Search

Metabolic modeling and machine learning are key components in the emerging next generation of systems and synthetic biology tools, targeting the genotype-phenotype-environment relationship. Rather than being used in isolation, it is becoming clear that their value is maximized when they are combined. However, the potential of integrating these two frameworks for omic data augmentation and integration is largely unexplored. We propose, rigorously assess, and compare machine-learning-based data integration techniques, combining gene expression profiles with computationally generated metabolic flux data to predict yeast cell growth. To this end, we create strain-specific metabolic models for 1,143 Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants and we test 27 machine-learning methods, incorporating state-of-the-art feature selection and multiview learning approaches. We propose a multiview neural network using fluxomic and transcriptomic data, showing that the former increases the predictive accuracy of the latter and reveals functional patterns that are not directly deducible from gene expression alone. We test the proposed neural network on a further 86 strains generated in a different experiment, therefore verifying its robustness to an additional independent dataset. Finally, we show that introducing mechanistic flux features improves the predictions also for knockout strains whose genes were not modeled in the metabolic reconstruction. Our results thus demonstrate that fusing experimental cues with in silico models, based on known biochemistry, can contribute with disjoint information toward biologically informed and interpretable machine learning. Overall, this study provides tools for understanding and manipulating complex phenotypes, increasing both the prediction accuracy and the extent of discernible mechanistic biological insights., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest.

We review the process of reconstructing genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) for single species and microbial communities. We present a detailed compendium of model-building platforms for experts and non-experts. We review and compare the approaches for testing GEMs towards engineering microbial systems. We discuss current challenges and future directions in model development, including the need for standards in microbial community models. Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are consolidating as platforms for studying mixed microbial populations, by combining biological data and knowledge with mathematical rigor. However, deploying these models to answer research questions can be challenging due to the increasing number of available computational tools, the lack of universal standards, and their inherent limitations. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of foundational concepts for building and evaluating genome-scale models of microbial communities. We then compare tools in terms of requirements, capabilities, and applications. Next, we highlight the current pitfalls and open challenges to consider when adopting existing tools and developing new ones. Our compendium can be relevant for the expanding community of modelers, both at the entry and experienced levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivation High-throughput biological data, thanks to technological advances, have become cheaper to collect, leading to the availability of vast amounts of omic data of different types. In parallel, the in silico reconstruction and modeling of metabolic systems is now acknowledged as a key tool to complement experimental data on a large scale. The integration of these model- and data-driven information is therefore emerging as a new challenge in systems biology, with no clear guidance on how to better take advantage of the inherent multisource and multiomic nature of these data types while preserving mechanistic interpretation. Results Here, we investigate different regularization techniques for high-dimensional data derived from the integration of gene expression profiles with metabolic flux data, extracted from strain-specific metabolic models, to improve cellular growth rate predictions. To this end, we propose ad-hoc extensions of previous regularization frameworks including group, view-specific and principal component regularization and experimentally compare them using data from 1143 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. We observe a divergence between methods in terms of regression accuracy and integration effectiveness based on the type of regularization employed. In multiomic regression tasks, when learning from experimental and model-generated omic data, our results demonstrate the competitiveness and ease of interpretation of multimodal regularized linear models compared to data-hungry methods based on neural networks. Availability and implementation All data, models and code produced in this work are available on GitHub at https://github.com/Angione-Lab/HybridGroupIPFLasso%5fpc2Lasso. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]