Search

Background: Various techniques have been described for distal biceps tendon reinsertion. Although high success rates have been reported, all current techniques have specific shortcomings, with complications such as heterotopic ossification, nerve damage, and gap formation. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically evaluate a new intramedullary fixation device that might reduce the risk of posterior interosseous nerve lesions. We therefore compared the fixation strength of this new intramedullary button with an extramedullary placed classic extracortical button., Methods: A standard bicortical button was compared to the new intramedullary fixation device using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The fixation strengths were tested both cyclically and statically. Load to failure and method of failure were also recorded., Results: There were no failures during the cyclic load testing. The mean tendon-bone displacement was 0.87 ± 0.13 mm for the bicortical group and 0.83 ± 0.13 mm for the new button. During static loading, the mean load to failure for the bicortical group was 296 ± 97 N, whereas the new button group showed a higher mean load to failure of 356 ± 37 N. Breakout through the anterior cortex was recorded in 2 of 6 bicortically placed buttons and 1 of 6 in the new device., Conclusions: The new intramedullary fixation device yields comparable loads to failure compared with currently used techniques in a biomechanical setup. These findings together with the theoretical advantages suggest that this technique may be a valuable solution for the repair of distal biceps tendon rupture., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this cadaveric study was to investigate different defined drill trajectories through the radial tuberosity for the placement of a cortical button and their proximity to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) by using the double-incision technique., Methods: A total of 10 elbows from 5 fresh entire cadavers were used in this study. Detachment of the distal biceps tendon was performed to simulate its rupture. A standardized double-incision approach was performed, and the radial tuberosity was exposed in full pronation. A drill hole was applied perpendicular through the center of the tuberosity. Another 8 drill holes were applied with the same starting point at the tuberosity with defined trajectories. A cortical button was then placed through the center hole. The distances between the PIN and the exit holes of the different trajectories were measured. The cortical button was analyzed regarding muscle entrapment as well as its closest distance to the PIN., Results: Contact of the PIN and the drill hole was observed for 6 of the 9 trajectories; only the proximal-ulnar, ulnar, and ulnar-distal trajectories had no contact with the PIN in any of the experiments. No contact of the cortical button and the PIN was observed for the ulnar and distal-ulnar drill trajectories only. The minimal distance to the PIN was 1.6 mm for both., Conclusion: Because of the potential risk of PIN injuries, the use of cortical button fixation in combination with the double-incision approach cannot be recommended., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY When treating tears of the distal biceps brachii muscle tendon, we repeatedly noticed a difference between the preoperative ultrasound findings and the operative findings. The aim of the study was to retrospectively correlate these findings in order to determine the sensitivity of the ultrasound examination in everyday orthopaedic practice. Moreover, we compared the results and complications of surgical treatment through two operative techniques used at our department. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the 2004-2016 period 20 patients underwent a surgery at our department for total tear of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii muscle. In 18 patients an ultrasound examination was performed preoperatively. In 3 patients it was repeated. Therefore, there were a total of 21 ultrasound observations made in this group of patients. Excluded were the cases of chronic tendinoses or inveterated tears. The group was divided into two sub-groups. The first sub-group was composed of patients in whom the preoperative ultrasound examination was performed by a radiologist-specialist in the musculoskeletal system, the second sub-group was composed of patients examined by a non-specialist. The ultrasound findings were compared with the operative findings. With the use of a formula for the calculation of sensitivity of the test, the sensitivity of the ultrasound examination was determined for proper recognition of a complete tear of the tendon concerned. Also, we compared the results and complications of the two operative methods applied: the technique using bone anchor vs. the Boyd-Anderson technique of transosseous reinsertion. RESULTS The sensitivity of the ultrasound examination was 91% in examinations performed by a radiologist-specialist and 40% in examinations performed by no-specialists. Both the surgical techniques brought very good results in our group of patients. The reported complications included 2 cases of temporary radial nerve palsy, 1 case of formation of heterotopic ossifications. DISCUSSION The sensitivity of ultrasound is adequate according to the literature. In our group of patients, the same applied only to examinations performed by a radiologist-specialist in the musculoskeletal system. This is because the ultrasound examination of the distal biceps tendon is a highly specialised examination. When performed by a non-specialist, the result of examination obtained in our observations is rather misleading, thus could lead to an improper method of treatment. Partial tears of this tendon are very rare according to the literature. Indirect signs of the partial tear presence at this location detected by ultrasound resulted in most cases in an incorrect diagnosis, therefore the description of a partial tear visualised by the ultrasound should be reserved exclusively for cases when intact fibrils are clearly detected during the examination. For unclear cases, the MRI scan is indicated. The results of both the surgical techniques of reinsertion applied were very good. The method using the bone anchors is technically easier to perform. Nonetheless, it has its specifics. CONCLUSIONS To diagnose correctly the tear of the distal biceps muscle tendon it is essential to perform a thorough clinical examination and to obtain the medical history of the patient, especially the mechanism of injury. Sonography can be beneficial only provided the examination is carried out by a specialist in the musculoskeletal system, with the use of appropriate device and under standard conditions. For surgical treatment of this injury we prefer the technique using a bone anchor, namely particularly since it is technically easier to perform. The functional results are very good. Key words: distal biceps tendon, elbow, tendon tear, ultrasound, suture anchors.

