Search

Telerehabilitation for heart failure (HF) patients is beneficial for physical functioning, prognosis, and psychological status. The study aimed at evaluating the influence of hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) on the level of anxiety in comparison to usual care (UC). The TELEREH-HF study was a multicenter prospective RCT in 850 clinically stable HF participants. Patients underwent clinical examinations, including the assessment of anxiety, at entry and after the 9-week training program (HCTR) or observation (UC). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used. 20.3% HCTR and 20.1% UC patients reported high level of anxiety as a state at baseline, with higher STAI results in younger participants (< 63 y.o.) (p = .048 for HCTR; p = .026 for UC). At both stages of the study, patients with lower level of physical capacity (measured by a peak VO 2 ) had shown significantly higher level of anxiety. There were no significant changes in anxiety levels during the 9-week observation for the entire study population, although there were different patterns of change in anxiety (both trait and state) in younger and older groups,with the decrease in younger patients, and the increase-in the older group.Trial registry number NCT02523560 (Clinical Trials.gov), date of registration: August 14, 2015., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Assessing prognosis in heart failure (HF) is of major importance., Aims: The study aimed to define predictors influencing long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization ("composite outcome") based on clinical status and measurements obtained after a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) program., Methods: This analysis is based on the TELEREH-HF (TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure) multicenter randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9-week HCTR plus usual care (experimental arm) or usual care only (control arm) and followed for median (interquartile range [IQR]) 24 (20-24) months for development of the composite outcome., Results: Over 12-24 months of follow-up, 108 (28.1%) patients experienced the composite outcome. The predictors of our composite outcome were: nonischemic etiology of HF, diabetes, higher serum level of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; low carbon dioxide output at peak exercise; high minute ventilation and breathing frequency at maximum effort in cardiopulmonary exercise tests; increase in delta of average heart rate in 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring, lower LVEF, and patients' non-adherence to HCTR. The model discrimination C-index was 0.795 and decreased to 0.755 on validation conducted in the control sample which was not used in derivation. The 2-year risk of the composite outcome was 48% in the top tertile versus 5% in the bottom tertile of the developed risk score., Conclusion: Risk factors collected at the end of the 9-week telerehabilitation period performed well in stratifying patients based on their 2-year risk of the composite outcome. Patients in the top tertile had an almost ten-fold higher risk compared to patients in the bottom tertile. Treatment adherence, but not peak VO2 or quality of life, was significantly associated with the outcome.

Background: Regular exercise training is beneficial in heart failure (HF) patients. However, its potential proarrhythmic effect is possible but has not been sufficiently investigated., Objective: To identify patients at risk for proarrhythmic effect after the 9-week of hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) program vs the 9-week of usual care (UC) and to investigate its predictors and impact on cardiovascular mortality based on data from the TELEREH-HF RCT., Methods: Proarrhythmic effect, strictly defined on the basis of available standards was evaluated by comparing 24-h Holter ECG before and after 9-week of HCTR or UC of 773 HF patients (The New York Heart Association class I-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%)., Results: The proarrhytmic effect was found in 78 (20.4%) and in 61 (15.6%) patients in the HCTR and UC group respectively, and the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.081). However, univariate analysis identified several statistically significant predictors of proarrhythmia in HCTR only vs the UC group. After a multivariate analysis ischaemic aetiology of HF (OR = 2.27, p = 0.008), peak oxygen consumption at baseline <14 ml/kg/min (OR = 2.03, p = 0.012) and level of N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the first and the second tercile (OR = 1.85, p = 0.043) were identified to be independent predictors of proarrhytmic effect of exercise training among the HF patients in HCTR group only., Conslusions: Patients who underwent a 9-week HCTR were not at a higher risk of proarrhythmic effect after its completion compared to UC. However, predictors of proarrhythmia such as ischemic aetiology of HF, poor physical capacity, lower NT-proBNP level were discovered in the HCTR group only, yet it does not cause a significant risk of cardiovascular mortality including sudden cardiac death in long-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors were supported by National Center for Research and Development, Warsaw, Poland., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) consisting of telecare (with psychological telesupport), telerehabilitation, and remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices might be an option to improve both physical capacity and depressive symptoms. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of HCTR on depressive symptoms and physical capacity in heart failure (HF) patients in comparison with usual care (UC)., Methods and Results: The present analysis formed part of a multicentre, randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (New York Heart Association I-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to HCTR or UC. Patients underwent an HCTR programme (1 week in hospital and 8 weeks at home; exercise training 5 times weekly) or UC with observation. The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score (cut point for depression ≥ 14) was used to assess depression and the physical capacity was measured by peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2; mL/kg/min). Measurements were made before and after 9-week intervention/observation (HCTR/UC group). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. In HCTR group, at entry, 23% of the sample obtained BDI-II scores ≥14 vs. 27.5% in UC group. There were no significant differences between groups regarding ΔBDI-II score (P = 0.992) after 9-week HCTR/UC. There was a significant improvement in physical capacity only in the HCTR group in both patients with (P = 0.033) and without (P &lt; 0.001) depression., Conclusions: In HF patients, HCTR provided similar reduction of depressive symptoms as UC. HCTR resulted in a significant improvement in physical capacity in patients with and without depression., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors were supported by National Centre for Research and Development, Warsaw, Poland., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2022. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Exercise training in heart failure (HF) patients should be monitored to ensure patients' safety. Electrocardiographic (ECG) telemonitoring was used to assess the safety of hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR)., Objective: Analysis of ECG recorded during HCTR in HF patients., Methods: The TELEREH-HF multicenter, randomized, controlled trial enrolled 850 HF patients with New York Heart Association class I-III and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40%. This subanalysis focuses on 386 patients (aged 62 ± 11 years, LVEF 31 ± 7%) randomized to HCTR. HCTR was telemonitored with a device allowing to record 16-s fragments of ECG and to transmit the data via mobile phone network to the monitoring center. ResultsIn 386 patients, 16,622 HCTR sessions were recorded and 66,488 ECGs fragments were evaluated. Sinus rhythm was present in 320 (83%) and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in 66 (17%) patients, respectively. The most common arrhythmias were ventricular and atrial premature beats, recorded in 76.4% and 27.7% of the patients, respectively. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (21 episodes in 8 patients) and paroxysmal AF episodes (6 in 4 patients) were rare. None of the analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics was predictive for onset of the new arrhythmias on exercise., Conclusion: Telerehabilitation in HF patients was safe without the evidence for symptomatic arrhythmias requiring discontinuation of telerehabilitation. Only one mildly symptomatic paroxysmal AF episode led to the short-term suspension of the training program. The most common arrhythmias were atrial and ventricular premature beats. These arrhythmias did not result in any changes in rehabilitation and therapy regimens., (© 2021 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced reorganization of the multidisciplinary healthcare system for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Digital solutions seem to be optimal for providing rehabilitation at this time. The aim of this study was to investigate whether it is possible to conduct respiratory physical therapy with the use of telerehabilitation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy., Methods: The study was conducted during an online conference for families with DMD. During the physical therapy panel we showed the video with the instructions of respiratory exercises. All participants ( n = 152) were asked to fill in the online survey evaluating the quality, acceptance, and understanding of the instructions., Results: The survey was filled in by 45 (29.6%) participants. The mean rating of satisfaction was 4.70/5, and for intelligibility was 4.78/5. Thirty-seven (82.2%) patients declared that they had performed the exercises, all caregivers declared that it was possible to perform the proposed exercises a few times a week or daily, and only two respondents replied to invitations to individual online sessions., Conclusions: Findings from the study show that respiratory telerehabilitation may be implemented for DMD patients; however, the interest in digital rehabilitation among caregivers of DMD boys in Poland is low. The reasons for this situation require further research.

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There are limited data regarding efficacy of hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF with versus those without diabetes., Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyze effects of 9-week HCTR in comparison to usual care on parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in HF patients according to history of DM., Methods: Clinically stable HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 40% after a hospitalization due to worsening HF within past 6 months were enrolled in the TELEREH-HF (The TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure Patients) trial and randomized to the HCTR or usual care (UC). Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were performed on treadmill with an incremental workload according to the ramp protocol., Results: CPET was performed in 385 patients assigned to HCTR group: 129 (33.5%) had DM (HCTR-DM group) and 256 patients (66.5%) did not have DM (HCTR-nonDM group). Among 397 patients assigned to UC group who had CPET: 137 (34.5%) had DM (UC-DM group) and 260 patients (65.5%) did not have DM (UC-nonDM group). Among DM patients, differences in cardiopulmonary parameters from baseline to 9 weeks remained similar among HCTR and UC patients. In contrast, among patients without DM, HCTR was associated with greater 9-week changes than UC in exercise time, which resulted in a statistically significant interaction between patients with and without DM: difference in changes in exercise time between HCTR versus UC was 12.0 s [95% CI - 15.1, 39.1 s] in DM and 43.1 s [95% CI 24.0, 63.0 s] in non-DM, interaction p-value = 0.016. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in the effect of HCTR versus UC between DM and non-DM were observed in ventilation at rest: - 0.34 l/min [95% CI - 1.60, 0.91 l/min] in DM and 0.83 l/min [95% CI - 0.06, 1.73 l/min] in non-DM, interaction p value = 0.0496 and in VE/VCO 2 slope: 1.52 [95% CI - 1.55, 4.59] for DM vs. - 1.44 [95% CI - 3.64, 0.77] for non-DM, interaction p value = 0.044., Conclusions: The benefits of hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation versus usual care on the improvement of physical performance, ventilatory profile and gas exchange parameters were more pronounced in patients with HFrEF without DM as compared to patients with DM., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02523560. Registered 3rd August 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02523560?term=NCT02523560&draw=2&rank=1 . Other Study ID Numbers: STRATEGME1/233547/13/NCBR/2015.

Aims: The aim of our study was to analyse the benefits of a 9 week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) programme in heart failure (HF) patients according to aetiology, as a subanalysis of the Telerehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients (TELEREH-HF) trial., Methods and Results: Overall, 555 (65.3%) patients with ischaemic (IS) and 295 (34.7%) patients with non-ischaemic (NIS) HF aetiology were randomized. There were no differences between the effect of HCTR and usual care (UC) on the primary outcome of number of days alive and out of the hospital in 26 months from the time of randomization in either aetiology (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test), and no heterogeneity of effect between the aetiologies was noted (van Elteren test, P = 0.746). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, treatment was not independently associated with the secondary outcomes. For all-cause mortality, the adjusted hazard ratio for HCTR vs. UC was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.51) in IS and 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-2.94) in NIS (P interaction = 0.316). Differences between HCTR and UC in terms of change in the 6 min walk test distance and cardiopulmonary exercise test time after 9 weeks reached statistical significance in the IS arm (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001, respectively), but not in the NIS arm; however, tests of heterogeneity indicated no statistically significant differences., Conclusions: The trial showed no difference between HCTR and UC in the primary outcome of percentage of days alive and out of the hospital for either IS or NIS aetiology. Moreover, the magnitude of changes in the clinical and functional statuses of the HF patients did not differ by aetiology. HCTR might have had beneficial effects on the 6 min walk test distance and cardiopulmonary exercise test time after 9 weeks in the IS patients; however, the effect was not statistically significantly different from that observed in the NIS patients., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Importance: Guidelines recommend exercise training as a component of heart failure management. There are large disparities in access to rehabilitation, and introducing hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) consisting of remote monitoring of training at patients' homes might be an appealing alternative., Objective: To assess whether potential improvements in quality-of-life outcomes after a 9-week HCTR intervention in patients with heart failure translate into improvement in clinical outcomes during extended 12 to 24 months of follow-up, compared with usual care., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Telerehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients (TELEREH-HF) trial is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial that enrolled 850 patients with heart failure up to 6 months after a cardiovascular hospitalization with New York Heart Association levels I, II, or III and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less. Patients from 5 centers in Poland were randomized 1:1 to HCTR plus usual care or usual care only and followed up for 14 to 26 months after randomization., Interventions: During the first 9 weeks, patients underwent either an HCTR program (1 week in hospital and 8 weeks at home) or usual care with observation. The HCTR intervention encompassed telecare, telerehabilitation, and remote monitoring of implantable devices. No intervention occurred in the remaining study period., Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of days alive and out of the hospital from randomization through the end of follow-up at 14 to 26 months., Results: A total of 850 patients were enrolled, with 425 randomized to the HCTR group (377 male patients [88.7%]; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [10.8] years) and 425 randomized to usual care (376 male patients [88.5%]; mean [SD] age, 62.2 [10.2] years). The HCTR intervention did not extend the percentage of days alive and out of the hospital. The mean (SD) days were 91.9 (19.3) days in the HCTR group vs 92.8 (18.3) days in the usual-care group, with the probability that HCTR extends days alive and out of the hospital equal to 0.49 (95% CI, 0.46-0.53; P = .74) vs usual care. During follow-up, 54 patients died in the HCTR arm and 52 in the usual-care arm, with mortality rates at 26 months of 12.5% vs 12.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.51]). There were also no differences in hospitalization rates (hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.79-1.13]). The HCTR intervention was effective at 9 weeks, significantly improving peak oxygen consumption (0.95 [95% CI, 0.65-1.26] mL/kg/min vs 0.00 [95% CI, -0.31 to 0.30] mL/kg/min; P < .001) and quality of life (Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36 questionnaire score, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.74-2.42] vs 0.00 [95% CI, -0.84 to 0.84]; P = .008), and it was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events during exercise., Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, the positive effects of a 9-week program of HCTR in patients with heart failure did not lead to the increase in percentage of days alive and out of the hospital and did not reduce mortality and hospitalization over a follow-up period of 14 to 26 months., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02523560.