Search

Background: The impact of teleneurology on healthcare utilization (HCU) in MS is unknown. Objective: Evaluate the association between teleneurology and HCU. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of HCU among adult MS and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients residing in the Cleveland/Akron area from July 2020 to July 2022. Negative binomial regression models evaluated the association between number of laboratory and MRI orders per visit and number of emergency visits per patient across patient groups with variable proportions of teleneurology visits. Results: A total of 3208 patients completed 15,795 visits. Patients using teleneurology had more visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.707–1.719, p < 0.001). Teleneurology visits had fewer laboratory (RR 0.571) and MRI orders (RR 0.693, p < 0.001). There was no difference in emergency care utilization for teleneurology patients (p ⩾ 0.05). More emergency visits were observed in Black (RR 1.414) and Medicaid (RR 1.893) patients, regardless of visit type (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Teleneurology visits were associated with fewer orders, suggesting teleneurology may be incorporated into healthcare models without increasing utilization related to the visit. Teleneurology was also associated with increased visit volumes but no difference in emergency HCU. More studies are needed to clarify the ultimate impact of teleneurology on overall HCU. More emergency visits, regardless of visit type, were observed among at-risk populations, warranting further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: To simulate patient-level costs, analyze the economic potential of telemedicine-based mobile stroke units for acute prehospital stroke care, and identify major determinants of cost-effectiveness, based on two recent prospective trials from the United States and Germany. Methods: A Markov decision model was developed to simulate lifetime costs and outcomes of mobile stroke unit. The model compares diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic patients by conventional care or by mobile stroke units. The treatment outcomes were derived from the B_PROUD and the BEST-mobile stroke unit trials and further input parameters were derived from recent literature. Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A lifetime horizon based on the US healthcare system was adopted to evaluate different cost thresholds for mobile stroke unit and the resulting cost-effectiveness. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at 1x and 3x gross domestic product per capita, as recommended by the World Health Organization. Results: In the base case scenario, mobile stroke unit care yielded an incremental gain of 0.591 quality-adjusted life years per dispatch. Mobile stroke unit was highly cost-effective up to a maximum average cost of 43,067 US dollars per patient. Sensitivity analyses revealed that MSU cost-effectiveness is mainly affected by reduction of long-term disability costs. Also, among other parameters, the rate of stroke mimics patients diagnosed by MSU plays an important role. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that mobile stroke unit can possibly be operated on an excellent level of cost-effectiveness in urban areas in North America with number of stroke mimic patients and long-term stroke survivor costs as major determinants of lifetime cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Telehealth in epilepsy care is not new. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, telehealth became more readily used to deliver epilepsy care. However, a summarized guidance of use in caring for people with epilepsy utilizing telehealth is needed. Methods: Existing literature was reviewed to provide guidance on various aspects of telehealth. Billing aspects are reviewed. Recommendations and considerations along with benefits and barriers to telehealth are provided. Results: Telehealth can be a preferred delivery route of care for people with epilepsy in specific situations. Examples include psychiatric complaints, medication management, and follow-up visits for noncomplicated epilepsy care. In addition, telehealth is useful for patients who need postoperative visits, are not able to travel, or live in residential facilities. In-person care may be more suitable for patients who are medically complex, have language barriers or difficulty with resource access, hearing impaired, or have neurostimulation devices where remote monitoring or programming options are infeasible. Discussion: Telehealth care for people with epilepsy can be a useful and important method of care delivery. It should remain an option for providers to use in epilepsy clinical care. It is important for the neurology provider to understand the benefits, billing, and barriers to providing telehealth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives:To better understand patients' and neurologists' assessments of their experiences regarding effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. Methods:Following an audio–video telehealth visit, neurologists asked patients to participate in a survey-based research study about the encounter, and then, the neurologists also recorded their own evaluations. Data were analyzed using standard quantitative and qualitative techniques for dichotomous and ordered-category survey responses in this cross-sectional analysis. Results:The study included unique encounters between 187 patients and 11 general neurologists. The mean patient age was 49 ± 17.5 years. Two thirds of the patients (66.8%, 125/187) were female. One third (33.2%; 62) were patients new to the NYU Langone Health neurology practices. The most common patient chief complaints were headache (69/187, 36.9%), focal and generalized numbness or tingling (21, 11.2%), memory difficulty (15, 8%), spine-related symptoms (12, 6.4%), and vertigo (11, 5.9%). Most patients (94.7%, 177/187) reported that the teleneurology encounter satisfied their needs. Patients and their neurologists agreed that the experience was effective in 91% (162/178) of encounters, regardless of whether the visit was for a new or established patient visit. Discussion:More than 90% of new and established patients and their neurologists agreed that teleneurology encounters were effective despite some limitations of the examination, the occasional need for patient assistance, and technical difficulties. Our results provide further evidence to justify and to expand the clinical use of teleneurology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A patient presented with acute onset of double vision during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic when elective medical care was restricted. Initially declining an in-person evaluation, she was examined using a telehealth video visit, incorporating multiple technological modalities to ascertain ophthalmic examination elements. Her findings prompted emergent neuroimaging, revealing a giant internal carotid artery aneurysm, which was successfully embolized to prevent debilitating and possibly fatal intracranial haemorrhage. This case report illustrates the successful use of telemedicine and remote patient data acquisition to make a life-saving diagnosis.

