Search

La cyberintimidation désigne toute situation où un individu ou un groupe recourt à une technologie numérique et/ou un média social, dans le but de nuire à un tiers. Au Québec, 22 % des adolescents sont victimes d’actes de cyberintimidation chaque année. Les effets les plus importants de ces actes sont notamment l’anxiété sociale, la baisse des résultats scolaires, la dépression sévère et l’apparition d’idées suicidaires. Cette thèse s’intéresse aux actions mises en œuvre par des vidéastes amateurs et par des adolescents pour lutter contre la cyberintimidation, à l’aide de la vidéo numérique et YouTube. La recherche s’appuie sur la théorie de la rationalité cognitive, qui propose d’expliquer l’existence des phénomènes sociaux en s’intéressant aux raisons pour lesquelles les individus agissent dans un contexte donné. Elle recourt aussi aux concepts de médiation et de médiatisation, dans le but de distinguer l’acte relationnel de communication de l’acte de mise en média de l’information. Dans le cadre de la recherche présentée, 59 vidéos amateures ont été archivées, trois entrevues avec des vidéastes ont été réalisées et 14 groupes de discussion avec 75 adolescents ont été menés. Ces trois ensembles de données ont fait l’objet d’une analyse catégorielle de contenu, qui a permis d’identifier les idées dominantes et les modes de représentation privilégiés dans les vidéos et dans les discours des participants. Les résultats présentés montrent que les vidéos amateures pressent le public à agir contre la cyberintimidation, mais qu’elles proposent peu de pistes de solution concrètes. Afin de convaincre le public à agir, les vidéos révèlent des taux de victimisation élevés, s’opposent à l’idée selon laquelle la cyberintimidation serait moins grave que l’intimidation traditionnelle, et affirment que ce phénomène peut conduire au suicide. Les vidéos mettent de l’avant une image des victimes qui peut paraître stéréotypée à première vue, mais qui correspond aux résultats des recherches sur la cyberintimidation. Cette recherche montre aussi que les vidéastes amateurs sont plus motivés par l’acquisition d’un capital de reconnaissance et par le développement d’habiletés en production vidéo que par le désir d’aider autrui en rapport avec la cyberintimidation. Les résultats montrent également que l’idée de produire des mises en scène caricaturales pour la cyberintimidation est rejetée par les adolescents, qui valorisent plutôt le réalisme et l’authenticité. Ils révèlent aussi que les adolescents sont peu réceptifs à l’idée de recourir à l’humour ou à la violence pour convaincre un public, et qu’ils s’opposent à l’idée de produire une vidéo dont les contenus sont générés par ordinateur ou dénués de toute présence humaine. La principale contribution de cette recherche à l’avancement des connaissances sur les jeunes et les médias est une meilleure compréhension des défis qu’ils rencontrent quand ils produisent une vidéo de nature socioéducative. Des programmes d’éducation aux médias ciblant les adolescents pourraient aborder avec eux les principes d’une telle communication, notamment le choix des contenus, le public visé et le mode de diffusion., Cyberbullying refers to any situation where an individual or a group uses digital technology and/or social media in order to harm a third party. In Quebec, 22% of teenagers are victims of cyberbullying each year. The major effects of these acts include social anxiety, lower grades, severe depression and the emergence of suicidal ideation. This thesis focuses on the actions favored by amateur videographers and adolescents to fight against cyberbullying, using digital video and YouTube. The research is inspired by the theory of cognitive rationality, which suggests that social phenomena may be explained by the reasons why individuals act in a given context. It also uses the concepts of mediation and mediatization in order to distinguish the relational act of communication and the act of formatting information. In this study, 59 amateur videos have been archived, three interviews with video producers have been conducted and 14 focus groups with 75 teenagers were lead. These three data sets have been subjected to a categorical content analysis, which identified the dominant ideas and the preferred modes of representation in the videos and in the discourses of participants. The results presented show that amateur videos urge the public to act against cyberbullying, but that they offer few concrete solutions. To convince the public to take action, the videos show high rates of victimization, take position against the idea that cyberbullying is less serious than traditional bullying, and argue that this phenomenon can lead to suicide. The videos present a picture of the victims that may seem stereotypical at first glance, but which corresponds to the results of research on cyberbullying. This study also shows that video producers are more motivated by the acquisition of a capital of recognition and by the development of skills in video production than by the desire to help those affected by cyberbullying. The results also show that the idea of ​​producing unrealistic dramatizations to describe cyberbullying is rejected by teenagers, who value instead realism and authenticity. They also reveal that teenagers are not receptive to the idea of ​​using humor or violence to convince an audience, and that they are opposed to the idea of ​​producing a video whose contents are computer-generated or in which there is no human presence. The main contribution of this research to the advancement of knowledge on youth and media is a better understanding of the challenges faced by teenagers when they produce a socioeducational video. Media education programs targeting teenagers could discuss with them the principles of such communication, especially regarding the choice of contents, the intended audience and the preferred mode of diffusion.

Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) have been introduced in Romania as a prerequisite for accessing EU funds under the Regional Operational Program (ROP). The IDPs designed for growth poles represent a specific category of strategic planning documents as: 1) they need to be considered within the frame of the national policy to whose implementation they contribute; and 2) they represent a first endeavor to think of development across functional areas rather than confined to the administrative borders of the main cities. The objectives of this report are: i) to carry out a strategic evaluation of the seven IDPs and assess how the current plans compare with the diagnostic of the challenges identified in the work on urban development; and ii) to provide clear recommendations for the improvement of existing IDPs which will contribute to the elaboration of the future generation of plans implemented during the next programming period and will help improve the targeting of investments to enhance their economic impact.

The objective of this rapid assessment is to inform the design of an Urban Youth Empowerment Project by providing information on youth and youth serving initiatives. Terms of reference crime and violence in Port Moresby and the National Capital District (NCD) are widespread and costly. In 2004, 68 percent of households reported that they had been victims of crime at least once in the past year and 51 percent had been victims of multiple crimes. Violence against women is pervasive, with domestic violence and rape, including gang rape, routine. By 2005, there had been small decreases in reported victimization; however, 61 percent of households still reported being victims of at least one crime and 46 percent reported being victims of multiple crimes. At the same time, costs associated with security and theft amounted to an estimated 15 percent of business turnover and law and order problems serve as a deterrent to investment. Young people account for the greatest share of crime and violence, so tackling the problem means addressing the underlying causes of youth crime and violence. This report provides a rapid assessment of youth and youth serving institutions in Port Moresby. The report relies on extensive consultations held in Port Moresby from July 23, 2008. Meetings were held with over 100 young people, their parents, community leaders, government officials, researchers, youth workers, leaders of youth groups and youth serving agencies, and representatives of the international non-governmental and donor agencies.