1. Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device.
- Author
-
Sayer T, Lim J, Gauld JM, Hinoul P, Jones P, Franco N, Van Drie D, and Slack M
- Subjects
- Aged, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures instrumentation, Humans, Middle Aged, Polypropylenes, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures methods, Suburethral Slings adverse effects, Surgical Mesh adverse effects, Uterine Prolapse surgery
- Abstract
Introduction and Hypothesis: This study was designed to evaluate clinical outcomes ≥2 years following surgery with polypropylene mesh and vaginal support device (VSD) in women with vaginal prolapse, in a prospective, multi-center setting., Methods: Patients re-consented for this extended follow-up (n = 110), with anatomic evaluation using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and validated questionnaires to assess pelvic symptoms and sexual function. Complications were recorded (safety set; n = 121)., Results: Median length of follow-up was 29 months (range 24-34 months). The primary anatomic success, defined as POP-Q 0-I, was 69.1%; however, in 84.5% of the cases, the leading vaginal edge was above the hymen. Pelvic symptoms and sexual function improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.01). Mesh exposure rate was 9.1%. Five percent reported stress urinary incontinence and 3.3% required further prolapse surgery., Conclusion: These results indicate this non-anchored mesh repair is a safe and effective treatment for women with symptomatic vaginal prolapse in the medium term.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF