Search

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto, Nascimento, L. (2020): Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). Insecta Mundi 2020 (785): 1-25, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Audinet-Serville, J. G. 1835. Nouvelle classification de la famille des longicornes. (suite). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 4(1): 5-110.","Aurivillius, C. 1923. Cerambycidae : Lamiinae II. p. 323-704. In: W. Junk and S. Schenkling (eds.). Coleopterorum Catalogus, Pars 74. W. Junk; Berlin. 381 p.","Bates, H. W. 1866. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Coleoptera: Longicornes. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (3)17: 425-435.","Bates, H. W. 1881a. Longicornia, p. 153-224. In: F. D. Godman and O. Salvin. Biologia Centrali- Americana, Vol. 5. R. H. Porter and Dulau & Co.; London. xii + 525 p. + 26 plates.","Bates, H. W. 1881b. Notes on longicorn Coleoptera. Revision of the aerenicides and amphionychides of tropical America. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5)8: 290-306.","Bezark, L. G. 2013. Distributional records and updates to type repositories for some New World Cerambycidae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Les Cahiers Magellanes 11: 39-58.","Bezark, L. G. 2019. Checklist of the Oxypeltidae, Vesperidae, Disteniidae and Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. 2019 Edition (updated through 31 December 2018). Available at http:// bezbycids.com/byciddb/checklists/WestHemiCerambycidae2019.pdf (Last accessed 15 January 2020.)","Bezark, L. G. 2020. A Photographic Catalog of the Cerambycidae of the World. New World Cerambycidae Catalog. Available at http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdefault.asp?w=n (Last accessed 15 January 2020.)","Blackwelder, R. E. 1946. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies and South America. Part 4. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 185: 551-763.","Chemsak, J. A. 1972. Review of the genus Cirrhicera Thomson (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). The Pan- Pacific Entomologist 48(2): 86-93.","Chemsak, J. A., E. G. Linsley, and F. A. Noguera. 1992. Listados faunisticos de Mexico. II. Los Cerambycidae y Disteniidae de Norteamerica, Centroamerica y las Indias Occidentales (Coleoptera). Universidad Nacional Autonoma; Mexico (D.F.). 204 p.","Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1835. Catalogue des Coleopteres de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean. [Livraison 4]. Mequignon-Marvis; Paris. 104 p. [p. 257-360].","Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1836. Catalogue des coleopteres de la collection de M. le comte Dejean. Troisieme edition, revue, corrigee et augmentee. [Livraisons 1-4]. Mequignon-Marvis Pere et Fils; Paris. 384 p.","Desmarest, E. 1860. Coleopteres. Buprestiens, scarabaeiens, pimeliens, curculioniens, scolytiens, chrysomeliens, etc. Troisieme partie. In: J. C. Chenu (ed.). Encyclopedie d'histoire naturelle ou traite complet de cette science d'apres les travaux des naturalistes les plus eminents de tous les pays et de toutes les epoques Buffon, Daubenton, Lacepede, G Cuvier, F Cuvier, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Latreille, de Jussieu, Brongniart, etc, etc Ouvrage resumant les observations des auteurs anciens et comprenant toutes les decouvertes modernes jusqu'a nos jours. Marescq and Compagnie; Paris. iii + 360 p., 48 pl.","Duffy, E. A. J. 1960. A monograph of the immature stages of Neotropical timber beetles (Cerambycidae). British Museum (Natural History); London. 327 p.","Gahan, C. J. 1892. Additions to the Longicornia of Mexico and C entral America, with notes on some previously-recorded species. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1892: 255-274.","Galileo, M. H. M., and A. Santos-Silva. 2016. Notes on the differences between Fredlanea and Eulachnesia, and description of a new species (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Hemilophini). Zootaxa 4097(4): 589-593.","Gemminger, M. 1873. Cerambycidae (Lamiini). p. 2989-3216. In: M. Gemminger and E. Harold. Catalogus coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Vol. 10. Gummi; Munich. 243 p.","Gilmour, E. F. 1965. Catalogue des Lamiaires du Monde (Col., Cerambycidae). Museum G. Frey, Tutzing bei Munchen 8: 559-655.","ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature), 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature; London. xxx + 306 p.","Lameere, A. A. 1883. Liste des cerambycides, decrits posterieurement au catalogue de Munich. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique 26: 1-78.","Lane, F. 1970. Cerambycoidea Neotropica nova VII (Coleoptera).Studia Entomologica 13(1-4): 369-428.","Lane, F. 1973. Cerambycoidea Neotropica nova IX (Coleoptera). Studia Entomologica 16(1-4): 371-438.","Lane, F. 1976. Cerambycoidea Neotropica nova X (Coleoptera). Studia Entomologica 19(1-4): 451-460.","Laporte, F. L. N. 1840. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes Coleopteres avec une introduction renfermant l'anatomie et la physiologie des animaux articules, par M. Brulle; ouvrage accompagne de 155 planches gravees sur acier representant plus de 800 sujets. Vol. 2. P. Dumenil; Paris. 563 p.","Lepeletier De Saint Fargeau, A. L. M., and J. G. Audinet-Serville. 1825. p. 335. In: M. Latreille. Encyclopedie methodique. Histoire naturelle. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Crustaces, des Arachnides et des insectes. Vol. 10(1). Mme veuve Agasse; Paris. 344 p.","Linsley, E. G. 1935. New species of neotropical longicorn beetles. Stylops 4(5): 109-113.","Martinez, C. 2000. Escarabajos longicornios (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana 1(1): 76-105.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo, 1985. Contribuicao ao estudo da tribo Aerenicini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae). VI. Revisao do genero Recchia Lane, 1966, adenda, correcoes e elenco da tribo. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 29(3-4): 481-496.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1991. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) relacionados com Malacoscylus Thomson, 1868. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 35(3): 619-629.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1992. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) com antenas de doze articulos. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36(3): 575-579.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1993. Descricao de novos taxons com antenas de doze articulos, transferencia de especies de Adesmus Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1825 e sinonimos (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Hemilophini). Iheringia ( Zoologia) 74: 109-116.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1996. Divisao de Eulachnesia Bates, 1872 e descricao de novos taxons (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Hemilophini). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 40(2): 189-196.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1998. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) semelhantes a Phoebe Audinet-Serville, 1835. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 41(2-4): 431-437.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo, 2014a. Subfamilia Lamiinae. Tribo Hemilophini. Parte I, p. 5-231. In: U. R. Martins (org.). Cerambycidae Sul-Americanos (Coleoptera). Taxonomia. V. 13. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba. 231 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 2014b. Subfamilia Lamiinae. Tribo Hemilophini. Parte II, p. 4-296. In: U. R. Martins (org.). Cerambycidae Sul-Americanos (Coleoptera). Taxonomia. V. 14. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba. 296 p.","Martins, U. R., A. Santos-Silva, and M. H. M. Galileo. 2015. Fourteen new species, one new genus, and eleven new country or state records for New World Lamiinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Zootaxa 3980(1): 81-105.","Monne, M. A. 1995. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. Part XX. Subfamily Lamiinae: Tribos Hemilophini, Aerenicini, Pretiliini, Falsamblesthiini and Calliini. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Sao Paulo. 120 p.","Monne, M. A. 2005. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical Region. Part II. Subfamily Lamiinae. Zootaxa 1023: 1-759.","Monne, M. A. 2020. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical region. Part II. Subfamily Lamiinae. Available at https://cerambycids.com/catalog/ (Last accessed 24 June 2020.)","Monne, M. A., and E. F. Giesbert. 1994. Checklist of the Cerambycidae and Disteniidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. Wolfsgarden Books; Burbank. 409 p.","Monne M. A., and F. T. Hovore. 2006. Checklist of the Cerambycidae, or longhorned wood-boring beetles, of the Western Hemisphere. Bio Quip Publications; Rancho Dominguez. 394 p.","Monne, M. A., A. Santos-Silva, S. A. Casari, and M. L. Monne. 