Search

This essay creates a heuristic homology between postcoloniality and strains of survivorship whose very contingency "de-humaniz[ es] greed as the primum mobile . . . [and thereby composes] the dangerous supplement, one on one yet collective" (Spivak, "Marx" 281). Using Spivak's attempt to globalize Marx by abjuring epistemological enterprises that privilege "a philosophically correct structural position" (281) at the expense of the subaltern's "right to intellectual labor" (284), this essay reads the phantasms and afflictions of the Scottish diaspora in the 1940s coal-mining town of Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, as represented by Sheldon Currie's The Glace Bay Miners' Museum (1996), for a postcoloniality that, in being attuned to what is left of communally viable forms of collective survival, especially as these remain inappropriable by capital, yields proliferative subjectifications of traumatic experience that are capable of eluding the open "secret of the theft of surplus value" (279) by which global capitalism ruthlessly extracts the unraveling of the biosphere as normality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This essay challenges the reduction of Gayatri Spivak's critique of postcolonial reason to functional and derivative identity politics. Such a reading neutralizes the philosophical nature of Spivak's conceptual contributions. Because Spivak is derided as preaching about subaltern victimhood, this essay discerns what is philosophical about the concept of the subaltern. I focus on Spivak's attempt at a space-clearing gesture that can create the possibility for breaking the frame of Eurocentrism. I argue that for this philosopher of the future, the concept of the subaltern is vital for making history and all its victims real. Rather than reiterating the dialectic of 'Western philosopher' and 'postcolonial critic,' our philosopher of the future knows how most philosophy begins with the commonplace of sorrow. In postcolonialism, she prays to be haunted by the ghosts of (our) history's victims. In other words, our philosopher of the future learns how we make (our) ghosts-as (this) history happens to us (right now). Because we are serious about philosophy, and not preserving our over-determined parts in The Great Game, this essay reads Spivak's critique of postcolonial reason to show how she prefigures 'colonialism to come' in Euro- US epistemological training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]