Introduction:Telestroke is an effective strategy to increase appropriate stroke treatments among patients in resource-limited environments. Despite the well-documented benefits of telestroke, there is limited literature regarding its utilization. The purposes of this study are: (1) determine the percentage of potential stroke patients who generate a telestroke consult in rural critical access hospitals (CAHs) and (2) validate an electronic medical record (EMR)-derived report as a stroke screen. Methods:This retrospective chart review analyzed patients presenting between September 1, 2020 and February 1, 2021 to three CAHs. Visits with triage complaints suggesting acute ischemic stroke (AIS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) were pooled for analysis using an EMR-derived report. Patients with confirmed AIS/TIA at discharge over this period were used to validate the EMR tool. Results:The EMR report pooled 252 possible AIS/TIA visits out of 12,685 emergency department visits for analysis. It had a specificity of 98.78% and sensitivity of 58.06%. Of the 252 visits, 12.7% met telestroke criteria and 38.89% received telestroke evaluation. Among these, a definite diagnosis of AIS/TIA was made in 92.86%. Of the remaining population who met criteria but didn't undergo consultation, 61.11% were diagnosed with AIS/TIA at discharge. Conclusion:This study provides novel characterization of stroke presentations and telestroke in rural CAHs. The EMR-derived report is a reasonable tool to concentrate potential AIS/TIA cases for review and resource allocation but is not sensitive enough to detect stroke as a stand-alone tool. The majority (56%) of eligible patients did not undergo telestroke consultation. Future studies are critical to further understand reasons contributing to this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A patient presented with acute onset of double vision during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic when elective medical care was restricted. Initially declining an in-person evaluation, she was examined using a telehealth video visit, incorporating multiple technological modalities to ascertain ophthalmic examination elements. Her findings prompted emergent neuroimaging, revealing a giant internal carotid artery aneurysm, which was successfully embolized to prevent debilitating and possibly fatal intracranial haemorrhage. This case report illustrates the successful use of telemedicine and remote patient data acquisition to make a life-saving diagnosis.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent acceleration of telemedicine usage allowed many neurologists to trial telemedicine for neurological care. The purpose of this study is to explore neurology providers' experiences with delivering telemedicine care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Semistructured video interviews were conducted with 27 neurology providers who practice at a single, urban academic center. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for content and themes. Results: Five major themes were identified: virtual examination subspecialty differences, tips and tricks for the virtual examination, improved infrastructure needs, future technologies that could support the virtual examination, and preferences for the postpandemic telemedicine protocol. Subspecialists who described their visits as more focused on behavioral examination and obtaining patient history reported fewer limitations with delivering neurological care through telemedicine platforms. Conclusions: The implementation of a telemedicine system should reflect the needs of each neurology subspecialty. Funding is needed to improve logistical infrastructure for health providers' telemedicine visits, such as technical and administrative assistance, as well as creation and testing of technologies to support physical examination in the virtual environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: To better understand neurologists' assessments of the experiences and effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. Methods: After completing an audio–video telehealth visit with verbally consenting patients, neurologists recorded their evaluations of the encounter. Data were analyzed using standard quantitative and qualitative techniques. Results: The study included unique encounters between 187 patients and 11 neurologists. The mean patient age was 49 ± 17.5 years. Two thirds of patients (66.8%, 125/187) were female. One third of patients (33.2%; 62) were new patients. The most common patient complaints were headache (69/187, 36.9%), focal and generalized numbness or tingling (21, 11.2%), memory difficulty (15, 8%), spine-related symptoms (12, 6.4%), and vertigo (11, 5.9%). Neurologists reported that they completed a virtual examination that provided enough information for medical decision-making in 94.9% of encounters (169/178, 9 missing responses). Fourteen of 25 examination elements important for medical decision-making could be performed sufficiently during virtual encounters. Examination assistance was needed for 16.4% (30/183) of patients, who were, on average, 17.3 years older than those who did not require assistance (62.9 years vs. 45.6 years, p = 0.0002). In 19.1% (34/178) of encounters, neurologists learned clinically relevant information from seeing patients in their homes. Neurologists' assessments of the effectiveness of encounters were not related to the presence (97.2%, 35/36 effective) or absence (95%, 134/141 effective) of technical difficulties (p = 0.5729) in 177 encounters (10 missing responses). Discussion: Neurologists reported that nearly 95% of teleneurology encounters were effective despite limitations of the virtual examination, occasional need for patient assistance, and technical difficulties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the overall satisfaction level of movement disorder specialists using a virtual platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a multicenter cross-sectional survey for a 6-month period during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Movement disorder specialists, who utilized telehealth visits from March 2020 to August 2020, were included. The study surveys, including provider's satisfaction with the care that they were able to provide and visit quality, were completed by the provider after each visit. Results: A total of 206 visits, provided by movement disorder specialists, were analyzed. Zoom was the most popular platform used for remote visits (70, 34%). A backup platform was not needed in the majority of movement disorder visits (171, 83%). The majority of physicians were very satisfied or satisfied with the care provided (72.9%) and visit quality (61%). Conclusions: The satisfaction level of specialists using telemedicine during COVID-19 was high despite having encounters with elderly patients with cognitive impairment or lacking advanced skills with technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to (a) review what theories have been applied to the development of digital self-management interventions for people with neurological disorders; (b) examine their effectiveness to improve depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy; and (c) identify the optimal mode of intervention delivery.Methods: Electronic databases (SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched. Two investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality and use of theory were also assessed.Results: A total of 944 studies were screened, and 16 randomised controlled trials were included. Theory-based digital self-management interventions were effective in reducing depression (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.04 to -0.49), anxiety (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.21) and fatigue (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.27) and in enhancing self-efficacy (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI 0.11-2.18). Cognitive-behavioural theory (CBT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.39), anxiety (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.44) and fatigue (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.54) and in improving self-efficacy (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.05), whereas social cognitive theory (SCT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.28). Partially digital interventions were more effective than fully digital interventions.Discussion: Our findings support the use of theory to guide the development of digital self-management interventions to increase intervention