2017. Checklist of Cerambycidae, Disteniidae and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) primary types of the Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zootaxa 4249(1): 1-104.","Noguera, F. A., and J. A. Chemsak. 1996. Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). p. 381-409. In: J. E. Llorente- Bousquets, A. N. Garcia-Aldrete, and E. Gonzales-Soriano. (eds.). Biodiversidad taxonomia, y biogeografia de artropodos de Mexico: Hacia una sintesis de su conocimiento. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Mexico (D.F.). 660 p.","Olivier, A. G. 1795-1800. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des insectes, avec leurs caracteres generiques et specifiques, leur description, leur synonymie, et leur figure enluminee. Coleopteres. Vol. 4. Desray; Paris. 519 p.","Ordonez-Resendiz, M. M., and Y. Martinez-Ramos. 2017. Diversidad y fenologia de Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) em bosques de la Sierra de Taxco, Mexico. Entomologia Mexicana 4: 826-831.","Tavakilian, G. L., and H. Chevillotte. 2020. Titan: base de donnees internationales sur les Cerambycidae ou Longicornes. Available at http://titan.gbif.fr/index.html (Last accessed 24 June 2020.)","Terron, S. R. A. 1997. Cerambycidae, p. 215-226. In: E. Gonzalez Soriano, R. Dirzo, and R. C. Vogt (eds.). Historia Natural de Los Tuxtlas. UNAM, Instituto de Biologia; Mexico. 647 p.","Thomson, J. 1857. Description de cerambycides nouveaux ou peu connus de ma collection. Archives Entomologiques 1: 291-320.","Thomson, J. 1860. Essai d'une classification de la famille des cerambycides et materiaux pour servir a une monographie de cette famille. J. Thomson; Paris. xvi + 128 p.","Thomson, J. 1864. Systema cerambycidarum ou expose de tous les genres compris dans la famille des cerambycides et familles limitrophes. H. Dessain; Liege. 352 p.","Thomson, J. 1878. Typi cerambycidarum Musei Thomsoniani. E. Deyrolle; Paris. 21 p.","Turnbow, R. H., R. D. Cave, and M. C. Thomas. 2003. A list of the Cerambycidae of Honduras, with additions of previously unrecorded species. Ceiba 44(1): 1-43."]}

Schmidarius kondratieffi Santos-Silva, Heffern, Botero and Nascimento, new species (Fig. 13–16) Description. Female. Integument mostly black; mouthparts reddish brown except nearly black palpomeres (apex of labial palpomeres I–II and maxillary palpomeres I–III narrowly yellowish brown); anteclypeus dark brown close to postclypeus, orangish brown on remaining surface; posterior half of labrum reddish brown; gulamentum mostly brown; base of antennomere III orangish brown; antennomeres IV–VIII pale yellow anteriorly (more orangish depending on light intensity), this area gradually shorter toward VIII, dark brown posteriorly; antennomeres IX–XI dark brown. Coxae partially dark reddish brown; protrochanters pale yellow; meso- and metatrochanters dark reddish brown. Head. Frons somewhat coarsely, abundantly punctate toward antennal tubercles, finer, sparser toward postclypeus, especially laterally; glabrous except superior area between eyes with dense, nearly black pubescence (this area triangularly projected toward central region); with minute whitish seta within punctures in glabrous area; with long, erect dark setae close to eyes. Vertex and area behind eyes somewhat finely, sparsely punctate (punctures coarser behind lower eye lobes); with dense black pubescence obscuring integument, except glabrous central area between antennal tubercles, nearly glabrous median groove from area between upper eye lobes, and not obscuring integument behind lower eye lobes; with long, erect, sparse dark setae on vertex and area behind upper eye lobes. Genae almost smooth; with dense, transverse white pubescent macula posteriorly close to lower eye lobe, glabrous on remaining surface; with a few long, erect dark setae near white macula. Antennal tubercles with black pubescence (more dark brown anteriorly) not obscuring integument, with long, erect dark setae interspersed. Postclypeus not distinctly separated from frons; finely sparsely punctate in wide central area (punctures sparser in center of this area), nearly smooth laterally; glabrous, with a few long, erect brownish setae centrally near anteclypeus. Labrum coplanar with anteclypeus in posterior half, oblique in anterior half; with transverse row of fine punctures in posterior half close to oblique area, with long, erect yellowish-brown seta in nearly all punctures. Gulamentum smooth, glabrous. Distance between upper eye lobes 0.37 times length of scape (0.30 times distance between outer margins of eyes); in frontal view, distance between lower eye lobes 0.78 times length of scape (0.62 times distance between outer margins of eyes). Antennae 1.25 times elytral length, almost reaching elytral apex. Scape with dense, bristly black pubescence, with long, erect black setae interspersed throughout in posterior 2/3. Pedicel with black pubescence, not obscuring integument dorsally, somewhat bristly, with long, erect black setae interspersed ventrally. Maximum diameter of antennomere III almost twice length of pedicel; with dense, erect black setae throughout, and longer black setae interspersed. Antennomeres IV–VIII with sparse whitish pubescence in pale yellow area, brownish in dark area (partially interspersed with whitish setae ventrally); with long, erect, sparse black setae ventrally. Antennomeres IX–XI with dark pubescence obscuring integument, with short, erect yellowish setae interspersed; ventral surface of IX may or may not have long, black erect setae (present only on left antennomere in holotype). Dorsal apex of antennomeres III–X with a few long, erect black setae (shorter toward X). Antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.67; pedicel = 0.12; IV = 0.62; V = 0.33; VI = 0.27; VII = 0.25; VIII = 0.21; IX = 0.19; X = 0.17; XI = 0.24. Thorax. Pronotum coarsely, sparsely punctate, punctures coarser, more abundantly posteriorly; with dense black pubescence partially obscuring integument, bristly in some areas, with long, erect black setae interspersed. Sides of prothorax coarsely, somewhat sparsely punctate; pubescence as on pronotum. Prosternum coarsely, abundantly punctate; with grayish-white pubescence not obscuring integument, except longitudinal, narrow white pubescent band on each side. Prosternal process with sparse grayish-white pubescence; narrowest area 0.15 times width of procoxal cavity. Mesoventrite with sparse grayish-white pubescence centrally, denser, dark laterally. Mesanepisternum and mesepimeron with dense blackish pubescence. Mesoventral process with whitish pubescence not obscuring integument. Metanepisternum and metaventrite with dense nearly black pubescence, except glabrous central area of metaventrite, and bristly yellowish-white pubescence posteriorly close to glabrous area. Scutellum with nearly black pubescence partially obscuring integument. Elytra. Coarsely, abundantly punctate in basal third, punctures gradually finer toward apex; with dark brown pubescence not obscuring integument (more grayish depending on light intensity); with long, erect, somewhat abundant dark setae interspersed; dorsal carina well-marked; apex individually rounded, sutural angle absent. Legs. Femora with grayish pubescence not obscuring integument (appearing to be darker dorsally and laterally due to integument color and light intensity), with long, erect setae of same color interspersed, more abundant ventrally. Tibiae with bristly dark brown pubescence not obscuring integument, with long, erect dark brown setae interspersed; protibiae with a few erect yellowish-white setae near apex. Abdomen. Ventrites with yellowish-white pubescence not obscuring integument (more grayish depending on light intensity), with long, erect setae of same color interspersed. Apex of ventrite V emarginated centrally, with abundant, long yellowish setae. Dimensions in mm. Total length 9.05; prothoracic length 1.25; anterior prothoracic width 1.65; posterior prothoracic width 1.70; humeral width 2.60; elytral length 6.75. Type material. Holotype female from MEXICO, MEXICO: San Antonio Albarranes, 23.VIII.1994, B.C. Kondratieff col. (TAMU, formerly CSUC). Etymology. It is a pleasure to name this species for Prof. Boris C. Kondratieff, educator and curator at CSUC, who has helped the second author tremendously for the last quarter century. Remarks. Schmidarius kondratieffi sp. nov. differs from S. usingeri by the absence of yellow pubescence in the center of the head, pronotum and scutellum (present in S. usingeri), and femora entirely dark (bicolorous in S. usingeri). It differs from S. grisescens and S. flavescens by the absence of yellow pubescence on the sides of the head and pronotum (present in both species)., Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on pages 6-7, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922

