Search

Objective: To assess the validity and clinical utility of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) to measure illness perceptions in multiple forms of vasculitis., Methods: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TA), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), and relapsing polychondritis (RP) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort. Patients independently completed the BIPQ, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36), and a patient global assessment (PtGA) at successive study visits. Physicians concurrently completed a physician global assessment (PGA) form. Illness perceptions, as assessed by the BIPQ, were compared to responses from the full-length Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) and to other clinical outcome measures., Results: There were 196 patients (GCA = 47, TA = 47, RP = 56, AAV = 46) evaluated over 454 visits. Illness perception scores in each domain were comparable between the BIPQ and IPQ-R (3.28 vs 3.47, P = 0.22). Illness perceptions differed by type of vasculitis, with the highest perceived psychological burden of disease in RP. The BIPQ was significantly associated with all other patient-reported outcome measures (rho = |0.50-0.70|, P < 0.0001), but did not correlate with PGA (rho = 0.13, P = 0.13). A change in the BIPQ composite score of ≥ 7 over successive visits was associated with concomitant change in the PtGA. Change in the MFI and BIPQ scores significantly correlated over time (rho = 0.38, P = 0.0008)., Conclusion: The BIPQ is an accurate and valid assessment tool to measure and monitor illness perceptions in patients with vasculitis. Use of the BIPQ as an outcome measure in clinical trials may provide complementary information to physician-based assessments.

Objective: To assess the relationship between measures of disease assessment in patients with large vessel vasculitis., Methods: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort. Assessments within the following outcomes were independently recorded: 1) patient-reported outcomes (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, patient global assessment of disease activity [PtGA], Short Form 36 health survey [SF-36], Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), 2) physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA), 3) laboratory outcomes (C-reactive protein [CRP] level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), and 4) imaging outcomes (PETVAS, a qualitative score of vascular 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography activity)., Results: Analyses were performed on 112 patients (GCA = 56, TAK = 56), over 296 visits, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Correlation network analysis revealed assessment measures clustered independently by type of outcome. PhGA was centrally linked to all other outcome types, but correlations were modest (ρ = 0.12-0.32; P < 0.05). PETVAS, CRP level, and PtGA were independently associated with clinically active disease. All 4 patient-reported outcomes strongly correlated with each other (ρ = 0.35-0.60; P < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes were not correlated with PETVAS, and only PtGA correlated with CRP level (ρ = 0.16; P < 0.01). Patients whose clinical assessment changed from active disease to remission (n = 29) had a corresponding significant decrease in ESR, CRP level, and PETVAS at the remission visit. Patients whose clinical assessment changed from remission to active disease (n = 11) had a corresponding significant increase in CRP level and PtGA at the active visit., Conclusion: Measures of disease assessment in large vessel vasculitis consist of independent, yet complementary, outcomes, supporting the need to develop composite outcome measures or a standard set of measures covering multiple types of outcomes., (© 2019, American College of Rheumatology. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Objectives: To determine the impact of imaging acquisition time on interpretation of disease activity on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) and assess the relationship between clinical features and image acquisition time., Methods: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort. After a single injection of FDG, all patients underwent two sequential PET scans at one and two-hour time points. Images were interpreted for active vasculitis by subjective assessment, qualitative assessment, and semi-quantitative assessment. Agreement was assessed by percent agreement, Cohen's kappa, and McNemar's test. Multivariable logistic regression identified associations between PET activity and clinical variables., Results: 79 patients (GCA  =  44, TAK  =  35) contributed 168 paired one and two-hour PET studies. A total of 94 out of 168 scans (56%) were interpreted as active at the one-hour time point, and 129 scans (77%) were interpreted as active at the two-hour time point (p < 0.01). Associations between clinical variables and PET activity categories (dual inactive, delayed active, dual active) were evaluated. Using multivariable nominal regression, clinically active disease was significantly more common in patients in the delayed active group (Odds Ratio 1.94, 95%CI 1.13-3.53; p  =  0.02) and the dual active group (Odds Ratio 1.71, 95%CI 1.06-2.93; p  =  0.04) compared to the dual inactive group., Conclusions: Imaging protocol significantly influences interpretation of PET activity in LVV. A substantial proportion of patients with LVV have PET activity only detected by delayed imaging. These patients were significantly more likely to have concomitant clinically-determined active disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To compare the presence of head, neck and upper extremity symptoms in patients with Takayasu's (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) and their association with vascular inflammation assessed by 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or arterial damage assessed by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)., Methods: Patients with TAK and GCA underwent clinical and imaging assessments within 24 hours, blinded to each other. Vascular inflammation was defined as arterial FDG-PET uptake greater than liver by visual assessment. Arterial damage was defined as stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm by MRA. Clinically reported symptoms were compared with corresponding imaging findings using generalised mixed model regression. Cranial symptoms were studied in association with burden of arterial disease in the neck using ordinal regression., Results: Participants with TAK (n=56) and GCA (n=54) contributed data from 270 visits. Carotidynia was reported only in patients with TAK (21%) and was associated with vascular inflammation (p<0.01) but not damage (p=0.33) in the corresponding carotid artery. Posterior headache was reported in TAK (16%) and GCA (20%) but was only associated with corresponding vertebral artery inflammation and damage in GCA (p<0.01). Arm claudication was associated with subclavian artery damage (p<0.01) and inflammation (p=0.04) in TAK and with damage in GCA (p<0.01). Patients with an increased burden of damaged neck arteries were more likely to experience positional lightheadedness (p<0.01) or a major central nervous system event (p=0.01)., Conclusion: The distribution of symptoms and association with imaging abnormalities differs in patients with TAK and GCA. These findings may help clinicians predict associated FDG-PET and MRA findings based on a specific clinical symptom., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02257866., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)