traditional risk factors were included. Results: Low BMD was diagnosed in 63 participants (58.9%), including osteoporosis in 11 (10%). At least one cause of osteoporosis was identified in 43 patients (40%), with a deficiency of vitamin D in 86 (89%) and secondary hyperparathyroidism in 30 (28%). In multivariate analysis, increasing age, a treatment based on boosted PI and tenofovir DF, and previous exposure to tenofovir were identified as independent risk factors for a decreased BMD in both lumbar spine and femoral neck. Conclusions: We have confirmed a high prevalence of reduced BMD, which is favoured by ritonavir-boosted PI and TDF. Bone safety should continue to be evaluated in clinical trials and cohort studies in order to demonstrate that the new drugs offer additional advantages regarding the impact on BMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ( DLBCL) patients failing rituximab-containing therapy have a poor outcome with the current salvage regimens. We conducted a phase 1b trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose ( MTD) of lenalidomide in combination with R- ESHAP (rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, methylprednisolone) ( LR- ESHAP) in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Efficacy data were collected as a secondary objective. Subjects received 3 cycles of lenalidomide at escalating doses (5, 10 or 15 mg) given on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle, in combination with R- ESHAP. Responding patients received BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. Lenalidomide 10 mg/d was identified as the MTD because, in the 15 mg cohort, one patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 angioedema) and two patients had mobilization failure. A total of 19 patients (3, 12 and 4 in the 5, 10 and 15 mg cohorts, respectively) were evaluable. All toxicities occurring during LR- ESHAP cycles resolved appropriately and no grade 4-5 non-haematological toxicities were observed. The complete remission and overall response rates were 47·4% and 78·9%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 24·6 (17·4-38·2) months, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 44% and 63%, respectively. In conclusion, the LR- ESHAP regimen is feasible and yields encouraging outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Quimioterapia is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In a prospective study of 418 HIV subjects receiving treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C, no risk factors for infections were identified. After multivariate analysis, severe neutropenia was not independently associated with the development of serious infections.Background. It is unclear whether pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) -induced neutropenia in subjects coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with increased risk of serious infections.Methods. This was a prospective cohort study conducted between 2000 and 2012 in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects initiating treatment with peg-IFN plus ribavirin (RBV). Infections were defined as serious when patients required hospitalization, treatment was discontinued, or the patient died. The association between neutropenia (severe, <500 cells/μL; nonsevere, 500 -1500 cells/μL) and infections (serious infections and infections of any severity) was determined by logistic regression analysis.Results. Among 418 subjects (3928 person-weeks of therapy), infections occurred in 123 (29%), accounting for 149 episodes (3.8 infections per 100 person-weeks of therapy). Most infections (47%) involved the upper respiratory tract and were minor. After a multivariate analysis adjusted by age, sex, CD4 count, AIDS, antiretroviral therapy, cirrhosis, neutrophil count, type of peg-IFN, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use, none of these variables remained independently associated with the risk of infection. Twenty subjects developed a serious infection (4.8% of all patients). The frequency of serious infections was higher in subjects with severe neutropenia compared to those with nonsevere neutropenia and without neutropenia, although it was not statistically significant (8.6%, 4.8%, and 3.6%, respectively; trend test P = .281). In multivariate analysis, neutropenia was not independently associated with increased risk of serious infections.Conclusions. In this large prospective cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with peg-IFN plus RBV, serious infections were uncommon, nonfatal, and unrelated to peg-IFN -induced severe neutropenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the most frequent resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to lopinavir/ritonavir in a cohort of patients attended in daily practice. Methods We retrospectively identified 195 multitreated subjects with virological failure. Patients were classified as follows: (i) 71 (36.4%) never received lopinavir/ritonavir (lopinavir/ritonavir naive); (ii) 75 (38.5%) had previously failed on lopinavir/ritonavir; and (iii) 49 (25.1%) were on lopinavir/ritonavir at failure. RAM patterns were assessed. Medians, IQRs, percentages, Kruskal–Wallis, χ2 or Fisher's exact test, and multinomial logistic regression were used whenever appropriate. Results L10I/F, K20R, L24I, L33F, M36I, M46I/L, I47V, G48V, F53L, I54V, A71V, G73S, V82A, I84V and L90M (all with P ≤ 0.037) were protease RAMs overexpressed in patients with lopinavir/ritonavir failure. L10I, M36I, M46I, I54V, L63P, A71V, V82A, I84V and L90M were the most common in lopinavir/ritonavir-naive patients. Other IAS-USA RAMs for lopinavir/ritonavir (L10R/V, K20M, V32I, I47A, I50V, I54L/A/M/T/S, A71T, L76V and V82F/T/S) were not associated with previous or current failure to lopinavir/ritonavir. Lopinavir/ritonavir failure was associated with the number of protease RAMs (OR = 1.146, 95% CI = 1.287, 1.626), higher exposure to protease inhibitors, and the presence of E44D, L33F, I54V and I84V. Conclusions In multitreated patients with previous or current lopinavir/ritonavir failure, some protease mutations are selected at significantly greater rates. L10I, M36I, I54V, L63P, A71V, V82A and L90M were found in >50% of cases. Thus, their presence should be expected when genotypic testing results are not available. The number of protease RAMs and higher prior exposures to protease inhibitors were significantly associated with lopinavir/ritonavir failure. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations (TE) and grade 4 total bilirubin elevations (TBE) among HIV/HCV- coinfected treatment-naïve patients with an initial regimen including 2 nucleoside analogs plus efavirenz (EFV), nevirapine (NVP), or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r).Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study that recruited 745 HIV-infected drug-naïve patients with detectable plasma HCV RNA who started a regimen including EFV, NVP, or PI/r.Results: EFV was prescribed in 323 (43%), NVP in 126 (17%), and a PI/r in 296 (40%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 TE were observed in 19 (5.9%) individuals receiving EFV compared with 14 (11%) on NVP (P = .056) and 31 (10.5%) on PI/r (P = .036). Grade 4 TBE were identified in 7 (2.2%) patients on EFV, 1 (0.8%) on NVP, and 11 (3.7%) on PI/r (P = .19). Therapy was discontinued due to liver toxicity in 13 (4%) patients on EFV, 16 (13%) on NVP, and 17 (6%) on PI/r (P = .003).Conclusions: Regimens including EFV, NVP, or PI/r are generally safe in treatment-naïve HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Grade 3-4 TE are less commonly seen with EFV than with PI/r. Discontinuations due to hepatotoxicity were less frequent for patients receiving EFV than for those treated with NVP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has substantially modified the natural history of HIV infection. At the beginning of the cART era the objective was focused on HIV-1-associated mortality and morbidity, but as this objective was accomplished other issues emerged, including toxicity, resistance and compliance with treatment. Moreover, the participation of other disease mechanisms, such as proinflammatory activity, in the so-called non-AIDS events is becoming increasingly important. To overcome these issues, therapeutic options have dramatically expanded, which has made the management of HIV-1-infected patients increasingly complex. The intense changes seen raise the question of what will be the future of HIV infection and its treatment. A projection into the future may help to reflect on current limitations, needs and research priorities, to optimize patient care. To debate on this topic a group of 38 experts has initiated The HIV 2020 Project, with the aim of reflecting on the future of HIV infection and identifying the needs that should be the attention of research in different areas. This document summarizes the group's conclusions on the future of antiretroviral treatment, presented as 20 relevant questions. Each question includes the current status of the topic and our vision for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The common response to stopping anti-HIV treatment is an increase of HIV-RNA load and decrease in CD4+, but not all the patients have similar responses to this therapeutic strategy. The aim was to identify predictive markers of CD4+ cell count declines to < 350/µL in CD4-guided antiretroviral treatment interruptions. Methods: 27 HIV-infected patients participated in a prospective multicenter study in with a 24 month follow-up. Patients on stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), with CD4+ count > 600/µL, and HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml for at least 6 months were offered the option to discontinue antiretroviral therapy. The main outcome was a decline in CD4+ cell count to < 350/µL. Results: After 24 months of follow-up, 16 of 27 (59%) patients (who discontinued therapy) experienced declines in CD4+ cell count to < 350/µL. Patients with a CD4+ nadir of < 200 cells/µL had a greater risk of restarting therapy during the follow-up (RR (CI95%): 3.37 (1.07; 10.36)). Interestingly, lymphoproliferative responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis purified protein derivative (PPD) below 10000 c.p.m. at baseline (4.77 (1.07; 21.12)), IL-4 production above 100 pg/ mL at baseline (5.95 (1.76; 20.07)) in PBMC cultured with PPD, and increased IL-4 production of PBMC with p24 antigen at baseline (1.25 (1.01; 1.55)) were associated to declines in CD4+ cell count to < 350/µL. Conclusion: Both the number (CD4+ nadir) and the functional activity of CD4+ (lymphoproliferative response to PPD) predict the CD4+ decrease associated with discontinuation of ART in patients with controlled viremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Tipranavir, a novel protease inhibitor, has demonstrated antiviral activity against protease inhibitor- resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-2) trial is an ongoing, open-label, phase III trial comparing ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) plus an optimized background regimen with an individually optimized, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced, HIV-1–infected patients. Methods. Patients at 171 sites in Europe and Latin America who had received ≥2 previous protease inhibitor regimens, had triple-antiretroviral class experience, had an HIV-1 RNA level ≥1000 copies/mL, and had genotypically demonstrated primary protease inhibitor resistance were eligible. After genotypic resistance tests were performed, a protease inhibitor and optimized background regimen were selected before randomization. Patients were randomized to receive either TPV/r or comparator protease inhibitor-ritonavir (CPI/r) and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed HIV-1 load reduction ≥1 log10 less than the baseline value without a treatment change at week 24. Results. A total of 863 patients were randomized and treated. At baseline, the mean HIV-1 load was 4.73 log10 copies/mL, and the mean CD4+ cell count was 218 cells/mm³. The preplanned 24-week efficacy analyses of 539 patients demonstrated treatment response rates of 41% in the TPV/r arm and 14.9% in the CPI/r arm (intent-to-treat analysis; P<.0001). The mean CD4+ cell count increased by 51 cells/mm³ in the TPV/r arm and by 18 cells/mm³ in the CPI/r arm. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Grade 3 or greater elevations in serum transaminase, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r arm. Conclusions. TPV/r had superior antiviral activity and increased immunologic benefits, compared with CPI/ r, at week 24 among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a prospective, randomized clinical trial study on the efficacy and safety of a short-course of a combination of a glycopeptide and gentamicin compared with a combination of cloxacillin and gentamicin for treatment of right-side endocarditis caused by Staphyloccocus aureus among drug users. Patients and methods; Results of the study; Discussion.