On Phoebella Lane, 1966 (Fig. 29–33) Redescription. Head not wider than prothorax; frons with projections in male, with or without transverse carina between projections; frons in female without projections. Antennal tubercles distant from each other. Eyes not divided; area of connection of eye lobes narrow (with 2–3 rows of ommatidia) or very narrow (with one row of ommatidia); distance between upper eye lobes variable. Antennae 12-segmented, distinctly longer than body length in both sexes, especially in male; scape without basal curvature, without apical cicatrix, shorter than antennomere III; pedicel much shorter than antennomere III and scape; antennomeres cylindrical, with long, sparse, erect setae ventrally on III–V or III–VI; antennomere III not tumid, without denser long setae; antennomere IV shorter than III; antennomere XII not stingershaped. Prothorax slightly longer than wide, or slightly wider than long; about as wide anteriorly as posteriorly, or slightly wider posteriorly; sides sinuous, without tubercle. Elytra narrowed from base to apex; humeral carina well-marked from base to near apex; area between humeral carina and epipleural margin without carinae, without whitish pubescence contrasting with that on dorsal surface, gradually more distinctly visible in dorsal view from posterior after middle; dorsal surface without longitudinal carinae; apex individually rounded, without projections at outer and sutural angles or slightly obliquely truncate; sutural area without long and erect setae. Metatarsomere I tumid or not; tarsal claws not divided basally, with inner tooth moderately shorter than outer one. Remarks. Phoebella is very similar to Phoebe, differing only by the antennae distinctly 12-segmented, while in Phoebe they are 11-segmented. It is also similar to Adesmus Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1825, differing by the antennae 12-segmented (11-segmented in Adesmus) and by the frons in male with distinct projections (absent in Adesmus). According to Martins and Galileo (2014a) (translated): “Frons in male with curved spine on each side of a curved elevation between the spines.” Actually, this curved carina between the projections of frons is present or absent depending on the particular species of Phoebe, and the projections may or may not be placed near antennal tubercles (e.g. Fig. 21). Accordingly, this feature is useless to separate Phoebella from Phoebe. Species included. Phoebella albomaculata (Gahan, 1889); P. phoebe (Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1825); P. tinga (Martins and Galileo, 1998)., Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on pages 9-10, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Lepeletier De Saint Fargeau, A. L. M., and J. G. Audinet-Serville. 1825. p. 335. In: M. Latreille. Encyclopedie methodique. Histoire naturelle. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Crustaces, des Arachnides et des insectes. Vol. 10 (1). Mme veuve Agasse; Paris. 344 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo, 2014 a. Subfamilia Lamiinae. Tribo Hemilophini. Parte I, p. 5 - 231. In: U. R. Martins (org.). Cerambycidae Sul-Americanos (Coleoptera). Taxonomia. V. 13. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba. 231 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1998. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) semelhantes a Phoebe Audinet-Serville, 1835. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 41 (2 - 4): 431 - 437."]}

Schmidarius fulvescens (Gahan, 1892), new rank, new combination Malacoscylus humilis var. fulvescens Gahan 1892: 271; Aurivillius 1923: 586 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 623 (checklist); Gilmour 1965: 633 (cat.). Gahan (1892) described this species as a variety of Malacoscylus humilis based on three specimens from two places in Guerrero (Mexico). We know he had a male and a female because the original description provided a drawing of a female, and we have a photograph of a male (Fig. 5). Thus, the syntypes are not three females as reported by Monné (2020) and Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2020). Apparently, the male and female are not of the same species. The male antennomere III agrees better with that of Lamacoscylus humilis, while that of the female agrees very well with that of the species of Schmidarius. The general shape of the elytra does not agree well with that of L. humilis (proportionally narrower and longer, with posterior quarter not widened, and not distinctly rounded toward outer angle). Unfortunately, the photograph at our disposal does not allow further considerations. We propose a new rank and transfer this species to Schmidarius based on the drawing in