Search

ABSTRACT: Hydropower with a small elevation change from inlet to outlet, known as “low-head” hydropower, is a relatively untapped resource for reliable green power generation. One major barrier to entry is the cost of the components needed to generate the power. Each installation site is unique, with various head levels, flow rates, and other unique site characteristics that drive up the cost of development and installation. As a result, custom-made components are necessary because the sites are intrinsically inefficient. However, customized parts are generally more expensive to manufacture than ready-made parts. Often times, the cost of custom-made components is so high that the low-head hydropower installation becomes non-viable. Additive manufacturing offers the ability to make custom components, ideal for one-off applications, at low costs that are well suited for the needs of low-head hydropower. Indirect additive manufacturing, such as making tools or dies rather than end use components, can also be used to make low-cost composite tooling as needed for these custom applications. This paper explores the use of additive manufacturing, both directly and indirectly, to produce the components of a turbine system for a low-head hydropower site. The parts were designed to form a unique modular system, which saves time for future designs and iterations. The system has operated for more than three years without failure at a test site in Wisconsin, USA. This work serves as a basis for future application of AM to low-head systems, in which the modular components can be customized for each unique hydropower installation.

At the onset of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic, USA faced supply chain issues causing a nationwide shortage of N95 respirators and PAPR devices. Researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL) Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) were sent to work from home to help slow the spread of the pandemic, and during that time they were tasked with using their manufacturing expertise to research alternative methods of producing face masks. To rapidly iterate on face mask designs without access to a research or manufacturing facility, 3D (3-Dimensional) printing and silicone casting were used. Molds and components for the masks are modeled with computer-aided design (CAD), printed with common home desktop 3D printers, and test poured with skin-safe silicone rubber. The resultant masks are form fitting and comfortable to wear. To ease the shortage of N95 filter media, the masks are designed to use existing filter materials such as home HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) filters. The masks can be sanitized, and the filter replaced to allow the same mask to be reused. The result is not equivalent to an N95 mask, and not meant to be a replacement, but is meant to be a stopgap mask that is still able to provide the wearer filtered protection. Filtration testing has not been performed because it is not the intention of the authors to make medical claims. This research is meant to demonstrate the rapid design, iteration, and manufacturing processes of a stopgap mask.