1. Treatment efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus tocilizumab in patients with active and severe Takayasu arteritis: an open-label study.
- Author
-
Wang J, Kong X, Ma L, Ding Z, Chen H, Chen R, Jin X, Chen C, Lin J, and Jiang L
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Adult, Male, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Severity of Illness Index, Antirheumatic Agents therapeutic use, Antirheumatic Agents adverse effects, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Takayasu Arteritis drug therapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Adalimumab therapeutic use, Adalimumab adverse effects, Drug Therapy, Combination, Glucocorticoids therapeutic use, Glucocorticoids adverse effects, Methotrexate therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) vs tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK)., Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, open-label study. Forty patients with active and severe TAK were enrolled. They were treated with ADA (n = 21) combined with glucocorticoids (GCs) and MTX or TCZ (n = 19) combined with GCs and MTX. The planned follow-up duration was 12 months. The primary end point was the efficacy rate (ER) at 6 months. The secondary end points included ER at 9 and 12 months, relapse rate, GC tapering, adverse effects, and life quality changes during treatment., Results: In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the ER at 6 months was higher in the ADA group (85.71% vs 52.63%, P = 0.02). A similar direction of effect was noted in the per-protocol set (89.47% vs 62.50%, P = 0.06). The percentages of patients who achieved a GC dose of ≤10 mg/day at 6 months were similar between the ADA and TCZ groups (47.37% vs 43.75%, P = 0.83). The ERs at 9 and 12 months were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). During the first 12 months of treatment, the relapse rate and adverse event incidence were comparable between the two groups (ADA vs TCZ: 9.52% vs 10.53%, P = 0.96; 38.10% vs 47.37%, P = 0.55, respectively)., Conclusion: ADA combined with GCs and MTX may be more efficacious than TCZ combined with GCs and MTX among patients with active and severe TAK., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04300686., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF