Sweetness as a sensation starts on the tongue and engages several signaling proteins that are coded by specific genes in the human genome. Sucrose stimulates a receptor on taste cells; the resulting signal is conducted via G proteins and eventually produces a signal interpreted centrally as sweet taste (i.e., taste transduction). The sweet receptor has two parts: the gene TAS1R2 encoding the first part was discovered in 1999, and the second gene, TAS1R3, was discovered in 2001 (for a review, see Reed & McDaniel, 2006). The respective proteins from these genes are T1R2 and T1R3. Among the G proteins, the one associated with sweet signaling is gustducin (Gα protein subunit), encoded by GNAT3 (McLaughlin, McKinnon, & Margolskee, 1992). In adult populations, variation in the TAS1R3 and GNAT3 genes relates to differences in the ability to perceive sweet tasting stimuli. For GNAT3, adults with two C alleles (CC) were better able to sort low concentrations of sucrose into the correct order than those with two T alleles (TT; rs7792845; Fushan, Simons, Slack, & Drayna, 2010). For TAS1R3, adults with one or two copies of the T nucleotide (TT) were less sensitive to the taste of sucrose than were those with two copies of the alternative C allele (CC; rs35744183; Fushan, Simons, Slack, Manichaikul, & Drayna, 2009). Adults with the TT genotype of the TAS1R3 gene also preferred higher levels of sweetness than those with the CC genotype (Mennella, Finkbeiner, Lipchock, Hwang, & Reed, 2014; Mennella, Finkbeiner, & Reed, 2012; Mennella, Reed, Mathew, Roberts, & Mansfield, 2015), possibly because they need more sucrose to obtain the same hedonic effect. Children live in different sensory worlds than adults when it comes to sweet taste (Mennella, 2008): They prefer higher levels than do adults (Mennella, Finkbeiner, et al., 2014), with preferences declining to adult levels during adolescence, which coincides with the cessation of physical growth (Coldwell, Oswald, & Reed, 2009; Mennella, Finkbeiner, et al., 2014). To date, whether genotype-related differences in sweet taste sensitivity exist among children has not been investigated. We do know, however, that variation in the TAS1R3 gene does not relate to differences in levels of sucrose most preferred in children, like it does in adults (Mennella et al., 2012, 2015; Mennella, Finkbeiner, et al., 2014). Unlike the sweet-associated TAS1R3 gene, variation in bitter receptor gene TAS2R38 can explain individual differences in sweet preferences among children. TAS2R38 contains three variant locations—best known for their association with the bitter perception of thioureas—such as propylthiouracil (Bufe et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2003). Foods containing thioureas are cruciferous vegetables such as kale, cabbage, and broccoli. Children with the bitter-sensitive genotypes (AP, PP; rs713598, A49P) prefer significantly higher levels of sucrose than those with the bitter-insensitive genotype (AA) both in laboratory-based measures and in reported preferences of real-world foods like cereal and beverages (Mennella et al., 2012; Mennella, Pepino, & Reed, 2005). Other investigators also report that children who are bitter sensitive consume diets higher in sugar than do bitter-insensitive children (Keller & Tepper, 2004). With these points in mind, we examined the degree of variation in children’s sucrose detection thresholds and whether sweet- and bitter-related genotypes might partially be accounted for such variation. Genotypes that were related to sucrose threshold were examined for the propensity of children to consume part of their calories as added sugars. Thus, estimates of dietary intake of added sugars (mg) and daily caloric intake (kcal/day) were obtained for a subset of the children. We also hypothesized that if sweet taste sensitivity, diet, and obesity share a common etiology, then sweet sensitivity could potentially provide insights into obesity. To that end, we examined how sensitivity to sweet taste varies with anthropometric measures of obesity: body mass index (BMI; a ratio of height to weight with national norms by age), percentage of body fat (an index of overall adiposity), and central obesity (waist-to-height ratio [WHtR]).