effectiveness. In particular, CBT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy, whereas SCT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recognition and management of stroke in the prehospital setting has become increasingly important to improve patient outcomes. Several strategies to advance prehospital stroke care have been developed, including the mobile stroke unit and the telemedicine-enabled ambulance-or "mini-MSU." These strategies both incorporate ambulance-based audio-visual telemedicine evaluation with a vascular neurologist to facilitate faster treatment but differ in several areas including upfront and recurring costs, scalability or growth potential, ability to integrate into existing emergency medical services systems, and interoperability across multiple specialties or conditions. While both the mobile stroke unit and mini-mobile stroke unit model are valid approaches to improve stroke care, the authors aim to compare these models based on costs, scalability, integration, and interoperability in order to guide our prehospital leaders to find the best solutions for their communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Virtual care is here to stay. The explosive expansion of telehealth caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is more than a necessary measure of protection. The key drivers of this transition in healthcare delivery to a virtual setting are changes in patient behavior and expectations and societal attitudes, and prevailing technologies that are impossible to ignore. The younger population - Generation Z - is increasingly connected and mobile-first. We are heading to a world where we expect to see healthcare in general and neurology, in particular, delivered virtually. The medical community should prepare for this overhaul; proper implementation of virtual care from the ground up is the need of the hour. In an era of virtualization, it is up to the medical community to ensure a well-informed patient population, overcome cultural differences and build digital infrastructure with enhanced access and equity in care delivery, especially for the aging neurological patient population, which is not technologically savvy. Virtual care is a continuum of care that needs deeper integration at systematic levels. The design principles of a patient's journey need to be incorporated while simultaneously placing physician satisfaction with a better user experience at the center of implementation. In this paper, we discuss common challenges and pitfalls of virtual care implementation in neurology - logistical, technical, medicolegal, and those faced in incorporating health and medical education into virtual care - intending to provide solutions and strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electronic consults (e-consults) are asynchronous, formalized requests by a provider to involve a specialist to assist with decision making. E-consults are an alternative to face-to-face consultation and are a promising strategy to efficiently address certain requests for advice. The objective of this project was to examine the utility and characteristics of electronic consults utilized in a safety-net hospital outpatient neurology clinic.We retrospectively reviewed e-consults to the neurology clinic from1 January 2021 to 31 September 2021. The reasons for requests and any diagnostic or treatment recommendations were collected. The time to completion of the e-consults and the percentage of e-consult referred for an in-person clinic evaluation were determined as outcome measures. Following each e-consult, the consulting provider completed a survey to gather their assessment on the appropriateness of the consult, time spent answering the consult, and if unnecessary testing or clinic visits were avoided.A total of 528 e-consults were completed during the study period. The most frequent e-consult referrals were for headache (22%), stroke/neurovascular (21%), neuropathy/neuritis/disturbance of skin sensation (11%), and seizures/spells (11%). The majority of e-consults (94%) were answered in one business day (defined as occurring within 24 h) with 67% of consults answered the same day (defined as occurring within the same calendar day). The consulting providers reported that more than 90% of e-consults took <15 min to answer, and 84% of e-consult requests were felt to be appropriate. A total 156 (41.4%) patients initially seen as an e-consult were referred for a face-to-face visit within 90 days of the e-consult.E-consults provided expedited input from neurologists, which is vital in health systems that provide care to vulnerable populations. The majority of e-consults were answered within 1 day of referral, offering rapid access to neurological expertise in comparison to wait times currently encountered for face-to-face visits. Accordingly, e-consults have the potential to expedite treatment for patients, empower primary care providers, and reduce demand for in-person consultations, particularly in large health systems caring for vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects nearly 1 million people and is estimated to cost $85.4 billion in the United States annually. People with MS have significant barriers to receiving care and telemedicine could substantially improve access to specialized, comprehensive care. In cross-sectional analyses, telemedicine has been shown to be feasible, have high patient and clinician satisfaction, reduce patient costs and burden, and enable a reasonable assessment of disability. However, no studies exist evaluating the longitudinal impact of telemedicine care for MS. Here we describe the study protocol for VIRtual versus UsuAL In-office care for Multiple Sclerosis (VIRTUAL-MS). The main objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of telemedicine for MS care on: patient clinical outcomes, economic costs, patient, and clinician experience. This two-site randomized clinical trial will enroll 120 adults with a recent diagnosis of MS and randomize 1:1 to receive in-clinic vs. telemedicine care for 24 months. The primary outcome of the study is worsening in any one of the four Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite 4 (MSFC4) measures at 24 months. Other study outcomes include patient and clinician satisfaction, major healthcare costs, Expanded Disability Status Scale, treatment adherence, and digital outcomes. The results of this study will directly address the key gaps in knowledge about longitudinal telemedicine-enabled care in an MS population. It will inform clinical care implementation as well as design of trials in MS and other chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT05660187 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The conduct of patient consults greatly changed during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a decrease in face-to-face patient consults and enhanced utilization of virtual consults. Infodemiological studies, using Google Trends, focus on internet search trends that may reflect public interest and awareness in diseases and as a proxy of public health risk perception. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the online behavior of internet users on teleneurology, telehealth, and telemedicine during the time of the pandemic, as reflected in search volume indices (SVI) projected in Google Trends. Methods: We used the data from Google Trends to quantify the interest of internet users in teleneurology, telehealth, and telemedicine. These keywords were entered in Google Trends as search terms. Data included were searches conducted from 2016 to 2020 to depict the transition into the pandemic. Results: The SVI of teleneurology was unchanged during the 5-year period search relative to the SVIs of telehealth and telemedicine. Contrary to the noted worldwide increase in the SVI of telehealth and telemedicine during the year of pandemic, teleneurology's SVI remained stable despite the increase of its utilization. Focusing on teleneurology, the highest SVI was observed in 2018. Conclusion: There was an increase in the SVI of telehealth and telemedicine, possibly implying an increase in the general awareness of these virtual methods of health care, as catalyzed by the pandemic. However, the stable SVI of teleneurology may signify that the public awareness regarding it remained unchanged despite the increase in application in clinics and hospitals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient groups traditionally affected by health disparities were less likely to use video teleneurology (TN) care during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge in the United States. Whether this asymmetry persisted later in the pandemic or was accompanied with a loss of access to care remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using patient data from a multicenter healthcare system in New York City. We identified all established pediatric or adult neurology patients with at least two prior outpatient visits between June 16th, 2019 and March 15th, 2020 using our electronic medical record. For this established pre-COVID cohort, we identified telephone, in-person, video TN or emergency department visits and hospital admissions for any cause between March 16th and December 15th, 2020 ("COVID period"). We determined clinical, sociodemographic, income, and visit characteristics. Our primary outcome was video TN utilization, and our main secondary outcome was loss to follow-up during the COVID period. We used multivariable logistic regression to model the relationship between patient-level characteristics and both outcomes. Results: We identified 23,714 unique visits during the COVID period, which corresponded to 14,170 established patients from our institutional Neurology clinics during the pre-COVID period. In our cohort, 4,944 (34.9%) utilized TN and 4,997 (35.3%) were entirely lost to follow-up during the COVID period. In the adjusted regression analysis, Black or African-American race [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.60, 97.5%CI 0.52–0.70], non-English preferred language (aOR 0.49, 97.5%CI 0.39–0.61), Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.50, 97.5%CI 0.44–0.57), and Medicare insurance (aOR 0.73, 97.5%CI 0.65–0.83) had decreased odds of TN utilization. Older age (aOR 0.98, 97.5%CI 0.98–0.99), female sex (aOR 0.90 97.5%CI 0.83–0.99), and Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.78, 0.68–0.90) were associated with decreased odds of loss to follow-up. Conclusion: In the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found sociodemographic patterns in TN utilization that were similar to those found very early in the pandemic. However, these sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with loss to follow-up, suggesting that lack of TN utilization may not have coincided with loss of access to care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The accelerating integration of telehealth technologies in neurology practice has transformed traditional interactions between neurologists and patients, allied clinicians and society. Despite the irnmense promise of these technologies to irnprove systems of neurological care, the infusion of telehealth technologies into neurology practice introduces a host of unique ethical challenges. Proactive consideration of the ethical dimensions of teleneurologyand of the impactof these innovationson thefield of neurology more generally can help to ensure responsible development and deployment across stages of implementation. Toward these ends, this article explores key ethical dimensions of teleneurology practice and policy, presents a normative framework for their consideration, and calls attention to underexplored questions ripe for further study at this evolving nexus of teleneurology and neuroethics. To promote successful and ethically resilient development of teleneurology across diverse con- texts, clinicians, organizational leaders, and information technology specialists should work closely with neuroethicists with the common goal of identifying and rigorously assessing the trajectories and potential limits of teleneurology systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A teleneurology hospitalist model aims to address the demand for high-quality neurologic acute care and the shortage of neurologists. Here, we review concepts and models of teleneurology services to address access and care gaps in neurology beyond telestroke models. The goal of these emergent teleservices is to empower community hospitals to deliver the highest quality care, while also reducing unnecessary patient transfers to tertiary care hospitals. We highlight the clinical models, patient populations, and innovative approaches of different tele-neurohospitalist services. This includes challenges related to clinical limitations, legal issues, and reimbursement. We highlight specific areas of research that can further clarify and refine the appropriate use, cost-effectiveness, and clinical outcomes of these telemed-icine-based care models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We evaluated the impact of teleneurologists on the time to initiating acute stroke care versus traditional bedside neurologists at an advanced stroke center.Methods: This observational study evaluated time to treatment for acute stroke patients at a single hospital, certified as an advanced primary stroke centre, with thrombectomy capabilities. Consecutive stroke alert patients between 1 March, 2016 and 31 March, 2018 were divided into two groups based on their neurology consultation service (bedside neurology: 1 March, 2016-28 February, 2017; teleneurology: 1 April, 2017-31 March, 2018). Door-to-tPA time and door-to-IR time for mechanical thrombectomy were compared between the two groups.Results: Nine hundred and fifty-nine stroke patients met the inclusion criteria (436 bedside neurology, 523 teleneurology patients). There were no significant differences in sex, age, or stroke final diagnosis between groups (p > 0.05). 85 bedside neurology patients received tPA and 35 had mechanical thrombectomy, 84 and 44 for the teleneurology group respectively. Door-to-tPA time (median (IQR)) was significantly higher among teleneurology (64 min (51.5-83.5)) than bedside neurology patients (45 min (34-69); p < 0.0001). There was no difference in door-to-IR times (mean ± SD) between bedside neurology (87.2 ± 33.3 min) and teleneurology (90.4 ± 33.4 min; p = 0.67).Discussion: At this facility, our teleneurology services vendor was associated with a statistically significant delay in tPA administration compared with bedside neurologists. There was no difference in door-to-IR times. Delays in tPA administration make it harder to meet acute stroke care guidelines and could worsen patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundPatient groups traditionally affected by health disparities were less likely to use video teleneurology (TN) care during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge in the United States. Whether this asymmetry persisted later in the pandemic or was accompanied with a loss of access to care remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using patient data from a multicenter healthcare system in New York City. We identified all established pediatric or adult neurology patients with at least two prior outpatient visits between June 16th, 2019 and March 15th, 2020 using our electronic medical record. For this established pre-COVID cohort, we identified telephone, in-person, video TN or emergency department visits and hospital admissions for any cause between March 16th and December 15th, 2020 (“COVID period”). We determined clinical, sociodemographic, income, and visit characteristics. Our primary outcome was video TN utilization, and our main secondary outcome was loss to follow-up during the COVID period. We used multivariable logistic regression to model the relationship between patient-level characteristics and both outcomes.ResultsWe identified 23,714 unique visits during the COVID period, which corresponded to 14,170 established patients from our institutional Neurology clinics during the pre-COVID period. In our cohort, 4,944 (34.9%) utilized TN and 4,997 (35.3%) were entirely lost to follow-up during the COVID period. In the adjusted regression analysis, Black or African-American race [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.60, 97.5%CI 0.52–0.70], non-English preferred language (aOR 0.49, 97.5%CI 0.39–0.61), Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.50, 97.5%CI 0.44–0.57), and Medicare insurance (aOR 0.73, 97.5%CI 0.65–0.83) had decreased odds of TN utilization. Older age (aOR 0.98, 97.5%CI 0.98–0.99), female sex (aOR 0.90 97.5%CI 0.83–0.99), and Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.78, 0.68–0.90) were associated with decreased odds of loss to follow-up.ConclusionIn the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found sociodemographic patterns in TN utilization that were similar to those found very early in the pandemic. However, these sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with loss to follow-up, suggesting that lack of TN utilization may not have coincided with loss of access to care.

