Search

BackgroundThe transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channels family, TRPV1-6, has been identified to profoundly affect a wide spectrum of pathological processes in various cancers. However, the biological function and prognostic value of TRPVs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are still largely unknown.MethodsWe obtained the gene expression data and clinical information of 539 ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A series of databases were used for data processing and visualization, including GEPIA, GeneMANIA, MethSurv, GSCA, TIMER, and starBase databases.ResultsThe mRNA expression of TRPV2/3 was upregulated while the expression of TRPV5/6 was downregulated in ccRCC tumor tissues. TRPV family members in ccRCC were rarely mutated (nearly 7 frequencies). The ROC curve showed that TRPV2/5/6 had a high diagnostic ability in discriminating ccRCC from the control samples (AUC>0.9). Higher levels of TRPV3 expression were associated with poor prognosis of ccRCC patients, while higher expression of TRPV4 was associated with favorable prognosis. The expression of TRPV3 in normal and ccRCC tissues was validated by Immunohistochemistry, and its expression was remarkably related to high histologic grade and advanced stage. Besides, TRPV3 exhibit a reduction of DNA methylation level with tumor progression, and 12 CpGs of TRPV3 were associated with a significant prognosis. In addition, TRPV3 expression was significantly associated with the accumulation of several tumor-infiltrating immune cells, especially regulatory T cells. Furthermore, high levels of TRPV3 induced the expression of immune checkpoints such as LAG3, CTLA4, PDCD1, and TIGIT. Finally, we predicted a key SNHG3/AL513497.1-miR-10b-5p-TRPV3 axis linking to carcinogenesis and progression of ccRCC.ConclusionOur study may uncover TRPV channels–associated molecular mechanisms involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of ccRCC. TRPV family members might be diagnosed and prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets for ccRCC patients.

Accumulating lines of evidence indicate that the deregulation of m6A is involved in various cancer types. The m6A RNA methylation is modulated by m6A methyltransferases, demethylases, and reader proteins. Although the aberrant expression of m6A RNA methylation contributes to the development and progression of multiple cancer types, the roles of m6A regulators across numerous types of cancers remain largely unknown. Here, we comprehensively investigated the expression, genetic alteration, and prognosis significance of 20 commonly studied m6A regulators across diverse cancer types using TCGA datasets via bioinformatic analyses. The results revealed that the m6A regulators exhibited widespread dysregulation, genetic alteration, and the modulation of oncogenic pathways across TCGA cancer types. In addition, most of the m6A regulators were closely relevant with significant prognosis in many cancer types. Furthermore, we also constructed the protein–protein interacting network of the 20 m6A regulators, and a more complex interacting regulatory network including m6A regulators and their corresponding interacting factors. Besides, the networks between m6A regulators and their upstream regulators such as miRNAs or transcriptional factors were further constructed in this study. Finally, the possible chemicals targeting each m6A regulator were obtained by bioinformatics analysis and the m6A regulators–potential drugs network was further constructed. Taken together, the comprehensive analyses of m6A regulators might provide novel insights into the m6A regulators’ roles across cancer types and shed light on their potential molecular mechanisms as well as help develop new therapy approaches for cancers.