Closed tendon ruptures of the thumb that require secondary reconstruction can affect the extensor pollicis longus (EPL), extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons. Treatment of rupture of the EPB tendon consists of refixation to the bone and temporary transfixation of the joint. In the case of preexisting or posttraumatic arthrosis, definitive arthrodesis of the thumb is the best procedure. Closed ruptures of the EPL and FPL tendons at the wrist joint cannot be treated by direct tendon suture. Rupture of the EPL tendon occurs after distal radius fractures either due to protruding screws or following conservative treatment especially in undisplaced fractures. Transfer of the extensor indicis tendon to the distal EPL stump is a good option and free interposition of the palmaris longus tendon is a possible alternative. The tension should be adjusted to slight overcorrection, which can be checked intraoperatively by performing the tenodesis test. Closed FPL ruptures at the wrist typically occur 3-6 months after osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures with palmar plates and are mostly characterized by crepitation and pain lasting for several weeks. They can be prevented by premature plate removal, synovectomy and carpal tunnel release. For treatment of a ruptured FPL tendon in adult patients the options for tendon reconstruction should be weighed up against the less complicated tenodesis or arthrodesis of the thumb interphalangeal joint.

Purpose: One of the options to repair a ruptured distal biceps tendon to the radial tuberosity is by means of a transosseous cortical button. Although excellent functional outcomes have been reported, no studies have been performed to quantify the effect of the transosseous fixation technique on the radius. Our study evaluated the clinical outcome and radiological outcome of this technique. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the radiographic evolution of the bone tunnel in the radius., Methods: Patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture treated with a transosseous cortical button were invited to take part in the study. Fourteen patients were included in the final analysis. All patients were evaluated both clinically and by computed tomography scanning of the proximal radius after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes were recorded using the visual analog scale score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Bone tunnel volume was measured with semiautomated computed tomography segmentation using image-processing software., Results: There were no failures of fixation in the patient group examined. Elbow mobility, arm, and forearm circumference were symmetric for all patients. Average visual analog scale for pain was less than 2. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 2.3 and 97.6, respectively. Computed tomography images showed an average closure of the radial bony tunnel of 64% of the initial volume., Conclusions: Biceps tendon repair with cortical button fixation only shows partial tunnel closure. This could reduce the risk of potential complications due to osteolysis, such as radius fracture or hardware failure. Functional results were excellent and comparable to other fixation methods. The role of interference screws in transosseous cortical button techniques to strengthen the repair and to avoid osteolysis may therefore be questioned., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Distal biceps tendon (DBT) ruptures are infrequent injuries that result in pain, weakness, and cosmetic deformity. Severe retraction of the ruptured DBT can occur at the time of injury, or in chronic neglected ruptures, and surgical exposure is performed using a single incision or a 2-incision technique. The technique presented here describes an endoscopic approach using 3 portals that provide access to the retracted DBT, biceps sheath, and radial tuberosity. Preoperative sonographic localization of the retracted DBT and neurovascular structures is used to guide portal placement. The parabiceps portal is used for visualization of the biceps sheath remnant, and the midbiceps portal is used to visualize and retrieve the retracted tendon in the arm. The retracted DBT is shuttled through the biceps sheath into the upper forearm, and 2 suture anchors are passed into the radial tuberosity under direct endoscopic vision. The DBT is whipstitched via the distal anterior portal, and nonsliding knots are tied to securely reattach the DBT to the prepared radial tuberosity., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Synchronous quadriceps tendon rupture is rare. A 29-year-old man, an amateur weight lifter, taking androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS), developed sudden onset bilateral pain and swelling of his anterior thighs when attempting to squat 280 kg (620 lb). Examination revealed gross swelling superior to the patella and palpable gaps in both quadriceps tendons. He underwent successful operative repair. MRI revealed a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the right knee. This was not reconstructed. Only a few case reports of the association between AAS and quadriceps rupture exist in the literature, with none to the best of our knowledge in the past 10 years. ACL rupture coexisting is very rare, with only two reported cases., (2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