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has compelled health care practices and academic departments to evaluate the suitability of telemedicine for various specialties and attempt rapid implementation to enable continuation of health care that is safe for providers and patients. Many patients with neurological disorders are well suited to evaluations through video. The department of neurology at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn Neurology), with the support of the health system, rapidly expanded telemedicine services to meet the needs of our patient population. This accomplishment required the complex coordination of multiple disciplines and roles within the department and the health care system, including faculty, residents, administrative staff, research and technical staff, information services, and the connected health team. Procedures for provider and patient education were established. Surveys of the provider and patient experience were developed and deployed. The process has demonstrated the vital role telemedicine in neurology (teleneurology) should play in the care of neurological patients beyond the pandemic. We describe our experience as a template for other departments and practices seeking to establish teleneurology programs, as well as an illustration of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Telehealth has proliferated since the 1950s, but adoption and coverage of telehealth services for the U.S. public have been slow. In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the federal government has implemented temporary policy changes that removed barriers and catalyzed the unprecedented adoption of telehealth. Methods: To assess ambulatory teleneurology satisfaction, we analyzed postvisit questionnaire data from patients and clinicians who completed teleneurology visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Neurology (VUMC). Results: From March 18 to May 8, 2020, VUMC completed 3,935 teleneurology visits. More than 97% of patients were very highly or highly confident in the telehealth care they received, whereas almost 99% of clinicians were very likely or somewhat likely to recommend telehealth to other clinicians. Conclusions: Teleneurology satisfaction at VUMC has been positive, and going forward, we must advance upon this unprecedented adoption of telehealth and never revert to former restrictive policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature about telemedicine in pediatric headache and to provide practical guidance for its implementation. Recent Findings: There are few studies dedicated to telemedicine in pediatric headache, and existing studies are small. Patients and families report high levels of satisfaction with telemedicine, and most are willing to continue telemedicine visits in the future. Telemedicine demonstrated similar reductions in headache frequency, severity, and duration as patients treated in-person. Remotely delivered psychologic interventions have some utility in reducing headache severity acutely. Families feel telemedicine reduces geographic and financial barriers to care. Summary: Telemedicine in pediatric headache is a growing field. While there is limited research available, it appears safe, efficacious, and feasible. Headache-related outcomes, including frequency, severity, and duration, were similar amongst telemedicine and in-person visits. Future studies should include larger sample sizes and detailed analysis of adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the performance of telehealth as a screening tool for spasticity compared to direct patient assessment in the long-term care setting. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Setting: Two long-term care facilities: a 140-bed veterans' home and a 44-bed state home for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Subjects: Sixty-one adult residents of two long-term care facilities (aged 70.1 ± 16.2 years) were included in this analysis. Spasticity was identified in 43% of subjects (Modified Ashworth Scale rating mode = 2). Contributing diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, birth trauma, stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Main measures: Movement disorders neurologists conducted in-person examinations to determine whether spasticity was present (reference standard) and also evaluated subjects with spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Telehealth screening examinations, facilitated by a bedside nurse, were conducted remotely by two teleneurologists using a three-question screening tool. Telehealth screening determinations of spasticity were compared to the reference standard determination to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristics. Teleneurologist agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa. Results: Teleneurologist 1 had a specificity of 89% and sensitivity of 65% to identify the likely presence of spasticity (n = 61; AUC = 0.770). Teleneurologist 2 showed 100% specificity and 82% sensitivity (n = 16; AUC = 0.909). There was almost perfect agreement between the two examiners at 94% (kappa = 0.875, 95% CI: 0.640–1.000). Conclusion: Telehealth may provide a useful, efficient method of identifying residents of long-term care facilities that likely need referral for spasticity evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The COVID-19 pandemic has provided us with a unique opportunity to experiment with telehealth and evaluate its benefits and limitations. This review discusses the impact of telehealth on multiple sclerosis (MS) care and research in adults and children. Recent Findings: Telehealth visits for MS patients have been shown to reduce missed workdays and costs for patients. Brief telephone-based counseling may be associated with better adherence to disease-modifying therapy, although results of multiple home-based tele-rehabilitation for people with MS have been equivocal. Overall, patients and providers have reported high levels of satisfactions with telehealth. Several remote disability measures and numerous other technological tools have emerged for use in remote MS research and care. Major challenges of telehealth include limitations to performing a complete neurologic exam and disparities in access to telehealth amongst vulnerable populations with limited access to virtual platforms. Summary: Following the rapid expansion of telehealth during the pandemic, it is highly likely that we will continue to embrace the benefits of this valuable tool. Future directions for improving telehealth should include more evidence-based research on the diagnostic accuracy in neuroimmunology and reducing disparities in the access to telehealth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Africa has over 1.3 billion inhabitants, with over 60% of this population residing in rural areas that have poor access to medical experts. Despite having a ridiculously huge, underserved population, very few African countries currently have any form of sustained and organized telemedicine practice, and even fewer have dedicated tele-neurology services. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has proved to be one of the most significant disruptors of vital sectors of human endeavor in modern times. In the healthcare sector, there is an increasing advocacy to deliver non-urgent care via telemedicine. This paper examined the current state of tele-neurology practice and infrastructural preparedness in sub-Saharan Africa. Currently, there is over 70% mobile phone penetration in most of the countries and virtually all of them have mobile internet services of different technologies and generations. Although the needed infrastructure is increasingly available, it should be improved upon. We have proposed the access, costs, ethics, and support (ACES) model as a bespoke, holistic strategy for the successful implementation and advancement of tele-neurology in sub-Saharan Africa.

Background:Stroke is the leading cause of serious long-term disability in the United States. Barriers to rehabilitation include cost, transportation, lack of trained personnel, and equipment. Telerehabilitation (TR) has emerged as a promising modality to reduce costs, improve accessibility, and retain patient independence. TR allows providers to remotely administer therapy, potentially increasing access to underserved regions. Objectives:To describe types of stroke rehabilitation therapy delivered through TR and to evaluate whether TR is as effective as traditional in-person outpatient therapy in improving satisfaction and poststroke residual deficits such as motor function, speech, and disability. Methods:A literature search of the term "telerehabilitation and stroke" was conducted across three databases. Full-text articles with results pertaining to TR interventions were reviewed. Articles were scored for methodological quality using the PEDro scale. Results:Thirty-four articles with 1,025 patients were included. Types of TR included speech therapy, virtual reality (VR), robotic, community-based, goal setting, and motor training exercises. Frequently measured outcomes included motor function, speech, disability, and satisfaction. All 34 studies reported improvement from baseline after TR therapy. PEDro scores ranged from 2 to 8 with a mean of 4.59 ± 1.94 (on a scale of 0–10). Studies with control interventions, randomized allocation, and blinded assessment had significantly higher PEDro scores. All 15 studies that compared TR with traditional therapy showed equivalent or better functional outcomes. Home-based robotic therapy and VR were less costly than in-person therapy. Patient satisfaction with TR and in-person clinical therapy was similar. Conclusions:TR is less costly and equally as effective as clinic-based rehabilitation at improving functional outcomes in stroke patients. TR produces similar patient satisfaction. TR can be combined with other therapies, including VR, speech, and robotic assistance, or used as an adjuvant to direct in-person care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The pandemic has implemented the need for new digital technologies as useful tools during the emergency and the long recovery phase that will follow. SARS-CoV-2 has strongly impacted stroke care with significant contraction in a number of patients treated. Methods: This mini-review is an initiative of the "Digital Technologies, Web and Social Media Study Group" of the Italian Society of Neurology and briefly discusses digital tools for managing the acute phase and the rehabilitation after stroke, even considering the new apps that will improve the process of remote monitoring of patients after discharge at home. Results: Telemedicine and digital technologies could play a role in each of the three stroke-belt stages: hyperacute treatment and reperfusion, acute care, etiological classification and secondary prevention and rehabilitation. Conclusion: The global emergency represented by the COVID-19 pandemic can be the stimulus to accelerate the digitalization process in the field of stroke for the use of new methods on a large scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Teleneurology has provided access to neurological expertise and state-of-the-art stroke care where previously they have been inaccessible. The use of Artificial Intelligence with machine learning to assist telestroke care can be revolutionary. This includes more rapid and more reliable diagnosis through imaging analysis as well as prediction of hospital course and 3-month prognosis. Intelligent Electronic Medical Records can search free text and provide decision assistance by analyzing patient charts. Speech recognition has advanced enough to be reliable and highly convenient. Smart contextually aware communication and alert programs can enhance efficiency of patient flow and improve outcomes. Automated data collection and analysis can make quality improvement and research projects quicker and much less burdensome. Despite current challenges, these synergistic technologies hold immense promise in enhancing the clinician experience, helping to reduce physician burnout while improving patient health outcomes at a lower cost. This brief overview discusses the multifaceted potential of AI use in telestroke.

Teleneurology has provided access to neurological expertise and state-of-the-art stroke care where previously they have been inaccessible. The use of Artificial Intelligence with machine learning to assist telestroke care can be revolutionary. This includes more rapid and more reliable diagnosis through imaging analysis as well as prediction of hospital course and 3-month prognosis. Intelligent Electronic Medical Records can search free text and provide decision assistance by analyzing patient charts. Speech recognition has advanced enough to be reliable and highly convenient. Smart contextually aware communication and alert programs can enhance efficiency of patient flow and improve outcomes. Automated data collection and analysis can make quality improvement and research projects quicker and much less burdensome. Despite current challenges, these synergistic technologies hold immense promise in enhancing the clinician experience, helping to reduce physician burnout while improving patient health outcomes at a lower cost. This brief overview discusses the multifaceted potential of AI use in telestroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The growth of telestroke services expanded the reach of acute stroke treatment. However, ethnic disparities in receiving such treatment have not been fully assessed. Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively maintained data on patients evaluated through the Medical University of South Carolina telestroke program between January 2016 and November 2018. Outcomes included odds of receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and achieving door-to-needle (DTN) time ≤60 and ≤45 min among patients receiving tPA. We used logistic regression to analyze the contribution of race/ethnicity. Results: We included 2,977 patients, of whom 1,093 (36.7%) identified as nonwhite; of these, 1,048 patients (95.9%) identified as black or African American. Significantly more nonwhite patients were seen at a primary stroke center (PSC) (68.4% vs. 52.3% in whites, p < 0.001). However, white patients had significantly higher odds of receiving tPA (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.17–1.84). There was no significant difference in receiving MT between races. Among patients receiving tPA, whites had higher odds of DTN ≤45 min (OR 1.76, 1.20–2.57) and ≤60 min (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.31–2.66). Conclusions: White patients had better odds achieving DTN ≤45 min and DTN ≤60 min if receiving tPA within a telestroke setting, as well as higher odds of receiving tPA, even after adjustment for comorbidities. This was noted despite white patients having less access to PSCs. However, larger scale studies are needed to further study the impact of ethnic disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:With increasing demand for neurologists, nontraditional health care delivery mechanisms have been developed to leverage this limited resource. Introduction:Telemedicine has emerged as an effective digital solution. Over the past three decades, telemedicine use has steadily grown; however, neurologists often learn on the job, rather than as part of their medical training. The current literature regarding telestroke training during neurology training is sparse, focusing on cerebrovascular fellowship curricula. We sought to enhance telestroke training in our neurology residency by incorporating real-life application. Materials and Methods:We implemented a formal educational model for neurology residents to use telemedicine for remote acquisition of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS) before arrival at our comprehensive stroke center. This three-phase educational model involved multidisciplinary classroom didactics, simulation exercises, and real-world experience. Training and feedback were provided by neurologists experienced in telemedicine. Results:All residents completed formal training in telemedicine prehospital NIHSS acquisition and had the opportunity to participate in additional simulation exercises. Currently, residents are gaining additional experience by performing prehospital NIHSS acquisition for patients in whom AIS is suspected. Our preliminary data indicate that resident video encounters average 10.6 min in duration, thus saving time once patients arrive at our hospital. Discussion:To our knowledge, this is the first report of a telestroke-integrated neurology residency program in a comprehensive stroke center resulting in shortened time to treatment in patients with suspected AIS. Conclusions:We present a model that can be adopted by other neurology residency programs as it provides real-world telemedicine training critical to future neurologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) face barriers accessing specialty care for evaluation and treatment. Telemedicine, the practice of clinical care at a distance with the aid of technology, may be a potential bridge to close the access gap for pwMS separated by distance or disability. The objective of this review was to investigate the types of telemedicine being utilized and overall outcomes for pwMS and their providers.Methods: A Boolean search of the medical literature was conducted between January 2000 and January 31, 2018. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane databases, were used to identify all relevant citations. Two reviewers independently appraised the articles for meeting study criteria and for study quality using the CASP system. Financial costs of the telemedicine applications were assessed.Results: A total of 28 studies involving 3252 participants met criteria for inclusion. Telemedicine interventions were classified, and outcomes were assessed systematically by the following categories: general MS care; rehabilitation and exercise; and neuropsychology/mental health. Studies showed a range of outcomes with variable quality. Overall, remote clinical examinations, long-term telemedicine management interventions and telerehabilitation were shown to be beneficial, cost-effective and satisfactory for patients and providers.Discussion: Telemedicine is a viable platform for delivering specialty MS care. Remote neurological assessments and several forms of therapy have been shown to be technically feasible. Optimal implementation and barriers to the use of telemedicine in the current healthcare system should be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The state of West Virginia (WV) is often seen as a health care desert with a scarcity of hospitals and resources. The prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and associated comorbidities are also some of the highest in the nation. Introduction: Ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive diagnosis. Prompt treatment in WV is difficult due to limited and isolated stroke-ready hospitals. Adoption of telestroke has helped to bypass these obstacles and improve access to care. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analyses; using data from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Stroke Data Registry, and other statewide agencies, we looked for trends in the volume of patients treated with intravenous-tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in WV. We also reviewed data from West Virginia University's (WVU) telestroke database to assess trends in consult volumes and quality metrics. Results: Since the establishment of WVU telestroke, the total number of stroke patients receiving tPA across the state increased by 173% from 2015 (259 patients) to 2018 (448 patients) (p < 0.0001). Telestroke consults made up 24% (107/448) of total statewide tPA administrations for 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, the total symptomatic hemorrhage rate for tPA treated patients through telestroke was 1% (3/292). Telestroke also facilitated local care by avoiding patient transfer on average 65% of the time. Conclusion: Not only has telestroke increased the quantity of treated acute ischemic strokes, but it has also done so safely and effectively even in resource-poor areas. These findings demonstrate that telestroke is a useful tool for treating strokes, particularly those that happen far from stroke centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telemedicine has been widely implemented during the COVID-19 global pandemic to enable continuity of care of chronic illnesses. We modified our general neurology clinic to be conducted using remote