Search

Background: This study evaluates the clinical trends, risk factors, and impact of waitlist blood transfusion on outcomes following isolated heart transplantation. Methods: The UNOS registry was queried to identify adult recipients from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2022. The recipients were stratified into two groups depending on whether they received a blood transfusion while on the waitlist. The incidence of waitlist transfusion was compared before and after the 2018 allocation policy change. The primary outcome was survival. Propensity score‐matching was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of waitlist transfusion. A sub‐analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of waitlist time on waitlist transfusion. Results: From the 21 926 recipients analyzed in this study, 4201 (19.2%) received waitlist transfusion. The incidence of waitlist transfusion was lower following the allocation policy change (14.3% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.001). The recipients with waitlist transfusion had significantly reduced 1‐year posttransplant survival (88.8% vs. 91.9%, p < 0.001) compared to the recipients without waitlist transfusion in an unmatched comparison. However, in a propensity score‐matched comparison, the two groups had similar 1‐year survival (90.0% vs. 90.4%, p = 0.656). Multivariable analysis identified ECMO, Impella, and pretransplant dialysis as strong predictors of waitlist transfusion. In a sub‐analysis, the odds of waitlist transfusion increased nonlinearly with longer waitlist time. Conclusion: There is a lower incidence of waitlist transfusion among transplant recipients under the 2018 allocation system. Waitlist transfusion is not an independent predictor of adverse posttransplant outcomes but rather a marker of the patient's clinical condition. ECMO, Impella, and pretransplant dialysis are strong predictors of waitlist transfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) supported with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and identified risk factors for in‐hospital mortality. Methods: Adults with CS who were supported with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified into three groups according to their CS etiology: (1) acute myocardial infarction (AMI), (2) acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and (3) postcardiotomy (PC). The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes included adverse events during Impella support and length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for in‐hospital mortality. Results: One hundred and thirty‐seven patients with CS secondary to AMI (n = 47), ADHF (n = 86), and PC (n = 4) were included. The ADHF group had the highest survival rates at all time points. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common complication during Impella support in all 3 groups. Increased rates of AKI and de novo renal replacement therapy were observed in the PC group, and the AMI group experienced a higher incidence of bleeding requiring transfusion. Multivariable analysis demonstrated diabetes mellitus, elevated pre‐insertion serum lactate, and elevated pre‐insertion serum creatinine were independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality, but the etiology of CS did not impact mortality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that Impella 5.0 and 5.5 provide effective mechanical support for patients with CS with favorable outcomes, with nearly two‐thirds of patients alive at 180 days. Diabetes, elevated pre‐insertion serum lactate, and elevated pre‐insertion serum creatinine are strong risk factors for in‐hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the current clinical trends, risk factors, and temporal effects of post-transplant dialysis on outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation after the 2018 United States adult heart allocation policy change. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried to analyze adult orthotopic heart transplant recipients after the October 18, 2018 heart allocation policy change. The cohort was stratified according to the need for post-transplant de novo dialysis. The primary outcome was survival. Propensity score-matching was performed to compare the outcomes between 2 similar cohorts with and without post-transplant de novo dialysis. The impact of post-transplant dialysis chronicity was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for post-transplant dialysis. A total of 7,223 patients were included in this study. Out of these, 968 patients (13.4%) developed post-transplant renal failure requiring de novo dialysis. Both 1-year (73.2% vs 94.8%) and 2-year (66.3% vs 90.6%) survival rates were lower in the dialysis cohort (p < 0.001), and the lower survival rates persisted in a propensity-matched comparison. Recipients requiring only temporary post-transplant dialysis had significantly improved 1-year (92.5% vs 71.6%) and 2-year (86.6 % vs 52.2%) survival rates compared to the chronic post-transplant dialysis group (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated low pretransplant estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) and bridge with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were strong predictors of post-transplant dialysis. This study demonstrates that post-transplant dialysis is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality in the new allocation system. Post-transplant survival is affected by the chronicity of post-transplant dialysis. Low pretransplant eGFR and ECMO are strong risk factors for post-transplant dialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To quantitate the impact of heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor utilization on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify all adult waitlisted and transplanted candidates between October 18, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Waitlisted candidates were stratified according to whether they had been approved for donation after brain death (DBD) offers only or also approved for DCD offers. The cumulative incidence of transplantation was compared between the 2 cohorts. In a post-transplant analysis, 1-year post-transplant survival was compared between unmatched and propensity-score-matched cohorts of DBD and DCD recipients. A total of 14,803 candidates were waitlisted, including 12,287 approved for DBD donors only and 2516 approved for DCD donors. Overall, DCD approval was associated with an increased sub-hazard ratio (HR) for transplantation and a lower sub-HR for delisting owing to death/deterioration after risk adjustment. In a subgroup analysis, candidates with blood type B and status 4 designation received the greatest benefit from DCD approval. A total of 12,238 recipients underwent transplantation, 11,636 with DBD hearts and 602 with DCD hearts. Median waitlist times were significantly shorter for status 3 and status 4 recipients receiving DCD hearts. One-year post-transplant survival was comparable between unmatched and propensity score–matched cohorts of DBD and DCD recipients. The use of DCD hearts confers a higher probability of transplantation and a lower incidence of death/deterioration while on the waitlist, particularly among certain subpopulations such as status 4 candidates. Importantly, the use of DCD donors results in similar post-transplant survival as DBD donors. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluates the impact of early massive transfusion and blood component ratios on outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods: Adults undergoing LVAD implantation between 2009 and 2018 at a single institution were included. Transfusions were analyzed during the intraoperative and the initial 24‐h postoperative period. Patients were stratified into massive and nonmassive transfusion groups. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. Sub‐analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of balanced transfusion. Results: A total of 278 patients were included. A total of 45.3% (n = 126) required massive transfusions. The massive transfusion group experienced significantly higher rates of postimplant adverse events, including reoperation, renal failure, and hepatic dysfunction (all, p ≤.05). Furthermore, the massive transfusion group had significantly lower 30‐day, 90‐day, 1‐year, 2‐year, and overall survival rates following LVAD implantation (all, p <.05). In multivariable analysis, massive transfusion significantly impacted overall risk‐adjusted mortality rate (hazard ratio: 2.402, 95% confidence Interval: 1.677–3.442, p <.001). In the sub‐analyses evaluating the impact of balanced massive transfusion, balanced fresh frozen plasma to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion did not provide any survival benefit (all, p >.05). However, balanced platelet to pRBC massive transfusion did improve 2‐year and overall mortality rates in the massive transfusion cohort (both, p ≤.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant association between early massive transfusion and adverse outcomes following LVAD implantation. Balancing platelet to pRBC transfusion in the early postoperative period may help mitigate some of these detrimental effects of massive transfusion on subsequent survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This single-center, retrospective study evaluates the impact of hepatic steatosis on outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.Methods: Adults undergoing LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018 with a preoperative noncontrast-enhanced chest and abdominal computed tomography scan were included in the study. Patients were stratified as with and without radiographic signs of hepatic steatosis. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes included rates of postimplant adverse events.Results: A total of 203 patients were included in the study. 27.6% (n = 56) had radiographic signs of hepatic steatosis. Hepatic steatosis group had a higher body mass index (30.1 vs. 27.0, p < .01), model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio score (16.8 vs. 15.1, p = .05), and incidence of diabetes (53.6% vs. 35.4%, p = .02). The rates of postimplant adverse events, including bleeding, infection, reoperation, renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, stroke, and right ventricular failure, were similar between the groups (all, p > .05). Unadjusted survival was comparable between the groups at 30-days, 90-days, 1-year, and 2-year following LVAD implantation (all, p > .05). In addition, hepatic steatosis did not impact risk-adjusted overall mortality when modeled as a categorical variable (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-1.13; p = .15).Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the presence of preoperative hepatic steatosis on imaging is not predictive of increased morbidity or mortality following LVAD implantation. Despite the association with obesity, metabolic diseases, and heart failure, hepatic steatosis on imaging appears to have a limited role in patient selection or prognostication in LVAD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to investigate the clinical trends and the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to compare adult patients before and after the allocation policy change. This study included 2 separate analyses evaluating the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the 2018 allocation system's risk-adjusted hazards for 1-year waitlist and post-transplant mortality. The initial analysis investigating the waitlist outcomes included 1779 patients listed for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. Of these, 1075 patients (60.4%) were listed after the 2018 allocation policy change. After the policy change, the waitlist outcomes significantly improved with a shorter waitlist time, lower likelihood of de-listing, and higher likelihood of transplantation. In the subsequent analysis investigating the post-transplant outcomes, 1130 simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients were included, where 738 patients (65.3%) underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation after the policy change. The 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year post-transplant survival and complication rates were comparable before and after the policy change. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the 2018 allocation system positively impacted risk-adjusted 1-year waitlist mortality (sub-hazard ratio, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.51-0.85, P <.001), but it did not significantly impact risk-adjusted 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72-1.47, P =.876). This study demonstrates increased rates of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation with a shorter waitlist time after the 2018 allocation policy change. Furthermore, there were improved waitlist outcomes and comparable early post-transplant survival after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 allocation system. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, predictors, and long‐term impact of gastrointestinal (GI) complications following adult cardiac surgery. Methods: Index Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adult cardiac operations performed between January 2010 and February 2018 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified by the occurrence of postoperative GI complications. Outcomes included early and late survival as well as other associated major postoperative complications. A subanalysis of propensity score‐matched patients was also performed. Results: A total of 10,285 patients were included, and the overall rate of GI complications was 2.4% (n = 246). Predictors of GI complications included dialysis dependency, intra‐aortic balloon pump, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and longer aortic cross‐clamp times. Thirty‐day (2.6% vs. 24.8%), 1‐ (6.3% vs. 41.9%), and 3‐year (11.1% vs. 48.4%) mortality were substantially higher in patients who experienced GI complications (all p <.001). GI complication was associated with a threefold increased hazard for mortality (hazard ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.6–3.7) after risk adjustment, and there was an association between the occurrence of GI complications and increased rates of renal failure (39.4% vs. 2.5%), new dialysis dependency (31.3% vs. 1.5%), multisystem organ failure (21.5% vs.1.0%), and deep sternal wound infections (2.6% vs. 0.2%; all p <.001). These results persisted in propensity‐matched analysis. Conclusion: GI complications are infrequent but have a profound impact on early and late survival, and often occur in association with other major complications. Risk factor modification, heightened awareness, and early detection and management of GI complications appear warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This single-center, the retrospective study evaluates the impact of preoperative serum prealbumin levels on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.Methods: Adults undergoing LVAD implantation, with a recorded preoperative prealbumin level, between 2004 to 2018 were included. Primary outcomes included rates of 1-year survival and secondary outcomes included rates of postimplant adverse events. Threshold regression and restricted cubic splines were utilized to identify a cut-point to dichotomize prealbumin level. Prealbumin was also evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression was used for risk-adjustment.Results: A total of 333 patients were included. Patients were dichotomized according to an optimal prealbumin threshold of 15 mg/dL: 47.4% (n = 158) had levels below and 52.6% (n = 175) had levels above this threshold, respectively. The rates of postimplant adverse events, including bleeding, infection, stroke, renal failure, and right heart failure, were similar between the groups (all P > .05). Furthermore, the rates of cardiac transplantation and device explantation were also similar (all P > .05). Unadjusted survival was comparable between the groups at 30-days, 90-days, and 1-year following LVAD implantation (all P > .05). In addition, lower prealbumin did not impact risk-adjusted 1-year mortality when modeled either as a categorical (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.48-2.12; P = .82) or continuous variable (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.73-2.34; P = .96).Conclusions: This study demonstrates that lower prealbumin levels were not predictive of increased post-LVAD morbidity or mortality. Although an established marker of nutritional and inflammatory status, the role of prealbumin in patient selection or prognostication appears limited in LVAD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]