Background: The use of cortical suspensory fixation in conjunction with an interference screw to treat distal biceps ruptures has yielded favorable results. However, literature examining the incidence of fixation failure in a large consecutive series of patients treated with this technique is lacking., Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records identified 170 distal biceps ruptures in 168 consecutive patients (164 men and 4 women) treated using a cortical button in conjunction with an interference screw. The study group was an average age of 48 years (range, 20-71 years). Records were reviewed from the time of the initial clinic visit to the most recent follow-up. Early failures were defined as those that occurred within 12 weeks of the index procedure. Failed repair was defined as tendon defect, deformity, or significant weakness in supination., Results: The early incidence of failure was 1.2%, with 2 of the fixations meeting the criteria for failure. One patient had significant brachial artery thrombosis. Other complications included posterior interosseous nerve palsy, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve-related complication, and numbness about the radial nerve., Conclusion: The use of a cortical suspensory fixation device in conjunction with an interference screw is an effective method of repairing a distal biceps rupture, with a low early rate of failure., (Copyright © 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Various fixation techniques have been described for ruptured distal biceps tendons. The authors hypothesized that no significant differences would be found between the mean failure strength, maximum strength, and stiffness of the interference screw and hybrid technique. Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were prepared. Specimens were randomized to either interference screw or hybrid cortical button with screw fixation. The tendon was pulled at a rate of 4 mm/s until failure. Failure strength, maximum strength, and stiffness were measured and compared. Failure strength, maximum strength, and stiffness were 294±81.9 N, 294±82.1 N, and 64.4±40.5 N/mm, respectively, for the interference screw technique and 333±129 N, 383±121 N, and 56.2±40.5 N/mm, respectively, for the hybrid technique. No statistically significant difference existed between the screw and hybrid technique in failure strength, maximum strength, or stiffness (P>.05). The interference screws primarily failed by pullout of the screw and tendon, whereas in the hybrid technique, failure occurred with screw pullout followed by tearing of the biceps tendon. The results suggest that this hybrid technique is nearly as strong and stiff as the interference screw alone. Although the hybrid technique facilitates tensioning of the reconstructed tendon, the addition of the cortical button did not significantly improve the failure strength of the interference screw alone., (Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis has been reliably used to treat a variety of biceps tendon pathologies. Interference screws have been shown to have superior biomechanical properties compared to suture anchors; although, only single anchor constructs have been evaluated in the subpectoral region. The purpose of this study was to compare interference screw fixation with a suture anchor construct, using 2 anchors for a subpectoral tenodesis., Methods: A subpectoral biceps tenodesis was performed using either an interference screw (8 × 12 mm; Arthrex) or 2 suture anchors (Mitek G4) with #2 FiberWire (Arthrex) in a Krackow and Bunnell configuration in seven pairs of human cadavers. The humerus was inverted in an Instron and the biceps tendon was loaded vertically. Displacement driven cyclic loading was performed followed by failure loading., Results: Suture anchor constructs had lower stiffness upon initial loading (P = .013). After 100 cycles, the stiffness of the suture anchor construct "softened" (decreased 9%, P < .001), whereas the screw construct was unchanged (0.4%, P = .078). Suture anchors had significantly higher ultimate failure strain than the screws (P = .003), but ultimate failure loads were similar between constructs: 280 ± 95 N (screw) vs 310 ± 91 N (anchors) (P = .438)., Conclusion: The interference screw was significantly stiffer than the suture anchor construct. Ultimate failure loads were similar between constructs, unlike previous reports indicating interference screws had higher ultimate failure loads compared to suture anchors. Neither construct was superior with regards to stress; although, suture anchors could withstand greater elongation prior to failure., (Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There are several methods for the refixation of the distal biceps tendon which show a variable complication rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and complication rate after distal biceps repair in cortical button technique., Methods: Clinical results, complications, strength of elbow flexion and supination and radiological evidence of heterotopic ossification in patients reporting persistent pain were evaluated in 27 male patients after an average of 36.1 month following distal biceps tendon repair in cortical button technique., Results: The mean Mayo elbow performance score was 95.9 (SD 11.9), the mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 1.9 (SD 4.9) and the mean American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score was 94.6 (SD 11.6). The mean flexion and supination strength of the involved side relative to the uninvolved side was 91.7 % (SD 12.6) and 87.8 % (SD 15.9). Nine patients had 14 different complications including four transient lesions of the posterior interosseous nerve, two persistent lesions of the superficial branch of the radial nerve, one symptomatic massive heterotopic ossification and one disengaged cortical button. Three patients had six revisions. Patients with complications had a significantly lower relative supination strength, Mayo elbow performance score, ASES score, pain on VAS (p < 0.05 each) and satisfaction (p = 0.005)., Conclusions: As described for other techniques there is a high complication rate of distal biceps tendon repair in cortical button technique which resulted in inferior functional results and satisfaction. Surgeons treating patients with distal biceps tendon rupture should know the specific complications and know how to avoid them., Level of Evidence: Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