audio-only telephone consultations. We included all patients over a 10-week period who agreed to both a telephone consultation and a questionnaire afterwards in order to ascertain the patient's perspective of the experience. There were 212 participants consisting of men (43.8%) and women (56.2%). The mean ± standard deviation of age was 47.8 ± 17.0 (range 17–93) years. For the most part, patients found remote consultations either "just as good" (67.1%) or "better" (9.0%) than face-to-face consultations. Those who deemed it to be "not as good" were significantly older (52.3 ± 17.9 years vs. 46.6 ± 16.6 years, p =0.045) or were more likely to have a neurological disorder that required clinical examination, namely, a neuromuscular condition (66.7%, p = 0.002) or an undiagnosed condition (46.7%, p = 0.031). At the height of the COVID-19 global pandemic, most patients were satisfied with remote consultations. The positive feedback for remote consultations needs to be verified outside of this unique scenario because the results were likely influenced by the patients' apprehension to attend the hospital amongst other factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of brain death and the determination of neurologic prognosis following cardiac arrest are important reasons for neurology consultation in the intensive care unit. In hospitals without access to neurology consultation, it may be challenging to address these important questions with high reliability in a timely manner. The American Academy of Neurology has established consensus criteria for diagnosis of brain death, which include (i) comatose state; (ii) presence of apnea; and (iii) absence of brainstem reflexes in the setting of a diagnosis of underlying brain injury compatible with brain death. It has recently been shown that virtual assessment of coma using standardized scales is feasible with good inter-rater reliability. The supervision of apnea testing and the neurologic examination of the brainstem by a remote neurologist are possible if conducted in conjunction with a well-trained and experienced bedside team. In this communication, we explore the essential clinical and legal framework that can support using virtual teleconsultations to address this complex topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction:Widespread screening for cognitive decline is an important challenge to address as the aging population grows, but there is currently a shortage of clinical infrastructure to meet the demand for in-person evaluation. Remotely delivered assessments that utilize eye-tracking data from webcams, such as visual paired comparison (VPC) tasks, could increase access to remote, asynchronous neuropsychological screening for cognitive decline but further validation against clinical-grade eye trackers is required. Methods:To demonstrate equivalence between a novel automated scoring system for eye-tracking metrics acquired through a laptop-embedded camera and a gold-standard eye tracker, we analyzed VPC data from 18 subjects aged 50+ with normal cognitive function across three visits. The eye tracker data were scored by the manufacturer's software, and the webcam data were scored by a novel algorithm. Results:Automated scoring of webcam-based VPC data revealed strong correlations with the clinical-grade eye-tracking camera. Correlation of mean VPC performance across all time points was robust: r = 0.95 (T1 r = 0.97; T2 r = 0.88; T3 r = 0.97; p's < 0.001). Correlation of per-trial performance across time points was also robust: r = 0.88 (T1 r = 0.85; T2 r = 0.89; T3 r = 0.92; p's < 0.001). Mean differences between performance data acquired by each device were 0.00. Conclusion:These results suggest that device-embedded cameras are a valid and scalable alternative to traditional laboratory-based equipment for gaze-based tasks measuring cognitive function. The validation of this technique represents an important technical advance for the field of teleneuropsychology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is the gold standard for cognitive screening in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic and the increased need for virtual clinical visits, we examined the reliability of remote administration of the SDMT vs. standard in-person administration to individuals with MS. Methods: Pearson's correlation analysis was performed between SDMT scores on the in-person and remote administrations. Results: For n = 132 participants, remote and in-person SDMT scores were strongly correlated (r =.80, p =.000). Conclusion: Remote administration of the SDMT is a reliable cognitive screening approach in MS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neurological conditions affect one-third of Americans and are some of the most prevalent health issues in the country. Many sufferers have difficulty accessing treatment, however, advances in technology may be able to support availability, affordability, and convenience of care through telehealth services. This review outlines the current state of telemedicine in neurological healthcare, highlighting evidence-based research and use cases for digital services. Details on expenses associated with managing certain well-known conditions are included to shed light on the financial burden of disease and how telehealth can contribute to cost savings for patients and providers. Finally, a discussion of current telehealth legislature gives additional perspective on regulatory dynamics experienced by different stakeholders in the field. Research supports telemedicine as a solution to enhance current care models given its many benefits, including efficient and clinically useful service delivery. This movement has the opportunity to help billions of individuals globally by acting as a mechanism to provide impactful and scalable neurological healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telehealth describes the provision of medical services remotely through technology, and may enhance patient access to specialty care services. Although teleneurology has expanded widely since the introduction of telestroke in 1999, telehealth services for outpatients with neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders are less widespread. In this narrative review, we will describe the current technology, applications, outcomes, and limitations of this dynamically growing field. Evidence for telehealth applications related to neuromuscular diseases, palliative care, specialized multidisciplinary services, and musculoskeletal care are reviewed. With growing demand for specialized services and finite resources, telehealth provides a promising avenue to promote access to high-quality care, decrease the cost and burden of travel for patients, and with the expansion of software to personal computing and mobile devices, offer flexible, low-overhead practice opportunities for clinicians. Providers embarking on careers in telehealth should be aware of current legal restrictions impacting care to minimize risk and avoid liability. Muscle Nerve 58: 475-485, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:The recent growth in telehealth has been facilitated by the need to deliver healthcare to patients living in remote or rural areas. In contrast, the role of telehealth in more urban settings is less clear. A teleneurology program was established in 2011 at the Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center (TRVAMC) in Long Beach, California. A review of teleneurology encounters was conducted to assess the feasibility of applying this telehealth modality to patients with chronic neurological disorders living in an urban setting. Methods:Teleneurology encounters were conducted by clinical video telehealth (CVT) between a provider at the TRVAMC and patients at local community-based outpatient clinics from November 2011 to December 2014. In a random sampling of veterans, they were asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey. Results:A total of 745 teleneurology encounters were performed including 570 unique patients. Veterans with a broad range of neurological disorders were seen, including Parkinson's disease, headaches, epilepsy, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral nervous system disorders, multiple sclerosis, and other problems such as dizziness and paresthesia.Compared with patients in face-to-face clinics, patients in teleneurology clinics consistently kept their appointments. Technical problems were rare and easily resolved. The majority of patients were satisfied with the care they received through teleneurology, and preferred CVT rather than a face-to-face encounter. Conclusions:This report demonstrates the successful application of telehealth to evaluate and manage a diverse group of neurological disorders in an urban setting. Despite the relatively short distances involved, the majority of patients preferred telehealth over face-to-face encounters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Introduction: Delivering care through telemedicine directly into the patient's home is increasingly feasible, valuable, and beneficial. However, qualitative data on how patients' and physicians' perceive these virtual house calls are lacking. We conducted a qualitative analysis of perceptions of these visits for Parkinson's disease to (1) determine how patients and physicians perceive virtual visits and (2) identify components contributing to positive and negative perceptions. Materials and Methods: Qualitative survey data were collected from patients and physicians during a 12-month randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson's disease. Data from 149 cases were analyzed using case-based qualitative content analysis and quantitative sentiment analysis techniques. Results: Positive and negative perceptions of virtual visits were driven by three themes: (1) personal benefits of the virtual visit, (2) perceived quality of care, and (3) perceived quality of interpersonal engagement. In general, participants who identified greater personal benefit, high quality of care, and good interpersonal engagement perceived visits positively. Technical problems with the software were commonly mentioned. The sentiment analysis for patients was strongly favorable (+2.5) and moderately favorable for physicians (+0.8). Physician scores were lowest (−0.3) for the ability to perform a detailed motor examination remotely. Discussion: Patients and providers generally view telemedicine favorably, but individual experiences are dependent on technical issues. Conclusions: Satisfaction with and effectiveness of remote care will likely increase as common technical problems are resolved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT) is an efficacious, first-line treatment for Tourette syndrome (TS) and other chronic or persistent tic disorders. However, CBIT's public health impact has been limited by suboptimal treatment access. Preliminary research has shown that providing CBIT over videoconference (teleCBIT) is a promising delivery method for patients who cannot access in-person care. However, extant studies have been small efficacy trials focused only on pediatric patients. Replication of these studies is needed in additional treatment settings and across a wider age range of patients, especially in light of advances in telehealth technology and increasing telehealth adoption among practitioners.We conducted a single-arm trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of teleCBIT embedded in comprehensive, medical tic specialty clinics. From October 2016 to September 2018, patients were offered teleCBIT at their usual care appointments. Those who were interested and met inclusion/exclusion criteria received 8 sessions of CBIT guided by a manualized protocol. An independent evaluator, masked to treatment progress, administered assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6 months after treatment.Twenty-five percent of patients who were offered treatment initiated teleCBIT through the study, and all treatment initiators completed treatment. From pre- to post-treatment, decreases in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) total tic severity scores showed a large effect size among pediatric patients (n = 19; t = 5.72, P < 0.001, d = 1.31) and a medium-to-large effect size for adult patients (n = 10, t = 1.41, P = 0.096, d = 0.664). Thirteen of 19 pediatric patients (68%) and 6 of 10 adult patients (60%) had a positive global treatment response at post-treatment. Patients rated the treatment as highly satisfactory. Ninety-three percent of sessions were free of substantial technical problems.Within the context of medical tic specialty clinics, teleCBIT demonstrated strong evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness comparable to in-person treatment for both pediatric and adult patients. TeleCBIT warrants study in future research on enhancing care systems for patients with TS. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/keydates/NCT04007913 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients in rural communities lack access to acute stroke therapies. Rapid administration of lytic therapy increases the likelihood of favorable functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). At the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), we implemented a Web-based telestroke program that allows patients presenting with AIS at a rural hospital to receive expert stroke consultation within minutes. This increases their chances of receiving lytic therapy, and therefore increases the likelihood of good functional outcome. Objectives: Our study aims to provide an update on how our telestroke program had developed and the rate and safety of intravenous (IV) alteplase administration through telestroke. Methods: Data were collected on all patients evaluated through the MUSC Telestroke program from May 2008 through April 2014. Collected data included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on presentation, number of IV alteplase administrations, number of patients transferred to MUSC, number of mechanical thrombectomies performed on transferred patients, rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (sICHs), and discharge location. Results: A total of 7,694 consults were performed during the study period. Of them 3,795 (49.2%) patients were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, of those 1,324 (34.8%) received IV alteplase. A total of 1,282 patients were transferred to MUSC for further care. From November 2014 to April 2016, 56 patients received mechanical thrombectomy. sICH occurred in 33 patients who received alteplase, and in 5 patients receiving a combination of IV and intraarterial thrombolysis. Over the study period, the number of participating sites increased from 6 to 19 sites. The percentage of transfers to MUSC decreased from 36% to 14%. Conclusions: Our study shows that our telestroke program had evolved over time to involve more sites throughout the state of South Carolina. Post-IV alteplase sICH was low and within the expected range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous analyses suggest that ethnic and racial differences exist in acute stroke care including thrombolytic treatment rates. The current study evaluates ethnic or racial differences in acute stroke treatment within a multi-state telestroke program.Acute telestroke consultations seen in the Emergency Department in 203 facilities and 23 states were extracted from the Telecare by TeleSpecialistsTM database. Cases were reviewed for age, race, ethnicity, sex, last known normal time, arrival time, treatment with thrombolytic therapy, door-to-needle (DTN) time, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Race was defined as Black, White, or Other; ethnicity was defined as Hispanic or non-Hispanic.The current study included 13,221 acute telestroke consultations consisting of 9890 White, 2048 Black, and 1283 patients classified as Other. A total of 934 patients were Hispanic and 12,287 patients were non-Hispanic. There were no statistically significant differences noted in thrombolytic treatment rates when comparing White (7.9%) patients with non-White patients (7.4%), p = 0.36, or comparing Black (8.1%) with non-Black patients (7.8%), p = 0.59. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in treatment rates comparing Hispanic (6.3%) with non-Hispanic (7.9%) patients, p = 0.072. We noted no measurable differences in DTN times by race or ethnicity.Contrary to previous reports, we failed to detect any significant differences in thrombolytic treatment rates and DTN times by race or ethnicity among stroke patients in a multistate telestroke program. These findings support the hypothesis that telestroke may mitigate racial and ethnic disparities which may be attributable to local variability in stroke procedures or access to healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]