the original description. For the moment, we prefer not to designate a lectotype for this species, as it would be necessary to examine all specimens identified as Malacoscylus humilis by Gahan (including the varieties) to know the sex and the true identity of each specimen, which at the moment is not feasible. In the case of lectotype designation, the specimen chosen should be a specimen with the antennomere III tumid, because Gahan (1892) figured this sex. As in several other cases, varieties have been considered as synonyms of the typical form or have been listed under the original species (e.g. Aurivillius 1923). Currently, according to ICZN (1999), the varieties need to be considered subspecies., Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on page 5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Gahan, C. J. 1892. Additions to the Longicornia of Mexico and C entral America, with notes on some previously-recorded species. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1892: 255 - 274.","Aurivillius, C. 1923. Cerambycidae: Lamiinae II. p. 323 - 704. In: W. Junk and S. Schenkling (eds.). Coleopterorum Catalogus, Pars 74. W. Junk; Berlin. 381 p.","Blackwelder, R. E. 1946. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies and South America. Part 4. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 185: 551 - 763.","Gilmour, E. F. 1965. Catalogue des Lamiaires du Monde (Col., Cerambycidae). Museum G. Frey, Tutzing bei Munchen 8: 559 - 655.","Monne, M. A. 2020. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical region. Part II. Subfamily Lamiinae. Available at https: // cerambycids. com / catalog / (Last accessed 24 June 2020.)","Tavakilian, G. L., and H. Chevillotte. 2020. Titan: base de donnees internationales sur les Cerambycidae ou Longicornes. Available at http: // titan. gbif. fr / index. html (Last accessed 24 June 2020.)","ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature), 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature; London. xxx + 306 p."]}

Key to species of Hemilophini with 12-segmented antennae (adapted from Martins and Galileo 2014a) Note: there is no reliable feature allowing separation of females in some of these genera. 1. Elytral apex rounded or obliquely truncate without projections at outer angle............. 2 — Elytral apex perpendicularly truncate in relation to body axis with short spine at outer angle, or obliquely truncate with long or somewhat long spine at outer angle................... 4 2(1). Humeral carina absent........................ Murupeaca Martins and Galileo, 1992 — Humeral carina present......................................................... 3 3(2). Frons in male with projections.................................. Phoebella Lane, 1966 — Frons in male without projections.............................. Gagarinia Lane, 1956 4(1). Inner tooth of claws shorter than outer one; antennae in male short, just surpassing elytral apex........................................................ Tabatinga Lane, 1966 — Inner tooth of claws about as long as outer one; antennae in male distinctly surpassing elytral apex........................................................................... 5 5(4). Scape with apical cicatrix......................................................... 6 — Scape without apical cicatrix..................................................... 7 6(5). Frons in male strongly projected centrally, acute and emarginate at apex Purusia Lane, 1956 — Frons in male without projections.... Purusiella Dalens, Touroult and Tavakilian, 2010 7(5). Frons in male uniformly convex.................................. Juninia Lane, 1966 — Frons in male with projections................. Sibapipunga Martins and Galileo, 1993, Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on page 10, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo, 2014 a. Subfamilia Lamiinae. Tribo Hemilophini. Parte I, p. 5 - 231. In: U. R. Martins (org.). Cerambycidae Sul-Americanos (Coleoptera). Taxonomia. V. 13. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba. 231 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1992. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) com antenas de doze articulos. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36 (3): 575 - 579.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1993. Descricao de novos taxons com antenas de doze articulos, transferencia de especies de Adesmus Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1825 e sinonimos (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Hemilophini). Iheringia (Zoologia) 74: 109 - 116."]}

