Search

Background: Tacrolimus is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5. We investigated the influence of CYP3A5 polymorphism and concurrent use of azole antifungal agents (AZ) on the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily modified-release tacrolimus formulation (Tac-QD) in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Design and Methods: Twenty-four patients receiving allogeneic HSCT were enrolled. Genotyping for CYP3A5*3 was done by a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Trough blood concentrations (C0) of tacrolimus were measured by chemiluminescence magnetic microparticle immunoassay. Continuous infusion of tacrolimus was administered from the day before transplantation and was switched to Tac-QD after adequate oral intake., Results: Thirteen patients had a CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, and 11 patients had a CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 genotype. No significant difference was observed in daily dosages and the C0 of tacrolimus between the two genotype groups without AZ. However, in patients who were co-administered AZ, the C0 values of tacrolimus were higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 allele than with the CYP3A5*1 allele (P = 0.034), although daily doses of Tac-QD in patients with CYP3A5*3/*3 were significantly lower than those with the CYP3A5*1 allele (P = 0.041). The cumulative incidence of acute kidney injury was higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 than with the CYP3A5*1 allele when AZ was co-administered. The decrement for daily dosage of Tac-QD was significantly greater in patients expressing the CYP3A5*3/*3 than the CYP3A5*1 allele., Conclusions: CYP3A5 genotyping may be useful for safe and effective immunosuppressive therapy with Tac-QD in HSCT patients in whom the use of AZ is anticipated.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the interactions of itraconazole (ITCZ) with orally administered calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in Japanese allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients., Methods: Sixteen HSCT patients (8 patients each receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine) were enrolled. An ITCZ oral solution was administered from day 30 after the initiation of ITCZ administration as a loading dose. Before the co-administration of ITCZ and CNI and 1 week daily thereafter, whole blood ITCZ and CNI (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) concentrations were measured in samples taken just before (C0h) and 2 h (C2h) after CNI administration., Results: The median dose-adjusted C0h values of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on day 7 after the start of ITCZ co-administration were 5.6- and 2.7-fold higher, respectively, than the corresponding values obtained before the initiation of ITCZ treatment. On day 7 after ITCZ treatment, the mean single dosages of tacrolimus and cyclosporine were reduced to 33.7 and 66.5 % of the dosages before ITCZ co-administration, respectively, to adjust the CNI target concentration. Although ITCZ co-administration did not alter the dose-adjusted C0h values of tacrolimus in a patient with a CYP3A5 1/ 1 allele, it did change this value of tacrolimus in patients with CYP3A5 3 alleles. However, in patients receiving cyclosporine, no such tendency was observed., Conclusion: The magnitude of the interaction between orally administered tacrolimus and ITCZ was significantly greater than that between cyclosporine and ITCZ. Prospective analysis of the CYP3A5 polymorphism may be important to ensure safe and reliable immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus in patients treated with ITCZ.