This case report describes the unique surgical management of a pectoralis major tendon rupture in a professional steer wrestler using intramedullary EndoButton fixation.

Objective: The presented surgical technique aims at fixation of the long head of the biceps tendon at the proximal humerus, distal to the bicipital groove, after arthroscopic tenotomy. This preserves the length and shape of the biceps muscle belly and avoids groove tenderness., Indications: All forms of degenerative changes of the long head of the biceps tendon, biceps instability due to pulley lesions, irreparable SLAP tears. The technique offers a cosmetically favorable outcome compared to a tenotomy., Contraindications: Old complete tears of the long head of the biceps, significant loss of bone density due to osteoporosis, tumor or bone cysts, implants in the proximal humerus, such as intramedullary nails, stem of total shoulder replacement. The presented technique is not indicated for patients with unspecific chronic shoulder pain or if asymmetric shape of the upper arm due to distal migration of the biceps is not relevant., Surgical Technique: After arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon, a small incision at the level of the pectoralis major tendon is made to the axillary fold. The stump of the long head of the biceps tendon is tenodesed to a predrilled hole with a bioabsorbable screw., Postoperative Management: No active training of the biceps for 6 weeks, a sling for comfort is optional until healing of the wound is completed., Results: Clinical studies of several authors have shown significant postoperative increase in all scores evaluated. Safety of the screw fixation and a low complication rate have been proven.

Suspensory cortical fixation is commonly used for distal biceps tendon repair and reconstruction with one of several commercially available devices. The single-incision approach typically used with these devices is believed to have a lower incidence of heterotopic ossification than the dual-incision technique, but the true incidence of heterotopic ossification is unknown. The role of chemotherapeutic or radiation prophylaxis is undefined. We have identified 4 cases of extensive heterotopic ossification after biceps fixation with a suspensory button and single-incision approach. Surgeons should be aware of this potential complication when using suspensory cortical buttons for distal biceps fixation., (Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tenodesis is a common surgical procedure used to treat pain caused by inflammation or instability of the long head of the biceps tendon. Many studies have evaluated different forms of fixation and their biomechanical characteristics, but few have discussed clinical complications or failures as a result of these techniques. The purpose of this article is to report a case series of 3 patients with failures after undergoing arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with an interference screw., (Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study was designed to present the novel technique of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair via a single-limited anterior portal., Methods: To reattach the ruptured biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity, two Bicepsbutton(™) (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) were intramedullary positioned to the anterior cortex. The surgical procedure is described in detail. This technique has been performed in a first series of 3 patients with acute distal biceps tendon ruptures., Results: All patients were very satisfied after surgery and would undergo the same surgical procedure again. All patients regained full range of elbow motion with comparable strength of forearm supination and elbow flexion measured against the uninjured arm at 6 months of follow-up. No neurovascular complications have been occured., Conclusion: Double intramedullary cortical button repair has shown to be a safe and reliable fixation method for distal biceps tendon rupture in a small series of patients. Preliminary results are encouraging.

Heterotopic ossification is rarely encountered following repair of a distal biceps tendon by an anterior approach. Although much less common than with a classic two-incision approach, a review of the literature demonstrates that heterotopic ossification may still occur following anterior single incision techniques. We describe only the second reported case to our knowledge of symptomatic heterotopic ossification following repair of a distal biceps tendon rupture with an EndoButton.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect that different drill trajectories across the radius have on the proximity of the drill tip to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN)., Methods: In 10 cadaveric specimens, we drilled from the bicipital tuberosity across the radius using 4 different trajectories: (1) aiming across the radius at 90° to the longitudinal axis of the radius, (2) distally at 45°, (3) ulnarly, and (4) radially. We measured the distance between the tip of the drill as it exited the dorsal cortex of the radius and the PIN., Results: Aiming 90° across the radius and aiming ulnarly across the radius resulted in a distance of 11.2 ± 3.2 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9 to 13.5 mm) and 16.0 ± 3.8 mm (95% CI, 13.3 to 18.7 mm), respectively, between the drill tip and the PIN. Aiming the drill 45° distally and aiming radially resulted in a distance of only 2.0 ± 2.2 mm (95% CI, 0.5 to 3.6 mm) and 4.2 ± 2.2 mm (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.8 mm), respectively. The differences were found to be statistically significant., Conclusions: On the basis of the results of this anatomic study, when using the cortical button distal biceps repair technique, we recommend drilling across the radius at 90° to its longitudinal axis and aiming from 0° to 30° ulnarly, with the patient's forearm in full supination. This provides an increased margin of safety to prevent injury to the PIN compared with drilling radially or distally., Clinical Relevance: By avoiding distal and radial drilling, the risks of PIN injury should be minimized during distal biceps tendon repair., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare the cyclic and ultimate failure load (UFL) of 4 widely used techniques for arthroscopically performable suprapectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB)., Methods: We used 28 fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age, 65 years [range, 43 to 78 years; SD, 6.7 years]; 43% male specimens) to investigate 4 different techniques for LHB tenodesis. All techniques were performed in an open manner, with localization at the entrance of the bicipital groove. Two suture anchor techniques (Healix [DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA], 5.5 mm, with modified lasso-loop stitch; BioSwiveLock [Arthrex, Naples, FL], 5.5 mm, with interlocking Krackow stitch) and two techniques using tenodesis screws (Bio-Tenodesis screw [Arthrex], 8 × 23 mm; Biceptor [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA], 8 × 25 mm) were investigated. Under a 10-N preload, an axial cyclic load with 100 cycles, 1-Hz frequency, and 50-N maximum load was applied. UFL was evaluated with an axial traction of 0.2 mm/s. LHB displacement during testing was measured by 3-dimensional photogrammetry., Results: All techniques had a mean displacement of less than 3 mm after cyclic loading. The highest UFL was measured with the Bio-Tenodesis screw (mean, 218.3 N; range, 134.0 to 313.0 N; SD, 59.7 N) and the lowest with the BioSwiveLock (mean, 111.2 N; range, 60.0 to 156.8 N; SD, 32.3 N). The Healix had the second highest UFL (mean, 187.1 N; range, 144.7 to 245.0 N; SD, 35.5 N), followed by the Biceptor (mean, 173.9 N; range, 147.0 to 209.3 N; SD, 27.2 N). There was no significant difference between the Healix, Bio-Tenodesis screw, and Biceptor (P > .05), but the Healix and Bio-Tenodesis screw had a significantly higher UFL than the BioSwiveLock (P < .01). The failure mode was either suture cutout or failure at the anchor-suture-bone interface or of the tendon itself and was generally dependent on technique., Conclusions: All techniques resisted cyclic testing without a higher grade of displacement, and all devices except the BioSwiveLock had a satisfactory UFL whereas different failure mechanisms were present. The modified lasso-loop stitch provides sufficient tendon fixation and is equivalent to interference screws., Clinical Relevance: The lasso-loop suture anchor technique is an appropriate alternative for suprapectoral LHB tenodesis compared with tenodesis screw techniques., (Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several complications have been reported with the use of the PLLA (poly-L-Lactide) bioabsorbable screw in orthopedic surgery. The hypothesis was that the use of a bioabsorbable screw in distal biceps tenodesis results in significant osteolysis of the radial bone. The correlation between osteolysis and functional and clinical outcomes was also studied., Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon with a bioabsorbable screw were included. From the x-ray taken immediately after the surgery, the ratio between the volume of the bone tunnel and the volume of the radius bone section was measured. This relation was calculated at different follow-up periods to obtain the percentage of tunnel enlargement over time. Complications, as well as functional and clinical outcomes, were also assessed. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the quick-Disability Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH), and the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) were used., Results: Nineteen consecutive patients were available for follow-up. The average initial relative volume occupied by the screw tunnel was 49% of the bone section and increased to 61% at the last follow-up at an average of 22 months (range, 3-62 months). Eight of the 19 patients presented postoperative complications. There was only 1 case of complete bone filling of the tunnel, which was observed at a 5-year and 2-months follow-up. There was no significant correlation between the volume of bone resorption and functional and clinical outcomes., Discussion: No correlation was found between the volume of bone tunnel and the functional outcome. However, the results indicate that the use of a bioabsorbable screw in distal biceps tendon repair results in significant bone osteolysis., (Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endobutton (Arthrex, Naples, FL) fixation of distal biceps rupture with interference screw fixation provides for a secure repair, allowing for early motion. We present a case in which Endobutton fixation failed with a loose interference screw, rendering the distal biceps attachment incompetent. Revision surgery with an extensile approach, mobilization of the biceps, and repeat Endobutton fixation at a more distal site provided a secure fixation with an excellent clinical outcome. An understanding of the mechanism of failure might allow surgeons to perform this procedure with a lower incidence of complications., (Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

