1. Assessing Decision Support Tools for Mitigating Tail Biting in Pork Production: Current Progress and Future Directions.
- Author
-
Ward, Sophia A., Pluske, John R., Plush, Kate J., Pluske, Jo M., and Rikard-Bell, Charles V.
- Subjects
SWINE breeding ,SCIENTIFIC literature ,AT-risk behavior ,SWINE ,AGRICULTURE - Abstract
Simple Summary: Tail biting in pigs is an abnormal event where one pig engages in the biting, chewing, or oral manipulation of another pig's tail. The repeat biting of the wounded site can lead to pain, infection, and the possible mortality of the victim pig(s), which is why it is a serious issue in pork production. Tail biting is often difficult to prevent as there are various reasons why a particular pig may choose to exhibit this behavior. The aim of this review is to identify current decision support tools and other technological aids that can be used to predict the likelihood of a tail biting event. Additionally, we aim to understand how dependable these decision support tools are for predictive tail biting events by examining both the underlying model and data utilized for generating predictions. Tail biting (TB) in pigs is a complex issue that can be caused by multiple factors, making it difficult to determine the exact etiology on a case-by-case basis. As such, it is often difficult to pinpoint the reason, or set of reasons, for TB events, Decision Support Tools (DSTs) can be used to identify possible risk factors of TB on farms and provide suitable courses of action. The aim of this review was to identify DSTs that could be used to predict the risk of TB behavior. Additionally, technologies that can be used to support DSTs, with monitoring and tracking the prevalence of TB behaviors, are reviewed. Using the PRISMA methodology to identify sources, the applied selection process found nine DSTs related to TB in pigs. All support tools relied on secondary information, either by way of the scientific literature or expert opinions, to determine risk factors for TB predictions. Only one DST was validated by external sources, seven were self-assessed by original developers, and one presented no evidence of validation. This analysis better understands the limitations of DSTs and highlights an opportunity for the development of DSTs that rely on objective data derived from the environment, animals, and humans simultaneously to predict TB risks. Moreover, an opportunity exists for the incorporation of monitoring technologies for TB detection into a DST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF