Search

Summary: This study mainly focuses on determining the optimal configuration that efficiently utilizes liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold energy in hydrogen precooling for liquid hydrogen production. To achieve this goal, two different configurations are designed: (a) adding LNG cold energy to the existing hydrogen precooling cycle and (b) replacing the existing hydrogen precooling cycle with LNG cold energy. An equilibrium hydrogen model is developed to reflect the thermodynamic property of ortho‐para conversion of hydrogen. Bayesian optimization is performed to determine the optimal operating conditions which minimize the specific energy consumption for all configurations. The specific energy consumption of the configuration involving hydrogen precooling with only LNG is 5.613 kWh/kg‐LH2, and it is reduced by 8.13% and 3.19% from the base case design and the configuration involving hydrogen precooling with both LNG and a mixed refrigerant cycle, respectively. In addition, a techno‐economic analysis is conducted. Compare to the base case design, the capital cost and operating cost of the design replacing hydrogen precooling with LNG are reduced by 31.76% and 11.55%, respectively. This study shows that the proposed design of replacing the hydrogen precooling cycle with an LNG stream can save energy consumption, moreover, it is highly effective for capital investment saving due to its simple configuration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the transition of the global energy paradigm toward decarbonization, hydrogen is expected to play a crucial role as an energy vector. To enhance the sustainability of hydrogen as an energy source, it is important to reduce costs and carbon emissions in the hydrogen production. Among various hydrogen production technologies, the autothermal reforming (ATR)-based blue hydrogen production method can stand out as a promising option in terms of both economic and environmental considerations. However, there are several bottlenecks: (i) ATR requires an air separation unit that increases the cost burden, and (ii) conventional amine-based carbon capture method consumes a significant amount of energy. To address these bottlenecks, this study proposes a novel cryogenic carbon capture process for ATR-based blue hydrogen production. In the proposed process, air separation unit are utilized not only for oxygen production but also for carbon capture. The compressed air from the air separation unit provides cooling energy to the mixture gas, leading to solidification and separation of carbon dioxide. Despite imposing an additional burden on the air separation unit, it significantly reduces the energy and cost associated with carbon capture. Consequently, there exists a trade-off relationship between the increased load on the air separation unit and the decreased load in carbon capture. This trade-off was evaluated by comparing it with the conventional absorption-based carbon capture process in terms of energy and economic aspects. The proposed process exhibits a 36.4% reduction in total energy consumption, with a particularly approximately 49.5% decrease in the energy consumed for carbon capture (0.278 kW h/kg-CO 2). The economic performance indicates an 11% decrease in the levelized cost of hydrogen (1.62$/kg-H 2), and a 45.3% decrease in CO 2 avoidance cost (40.1$/kg-CO 2). The captured solid CO 2 can offer advantages during storage and transportation. Furthermore, the potential utilization of cooling energy of solid CO 2 from an end-user perspective is expected to contribute to the establishment of a new industrial value chain. [Display omitted] • A novel cryogenic CO 2 capture process is proposed for ATR hydrogen production. • The proposed process imposes a slight burden on the ASU but simplifies CO 2 capture. • In terms of overall H 2 production, an energy saving of 36.4% was achieved. • LCOH and CO 2 avoidance cost are 1.62$/kg-H 2 and 40$/kg-CO 2 , respectively. • The economic viability variations across diverse carbon scenarios were evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]