No consensus exists in the literature on the optimal operative treatment method for distal biceps tendon ruptures. It is our hypothesis that a single-incision technique with a poly-L-lactide Bio-Tenodesis screw (Arthrex, Inc, Naples, Florida) is a safe and effective method for operative management of distal biceps tendon ruptures, with success and complication rates comparable to previous reports in the literature. This article describes a prospective case series of 29 consecutive patients (30 operations) managed by the same surgeon over 34 months. Average follow-up was 19.6 months. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Elbow range of motion (ROM) and strength; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; and SF-12 score were measured at various time points up to 2 years. All patients had full extension and supination. Supination and flexion strength was at least 4/5 in all patients. Mean DASH, SF-12 Physical Component (PCS), and SF-12 Mental Component (MCS) scores were 5.86 (range, 0-16.67), 50.35 (range, 30.4-60.1), and 57.15 (range, 41.7-64.4), respectively. These scores are comparable to normative values reported by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Complication rates were similar to those previously reported in the literature. This type of fixation allowed for early mobilization of the operative arm. Our study demonstrates that use of a tenodesis screw for distal biceps repair results in DASH and SF-12 scores comparable to the norm for the general population with complications similar to those seen in past studies. In addition, biomechanical studies suggest that the repair is strong enough to allow early ROM, and the fixation technique may allow for more anatomic positioning of the distal biceps along the ulnar border of the bicipital tuberosity., (Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.)

Objective: To investigate the techniques and therapeutic effects of suture anchors for the reconstruction of distal tendo achillis rupture., Methods: The clinical data of 16 patients of distal tendo achillis rupture repaired with suture anchors from June 2005 to August 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 13 males and 3 females with a mean age of 33.5 years (ranged from 17 to 46 years). The postoperative rehabilitation was conducted for every patient. The operation time, position of suture anchor and complications of the surgery were analyzed. The healing of stendo achillis and functional recovery were assessed by Arner-Lindholm standard., Results: All the patients were followed up for an average of 13.2 months. There were no complications of foreign-body reaction or re-rupture. The average operation time was 35.5 minute. There was no intraoperative injuries of blood vessels, nerves or tendons. A total of 19 suture anchors were used, and only 1 anchor was displaced. The functional recovery of tendo achillis was rated as excellent in 13 cases,good in 2 cases, bad in 1 case. All patients were satisfied with the effects on their current work and life. And no displacement of anchors was found in radiographic films., Conclusion: Repairing of the distal tendo achillis rupture with suture anchors can make operation simple and quick, rigid fixation, less complications, and provide good therapeutic effects.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral motion after knotless anchor repair of type II SLAP lesions versus repair with simple suture arthroscopic knot-tying techniques and to compare the initial fixation strength of the 2 repair techniques., Methods: Six matched-pair cadaveric shoulders were tested in an uninjured condition, after creation of a type II SLAP tear, and after repair with either a knotless repair with two 3.5-mm Bio-PushLock anchors (Arthrex, Naples, FL) or a simple suture repair with two 3.0-mm Bio-SutureTak anchors (Arthrex) placed anterior and posterior to the biceps tendon. Glenohumeral rotation, translation, and kinematics were measured. The SLAP repairs were then loaded to failure perpendicular to the glenoid face., Results: Glenohumeral rotation increased after creation of a type II SLAP lesion and was restored to the intact state after both repairs. There was no significant difference in glenohumeral translation or kinematics with SLAP lesion or either repair technique. There was no significant difference between stiffness, yield load, or ultimate load of the 2 repairs. Simple suture repairs failed most commonly by knot breakage, and knotless repairs failed by suture slippage around the anchor., Conclusions: Knotless anchor repairs of type II SLAP lesions restore glenohumeral rotation as well as simple suture arthroscopic repair techniques without overconstraining the shoulder. In addition, the initial fixation strength of knotless anchor repairs of type II SLAP lesions is similar to that of simple suture repairs., Clinical Relevance: Knotless anchor repairs of type II SLAP lesions restore capsulolabral anatomy without overconstraining the shoulder.

Background: Overhead athletes report an inconsistent return to their previous level of sport and satisfaction after arthroscopic SLAP lesion repair., Hypothesis: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis offers a viable alternative to the repair of an isolated type II SLAP lesion., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients operated for an isolated type II SLAP lesion between 2000 and 2004 were evaluated at a mean of 35 months postoperatively (range, 24-69). Patients with associated instability, rotator cuff rupture, posterosuperior impingement, or previous shoulder surgery were excluded. Ten patients (10 men) with an average age of 37 years (range, 19-57) had a SLAP repair performed with suture anchors. Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) with an average age of 52 years (range, 28-64) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis performed with an absorbable interference screw. Arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment were performed by a single experienced shoulder surgeon, and all patients were reviewed by an independent examiner., Results: In the repair group, the Constant score improved from 65 to 83 points; however, 60% (6 of 10) of the patients were disappointed because of persistent pain or inability to return to their previous level of sports participation. In the tenodesis group, the Constant score improved from 59 to 89 points, and 93% (14/15) were satisfied or very satisfied. Thirteen patients (87%) were able to return to their previous level of sports participation following biceps tenodesis, compared with only 20% (2 of 10) after SLAP repair (P = .01). Four patients with failed SLAP repairs underwent subsequent biceps tenodesis, resulting in a successful outcome and a full return to their previous level of sports activity., Conclusion: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis can be considered an effective alternative to the repair of a type II SLAP lesion, allowing patients to return to a presurgical level of activity and sports participation. The results of biceps reinsertion are disappointing compared with biceps tenodesis. Furthermore, biceps tenodesis may provide a viable alternative for the salvage of a failed SLAP repair. As the age of the 2 treatment groups differed, these findings should be confirmed by future studies.

Background: There are many techniques described to repair acute distal biceps tendon ruptures. The authors' objective is to report the results of a single-incision technique using a combination of a soft tissue button and biotenodesis interference screw with accelerated rehabilitation., Hypothesis: Dual fixation of a distal biceps rupture will allow for early return to function., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: From February 2004 to July 2007, 41 elbows in 40 patients had repair of an acute distal biceps tendon rupture (<6 weeks) through an anterior incision using a soft tissue button and interference screw combined technique. The patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively with a physical examination, radiographs, and the Andrews-Carson elbow score. Nine patients were unavailable for follow-up. The remaining 31 patients (32 elbows) were contacted for a telephone interview at an average of 24 months postoperatively., Results: The preoperative Andrews-Carson score averaged 168 and the postoperative Andrews-Carson score averaged 196 points at final clinical follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between the pre- and postoperative Andrews-Carson scores (P < .001). One patient had heterotopic ossification associated with decreased pronation and supination. Two superficial radial nerve palsies completely resolved by final follow-up. The average postoperative time to resume normal activities or return to work was 6.5 weeks., Conclusion: Repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures using a soft tissue button and interference screw technique through a limited anterior incision can allow for accelerated rehabilitation and early return to function.

The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of distal biceps tendon ruptures repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms underwent simulated distal biceps tendon ruptures and were repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique. We analyzed pullout strength, stiffness, and mode of failure for each construct. The mean pullout strength of the repair with a Bio-Tenodesis screw was significantly higher (192 N [SD, 42.5 N] vs 147 N [SD, 29.5 N], P < .013). Use of the Bio-Tenodesis screw is an effective means of repairing distal biceps tendon ruptures. It provides significantly more initial pullout strength compared with suture anchors. This could potentially allow more aggressive rehabilitation and faster return to function.