Search

Introduction: Corrected QT interval (QTc)is an established biomarker for drug-induced Torsade de Pointe (TdP), but with concerns for a false positive signal. Clinically, JTpc and TpTec have emerged as ECG sub-intervals to differentiate predominant hERG vs. mixed ion channel blocking drugs that prolong QTc., Methods: In a multicentric, prospective, controlled study, different proarrhythmic drug effects on QTc, JTpc and TpTec were characterized with cynomolgus monkeys using telemetry in a Lead II configuration for internal and external telemetry.Drugs and vehicle were administered orally (PO) to group size of 4 to 8 animals, in 4 laboratories., Results: In monkeys, dofetilide (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) was associated with exposure dependent QTc and JTpc increase, but no significant TpTec effect. Similarly, quinidine (2-50 mg/kg) increased QTc and JTpc but did not change TpTec. Mexiletine (1-15 mg/kg) and verapamil (50 mg/kg) did not induce any significant effect on QTc, JTpc or TpTec., Discussion: Clinically, predominant hERG blockers (dofetilide and quinidine) prolong QTc, JTpc and TpTec and are associated with increased risk for TdP. Results from this study demonstrate that ECG changes after dofetilide and quinidine administration to telemetered monkeys differ from the clinical response, lacking the expected effects on TpTec. Potential explanations for the lack of translation include physio-pharmacology species differences or ECG recording and analysis methodology variations. Mixed ion channel blockers verapamil and mexiletine administered to monkeys showed no significant QTc, JTpc or TpTec prolongation as expected based on the similar clinical response for these agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare. The data was generated as part of a PhD program (Emmanuel Boulay) funded by Charles River Laboratories., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Characterization of the incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias to identify possible drug-related effects is often an important part of the analysis in safety pharmacology studies using telemetry., Methods: A retrospective analysis in non-clinical species with and without telemetry transmitters was conducted. Electrocardiograms (24 h) from male and female beagle dogs (n = 131), Göttingen minipigs (n = 108) and cynomolgus non-human primates (NHP; n = 78) were analyzed., Results: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was observed in 3% of the dogs but was absent in minipigs and NHPs. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was not observed in the 3 species. Ventricular premature beats (VPBs) were more frequent during daytime and atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) were more frequent at night in all species. A limited number of animals exhibited a high arrhythmia frequency and there was no correlation between animals with higher frequency of an arrhythmia type and the frequency of other arrythmias in the same animals. Clinical chemistry or hematology parameters were not different with or without telemetry devices. NHP with a transmural left ventricular pressure (LVP) catheter exhibited a greater incidence of VPBs and PJCs compared to telemetry animals without LVP., Discussion: All species were similar with regards to the frequency of ventricular ectopic beats (26-46%) while the dog seemed to have more frequent junctional complexes and AVB compared to NHP and minipigs. Arrhythmia screening may be considered during pre-study evaluations, to exclude animals with abnormally high arrhythmia incidence., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflicts of interest, other than their employment in commercial biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, or contract research organizations. No information is presented in this paper that advocates for or promotes commercial products from any of our organizations., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This study compared torcetrapib-induced blood pressure (BP) changes simultaneously obtained by high-definition oscillometry (HDO) and telemetry. Male beagles (n = 6) received single oral doses of vehicle or torcetrapib at 10 or 30 mg/kg; BP were acquired simultaneously by HDO and telemetry from 2 h before dosage until 7 h afterward. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) and heart rate were compared by using Altman-Bland agreement analysis. Dogs were allocated into subgroups according to temperament and baseline MAP (less than 110 mm Hg and 110 mm Hg or greater). Both methods demonstrated high precision. HDO recordings exhibited higher variability for all parameters (inclusive MAP SDs were 7.0 +/- 2.7 mm Hg for HDO compared with 3.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg for telemetry), accompanied by a positive bias for all pressures (systolic, 10.4 mm Hg; diastolic, 5.7 mm Hg; MAP, 1.9 mm Hg). Both methods detected similar maximal increases in MAP with 30 mg/kg torcetrapib (HDO, 15.8 +/- 10.4 mm Hg; telemetry, 15.8 +/- 5.3 mm Hg). No significant effects were noted for heart rate. Torcetrapib elicited a dose-dependent increase in BP in dogs with baseline MAP of less than 110 mm Hg, whereas increases were maximal with 10 mg/kg in the other group, and dose-dependence was no longer observed. BP changes were influenced by animal temperament, demonstrating that HDO results must be interpreted with caution. HDO may provide a useful and accurate method for noninvasive BP measurements in canine studies.

Pending updates to ICH S7B/E14 guidelines will enable the substitution of human TQT studies with support from concomitant negative hERG and non-rodent CV studies. This retrospective analysis compared the effects of thioridazine (THD) (5–20 mg/kg) on heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), body temperature (Tc), and QT in the dog (n = 6), cynomolgus monkey (n = 4), and Goettingen minipig (n = 4) with data from previously completed studies employing crossover designs. As QT measurements are confounded by HR and Tc changes, QT effects were individually corrected for changes in HR (QTca) and Tc (QTcaT). THD-induced hemodynamic changes seen in humans were most accurately reflected in the monkey and, to a lesser extent, the dog, but not in the minipig. The minipig was most sensitive to THD QTc effects. When QTca was adjusted for THD-associated Tc decreases in minipigs and monkeys, the minipig revealed a lessened but pronounced QTcaT increase (48 ms). In the monkey, a persistent QTca increase was reduced to only a transient (0.5–3 h) QTcaT increase (20 ms). The dog's lack of THD QTca effects triggered co-administration of atenolol (AT) to attenuate THD-induced HR increases in the dog and monkey. THD + AT revealed peak QTcaT increases of 32 ms in the dog and 40 ms in the monkey, suggesting potential autonomic nervous system (ANS) interference in detecting repolarization changes. These results highlight critical species-specific differences in the outcome of parallel safety investigations. Species selection for nonclinical safety studies should consider the potential impact of Tc and ANS effects to avoid false-negative or overly positive outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ICH E14/S7B Questions and Answers (Q&As) guideline introduces the concept of a "double negative" nonclinical scenario (negative hERG assay and negative in vivo QTc study) to demonstrate that a drug does not produce a clinically relevant QT prolongation (i.e., no QT liability). This nonclinical "double negative" data package, along with negative Phase 1 clinical QTc data, may be sufficient to substitute for a clinical Thorough QT (TQT) study in some specific cases. While standalone GLP in vivo cardiovascular studies in non-rodent species are standard practice during nonclinical drug development for small molecule programs, a variety of approaches to the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation are utilized across pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations (CROs) that may, in some cases, negatively impact the stringent sensitivity needed to fulfill the new Q&As. Subject matter experts from both Pharma and CROs have collaborated to recommend best practices for more robust nonclinical cardiovascular telemetry studies in non-rodent species, with input from clinical and regulatory experts. The aim was to increase consistency and harmonization across the industry and to ensure delivery of high quality nonclinical QTc data to meet the proposed sensitivities defined within the revised ICH E14/S7B Q&As guideline (Q&As 5.1 and 6.1). The detailed best practice recommendations presented here cover the design and execution of the safety pharmacology cardiovascular study, including optimal methods for acquiring, analyzing, reporting, and interpreting the resulting QTc and pharmacokinetic data to allow for direct comparison to clinical exposures and assessment of safety margin for QTc prolongation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]