Search

This article provides a summary of a Cochrane review on the medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). EoE is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus that can affect individuals of all ages, but is more common in males and adults. The review evaluated the efficacy and safety of different medical interventions for EoE, including corticosteroids and biologics. The findings suggest that corticosteroids improve clinical and histological outcomes, while biologics may improve clinical outcomes. However, the cost and availability of biologics should be considered. Further research and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to fully evaluate and compare these treatments. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) involves a chronic immune‐mediated response to dietary antigens. Recent work identifies T‐cell clonality in children with EoE, however, it is unknown whether this is true in adults or whether there is a restricted food‐specific T‐cell repertoire. We sought to confirm T‐cell receptor (TCR) clonality in EoE and assess for differences with specific food triggers. Methods: Bulk TCR sequencing was performed on mRNA isolated from esophageal biopsies obtained from adults and children with EoE (n = 15) who had food triggers confirmed by endoscopic evaluation. Non‐EoE adult and pediatric controls (n = 10) were included. Differences in TCR clonality by disease and treatment status were assessed. Shared and similar V‐J‐CDR3s were assessed based on specific food triggers. Results: Active EoE biopsies from children but not adults displayed decreased unique TCRα/β clonotypes and increased relative abundance of TCRs comprising >1% of the total compared to non‐EoE controls and paired inactive EoE samples. Among patients in which baseline, post diet elimination, and food trigger reintroduction samples (n = 6) were obtained, we observed ~1% of TCRs were shared only between pre‐diet elimination and trigger reintroduction. Patients with a shared EoE trigger (milk) had a greater degree of shared and similar TCRs compared to patients with differing triggers (seafood, wheat, egg, soy). Conclusion: We confirmed relative clonality in children but not adults with active EoE and identified potential food‐specific TCRs, particularly for milk‐triggered EoE. Further studies are needed to better identify the broad TCR repertoire relevant to food triggers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease characterized histologically by > 15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf). Esophageal mucosal mast cells have been implicated in EoE pathogenesis. The association of atopy with EoE has been established but has not been correlated with levels of serum tryptase. The lack of concurrent atopy in some patients suggests the possibility that atopy may either be the related subtype of EoE or may be a sign of comorbidities. No study has looked at whether patients present with different phenotypes/comorbid disease when they have evidence of elevated serum tryptase. We hypothesized that these patients differ with respect to presentation and comorbidities with more refractory GI disease.Aims: To examine whether elevations of serum tryptase associate with different, more severe clinical presentations in EoE patients which may be explained via mast cell activation.Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review identified 72 patients with EoE with results for serum tryptase between 2015 and 2016. Patients were classified as TryptaseHI (tryptase > 10.9 µg/l) and TryptaseLO (< 10.9 µg/l). Clinical characteristics and treatment response were compared using univariate analysis and multivariate regression between the groups.Results: Out of 72 patients, 12 were tested as TryptaseHI (16.7%, 95% CI 8.1-25.3%). TryptaseHI was associated frequently with asthma (P = 0.0003), urticaria (P = 0.002), arthralgia (P = 0.005), sinusitis (P = 0.03), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.046), and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (P = 0.001). Asthma and arthralgia were found to be significantly associated with TryptaseHI (P = 0.0013, P = 0.0098, respectively). Mucosal eosinophil counts and tryptase levels were not correlated (R2 0.095, P = 0.77). Tryptase did not resolve with resolution of esophageal eosinophilia.Conclusions: We found that EoE patients with elevated tryptase levels more commonly presented with asthma, urticaria, arthralgia, nausea/vomiting, sinusitis, and more distal eosinophilia. This indicates that atopy in EoE patients warrants further exploration. The lack of correlation between histologic remission and reduction of serum tryptase levels post-treatment suggests that mast cell activation may be an independent, yet associated disease. More study into this unique association is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a relatively recently discovered disease of increasing incidence and prevalence and is a common cause of dysphagia and food bolus impaction. The definition of eosinophilic esophagitis continues to evolve, most recently with the characterization of proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. The number of high-quality prospective, controlled trials guiding therapeutic decisions in eosinophilic esophagitis has increased steadily over the past several years. Treatment options at present focus on dietary therapy, particularly implementation of a 6-food elimination diet, and medical therapy, primarily the use of swallowed, topical corticosteroids. Proton pump inhibitors play an important role in current management. Conservative esophageal dilation is effective at ameliorating dysphagia in symptomatic patients with esophageal strictures. We conducted an evidence-based review of the diagnosis and treatment options in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. The understanding of eosinophilic esophagitis continues to be refined. Continued validation of appropriate endpoints, however, is essential to establish the efficacy of existing and novel therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Symptoms of vomiting and dysphagia in children with eosinophilic esophagitis may be related to the development of mucosal fibrosis.Aim: Our aims were to (1) investigate esophageal fibrosis in children with EoE compared to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and normal individuals, and (2) to assess the degree of mucosal fibrosis in patients with EoE before and after medical treatment.Methods: A retrospective analysis of esophageal biopsies from patients with EoE, GERD, and normal mucosa was performed. Demographic data, clinical information, eosinophil number, and sub-epithelial fibrosis was compared among the groups. A similar comparison was performed in EoE patients, before and after therapy.Results: Esophageal biopsies from 53 children were included, of which 17 with EoE, 17 GERD, and 19 were normal. A significantly higher number of eosinophils and greater fibrosis was found in EoE patients vs. GERD and normal (fibrosis grade 2: 13 patients in the EoE group vs. one patient for each control group; p=0.0001). After therapy, a significant decrease in fibrosis and eosinophils number was noted in EoE patients [fibrosis grade 2: 10 (71.5%) patients vs. one (7.1%) patient, and eosinophil count was 35.5/HPF vs. 13.4/HPF, pre- and post-therapy, respectively; p<0.05]. The decrease in esophageal fibrosis paralleled the improvement in the related clinical symptoms.Conclusion: A higher degree of esophageal fibrosis was found in patients with EoE compared to GERD or normal esophagus. Conventional therapy in EoE improved obstructive symptoms, decreased eosinophils count, and reversed the degree of fibrosis. We suggest that appropriate therapy in patients with EoE will improve clinical symptoms and histology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]