1. Large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet
- Author
-
Julien Dandois, Vincent Brion, Ivan Mary, DAAA, ONERA, Université Paris Saclay (COmUE) [Meudon], and ONERA-Université Paris-Saclay
- Subjects
Shock wave ,TURBULENT TRANSITION ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,[SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph] ,010305 fluids & plasmas ,symbols.namesake ,Flow separation ,0203 mechanical engineering ,0103 physical sciences ,Physics ,020301 aerospace & aeronautics ,Shock (fluid dynamics) ,Turbulence ,TREMBLEMENT ,Mechanical Engineering ,Laminar flow ,LAMINARITE ,Mechanics ,TRANSSONIQUE ,Condensed Matter Physics ,Vortex shedding ,Boundary layer ,Mechanics of Materials ,COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS ,symbols ,Strouhal number ,SHOCK WAVES - Abstract
A large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet on an airfoil at a Mach number $M=0.735$, an angle of attack $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4^{\circ }$, a Reynolds number $Re_{c}=3\times 10^{6}$ has been carried out. The boundary layer is laminar up to the shock foot and laminar/turbulent transition occurs in the separation bubble at the shock foot. Contrary to the turbulent case for which wall pressure spectra are characterised by well-marked peaks at low frequencies ($St=f\cdot c/U_{\infty }\simeq 0.06{-}0.07$, where $St$ is the Strouhal number, $f$ the shock oscillation frequency, $c$ the chord length and $U_{\infty }$ the free-stream velocity), in the laminar case, there are also well-marked peaks but at a much higher frequency ($St=1.2$). The shock oscillation amplitude is also lower: 6 % of chord and limited to the shock foot area in the laminar case instead of 20 % with a whole shock oscillation and intermittent boundary layer separation and reattachment in the turbulent case. The analysis of the phase-averaged fields allowed linking of the frequency of the laminar transonic buffet to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon associated with a vortex shedding mechanism. These vortices are convected at $U_{c}/U_{\infty }\simeq 0.4$ (where $U_{c}$ is the convection velocity). The main finding of the present paper is that the higher frequency of the shock oscillation in the laminar regime is due to a different mechanism than in the turbulent one: laminar transonic buffet is due to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon occurring at the shock foot.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF