Search

Mallet fingers are injuries to the extensor tendon at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and can present as a bony avulsion or as a soft tissue injury. Nonbony mallet fingers are frequently splinted in extension between 6 and 8 weeks. If splinted correctly, most results are good with a mean DIP joint extension lag between 5 and 10 degrees. However, decreased swelling, hygienic considerations and patient compliance can lead to splint removal and a less favorable outcome. We present a percutaneous tenodermodesis using only a digital block and a 4.0 nylon suture. This office-based procedure provides joint reduction and prevents joint movement during the immobilization period. The suture can be removed after 8 weeks, allowing active mobilization of the DIP joint. We present the results of 8 patients with a mean follow-up of 3 months and mean initial extension lag of 32 degrees, resulting in a mean final extension lag of 2 degrees and excellent outcomes using the Crawford criteria., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the biomechanical parameters of four different suture techniques specifically designed for zone IV extensor tendon injuries: the double figure of eight, the double modified Kessler, the six-strand double-loop, and the modified Becker suturing techniques. Ease of repair, tendon shortening, strength to 1-mm gap, strength to 2-mm gap, ultimate strength, and mode of repair failure were evaluated., Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaver hand-forearm units (48 fingers) were randomly assigned to the four suture repair treatments. The speed of tendon repair as performed by two matched-hand surgeons was recorded. Prerepair and postrepair tendon lengths were measured to document tendon shortening. The repair was stressed by linear distraction at 2.0 mm/minute using a servohydraulic frame. Video recordings of each distraction were independently reviewed for biomechanical parameters by three physician-observers in a double-blind setup. A one-way analysis of variance and t test analysis was performed., Results: Results show that the double figure-of-eight technique and the double modified Kessler were significantly (p < 0.05) easier to perform at 7 minutes 31 seconds and 7 minutes 58 seconds, respectively, than the other two techniques. Tendon shortening ranged from 1.9 to 2.4 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in tendon shortening among the four techniques. Strength to 1-mm gap was significantly higher with the modified Becker technique, with a mean 28.8 +/- 8.0 N. This was followed by the six-strand double-loop technique, with 21.0 +/- 6.6 N, the double modified Kessler at 17.7 +/- 4.5 N, and the figure-of-eight technique at 17.5 +/- 2.4 N. Strength to 2-mm gap was significantly (p < 0.05) greater for the modified Becker technique and the modified Kessler technique at 56.0 +/- 9.2 N and 48.6 +/- 12.6 N, respectively, as compared with the other two suture methods. The modified Becker technique showed the highest ultimate strength at maximal loading at 63.3 +/- 7.8 N, followed by the double modified Kessler technique with strength of 56.8 +/- 14.8 N. Both were significantly stronger than the other two techniques., Conclusions: This study shows that the modified Becker suture technique, although not easily performed, proved to be the strongest repair, with a significantly greater resistance to 1-mm and 2-mm gap and the greatest ultimate strength on maximal loading.

The results of three different surgical techniques used for the treatment of 46 ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon in 45 patients were evaluated and compared. Mean follow-up time was 14 months. The 46 ruptures were categorised according to the surgical technique used for treatment. In Group I, 17 arms were treated using two incisions and transosseous suture fixation; in Group II, 19 patients were treated using bone-anchor fixation; and in Group III, ten patients were treated using a tie-on-button technique. After treatment, 41 patients (89.1%) had full active range of motion (ROM) and 38 patients (82.6%) had excellent or good strength. The results after treatment in all three groups were satisfactory. Though the outcomes of these techniques were similar, operative time, time to return to regular activity, and time to return to work was shorter in the bone-anchor and tie-on-button groups than that in the two-incision transosseous fixation group.