Schmidarius Santos-Silva, Heffern, Botero and Nascimento, new genus Type species. Schmidarius kondratieffi Santos-Silva, Heffern, Botero and Nascimento, sp. nov., present designation. Description. Female. Head not wider than prothorax; frons without projections, transverse. Gena distinctly longer than lower eye lobe. Antennal tubercles distant from each other. Eyes not divided; posterior margin of eyes distant from base of prothorax; upper eye lobes narrow, distance between them distinctly greater than width of one lobe. Antennae 11-segmented, not reaching elytral apex; scape without basal curvature, without apical cicatrix, shorter than antennomere III; pedicel much shorter than antennomere III and scape; antennomere III distinctly tumid, with dense erect setae throughout; antennomere IV shorter than III; antennomeres IV–XI cylindrical; antennomeres IV–VIII with long, erect, sparse setae on inner surface; antennomere XI not stinger-shaped. Prothorax proportionally short, transverse, about as wide anteriorly as posteriorly; sides without tubercles or strong gibbosities. Prosternal process distinctly narrow centrally, about 0.2 times width of procoxal cavity. Mesoventral process with flap on each side near apex. Elytra not distinctly widened from base to apex; humerus rounded, not projected; humeral carina well marked from base to apex; area between humeral carina and epipleural margin without carinae, without whitish pubescence contrasting with that on dorsal surface, gradually more distinctly visible in dorsal view from basal quarter; dorsal carina from well-marked to slightly distinct; apex individually rounded, without sutural projection; sutural area without long and erect setae. Metatarsomere I slightly shorter than II–III together; tarsal claws not divided basally, with inner tooth moderately shorter than outer one. Etymology. The new genus is named in honor of Herbert Schmid (Austria), for his frequent assistance with information and photographs of the type specimens deposited in his collection; the suffix “-arius” is Latin, meaning “belonging to”. Masculine gender. Remarks. Schmidarius gen. nov. is rather similar to Lamacoscylus Martins and Galileo, 1991, from which it differs by the antennomere III distinctly tumid and with long, dense and erect setae throughout. In Lamacoscylus the antennomere III is cylindrical, similar to the other antennomeres, and the erect setae are much sparser. It differs from Malacoscylus Thomson, 1868 by the antennomere III not much longer than IV (much longer in Malacoscylus); from Sybaguasu Matins and Galileo, 1991 by the scape not curved basally, and vertex not concave (scape curved and vertex concave in Sybaguasu); from Themistonoe Thomson, 1864 by the pronotum without distinct gibbosities, and elytra with dorsal carina (pronotum with anterolateral gibbosities, and elytra without carina in Themistonoe); and from Cacupira Martins and Galileo, 1991 by the sutural apex not projected (projected in Cacupira). Martins and Galileo (1991) did not describe the shape of the antennomere III in the original description of Lamacoscylus. According to them, the setae on antennomere III are denser in females than in the males of this genus. However, male and female of L. humilis have the antennomere III nearly identical. Therefore, we believe that the shape of the antennomere III in S. usingeri (see photograph in Bezark 2020) and S. kondratieffi is not sexually dimorphic. Species included. Schmidarius kondratieffi, sp. nov.; S. usingeri (Linsley, 1935); S. grisescens (Gahan, 1892); S. flavescens (Gahan, 1892)., Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on pages 4-5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1991. Generos de Hemilophini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) relacionados com Malacoscylus Thomson, 1868. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 35 (3): 619 - 629.","Thomson, J. 1864. Systema cerambycidarum ou expose de tous les genres compris dans la famille des cerambycides et familles limitrophes. H. Dessain; Liege. 352 p.","Bezark, L. G. 2020. A Photographic Catalog of the Cerambycidae of the World. New World Cerambycidae Catalog. Available at http: // bezbycids. com / byciddb / wdefault. asp? w = n (Last accessed 15 January 2020.)","Linsley, E. G. 1935. New species of neotropical longicorn beetles. Stylops 4 (5): 109 - 113.","Gahan, C. J. 1892. Additions to the Longicornia of Mexico and C entral America, with notes on some previously-recorded species. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1892: 255 - 274."]}

