Search

Introduction: Canadians are living longer, many with multiple chronic conditions. This population of older, frail Canadians continues to grow in size as do concurrent demands for community-based, outpatient and ambulatory models of care. Ideally, a multifaceted, proactive, planned and integrated care model includes ehealth. Although several factors are known to facilitate the implementation of ehealth in chronic disease management (CDM), for example, adequate support, usability, alignment of programme objectives, there is a growing body of inconclusive evidence on what is critical for implementation. We aim to achieve a fulsome understanding of factors critical to implementation by conducting a realist review-an approach suitable for understanding complex interventions. Our proposed review will identify factors critical to the implementation of ehealth in CDM (heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes (type 1 or 2)) without limitations to care setting, language, publication year or geography. Findings will be presented in configurations of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes (CMOs)., Methods and Analysis: A search strategy will be iteratively developed based on the concepts of 'implementation' and 'adoption' of 'ehealth' interventions used within 'CDM' to identify the peer-reviewed and grey literature published before 31 March 2021 from five databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsychInfo) on ehealth interventions actively involving a healthcare provider for CDM among adults. Data extraction and synthesis will be guided by Realist and Meta-review Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines informing core concepts of CMOs, and a study output will include a middle-range-theory describing the implementation of ehealth in CDM., Ethics and Dissemination: Findings will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. A multistakeholder (patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and practitioners, decision-makers and policy-makers) perspective will be used in our dissemination approach. No formal ethics approval is required for this review., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020208275., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: Patients with CKD are at risk for adverse drug reactions, but effective community-based preventive programs remain elusive. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of two digital applications designed to improve outpatient medication safety., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In a 1-year randomized controlled trial, 182 outpatients with advanced CKD were randomly assigned to receive a smartphone preloaded with either eKidneyCare ( n =89) or MyMedRec ( n =93). The experimental intervention, eKidneyCare, includes a medication feature that prompted patients to review medications monthly and report changes, additions, or medication problems to clinicians for reconciliation and early intervention. The active comparator was MyMedRec, a commercially available, standalone application for storing medication and other health information that can be shared with patients' providers. The primary outcome was the rate of medication discrepancy, defined as differences between the patient's reported history and the clinic's medication record, at exit., Results: At exit, the eKidneyCare group had fewer total medication discrepancies compared with MyMedRec (median, 0.45; interquartile range, 0.33-0.63 versus 0.67; interquartile range, 0.40-1.00; P =0.001), and the change from baseline was 0.13±0.27 in eKidneyCare and 0.30±0.41 in MyMedRec ( P =0.007). eKidneyCare use also reduced the severity of clinically relevant medication discrepancies in all categories, including those with the potential to cause serious harm (estimated rate ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.63). Usage data revealed that 72% of patients randomized to eKidneyCare completed one or more medication reviews per month, whereas only 30% of patients in the MyMedRec group (adjusted for dropouts) kept their medication profile on their phone., Conclusions: In patients who are high risk and have CKD, eKidneyCare significantly reduced the rate and severity of medication discrepancies, the proximal cause of medication errors, compared with the active comparator. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT:02905474., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the pilot Toronto tele-retina screening program in comparison with existing standard of care (SOC) diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening for patients with diabetes mellitus and in a simulated Pan-Ontarian cohort., Methods: Decision trees were constructed to compare tele-retina to SOC in the pilot and Pan-Ontarian cohort. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as cost per case detected (true-positive) and cost per case correctly diagnosed (true-positive and true-negative results)., Results: Pilot program screening costs were $95.77 and $137.56 for tele-retina and SOC, respectively. In the base-case analysis, cost per case correctly detected was $379.06 with tele-retina and $985.56 with SOC, and the cost per case correctly diagnosed was $109.29 and $315.22, respectively. In the sensitivity analysis, cost per case correctly detected was $467.29 with tele-retina and $894.93 with SOC, and the cost per case correctly diagnosed was $136.88 and $250.35, respectively. Pan-Ontarian screening costs were $57.58 and $137.56 for tele-retina and SOC, respectively. The cost per case correctly detected was $281.10 with tele-retina and $982.00 with SOC, and the cost per case correctly diagnosed was $82.21 and $314.14, respectively. For both pilot and Pan-Ontarian sensitivity analyses, tele-retina remained the dominant strategy (ICER <0)., Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that tele-retina is a more cost-effective means of screening for diabetic retinopathy than the SOC in urban and rural underscreened communities. Subsequent economic studies should focus on evaluations that consider the impact of tele-retina on the prevention of severe vision loss in underscreened urban and rural communities., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in blood pressure among patients enrolled in the Telehomecare programme in Ontario, Canada. Methods This observational study utilised a prospective longitudinal cohort design, including patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease enrolled in the Ontario Telehomecare programme from July 2012 to July 2015. The outcome of interest was change in mean (biweekly) systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels over a six-month period. Patient data were extracted from the Ontario Telemedicine Network database, and analysed using generalised linear mixed model procedures. Results Overall, we analysed data for 3513 patients. Patients were on average 74.1 ± 11.4 years of age; almost half were men, 62% had heart failure, 55% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 29% diabetes. At baseline, the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were 130.4 ± 19.1 mmHg and 72.2 ± 12.5 mmHg for the total sample. At six months, the adjusted reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were 4.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to -3.5) and 2.7 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -3.1 to -2.4), respectively. In a subgroup of 1220 patients with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline (systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 150.7 ± 10.2 mmHg/80.2 ± 13.5 mmHg) the adjusted reduction in systolic blood pressure was 12.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -13.4 to -11.6) and in diastolic blood pressure was 7.1 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -7.8 to -6.5) over the six-month period. Conclusions Blood pressure levels were significantly reduced in patients enrolled in the Telehomecare programme, with changes being more pronounced in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. The sustainability of decreased blood pressure on other clinical outcomes needs further evaluation.

Background: Despite research demonstrating the potential effectiveness of Telehomecare for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Heart Failure, broad-scale comprehensive evaluations are lacking. This article discusses the qualitative component of a mixed-method program evaluation of Telehomecare in Ontario, Canada. The objective of the qualitative component was to explore the multi-level factors and processes which facilitate or impede the implementation and adoption of the program across three regions where it was first implemented., Methods: The study employs a multi-level framework as a conceptual guide to explore the facilitators and barriers to Telehomecare implementation and adoption across five levels: technology, patients, providers, organizations, and structures. In-depth semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations with program stakeholders, as well as a Telehomecare document review were used to elicit key themes. Study participants (n = 89) included patients and/or informal caregivers (n = 39), health care providers (n = 23), technicians (n = 2), administrators (n = 12), and decision makers (n = 13) across three different Local Health Integration Networks in Ontario., Results: Key facilitators to Telehomecare implementation and adoption at each level of the multi-level framework included: user-friendliness of Telehomecare technology, patient motivation to participate in the program, support for Telehomecare providers, the integration of Telehomecare into broader health service provision, and comprehensive program evaluation. Key barriers included: access-related issues to using the technology, patient language (if not English or French), Telehomecare provider time limitations, gaps in health care provision for patients, and structural barriers to patient participation related to geography and social location., Conclusions: Though Telehomecare has the potential to positively impact patient lives and strengthen models of health care provision, a number of key challenges remain. As such, further implementation and expansion of Telehomecare must involve continuous assessments of what is working and not working with all stakeholders. Increased dialogue, evaluation, and knowledge translation within and across regions to understand the contextual factors influencing Telehomecare implementation and adoption is required. This can inform decision-making that better reflects and addresses the needs of all program stakeholders.