Search

Eye disorders are one of the characteristic adverse events associated with S-1 chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the frequency and outcome of eye disorders associated with S-1 chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. This retrospective study included 75 advanced gastric cancer patients who received S-1 monotherapy between January 2014 and December 2015. We retrospectively evaluated the frequency, Grade, and treatment of eye disorders. Eye disorders were observed in 16 patients(21%). The median time of onset was 3(range, 1-8)months. Grade 2 watering eyes, eye discharge, and conjunctivitis were reported in 14, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. Artificial tears, fluorometholone eye-drops, and both of these treatments were used in 7, 1, and 8 patients, respectively. Ophthalmologic examination was performed for 3 patients. No delay or reduction of S-1 therapy was required for the eye disorders. Eye disorders associated with S-1 therapy in gastric cancer patients did not affect treatment if managed properly using eye drops.

After Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer(ACTS-GC), adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is a standard treatment for stage II or III gastric cancer patients. In this study, we retrospectively examined factors that influence the continuity of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We analyzed the clinical documentation of 27 gastric cancer patients being treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who completed the treatment without reduction dose were classified into a complete group(n=14), and those for whom S-1 was discontinued or reduced due to adverse reactions were classified into a reduced/discontinuation group(n=13). First, we examined the background factors at baseline between these two groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the operative procedure, leukocyte count, and serum creatinine level at baseline were identified as factors that influence the continuity of S-1 chemotherapy. Next, we investigated the hematological and nutritional conditions of these patients during the treatment period. The loss of body mass index(BMI)during the treatment period was remarkable in the reduced/discontinuation group regardless of the operative procedure. This result suggests that an early nutritional intervention might be important for gastric cancer patients undergoing S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

We investigated the efficacy of gastrojejunostomy followed by S-1-based chemotherapy for unresectable gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis. We performed gastrojejunostomy and S-1-based chemotherapy in 14 unresectable gastric cancer patients with gastric outlet obstructions between April 2006 and June 2010. Although there were two complications after surgery, no treatment-related deaths were observed. The response rate of the S-1-based chemotherapy was 41.7%, and the median survival after surgery was 12.3 months. All patients were tolerating a regular diet and a significant improvement in oral intake lasted for at least 6 months. In conclusion, gastrojejunostomy followed by chemotherapy with S-1 appears to be an effective treatment modality for unresectable gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis. It enables us to practice S-1-based standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer and improve the quality of life of patients.

The S-1(tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium)granule was developed to meet the needs of patients with cancer. Although the choice of the patients was thought to spread by the addition of the new agent type, the recognition of the S-1 granule is still low and you should adapt yourself to what kind of patients or are unknown. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patients with gastric cancer undergoing treatment with S-1 capsules to investigate the adaptation and taste of the patients. As a result, although it was the investigation by the patients during S-1 capsule remedy, it was replied when 21. 3%(13/61 case)'had good granule,'and all cases raised it by the reason of there'not being the sense of incongruity of the throat at taking.'Also, about the global assessment of granule, the proportion of patient who replied'very good'or'good'were 31. 1% and 47%, in all cases and in the cases that felt the sense of incongruity of the throat during S-1 capsule remedy, respectively. Therefore, in the patients treated with the S-1 capsule, there were thought to be the patients who expected treatment with a granule. By the results of this survey, it was found that it is necessary to perform a medical teaching including dosage form to contribute to the adherence improvement of the patients.

Next to ACTS-GC (Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer), adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is the standard treatment for stage II or III gastric cancer patients.In this study, we retrospectively examined the continuity and adverse reaction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in 30 gastric cancer patients who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2008, and compared them with those of patients treated with ACTS-GC. Whereas the persistent rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for one year in ACTS-GC was 65.8%, it was 86.7% in our hospital.The RP (Relative performance) value in cases who completed S-1 adjuvant therapy for one year in ACTS-GC and for one year in our hospital was 81.2% and 88.5%, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events in our hospital were leukopenia (3.3%), neutropenia (16.7%), and anorexia(6.7%). In conclusion, our hospital has shown a far greater continuity with S- 1 adjuvant chemotherapy than with ACTS-GC, a result suggesting that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in clinical practice.

A 82-year-old male patient had suffered from a cancer of the papilla of Vater. After the operation, he received 4 courses of gemcitabine(GEM)adjuvant chemotherapy and warfarin(WF)administration because of thrombosis in the left internal jugular vein. Since the tumors re-grew, GEM was discontinued, and chemotherapy including S-1 and GEM was examined. However, the chemotherapy could not be continued because of edema in both lower legs and tassel midway in the 2nd course. Because of a bleeding tendency(non-measurable INR(international normalized ratio of prothrombin time)), WF administration was discontinued on the 11th day after S-1/GEM combined therapy was suspended. On the following day, although the INR value recovered to 1.7, it gradually worsened and the symptoms of pulmonary embolism developed on the 13th day. Then, INR was controlled by continuous infusion of heparin. Since the INR level decreased after that, in addition to heparin, re-medication of WF was performed. We tried to analyze the genotype of a patient, who had a tendency to bleed by coadministration of WF with S-1, in terms of hepatic cytochrome P-450(CYP)2C9 and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1(VKORC1). We also measured the plasma concentration of S-and R-WF by HPLC after obtaining informed consent from the patient. We found that he is homozygous for CYP2C9 1/1 and for A/A of VKORC1(-1639G>A). The obtained data did not show the abnormalities of blood coagulation. Because the genotype of a patient with a tendency to bleed was a major type in a Japanese population, fine monitoring of INR is required in order to prevent side effects of blood coagulation by S-1 and WF coadministration, regardless of patient genotypes.