Fredlanea consobrina (Lane, 1970) (Fig. 57–60) Eulachnesia consobrina Lane 1970: 410; Martins and Galileo 1985: 492; Monné and Giesbert 1994: 291 (checklist); Monné 1995: 53 (cat.). Fredlanea consobrina; Martins and Galileo 1996: 193; Martínez 2000: 99 (distr.); Monné 2005: 471 (cat.); Monné and Hovore 2006: 260 (checklist); Martins and Galileo 2014b: 227; Monné et al. 2017: 70 (holotype); Monné 2020: 688 (cat.); Bezark 2019: 301 (checklist). This species was based on a single female (Fig. 59–60) from Colombia (Boyacá). We examined a second female also from Colombia, which shows chromatic variation on the elytra (Fig. 57–58). The general appearance resembles that of F. maculata Martins and Galileo, 1996, F. birai Galileo and Santos-Silva, 2016 and F. aequatoria (Bates, 1881), but differs from both by the absence of dorsal elytral carinae (present in these three species); it also differs from F. maculata that has the ventral surface of the body with dense grayish-white pubescence throughout (sparser in F. maculata), and by all antennomeres entirely dark (some antennomeres mostly yellowish in F. maculata). Material examined. COLOMBIA, CUNDINAMARCA (new department record): Quetame, 1 female (MEFLG 48237), VI.1946, Gallego col. (MEFLG)., Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo, de, Francisco Eriberto & Nascimento, L., 2020, Notes, new records, new combinations, a new genus and three new species in Hemilophini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), pp. 1-25 in Insecta Mundi 2020 (785) on pages 14-15, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5458922, {"references":["Lane, F. 1970. Cerambycoidea Neotropica nova VII (Coleoptera). Studia Entomologica 13 (1 - 4): 369 - 428.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo, 1985. Contribuicao ao estudo da tribo Aerenicini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae). VI. Revisao do genero Recchia Lane, 1966, adenda, correcoes e elenco da tribo. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 29 (3 - 4): 481 - 496.","Monne, M. A., and E. F. Giesbert. 1994. Checklist of the Cerambycidae and Disteniidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. Wolfsgarden Books; Burbank. 409 p.","Monne, M. A. 1995. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. Part XX. Subfamily Lamiinae: Tribos Hemilophini, Aerenicini, Pretiliini, Falsamblesthiini and Calliini. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Sao Paulo. 120 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 1996. Divisao de Eulachnesia Bates, 1872 e descricao de novos taxons (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Hemilophini). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 40 (2): 189 - 196.","Martinez, C. 2000. Escarabajos longicornios (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana 1 (1): 76 - 105.","Monne, M. A. 2005. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical Region. Part II. Subfamily Lamiinae. Zootaxa 1023: 1 - 759.","Monne M. A., and F. T. Hovore. 2006. Checklist of the Cerambycidae, or longhorned wood-boring beetles, of the Western Hemisphere. Bio Quip Publications; Rancho Dominguez. 394 p.","Martins, U. R., and M. H. M. Galileo. 2014 b. Subfamilia Lamiinae. Tribo Hemilophini. Parte II, p. 4 - 296. In: U. R. Martins (org.). Cerambycidae Sul-Americanos (Coleoptera). Taxonomia. V. 14. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba. 296 p.","Monne, M. A., A. Santos-Silva, S. A. Casari, and M. L. Monne. 2017. Checklist of Cerambycidae, Disteniidae and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) primary types of the Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zootaxa 4249 (1): 1 - 104.","Monne, M. A. 2020. Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical region. Part II. Subfamily Lamiinae. Available at https: // cerambycids. com / catalog / (Last accessed 24 June 2020.)","Bezark, L. G. 2019. Checklist of the Oxypeltidae, Vesperidae, Disteniidae and Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. 2019 Edition (updated through 31 December 2018). Available at http: // bezbycids. com / byciddb / checklists / WestHemiCerambycidae 2019. pdf (Last accessed 15 January 2020.)","Galileo, M. H. M., and A. Santos-Silva. 2016. Notes on the differences between Fredlanea and Eulachnesia, and description of a new species (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Hemilophini). Zootaxa 4097 (4): 589 - 593."]}