Copyright of Revista Española de Quimioterapia is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To assess the risk for development of tuberculosis among anergic patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Tertiary referral center.Patients: All HIV-infected patients who had a baseline positive protein purified derivative test (PPD) and delayed-type hypersensitivity skin tests.Measurements: Development of active tuberculosis.Results: Of 374 patients, 108 (29%) had positive results of PPD tests, 154 (41%) had negative results of PPD tests but no skin anergy, and 112 (30%) were anergic. Conversion of the PPD to positive was observed in 10 of 67 (15%) patients with previously negative results of PPD tests and no anergy and in 3 of 36 (8%) anergic patients who were retested during the follow-up period (mean, 26 months). The risk for active tuberculosis to develop in patients not receiving isoniazid chemoprophylaxis was similar in patients with a positive PPD test result (10.4 cases per 100 person-years) and in anergic patients (12.4 cases per 100 person-years) and higher in both groups than in nonanergic patients with a negative PPD test result (5.4 cases per 100 person-years). Tuberculosis was more frequent among intravenous drug abusers with no previous isoniazid treatment (63 of 290, 22%) than among homosexual men (0 of 29) or patients in other HIV transmission categories (0 of 31). Preventive therapy with isoniazid reduced tuberculosis development (4% as compared with 31%; P = 0.008). Among 15 anergic patients who had CD4 counts measured within 3 months of tuberculosis development, only 1 (7%) had more than 500 CD4 cells/mm3.Conclusions: Anergic HIV-infected patients are at high risk for development of tuberculosis. Anergic HIV-infected patients, in addition to HIV-infected patients with positive results of PPD tests, should be offered preventive therapy if they live in areas with a high prevalence of tuberculosis, at least when the CD4 count decreases to less than 500 CD4 cells/mm3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an 8-month period nine patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were diagnosed as having visceral leishmaniasis; all diagnoses were based on cultures (eight from bone marrow and one from the skin). Visceral leishmaniasis developed before full-blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in seven patients and at the same time as or after AIDS in the other two patients. Three patients had a history of leishmaniasis. Clinical manifestations and laboratory findings were atypical. Leishmania species were cultured from samples taken from all patients; however, six patients had an insignificant antileishmanial antibody titer and Leishmania amastigotes were not seen in their bone marrow smears. Four isolates were identified by isoenzyme analysis as Leishmania donovani infantum. Five patients died, including two patients who had completed at least one 3-week course of therapy with N-methylglucamine antimoniate. Screening should be done for visceral leishmaniasis in patients with HIV infection who live or travel in areas where the disease is endemic. The diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis may frequently be missed if cultures are not done. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction EuroSIDA has previously reported a poorer clinical prognosis for HIV-positive individuals in Eastern Europe (EE) as compared with patients from other parts of Europe, not solely explained by differences in patient characteristics. We explored regional variability in self-reported HIV management at individual EuroSIDA clinics, with a goal of identifying opportunities to reduce the apparent inequalities in health. Methods A survey () on HIV management was conducted in early 2014 in all currently active EuroSIDA clinics. Responders in EE were compared with clinics in all other EuroSIDA regions combined (non-EE). Characteristics were compared between regions using Fishers exact test. Results A total of 80/97 clinics responded (82.5%, 12/15 in EE, 68/82 in non-EE). Participating clinics reported seeing a total of 133,532 patients [a median of 1300 per clinic (IQR 700-2399)]. The majority of clinics requested viral load and CD4 measurements at least every six months for patients on as well as off ART (EE 66.7%, non-EE 75%, p=0,72). Significantly fewer EE clinics performed resistance tests before ART as well as upon treatment failure (Figure 1). Half of the EE clinics indicated following WHO guidelines (EE 50%, non-EE 7.4%, p<0.0001), whereas most non-EE clinics followed EACS guidelines (non-EE 76.5%, EE 41.7%, p=0.017). The majority of EE clinics and ¼ non-EE clinics indicated deferral of ART initiation in asymptomatic individuals until CD4 ≤350 cells/mm3 (Figure 1). There were no significant regional differences in screening haematology, liver or renal function, which the majority of clinics reported to do routinely. However, EE clinics reported screening significantly less for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and only about half screened for tobacco use, alcohol consumption and drug use (Figure 1). Screening for cervical cancer and for anorectal cancer was low in both regions (Figure 1). Conclusions We found significant regional variability in self-reported HIV management across Europe, with less resistance testing, screening for CVD and substance use in EE. EE clinics indicated deferral of ART initiation for longer than non-EE clinics. Adherence to international guidelines for cervical cancer screening was poor in both regions. Whether differences in HIV management are reflected in clinical outcomes deserves further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Etravirine has become an alternative in HIV/HCV coinfected patients because of safety and lack of interactions with anti-HCV drugs. The aim of this study was to establish the risk of liver toxicity in HIV/HCV coinfected patients receiving etravirine in the clinical setting, according to the degree of liver fibrosis and different accompanying drugs. Material and Methods Cohort study of 211 patients initiating etravirine as part of their antiretroviral regimen. HCV coinfection was defined as a positive RNA-HCV, whereas baseline liver fibrosis was assessed by transient elastography at baseline. Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increased AST/ALT, 5-fold higher over upper, normal limits for patients with normal baseline values, or 3.5-fold if altered at baseline. Results HCV coinfection was observed in 145 patients (69%) with a longer time of HIV infection and time on HAART than mono-infected patients, and a lower nadir (182 vs 227 cells/mL; p=0.02) and baseline CD4+ count (446 vs 552 cells/mL; p=0.02). Etravirine was used with two nucleoside analogues in 62%, with boosted darunavir in 17%, with raltegravir in 10%, and with darunavir plus raltegravir or maraviroc in 10% of patients without differences according to HCV serostatus. Transient elastography in 117 patients performed at etravirine initiation (median, 33 days) showed fibrosis 1 and fibrosis 4 in 37% and 24% of cases, and median stiffness value was 8.25 kPa (3.5-69). During an accumulated follow-up of 449.3 patient-years (median, 611 days), only one coinfected patient with fibrosis 4 (stiffness value, 50.1 kPa), receiving a rescue regimen including darunavir/r plus maraviroc plus two nucleoside analogues, developed a grade 3-4 of liver toxicity (0.5%). There were no other episodes of liver toxicity, as defined, and only 6 (3%) and 9 patients (4%) had a grade 1 and 2 of toxicity, respectively, in most cases related to HCV coinfection (6 and 6 cases). Moreover, HCV coinfection or advanced fibrosis was not associated to a higher risk of etravirine discontinuation (26% vs 21%; p=0.27, log-rank test) or virologic failure (9% vs 11%, p=0.56). CD4+ cell count increase was lower in HCV patients (+23 vs +86 at 6 month; p=0.02). Conclusions Etravirine is safe in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, even in presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis and as part of different antiretroviral regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Concomitant use of combination antiretroviral regimen (cART) and cancer chemotherapy is difficult due to complex interactions and increased toxicity. Raltegravir could be an adequate option through its favourable drug-drug interaction profile. Methods Prospective longitudinal study of HIV patients with cancer, AIDS related or not, undergoing chemotherapy. Patients without resistance or previous failure were switched or initiated raltegravir plus two nucleoside analogues. Plasma trough levels of raltegravir were measured. Results Overall, 28 patients receiving a raltegravir-based regimen (4 naive) with tenofovir-emtricitabine (18 cases) or abacavir-lamivudine (10 cases) were included. Mean age was 46.2 years (IQR, 39-52.7), and 79% were male. Median time of HIV was 201.7 months, CD4+ nadir was 268 cells/mm3, and 75% had previous AIDS. At the diagnosis of neoplasia, 17 were on protease inhibitors and 4 with efavirenz. Ten patients had a non-HIV-related cancer (three breast, two pancreatic, one Ewing sarcoma, one myeloblastic leukemia, one melanoma, one parotid adenocarcinoma, one lung), and 18 had an HIV-related cancer (nine non-Hodgkin lymphoma, seven Hodgkin disease, two anal). Overall, 43% of patients received more than one line of chemotherapy, including antimetabolites in 12 patients (5-FU, capecitabine, methotrexate, gemcitabine), alkylating agents in 12 cases (ciclophosphamide, iphosphamide), vinca alkaloids in 20 patients (vincristine, vinblastine, vindesine), antitumor antibiotics in 16 cases (adriamycin), cisplatin o carboplatin in six and monoclonal antibodies in six patients (rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab). Six patients modified the doses of antineoplastic agents due to toxicity (four neutropenia), not related to raltegravir. During a median follow up of 12.7 patients-year in concomitant therapy, there was only 1 case of virological failure and no patient discontinued raltegravir. Plasma concentrations of raltegravir in eight patients showed a median concentration of 143 ng/mL (79-455). Four patients (14%) died during the study, not related to AIDS progression. Raltegravir was continued after chemotherapy in all the cases. Conclusions A raltegravir-based therapy is safe and effective in HIV patients undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy, regardless of the type of tumour, and type and duration of chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic data show adequate raltegravir levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The combination of lamivudine plus a protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir (PI/r) has become an alternative as simplification strategy in HIV-infected patients with toxicity/intolerance to other nucleoside analogues (NA). Lamivudine plus darunavir/r (DRV/r) could be an adequate once daily option. Materials and Methods Prospective cohort study of 48 HIV-infected patients on suppressive triple therapy-based HAART, HBV negative, who switched to lamivudine 300 mg plus DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily. Results Mean age was 50 yrs (35-74), and 65% were male. Thirty patients (63%) had HCV co-infection (fibrosis 4 in 7 cases, 23%). Median time of HIV infection was 19.1 years, and CD4+ count nadir was 220 cells/µL (2-604). They had received a mean of three regimens before (2-20), and 20 (42%) had a previous AIDS diagnosis. In eight cases, a previous resistance test showed two to seven secondary mutations in the protease gene, without resistance to DRV/r (one patient with the I84V mutation). At baseline, patients had viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) for a median time of 1263 days (341-1884), and they were receiving predominantly a PI based regimen (ATV in four, FPV in four, LPV in three, DRV in six) or an efavirenz-based regimen (seven). The main reason to switching to this dual therapy was toxicity (35 patients, 75%), mainly renal toxicity attributed to tenofovir (24 cases). During 104.3 patients-year of follow-up (median 912 days), only two patients (4%) failed at 27 and 505 days, due to non-adherence and lost to follow up, respectively. Total cholesterol and triglycerides increased significantly during the first six months after initiation (TC, from 185 to 269 mg/dL; p=0.01, TG from 118 to 185 mg/dL; p=0.03, TC/HDL ratio, from 4.09 to 4.66) and decreased after. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved during follow up (from 86 to 96.1 mL/min; p=0.13). In patients with renal toxicity as cause of switch there was a mild, no significant improvement during the first year (from 63.3 to 68.7 mL/min), although an improvement in protein-uria levels (protein/creatinine ratio, from 171 to 126 mg/g; p=0.04) was observed soon after initiation. Conclusions Dual therapy with lamivudine plus darunavir boosted with ritonavir once daily is safe and effective as simplification strategy in HIV-infected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction No controlled clinical trials had studied the role of maraviroc (MRV) in fully suppressed patients []. Materials and Methods MRV-cohort is an observational, retrospective, multicentric (27 sites) large cohort study of patients starting MRV in clinical practice under different circumstances, with at least 48 weeks of follow-up. For the present analysis we selected all those patients starting with an HIV-RNA<50 copies/mL. Demographics, baseline CD4 cell count, past history of antiretroviral treatment (ART), tropism, reasons for MRV use, MRV based therapy and change/end of MRV use were assessed. Paired analysis of lipid, hepatic and kidney profile changes and univariate and multivariate analyses of HIV-RNA<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks were explored. Results We included 247 out of 667 subjects from the entire cohort. At study entry, their median age was 47 years, 23% were women, 31% MSM, 49% had CDC category C, median CD4+ counts were 468 cells/mm3, 46% were HCV+ and 4.5% AgHBs+. Tropism information was available in 197 (94% R5). Median length of prior ARTV was 10.7 years, with exposure to a median of three drug families. Main reasons for prescribing MRV were: toxicity 38%, inmunodiscordance 23%, simplification 19% and admission in a clinical trial 10.4%. MRV based therapies used were MRV+2NRTIs 9%, MRV+PI 46%, MRV+PI+other 40% and MRV+other 5%. At 48 weeks, 23% of patients had changed or finished MRV therapy due to toxicity 2.4%, virological failure 2%, immunological failure 1.2%, simplification 3,2%, trial requirement 9.7%, medical decision 2.8%, treatment suspension 1.2% and unknown 0.4%. At 48 weeks, no significant changes were observed in lipid, hepatic or kidney profiles, and 85% of patients remained with HIV-RNA<50 copies/mL. Focusing on viral response univariate and multivariate models did not show any significant baseline variable explaining viral failure. Conclusions In clinical practice MRV was used, mostly in R5 positive patients, with adequate efficacy and tolerance, but important number of patients changed due to non-clinical reasons. In this scenario neither reason for use of MRV nor MRV-based therapy explained viral failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The combination of etravirine (ETR) plus raltegravir (RAL) could be an option for HIV patients with resistance, intolerance or important interactions with other drugs. However, there are few data on the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of this dual therapy, taking into account the effect of HCV co-infection or the possible induction of ETR in the drug metabolism of RAL. Material and Methods Cohort study of HIV patients initiating ETR plus RAL as dual therapy. Plasma trough levels of RAL were measured by LC/MS after at least one month on therapy. Results A total of 25 patients have been included in this combination since 2009. Mean age was 46 years, 72% were male, and 20 patients (80%) had HCV co-infection (seven patients with fibrosis 3-4). Median nadir CD4+ count was 109 (60-209), and 21 patients had an HIV RNA level below 50 copies/mL. Median time on previous therapy was 473 months (IQR, 395-570), and reasons for this dual therapy was toxicity/intolerance in 19, and interactions in nine (two chemotherapy, three DAAs, two methadone, two other). After a median follow up of 722 days (473-1088: 53.3 patients-year), there were no cases of blips or virological failure. Six patients (24%) discontinued therapy after more than 1.5 year on therapy, in four cases due to lost follow up and in two due to simplification after finishing the reason for interaction. There were no cases of liver toxicity, and only two patients increased slightly transaminases values (grade 1 and 2). Total cholesterol and triglycerides levels decrease significantly after initiation (TC, from 182 to 165 at one year; p=0.01; TG from 185 to 143 mg/dL; p=0.01). CT/HDL ratio decreases from 4.35 to 4.28 after six months. Geometric mean plasma trough level of RAL was 166 ng/mL (IQR, 40-249) and only one patient (6%) was below the in vitro IC50 of the wild type. Conclusions The combination of ETR plus RAL as dual therapy is effective and safe in patients with expanded intolerance or interactions. There are no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between both drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Viral reactivation from latently infected cells has become a promising therapeutic approach to eradicate HIV. Due to the complexity of the viral latency, combinations of efficient and available drugs targeting different pathways of latency are needed. In this work, we evaluated the effect of various combinations of bryostatin-1 (BRY) and novel histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) on HIV-reactivation and on cellular phenotype. The lymphocyte (J89GFP) or monocyte/macrophage (THP89GFP) latently infected cell lines were treated with BRY, panobinostat (PNB) and romidepsin (RMD) either alone or in combination. Thus, the effect on the viral reactivation was evaluated. We calculated the combination index for each drug combination; the BRY/HDACIs showed a synergistic HIV-reactivation profile in the majority of the combinations tested, whereas non-synergistic effects were observed when PNB was mixed with RMD. Indeed, the 75% effective concentrations of BRY, PNB and RMD were reduced in these combinations. Moreover, primary CD4 T cells treated with such drug combinations presented similar activation and proliferation profiles in comparison with single drug treated cells. Summing up, combinations between BRY, PNB and/or RMD presented a synergistic profile by inducing virus expression in HIV-latently infected cells, rendering these combinations an attractive novel and safe option for future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple studies have shown that HIV-1 patients may develop virus reservoirs that impede eradication; these reservoirs include the central nervous system (CNS). Despite an undetectable viral load in patients treated with potent antiretrovirals, current therapy is unable to purge the virus from these latent reservoirs. To broaden the inhibitory range and effectiveness of current antiretrovirals, the potential of bryostatin was investigated as a latent HIV-1 activator. We used primary astrocytes, NHA cells, and astrocytoma cells U-87. Infected cells with HIV-1NL4.3 were treated with bryostatin alone or in combination with different inhibitors. HIV-1 production was quantified by using ELISA. Transcriptional activity was measured using luciferase reporter gene assays by using lipofectin. We performed cotransfection experiments of the LTR promoter with the active NF-κB member p65/relA. To confirm the NF-κB role, Western blot and confocal microscopy were performed. Bryostatin reactivates latent viral infection in the NHA and U87 cells via activation of protein kinase C (PKC)-alpha and -delta, because the PKC inhibitors rottlerin and GF109203X abrogated the bryostatin effect. No alteration in cell proliferation was found. Moreover, bryostatin strongly stimulated LTR transcription by activating the transcription factor NF-κB. Bryostatin could be a beneficial adjunct to the treatment of HIV-1 brain infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (GClb) in untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy.Methods: A Markov model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of GClb versus other chemoimmunotherapy options. The model comprised three mutually exclusive health states: "progression-free survival (with/without therapy)", "progression (refractory/relapsed lines)", and "death". Each state was assigned a health utility value representing patients' quality of life and a specific cost value. Comparisons between GClb and rituximab plus chlorambucil or only chlorambucil were performed using patient-level clinical trial data; other comparisons were performed via a network meta-analysis using information gathered in a systematic literature review. To support the model, a utility elicitation study was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.Results: There was good agreement between the model-predicted progression-free and overall survival and that from the CLL11 trial. On incorporating data from the indirect treatment comparisons, it was found that GClb was cost-effective with a range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and remained so during deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses under various scenarios.Conclusions: GClb was estimated to increase both quality-adjusted life expectancy and treatment costs compared with several commonly used therapies, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below commonly referenced UK thresholds. This article offers a real example of how to combine direct and indirect evidence in a cost-effectiveness analysis of oncology drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the cost per unit of effectiveness (successful treatment episode) of 2 highly active antiretroviral therapy combinations–emtricitabine/tenofovir DF + efavirenz (TVD + EFV) and lamivudine/zidovudine + efavirenz (COMB + EFV)–in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients from the perspective of costs to society. Methods: This cost-effectiveness analysis was modeled using a decision tree that considered the therapeutic response (successful treatment episode, ie, HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL using data obtained directly from a clinical trial) and the switch to rescue therapy in nonresponders. The time horizon was 24 months of treatment. Cost was defined as direct medical costs (drugs, diagnostic and/or laboratory tests, treatment of adverse effects) and indirect medical costs (productivity losses). All data are presented as €(2005). Sensitivity analysis was 1-factor threshold, adjustment of ex-factory cost, only direct costs, and applying discount rate in the study. The results are presented as incremental costs, success rates, and cost per patient with undetectable viral load or additional success. Results: The expected 48-week cost of the regimen that includes TVD + EFV was €46,464, and for the regimen that included COMB + EFV, €56,198. Therefore, savings of €9734 were achieved for each patient treated with TVD + EFV, as well as a gain of 13% of patients with undetectable viral load after 24 months of treatment. Consequently, treatment with TVD + EFV combination would be dominant in therapy for antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients. Sensitivity tests supported the stability of the base-case analysis. The cost-effectiveness ratios were €619.52 for the TVD + EFV regimen versus €906.41 for the COMB + EFV regimen. Conclusion: Based on the results of this analysis, patients who started treatment of HIV-1 infection with combination TVD + EFV had significantly lower health care resource utilization and overall treatment costs compared with the COMB + EFV combination. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In this study, we have characterized quasispecies dynamics and the evolution of viral tropism in naive HIV-1-infected patients treated with a short course of maraviroc monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01060618) independently of the tropism of the infecting virus. We randomly selected 20 patients infected with viruses displaying different basal tropisms--10 carrying R5 and 10 carrying dual/mixed X4 (DM/X4) viruses--at recruitment as determined by phenotypic assay (Trofile). Evolution of viral quasiespecies at the end of treatment was determined by ultradeep sequencing of the V3 region using a 454 Life Sciences Platform and geno2pheno (g2p) algorithm for viral tropism prediction. The false-positive rate (FPR) that defines the probability of classifying an R5 virus falsely as X4 was set at 10%. X4-specific HIV-1 viral load (VL) was calculated from sequences with an FPR of <3.75%. Virological response as defined as >1-log10 copies/ml reduction in VL was detected in 70% of patients independently of the basal tropism of the infecting virus. Viral tropism remained stable, and nonsignificant differences in FPR values before and after treatment were found for the majority of patients in both tropism groups. Only three patients (one with R5 and two with DM/X4 viruses) showed an increased (>1 log) X4 VL, and one patient harboring a DM/X4-tropic virus displayed a significant reduction in FPR values at the end of treatment. Fast changes in the composition of viral populations were observed in all patients after 10 days of maraviroc (MVC) monotherapy treatment, and a complete replacement of viral quasiespecies was found in 3/10 patients carrying R5-using viruses and 4/10 patients carrying DM/X4-using viruses. IMPORTANCE Initiation of treatment with maraviroc requires previous determination of viral tropism by genotypic or phenotypic methods because of the risk of treatment failure and selection of DM/X4-tropic variants. In this study, we confirm previous work showing that the virologic response to maraviroc is independent of basal tropism. By deep-sequencing analysis, we determined that fast changes in viral populations were due to the emergence of minority variants in some patients whereas in others generation of new strains was detected. The risk of DM/X4 selection was very low as FPR values remained stable, and only one patient showed a detrimental switch to DM/X4 variants. Our data show that some DM/X4 viruses are sensitive to maraviroc treatment probably because only a low proportion of DM/X4 viruses use preferentially the X4 receptor and contain authentically maraviroc-resistant viruses that are not accurately detected by current assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maraviroc is a CCR5 antagonist used in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. We and others have suggested that maraviroc could reactivate latent HIV-1. To test the latency-reversing potential of maraviroc and the mechanisms involved, we performed a phase II, single-center, open-label study in which maraviroc was administered for 10 days to 20 HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (EudraCT registration no. 2012-003215-66). All patients completed full maraviroc dosing and follow-up. The primary endpoint was to study whether maraviroc may reactivate HIV-1 latency, eliciting signaling pathways involved in the viral reactivation. An increase in HIV-1 transcription in resting CD4+ T cells, estimated by levels of HIV-1 unspliced RNA, was observed. Moreover, activation of the NF-κB transcription factor was observed in these cells. To elucidate the mechanism of NF-κB activation by maraviroc, we have evaluated in HeLa P4 C5 cells, which stably express CCR5, whether maraviroc could be acting as a partial CCR5 agonist, with no other mechanisms or pathways involved. Our results show that maraviroc can induce NF-κB activity and that NF-κB targets gene expression by CCR5 binding, since the use of TAK779, a CCR5 inhibitor, blocked NF-κB activation and functionality. Taking the results together, we show that maraviroc may have a role in the activation of latent virus transcription through the activation of NF-κB as a result of binding CCR5. Our results strongly support a novel use of maraviroc as a potential latency reversal agent in HIV-1-infected patients. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 persistence in a small pool of long-lived latently infected resting CD4+ T cells is a major barrier to viral eradication in HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. A potential strategy to cure HIV-1-infection is the use of latency-reversing agents to eliminate the reservoirs established in resting CD4+ T cells. As no drug has been shown to be completely effective so far, the search for new drugs and combinations remains a priority for HIV cure. We examined the ability of maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist used as an antiretroviral drug, to activate latent HIV-1 in infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy. The study showed that maraviroc can activate NF-κB and subsequently, induce latent HIV-1-transcription in resting CD4κ T cells from HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Additional interventions will be needed to eliminate latent HIV-1 infection. Our results suggest that maraviroc may be a new latency-reversing agent to interfere with HIV-1 persistence during antiretroviral therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maraviroc is approved for treatment-experienced HIV+ adults in twice-daily administration. Limited data are available on safety, efficacy and use in routine clinical practice, outside of restrictive clinical trials. This retrospective multicenter (27 centers) study included 667 subjects starting a regimen with maraviroc. The primary endpoint was plasma HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL and CD4 + cell count change at 48 and 96 weeks (FDA snapshot analysis). 94.4% had CCR5 tropism (58.3% Trofile™, 29.2% population genotype, and 12% genotyping proviral DNA). Half of the subjects received the drug in scenarios or dosages outside the initial approval. Maraviroc was prescribed for salvage in 346 (51.9%) individuals, as a switch strategy due to toxicity in 135 (38.7%), for immune discordance in 75 (11.2%), and for simplification in 48 (7.2%). After salvage therapy, 223 (64.5%) subjects had HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks, and 178 (51.4%) at 96 weeks. Darunavir/r was included in 224 (64.7%) subjects and associated with higher rates of virological and immunologic efficacy ( p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis MSM (OR 2.25; 95%CI 1.29–3.94) and baseline HIV-RNA <100,000 copies/mL (OR 1.96; 1.06–3.70) were associated with virological suppression. An increase in CD4 + counts was seen at 48 and 96 weeks in subjects with immune discordance ( p < 0.001). Maraviroc was used once-daily in 142 (21.3%) subjects overall, and 68 (57.4%) in switch/simplification. No new safety signals were identified. Besides in salvage regimens, maraviroc was frequently used in switch due to toxicity, simplification, and immune discordance. The efficacy in salvage in clinical practice was higher than in phase III clinical trials, likely due to availability of new active drugs in the regimen. These results increase our understanding of the efficacy, safety, and conditions of prescription of maraviroc beyond the initial registrational trials and the early manufacturer pharmacovigilance programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel combination antiretroviral regimens may be needed for selected HIV-infected patients with toxicity or resistance. We evaluated prospectively 25 virologically suppressed patients, largely pretreated (15.6 years on therapy) with antiretroviral drug toxicity ( n = 19) or interactions ( n = 9, mainly with chemotherapy against non-Hodgkin lymphoma or anti-HCV therapy), who switched to a dual therapy with etravirine (ETR) plus raltegravir (RAL). Patients were required not to have prior virological failure or resistance to both drugs. After a median follow up of 722 days (473–1088: 53.3 patients-year), there were no cases of transient virological replication or failure. Only 1 patient left therapy at day 10 due to a grade 2 rash, and therefore efficacy by intent-to-treat analysis was 96% at 48 weeks. There were no cases of liver toxicity grade 3–4, and total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) levels decrease significantly after initiation (TC, −17 mg/dl; p = 0.01; TG, −42 mg/dl; p = 0.01), as well as the TC/High density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (from 4.35 to 4.28). Geometric mean plasma trough level of RAL was 166 ng/ml (IQR, 40–249), well above the inhibitory concentration 90 (IC 90 ). In conclusion, a novel dual therapy with ETR plus RAL is effective and well tolerated, and it could be an option to maintain durable viral suppression in hard-to-treat HIV-infected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the lipid and apoprotein profile in HIV-I infected patients after twelve months on treatment interruption (TI). A study was conducted to determine the metabolic abnormalities and cytokine derangements in HIV-I infected patients. The result of the study revealed that lipid profile and apoproteins levels vary depending on atherogenic profile after TI.

Background/Aims: Differences in HCV-RNA clearance during therapy might explain the lower efficacy of peg-IFN/RBV in HIV/HCV-coinfection. There are limited data on HCV-RNA clearance and treatment outcomes in liver transplanted (LT) patients. Methods: To assess the rates of SVR and baseline predictors of failure after 48 weeks of weight-adjusted peg-IFN-α-2b/RBV in 120 patients with HCV genotype 1: 61 HCV-monoinfected, 40 HIV-coinfected and 19 LT-patients. Viral clearance was evaluated in patients completing 24 weeks of therapy (n=112, 93%). Results: SVR was significantly lower in HIV-coinfection than in HCV-monoinfection or LT (18 vs. 39 vs. 42%, P<0.02). By multivariate analysis, HIV-coinfection (OR 3.048, 95% CI 1.133–8.196; P=0.027), baseline HCV-RNA over 800,000IU/ml (OR 2.800; 95% CI 1.121–6.993, P=0.027) and higher AST values (OR 1.009; 95% CI 1.001–1.018; P=0.028) were significantly associated to failure. Despite similar baseline HCV load (5.67 vs. 5.75 vs. 5.90log10 IU/ml), HIV-coinfection showed significantly lower HCV-RNA decreases than HCV-monoinfection at weeks 4 (P=0.015), 12 (P=0.015) and 24 (P=0.0003), and than LT at weeks 12 (P=0.003) and 24 (P=0.023). 36/60 subjects (60%) reaching EVR by week 12 obtained SVR vs. 3/60 (5%) who did not. Conclusions: HIV-coinfection was independently associated to treatment failure, and led to a significantly slower HCV-RNA clearance. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article by Gordin et al., which appeared in the July 31, 1997 issue of the magazine, regarding giving isoniazid prophylaxis to patients with HIV infection.

The article discusses neuropsychiatric side effect of efavirenz (EFV) on the treatment of HIV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The common side effects of the EFV, which is considered the first-line antiretroviral drug for HIV infection, include headache, insomnia and mood disorders. Study suggests that HIV/HCV patients who were treated with interferon (IFN) were recorded to have mild and moderate symptoms compared with EFV-treated patients.