Search

Purpose: The study aims to determine the diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography (US) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of temporomandibular disorders (TMD)., Methods: Fifty consecutive patients (42 female and 8 male) with signs and symptoms of TMD according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent US (13 and 20 MHz) and MRI examination of both TMJs, 1-7 days following clinical examination. All MRI examinations were performed by another radiologist using an 1.5 T MRI device. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were computed along with 95% confidence intervals., Results: For overall disc displacements, 13 MHz US showed a Se of 72.58%, Sp of 86.84%, PPV of 90%, NPV of 66% and diagnostic accuracy of 78%, while 20 MHz US showed a Se of 75.81%, Sp of 86.84%, PPV of 90.38%, NPV of 68.75% and a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. For degenerative changes, 13 MHz US revealed a Se of 58.33%, Sp of 92.11%, PPV of 70%, NPV of 87.5% and a diagnostic accuracy of 84%, whereas 20 MHz US indicated the same Se of 58.33%, Sp of 93.42%, PPV of 73.68%, NPV of 87.65% and a diagnostic accuracy of 85%. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient for the intra- and inter-observer agreement was 0.822 and 0.836 for disc displacement, respectively 0.813 and 0.788 for degenerative disorders (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: High-resolution US could be a useful imaging technique in diagnosing TMJ disc displacements., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography (US) in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacements., Materials and Methods: A number of 74 patients (148 TMJs) with signs and symptoms of TMJ disorders, according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, were included in this study. All patients received US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both TMJs 1 to 5 days after the clinical examination. MRI examinations were performed using 1.5 T MRI equipment (Siemens Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen). Ultrasonographic examination was performed on a Hitachi EUB 8500 (Hitachi Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan) scanner with L 54 M6.5-13 MHz linear transducer., Results: MRI depicted 68 (45.95%) normal joints, 47 (31.76%) with disc displacement with reduction, 33 (22.3%) with disc displacement without reduction and 34 (22.97%) with degenerative changes. US detected 78 (52.7%) normal joints, 37 (25%) with disc displacement with reduction, 33 (22.3%) with disc displacement without reduction and 21 (14.19%) with degenerative changes. Compared to MRI, US showed a sensitivity of 93.1%, specificity of 87.88%, accuracy of 90.32%, a positive predictive value of 87.1% and a negative predictive value of 93.55% for overall diagnosis of disc displacement. The Youden index was 0.81., Conclusions: Based on our results, high-resolution ultrasonography showed high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of TMJ disc displacement. It could be a valuable imaging technique in assessing TMJ disc position. The diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography depends strictly on the examiner's skills and on the equipment used.