Search

The Covid-19 pandemic has challenged hard the national health systems worldwide. According to the national policy issued in March 2020 in response to the evolving Covid-19 pandemic, several hospitals were re-configured as Covid-19 centers and elective surgery procedures were rescheduled according to the most recent recommendations. In addition, Covid-19 protected cancer hubs were established, including the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Central Italy. At our Institute, the Breast Surgery Department continued working under the sign of a multidisciplinary approach. The number of professional figures involved in case evaluation was reduced to a minimum and interactions took place in the full respect of the required safety measures. Treatments for benign disease, pure prophylactic surgery and elective reconstructive procedures were all postponed and priority was assigned to the histologically-proven malignant breast tumors and highly suspicious lesions. From March 15th though April 30th 2020, we treated a total of 79 patients. This number is fully consistent with the average quantitative standards reached by our Department under ordinary circumstances. Patients were mostly discharged the day after surgery and none was readmitted due to surgery-related late complications. More generally, post-operative complications rates were unexpectedly low, particularly in light of the relatively high number of reconstructive procedures performed in this emergency situation. A strict follow up was performed based on the close contact with the surgical staff by telephone, messaging apps and telemedicine. Patients ascertainment for their Covid-19 status prior to hospital admission and hospital discharge allowed to maintain the "no-Covid-19" status at our Institution. In addition, during the aforementioned time window, none of the care providers developed SARS-CoV-2 infection or disease, as shown by the results of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M and G profiling. In conclusions, elective breast cancer surgery procedures were successfully performed in a lockdown situation due to a novel viral pandemic. The well-coordinated regional and hospital efforts in terms of medical resource re-allocation and definition of clinical priorities allowed to maintain high quality standards of breast cancer care while ensuring safety to the cancer patients and care providers involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background For patients with melanoma metastases in the pelvic and groin regions, the median survival time (MST) was 8 mo with old treatments, whereas today is approximately 20 mo with new target therapy and novel immunotherapy. Unfortunately, approximately 30% of patients are nonresponsive to these new drugs. Materials and methods Thirty-six patients, previously progressing after standard treatments, collectively received 146 melphalan (30 mg/m 2 ) hypoxic pelvic perfusions with hemofiltration, in association with palliative excision in most cases. Results The median follow-up time was 15 mo. Among 36 patients, three patients were alive without evidence of disease after 62, 95, and 118 mo, respectively. Thirty-three patients died of melanoma. The overall MST was 15 mo. The 5-y survival rate was 8%. The MST was 37 mo for stage IIIB; 19 mo for stage IIIC; and 6 mo for stage IV. The MST was 11 mo for patients with ≥1 mitosis per mm 2 and 20 mo for patients with <1 mitosis per mm 2 ; 17 mo for patients who received excision and 7 mo for patients who did not receive excision; and 19.5 mo for patients who received >2 treatments and 7.5 mo for patients who received ≤2 treatments. Conclusions Pelvic/inguinal perfusion is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with advanced melanoma. Further studies are necessary to establish if it may play a role in patients who fail current systemic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]