Search

Objective Excess mortality has been demonstrated in patients with SLE compared with the general population. We aimed to investigate the 5-year and 10-year all-cause mortality in patients with SLE compared with the general population in recent decades. Methods This was a Danish nationwide population-based exposure-matched cohort study. Incident cases of SLE diagnosed between 1996 and 2015 were identified using administrative health registries and followed until 2020, allowing for 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Patients with SLE were matched 1:5 on age and sex with individuals from the Danish general population. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the pseudo-observation approach. Results In total, 1351 incident cases of SLE and 6755 matched controls were identified. The crude risk difference (RD) for 5-year mortality decreased over the study period, from 10.3% (95% CI 6.5–14.1%) to 4.6% (95% CI 1.4–7.8%) for patients with SLE compared with controls. The relative risk (RR) for 5-year mortality decreased similarly in the same period. Adjustment for comorbidities revealed lower RD and RR for mortality in patients with SLE compared with controls, but the decreasing trend remained. The crude and adjusted RD and RR for 10-year mortality did not change over the calendar period. The 10-year RR was highest in young patients with SLE (<50 years of age). Conclusion The 5-year mortality risk decreased over time for both patients with SLE and matched controls. However, excess 5-year mortality for patients with SLE in the most recent calendar period and excess mortality late in their disease course remained. Continued focus on preventing disease progression and comorbidity is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experience significant fatigue, a debilitating symptom associated with reduced quality of life. There has not yet been agreed on a simple and reliable method for assessing fatigue in SLE. Objectives: To investigate the internal consistency, test–retest reliability and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) in patients with SLE. The secondary objective was to investigate the contribution of disease activity and organ damage to fatigue. Methods: Fatigue was assessed using the MFIS in 61 patients with SLE. Internal consistency of MFIS was assessed with Cronbach's alpha (α) and Principal Component Analysis. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was studied using Spearman's rank correlation (rs). Associations between MFIS and disease activity and organ damage were estimated with rs. Results: Internal consistency of the MFIS was excellent with Cronbach's α = 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96–0.98) for the complete scale. Test–retest reliability was good with ICC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78–0.95, p < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by Spearman's correlation (VT-SF36: rs = −0.73, p < 0.001. MH-SF36: rs = 0.70, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the MFIS and SLEDAI (rs = 0.03, p = 0.83). There was a moderate correlation between MFIS and SLICC Damage Index (rs = 0.43, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The present study found the MFIS to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing fatigue in SLE. Further investigations are needed to clarify if an association between measured fatigue and disease components exists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are associated with an impaired autonomic nervous system and vagus nerve function. Electrical or physiological (deep breathing—DB) vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) could be a potential treatment approach, but no direct comparison has been made. In this study, the effect of transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) and DB on vagal tone was compared in healthy participants and RA or SLE patients. The vagal tone was estimated using time-domain heart-rate variability (HRV) parameters. Forty-two healthy participants and 52 patients performed 30 min of DB and 30 min of taVNS on separate days. HRV was recorded before and immediately after each intervention. For the healthy participants, all HRV parameters increased after DB (SDNN + RMSSD: 21–46%), while one HRV parameter increased after taVNS (SDNN: 16%). For the patients, all HRV parameters increased after both DB (17–31%) and taVNS (18–25%), with no differences between the two types of VNS. DB was associated with the largest elevation of the HRV parameters in healthy participants, while both types of VNS led to elevated HRV parameters in the patients. The findings support a potential use of VNS as a new treatment approach, but the clinical effects need to be investigated in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are associated with autonomic dysfunction, potentially through reduced vagus nerve tone. Vagus nerve stimulation has been proposed as an anti-inflammatory treatment, and it can be performed through deep breathing (DB) exercises. In this study, the dose-response relationship between DB exercises and heart rate variability (HRV) was investigated in healthy participants and reliability across days in patients with RA and SLE. On three separate days, 41 healthy participants performed DB for: 5, 15, or 30 min. On two separate days, 52 RA or SLE patients performed DB with the dose associated with the highest HRV increase in healthy participants. The HRV was estimated from ECG-recordings recorded prior and post the DB exercises. Increases in dose led to larger HRV-responses. Thirty minutes led to the largest HRV-response. In the RA and SLE patients, this dose increased the HRV-parameters consistently across the two days, indicating reliability. DB increases HRV in healthy participants and RA or SLE patients, which indicates stimulation of the vagus nerve. Of the tested durations, 30 min of DB was the optimal period of stimulation. A potential anti-inflammatory effect of DB exercises should be investigated in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but not widely used in clinical practice. However, interest in incorporating PROMs into the management of SLE is increasing as PROMs provide a unique insight into the patient's perception of lupus disease activity. The objective was to assess agreement in PROMs answered using a web app versus an outpatient touchscreen among patients with SLE. Methods: In a crossover RCT, SLE patients answered the following PROMs in a random order using the web app and the outpatient touchscreen: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) Global Health, SLAQ Symptom, SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fatigue VAS, Patient Global Health VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and an Anchoring Question. Equivalence between the two device types was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in PROM scores was within the prespecified equivalence margin. Agreement between the two device types was assessed using mixed linear models. Results: Thirty-four patients with SLE were included. Equivalence was demonstrated between the two device types for SLAQ Global Health with a difference of −0.21 (95% CI: −0.65 to 0.23). Moreover, equivalence was also found for HAQ-DI, Pain VAS, and Fatigue VAS whereas only comparability within the limits of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was demonstrated for VAS Patient Global Health. Statistical comparability was demonstrated for SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, PASS, and Anchoring Question (no predefined MCID/equivalence margins available). However, a statistically significant difference between device types was observed for the SLAQ Symptom of −0.56 (95% CI: −1.10 to −0.01). The difference was, however, very small when considering the scale range of 0–24; thus, it was not judged to be of clinical relevance. Preference for the web app was very high (91.2%). Conclusion: For the first time ever, equivalence and comparability between two electronic device types for various PROMs were demonstrated among patients with SLE. Implementation of the device is expected to improve the management of SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of infections due to impaired immune functions, disease activity, and treatment. This study investigated the impact of having SLE on the incidence of hospitalisation with COVID-19 infection. Methods: This was a nationwide cohort study from Denmark between 1 March 2020 to 2 February 2021, based on the linkage of several nationwide registers. The adjusted incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation was estimated for patients with SLE compared with the general population in Cox-regression models. Among SLE patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for hospitalisation was analysed as nested case-control study. Results: Sixteen of the 2533 SLE patients were hospitalised with COVID-19 infection. The age-sex adjusted rate per 1000 person years was 6.16 (95% CI 3.76–10.08) in SLE patients, and the corresponding hazard ratio was 2.54 (95% CI 1.55–4.16) compared with the matched general population group after adjustment for comorbidities. Among SLE patients, hydroxychloroquine treatment was associated with a HR for hospitalisation of 0.61 (95% CI 0.19–1.88), and 1.06 (95% CI 0.3–3.72) for glucocorticoid treatment. Conclusion: Patients with SLE were at increased risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]